ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07440342TEAS-ERCP-MCUpdated Jun 16, 2026

TEAS for Sedation During ERCP: A Multicenter Trial With Mechanistic Substudy

An interventional study of TEAS + Conscious Sedation and Sham TEAS + Conscious Sedation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, Conscious Sedation Adverse Event and Procedural Pain, sponsored by Beijing 302 Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-16.

Sponsored by Beijing 302 Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
130
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  1. The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS), a non-invasive therapy that applies mild electrical current to specific points on the skin, can help patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) better tolerate the procedure and experience fewer complications related to sedation. It will also explore the underlying neuro-endocrine-immune mechanisms by measuring changes in serum biomarkers.
  2. The main questions the study aims to answer are:

(1)Does TEAS reduce the incidence of sedation-related adverse events (such as low blood oxygen, low blood pressure, or breathing problems) during ERCP? (2)Does TEAS improve patient comfort and reduce the need for additional sedative medications during the procedure? (3)Does TEAS lead to faster recovery and higher patient and physician satisfaction? (4) Does TEAS modulate the neuro-endocrine-immune network, as reflected by changes in serum β-endorphin, cortisol, TNF-α, and IL-6 levels?

3.Researchers will compare two approaches:

  1. Active TEAS: Electrical stimulation at specific points on the legs and arms before and during ERCP.
  2. Sham TEAS: Pads placed on the same points but no electrical stimulation delivered (the device appears active).

4.All participants will receive standard conscious sedation with meperidine and diazepam, which is commonly used for ERCP in many centers. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups. The study will measure sedation-related complications, pain levels, medication requirements, recovery times, satisfaction scores, and changes in serum biomarkers (β-endorphin, cortisol, TNF-α, IL-6).

Read the detailed description
  1. Background and Rationale:

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a complex procedure essential for diagnosing and treating various pancreaticobiliary disorders. Adequate sedation is critical for patient comfort and procedural success. Traditional conscious sedation with meperidine and diazepam remains widely used, particularly in resource-limited settings, but is associated with risks of respiratory depression, hypoxemia, hypotension, and inadequate sedation.

    Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) is a non-invasive modality derived from traditional acupuncture principles that delivers controlled electrical currents to specific acupoints via surface electrodes. TEAS has been shown to exert analgesic effects through the release of endogenous opioid peptides (elevating β-endorphin), modulate autonomic nervous system activity, reduce perioperative opioid requirements, suppress excessive inflammatory responses (reducing TNF-α and IL-6), and decrease the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

    However, robust evidence on its efficacy and safety specifically during ERCP with traditional conscious sedation is lacking. This multicenter trial with an embedded mechanistic substudy aims to rigorously evaluate whether adjunctive TEAS improves procedural safety, tolerance, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing ERCP, while simultaneously exploring the underlying neuro-endocrine-immune mechanisms.

  2. Study Design and Methodology:

This is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial with an embedded mechanistic substudy conducted at four centers: The Fifth Medical Center (lead site), The First Medical Center, The Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, and one additional participating site.

Patients scheduled for elective diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP will be assessed for eligibility. Eligible and consenting participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated random allocation sequence with stratified block randomization (block sizes 4 and 6), with allocation concealment in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.

Participants will be allocated to one of two groups:

  1. Active TEAS Group: Receives real TEAS stimulation applied bilaterally to four predefined acupoints: Neiguan (PC6), Xuehai (SP10), Yinlingquan (SP9), and Yanglingquan (GB34). The acupoint combination was designed based on traditional Chinese meridian theory and modern neuroanatomical evidence by the team from the PLA Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Acupoint locations will be determined according to WHO Standard Acupuncture Point Locations. Disposable self-adhesive electrodes will be connected to a Hwato SDZ-III electronic acupoint stimulator (Suzhou Medical Supplies Factory Co., Ltd., China). Stimulation parameters are set to dense-disperse wave mode (alternating frequencies of 2 Hz and 10 Hz, each for 3 seconds). The intensity is adjusted to the patient's maximum tolerable level without pain (typically 2-10 mA). Stimulation begins 30 minutes before sedation induction and continues until 15 minutes after the completion of ERCP.
  2. Sham TEAS Group: Receives identical electrode placement at the same four bilateral acupoints using the same device, but no electrical current is delivered. The device appears active (indicator lights on) to maintain blinding. All patients in both groups are informed that they may or may not feel any sensation during the stimulation, which is normal.
  3. Standardized Sedation Protocol (Both Groups): All participants receive standardized conscious sedation. Sedation is induced with intravenous meperidine at an initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg and intravenous diazepam at an initial dose of 0.1 mg/kg, both administered slowly. The target sedation level is a Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 2-4. If adequate sedation is not achieved within 3-5 minutes, supplementary doses of diazepam (0.05 mg/kg, approximately one-third to one-half of the initial dose) may be administered at the discretion of the blinded anesthesiologist until the target Ramsay score is reached. The total doses of meperidine and diazepam are recorded for analysis. All patients receive topical pharyngeal anesthesia with 10 mL dyclonine hydrochloride mucilage and supplemental oxygen (3-5 L/min) via nasal cannula. ERCP procedures are performed by experienced endoscopists (each with >500 prior ERCPs) who are also blinded to group assignment.
  4. Blinding: A designated research assistant not involved in patient care, outcome assessment, or data analysis performs the TEAS or sham-TEAS intervention. The device display is shielded from the patient's view with opaque tape. Patients, endoscopists, recovery room nurses, outcome assessors, laboratory personnel performing ELISA assays, and data analysts are all blinded to group assignment. Blood samples are labeled only with the participant's study ID code. The TEAS practitioner cannot be blinded but is not involved in any outcome assessments or data collection.

3.Sample Size Calculation: Based on the primary outcome measure (composite incidence of SRAEs), from pilot data (n=30; SRAE rates: TEAS 13.3%, sham 33.3%) and published literature, the estimated incidence of SRAEs under traditional sedation is 25%. We hypothesize that active TEAS can reduce this to 12.5% (a 50% relative risk reduction). Using a two-sided α = 0.05 and a power of 80%, a total of 118 patients (59 per group) is required (χ² test). To account for a 10% dropout rate, the target sample size is increased to 130 patients (65 per group). This sample size is also sufficient to detect moderate-to-large effect sizes (Cohen's d ≈ 0.5-0.6) for the mechanistic biomarker analyses.

4.Statistical Analysis Plan:

  1. Descriptive Statistics: Continuous variables: mean ± standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed, or median with interquartile range (IQR) if non-normally distributed. Categorical variables: frequencies and percentages (n, %). Baseline comparability: continuous variables using independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test; categorical variables using χ² test or Fisher's exact test.
  2. Primary Outcome Analysis: The composite incidence of SRAEs will be compared between groups using χ² test. Center stratification will be performed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test to account for potential center effects.
  3. Secondary Outcome Analysis: Continuous variables (sedative doses, VAS scores, recovery time, discharge time): independent samples t-test for normally distributed data, Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data. Repeated measures (MAP, HR at multiple time points): linear mixed model with group, time, and group-by-time interaction as fixed effects and center as a random effect. Categorical variables (satisfaction scores, adverse events): χ² test or Fisher's exact test.
  4. Mechanistic Outcome Analysis: Changes in serum biomarkers (Δ = post-procedure - baseline) will be compared between groups using independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Correlations between biomarker changes and clinical outcomes will be explored using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients.
  5. Multivariable Analysis: Binary logistic regression for factors influencing sedation success rate and adverse events. Multiple linear regression for factors influencing VAS score, recovery time, and discharge time.
  6. Center Effect: Heterogeneity across centers will be assessed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. If significant heterogeneity is detected, generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) with center as random effect will be used.
  7. Statistical Software and Significance Level: SPSS version 27.0. Two-sided tests with significance level α = 0.05; P \< 0.05 considered statistically significant.

5.Scientific Justification: The selection of specific acupoints (PC6, SP10, SP9, GB34) is based on traditional Chinese medicine principles and modern physiological understanding: PC6 calms the spirit, suppresses nausea, and regulates cardiovascular function via modulation of autonomic tone; SP10 invigorates blood circulation, alleviates pain, and has anti-inflammatory properties; SP9 strengthens the spleen, resolves dampness, and provides adjunctive analgesia; GB34 relaxes tendons, activates collaterals, produces analgesia, and enhances dynamic cerebral autoregulation. The sham-controlled design is crucial for isolating the specific effects of electrical neuromodulation from non-specific placebo effects. The embedded mechanistic substudy, measuring β-endorphin, cortisol, TNF-α, and IL-6, will provide insights into the neuro-endocrine-immune pathways through which TEAS exerts its clinical effects. This trial addresses a significant gap in optimizing sedation for ERCP by evaluating a readily deployable, non-pharmacological adjunctive strategy that could enhance patient safety and procedural quality, particularly in settings where newer sedative agents or dedicated anesthesia services are not readily available.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
  • Conscious Sedation Adverse Event
  • Procedural Pain
  • Sedation-related Complications

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation
  • ERCP
  • Conscious Sedation
  • Diazepam
  • Sedation-Related Adverse Events
  • Acupuncture
  • Non-Pharmacological Intervention
  • Neuro-endocrine-immune Mechanisms
  • Inflammatory Cytokines
  • Cortisol
  • β-endorphin
03

In context

Pain, Procedural

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Procedural; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 130 is above the median of 90 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Procedural.

Browse Pain, Procedural studies →

Lead sponsor

Beijing 302 Hospital is the lead sponsor of 88 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

1. Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged 18-85 years scheduled for elective diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for pancreaticobiliary indications.
  2. (ASA) physical status classification I, II, or III.
  3. (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg/m².
  4. Willing and able to provide written .

2. Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known allergy or to meperidine, diazepam, or any other medication used in the protocol.
  2. Chronic use of benzodiazepines or opioids (regular use more than three times per week in the preceding three months).
  3. Severe cardiopulmonary, hepatic, or renal dysfunction (e.g., class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled , estimated \<30 mL/min/1.73m², active liver disease).
  4. Anticipated difficult airway (Mallampati score IV, mouth opening \<3 cm, thyromental distance \<6 cm).
  5. Untreated or severe obstructive sleep apnea requiring continuous positive airway pressure therapy.
  6. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  7. Psychiatric or cognitive disorders precluding cooperation or valid assessment (e.g., severe anxiety, cognitive impairment).
  8. Pre-induction resting heart rate \<50 beats per minute or second-degree or higher atrioventricular block.
  9. Conditions predisposing to aspiration (e.g., gastric outlet obstruction, previous esophageal or gastric surgery with delayed emptying).
  10. Previous exposure to transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation or knowledge of TEAS that could compromise blinding for the sham procedure.
  11. Skin lesions, infections, or electronic implants at or near the proposed acupoint locations.
  12. Inability to provide informed consent.

3. Dropout Criteria:

  1. Requirement for conversion to general anesthesia due to failed sedation or clinical necessity.
  2. Occurrence of a serious adverse event related to the study intervention (e.g., severe allergic reaction, hemodynamic collapse).
  3. Life-threatening deterioration during endoscopy (e.g., uncontrolled bleeding, respiratory failure, cardiac arrest).
  4. Voluntary withdrawal of consent by participant or legal representative at any time.
  5. Occurrence of a major ERCP-related complication (e.g., perforation, major bleeding, severe pancreatitis) requiring surgical or intensive care intervention.
  6. Principal investigator-identified safety risks (e.g., sepsis, acute liver failure).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
130 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active TEAS + Conscious Sedation

    Participants receive real Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation (TEAS) delivered via surface electrodes bilaterally at four predefined acupoints: Neiguan (PC6), Xuehai (SP10), Yinlingquan (SP9), and Yanglingquan (GB34). Stimulation (dense-disperse wave, 2/10 Hz alternating frequency, intensity 2-10 mA adjusted to patient tolerance) begins 30 minutes before sedation induction and continues throughout the procedure and for 15 minutes after procedure completion. All participants receive standardized conscious sedation with intravenous meperidine (initial dose 0.5 mg/kg) and diazepam (initial dose 0.1 mg/kg), titrated to a Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 2-4. Supplementary diazepam (0.05 mg/kg) may be administered as needed by a blinded anesthesiologist.

    Other: TEAS + Conscious Sedation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham TEAS + Conscious Sedation

    Participants receive sham TEAS. Electrodes are placed identically to the Active TEAS Group at the same four acupoints (PC6, SP10, SP9, GB34) using the same device, but no electrical current is delivered. The device appears active (indicator lights on) to maintain blinding. All participants are informed that they may or may not feel any sensation, which is normal. All participants receive standardized conscious sedation with intravenous meperidine (initial dose 0.5 mg/kg) and diazepam (initial dose 0.1 mg/kg), titrated to a Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 2-4. Supplementary diazepam (0.05 mg/kg) may be administered as needed by a blinded anesthesiologist.

    Other: Sham TEAS + Conscious Sedation

Interventions

  • OtherTEAS + Conscious Sedation

    Participants receive real Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation (TEAS) delivered via surface electrodes bilaterally at four predefined acupoints: Neiguan (PC6), Xuehai (SP10), Yinlingquan (SP9), and Yanglingquan (GB34). Stimulation (dense-disperse wave, 2/10 Hz alternating frequency, intensity 2-10 mA adjusted to patient tolerance) begins 30 minutes before sedation induction and continues throughout the procedure and for 15 minutes after procedure completion. All participants receive standardized conscious sedation with intravenous meperidine (initial dose 0.5 mg/kg) and diazepam (initial dose 0.1 mg/kg), titrated to a Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 2-4. Supplementary diazepam (0.05 mg/kg) may be administered as needed by a blinded anesthesiologist.

  • OtherSham TEAS + Conscious Sedation

    Participants receive sham TEAS. Electrodes are placed identically to the Active TEAS Group at the same four acupoints (PC6, SP10, SP9, GB34) using the same device, but no electrical current is delivered. The device appears active (indicator lights on) to maintain blinding. All participants are informed that they may or may not feel any sensation, which is normal. All participants receive standardized conscious sedation with intravenous meperidine (initial dose 0.5 mg/kg) and diazepam (initial dose 0.1 mg/kg), titrated to a Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 2-4. Supplementary diazepam (0.05 mg/kg) may be administered as needed by a blinded anesthesiologist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite Incidence of Sedation-Related Adverse Events

    The composite incidence of sedation-related adverse events occurring from the start of sedation until discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, defined as the occurrence of any of the following: hypoxemia (SpO₂ \<90% for ≥10 seconds, or requirement for airway interventions including chin lift, jaw thrust, or bag-mask ventilation); hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or a decrease of \>20% from baseline, or requirement for vasoactive drugs); respiratory depression (respiratory rate \<8 breaths per minute, or apnea for \>15 seconds); arrhythmias (new-onset bradycardia with heart rate \<50 bpm requiring treatment, tachycardia \>120 bpm, or any arrhythmia requiring pharmacological intervention).

    Time frame: From start of sedation until discharge from post-anesthesia care unit (approximately 1-3 hours)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedure Success Rate

    Defined as successful cannulation of the desired duct (bile or pancreatic duct) and completion of the intended diagnostic or therapeutic intervention.

    Time frame: Immediately after the endoscopy procedure

  2. Total Dose of Sedatives and Analgesics

    Meperidine and diazepam total dosage (mg).

    Time frame: Immediately after procedure

  3. Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)

    Mean arterial pressure (MAP) measured in mmHg at the following time points: baseline, after sedation, at scope insertion, every 5 minutes during the procedure, at end of procedure, and at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. Multiple measurements over time will be summarized as the mean of all intra-procedural measurements for each participant, and group-level comparisons will be performed using a linear mixed model.

    Time frame: From baseline through PACU discharge (approximately 1-3 hours)

  4. Heart Rate (HR)

    Heart rate (HR) measured in beats per minute (bpm) at the following time points: baseline, after sedation, at scope insertion, every 5 minutes during the procedure, at end of procedure, and at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. Multiple measurements over time will be summarized as the mean of all intra-procedural measurements for each participant, and group-level comparisons will be performed using a linear mixed model.

    Time frame: From baseline through PACU discharge (approximately 1-3 hours)

  5. Patient Tolerance

    Assessed using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0 = no discomfort, 10 = worst imaginable discomfort) at 30 minutes post-procedure.

    Time frame: 30 minutes post-procedure

  6. Recovery Time

    Time from end of procedure until patient is oriented (can state name, age, date of birth).

    Time frame: Post-procedure (approximately 10-60 minutes)

  7. Discharge Time

    Time from end of procedure until a Modified Aldrete Score of ≥9 is achieved.

    Time frame: Post-procedure (approximately 0.5-2 hours)

  8. Patient Satisfaction

    Assessed by the patient at the time of post-anesthesia care unit discharge using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, 5 = very satisfied).

    Time frame: At post-anesthesia care unit discharge (approximately 1-2 hours post-procedure)

  9. Endoscopist Satisfaction

    Assessed by the performing gastroenterologist immediately after the procedure using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 5 = very satisfied).

    Time frame: Immediately after the endoscopy procedure

  10. Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (24 Hours)

    Incidence of nausea or vomiting within 24 hours post-procedure, assessed by patient report and nursing records.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours post-procedure

  11. Incidence of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

    Defined by consensus criteria (new or worsened abdominal pain, serum amylase or lipase ≥3 times normal at \>24 hours post-procedure, and imaging findings consistent with pancreatitis).

    Time frame: Within 7 days post-procedure

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Serum β-endorphin Level

    Change from baseline (before TEAS/sham initiation) to 2 hours post-ERCP completion. Measured by high-sensitivity ELISA kit.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 hours post-procedure

  2. Change in Serum Cortisol Level

    Change from baseline (before TEAS/sham initiation) to 2 hours post-ERCP completion. Measured by high-sensitivity ELISA kit.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 hours post-procedure

  3. Change in Serum TNF-α Level

    Change from baseline (before TEAS/sham initiation) to 2 hours post-ERCP completion. Measured by high-sensitivity ELISA kit.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 hours post-procedure

  4. Change in Serum IL-6 Level

    Change from baseline (before TEAS/sham initiation) to 2 hours post-ERCP completion. Measured by high-sensitivity ELISA kit.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 hours post-procedure

  5. Blinding Assessment

    Patients asked to guess their group assignment (active TEAS, sham TEAS, or uncertain) at PACU discharge.

    Time frame: At post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge, approximately 15 minutes after the end of the procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Ongoing Research Commitments: Further analyses and secondary studies using the same dataset are planned, including subgroup investigations and long-term outcome assessments. Premature data sharing could compromise the integrity of these planned works. Participant Privacy and Confidentiality: The dataset contains sensitive clinical information. Complete anonymization is challenging, and re-identification risks violate ethical and legal safeguards established by the institutional ethics committee and relevant regulations.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Aug 2027, 11 months later.

Of 141 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Procedural, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's planned 11 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 141 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 23, 2026
First posted
Feb 27, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2027
Last update
Jun 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07440342
Lead sponsor
Beijing 302 Hospital
Responsible party
Liu Yan (Chief of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beijing 302 Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 27, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 16, 2026

Study contacts

Zheng Lu, Doctor
Contact
wuliangdoc@163.com
+86 10 18800153001
Liang Zheng, Doctor
principal investigator · Beijing 302 Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion