CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07437846PEEP-EFFORTUpdated Feb 27, 2026

Impact of PEEP on Respiratory Effort During Assisted Ventilation

An interventional study of PEEP Level Adjustment in Mechanical Ventilation, Respiratory Failure and Effort, sponsored by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile. Recruiting at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-27.

Sponsored by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Feb 2026).
  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Assisted mechanical ventilation is widely used to preserve diaphragmatic activity and improve lung aeration in patients with acute respiratory failure. However, during assisted ventilation, excessive inspiratory effort may develop and contribute to lung injury, diaphragmatic overload, and patient self-inflicted lung injury.

Optimizing ventilator settings to modulate respiratory effort therefore represents a major physiological and clinical challenge.

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key determinant of lung recruitment and respiratory system mechanics and may influence inspiratory effort by modifying lung volume, compliance, and respiratory drive. Despite its widespread use, PEEP titration in clinical practice is still mainly guided by oxygenation parameters, while its direct effects on inspiratory effort during assisted mechanical ventilation remain insufficiently characterized.

This physiological randomized crossover study aims to evaluate the effect of four predefined levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (0, 5, 10, and 15 cmH₂O) on the respiratory system and inspiratory effort in adult patients receiving assisted mechanical ventilation. Patients will be exposed to each PEEP level in randomized order, with stabilization and washout periods between conditions, while ventilatory support settings other than PEEP are kept constant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Respiratory Failure
  • Effort

Keywords

  • Assisted mechanical ventilation
  • Inspiratory Effort
  • Breathing effort
03

In context

Respiratory Insufficiency

1,650 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 296 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 55 across 1,043 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.

Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile is the lead sponsor of 215 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • ICU patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (endotracheal tube or tracheostomy).
  • Ventilated in an assisted mode with spontaneous breathing
  • Clinically stable to undergo protocolized PEEP changes.
  • Sedation level compatible with spontaneous breathing and ventilator triggering
  • Informed consent from the patient or legally authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to esophageal balloon placement (if applicable).
  • Significant hemodynamic instability or unstable vasopressor requirements.
  • Unstable arrhythmia or active myocardial ischemia.
  • Undrained pneumothorax or major air leak.
  • Controlled ventilation without effective spontaneous effort (apnea, neuromuscular blockade, deep sedation).
  • Pregnancy
  • Acute or chronic neurological conditions that may impair respiratory drive or interfere with the regulation of spontaneous breathing.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PEEP 0 cmH₂O

    Participants are ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 0 cmH₂O during assisted mechanical ventilation. Physiological measurements of respiratory effort are obtained during a predefined stabilization period according to the study protocol.

    Other: PEEP Level Adjustment

  • Experimental
    PEEP 5 cmH₂O

    Participants are ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH₂O during assisted mechanical ventilation. Physiological measurements of respiratory effort are obtained during a predefined stabilization period according to the study protocol.

    Other: PEEP Level Adjustment

  • Experimental
    PEEP 10 cmH₂O

    Participants are ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 10 cmH₂O during assisted mechanical ventilation. Physiological measurements of respiratory effort are obtained during a predefined stabilization period according to the study protocol.

    Other: PEEP Level Adjustment

  • Experimental
    PEEP 15 cmH₂O

    Participants are ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 15 cmH₂O during assisted mechanical ventilation. Physiological measurements of respiratory effort are obtained during a predefined stabilization period according to the study protocol.

    Other: PEEP Level Adjustment

Interventions

  • OtherPEEP Level Adjustment

    Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) will be adjusted to four predefined levels (0, 5, 10, and 15 cmH₂O) following a randomized crossover protocol during assisted mechanical ventilation. Only the PEEP level will be modified, while all other ventilator settings will be kept constant. Each PEEP level will be maintained for 15 minutes, followed by a 15-minute washout period between levels. Physiological measurements will be obtained during the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level, including respiratory effort assessed using invasive and non-invasive methods, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic parameters.

    Also known as: PEEP levels

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Esophageal pressure swing (ΔPes)

    Esophageal pressure swing (ΔPes), defined as the absolute difference between end-expiratory and end-inspiratory esophageal pressure, measured using an esophageal balloon catheter.

    Time frame: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level

  2. Pressure-time product per minute (PTPmin)

    Pressure-time product per minute (PTPmin), expressed as cmH₂O·s/min, measured using an esophageal balloon catheter as an index of global inspiratory effort.

    Time frame: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level

  3. Delta Pocc (ΔPocc)

    Airway occlusion pressure-derived index (ΔPocc) obtained from brief ventilator-based airway occlusion maneuvers as a non-invasive measurement of inspiratory effort.

    Time frame: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level

  4. Muscular Pressure Index (PMI)

    Muscular Pressure Index (PMI) calculated from ventilator-based airway occlusion maneuvers as a non-invasive estimate of inspiratory muscle pressure.

    Time frame: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level

Secondary outcomes

  1. Airway occlusion pressure at 100 ms (P0.1)

    Airway occlusion pressure at 100 milliseconds (P0.1), measured by the mechanical ventilator as an index of respiratory drive.

    Time frame: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level

  2. Respiratory system compliance (Cest)

    Static compliance of the respiratory system (Cest) measured during assisted mechanical ventilation at each PEEP level.

    Time frame: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level

  3. Driving pressure

    Driving pressure calculated as the difference between airway plateau pressure and total PEEP during assisted mechanical ventilation at each PEEP level.

    Time frame: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level

  4. Plateau pressure

    Airway plateau pressure measured during assisted mechanical ventilation at each PEEP level.

    Time frame: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level

  5. Hemodynamic response

    Hemodynamic response assessed using heart rate, arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation during assisted mechanical ventilation at different PEEP levels.

    Time frame: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level

  6. Gas exchange (SaFi index)

    Gas exchange assessed using the SaFi index (SpO₂/FiO₂ ratio) at each PEEP level.

    Time frame: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level

  7. Dynamic transpulmonary pressure

    ynamic transpulmonary pressure calculated during assisted mechanical ventilation using airway pressure and esophageal pressure measurements obtained with an esophageal balloon catheter.

    Time frame: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospital Clinico UC
    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
    • Diego Lopez Arnello, Physioterapy · Contact · diegon.lopez@uc.cl · 973805897
    • Roque Basoalto, PhD, Msc, Physioterapy · Contact · roque.basoalto@gmail.com · +56 9 8446 3575
    • Diego Lopez Arnello, Physioterapy · Principal investigator
    • Roque Basoalto, PhD, Msc, Physioterapy · Principal investigator
    • Felipe Damiani, PhD, Msc, Physioterapy · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Morais CCA, Koyama Y, Yoshida T, Plens GM, Gomes S, Lima CAS, Ramos OPS, Pereira SM, Kawaguchi N, Yamamoto H, Uchiyama A, Borges JB, Vidal Melo MF, Tucci MR, Amato MBP, Kavanagh BP, Costa ELV, Fujino Y. High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Renders Spontaneous Effort Noninjurious. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 May 15;197(10):1285-1296. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1244OC. PubMed 29323536 ↗
  • Foti G, Cereda M, Banfi G, Pelosi P, Fumagalli R, Pesenti A. End-inspiratory airway occlusion: a method to assess the pressure developed by inspiratory muscles in patients with acute lung injury undergoing pressure support. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Oct;156(4 Pt 1):1210-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.4.96-02031. PubMed 9351624 ↗
  • Mauri T, Yoshida T, Bellani G, Goligher EC, Carteaux G, Rittayamai N, Mojoli F, Chiumello D, Piquilloud L, Grasso S, Jubran A, Laghi F, Magder S, Pesenti A, Loring S, Gattinoni L, Talmor D, Blanch L, Amato M, Chen L, Brochard L, Mancebo J; PLeUral pressure working Group (PLUG-Acute Respiratory Failure section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine). Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Sep;42(9):1360-73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4400-x. Epub 2016 Jun 22. PubMed 27334266 ↗
  • Goligher EC, Dres M, Patel BK, Sahetya SK, Beitler JR, Telias I, Yoshida T, Vaporidi K, Grieco DL, Schepens T, Grasselli G, Spadaro S, Dianti J, Amato M, Bellani G, Demoule A, Fan E, Ferguson ND, Georgopoulos D, Guerin C, Khemani RG, Laghi F, Mercat A, Mojoli F, Ottenheijm CAC, Jaber S, Heunks L, Mancebo J, Mauri T, Pesenti A, Brochard L. Lung- and Diaphragm-Protective Ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct 1;202(7):950-961. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0655CP. PubMed 32516052 ↗
  • Bello G, Giammatteo V, Bisanti A, Delle Cese L, Rosa T, Menga LS, Montini L, Michi T, Spinazzola G, De Pascale G, Pennisi MA, Ribeiro De Santis Santiago R, Berra L, Antonelli M, Grieco DL. High vs Low PEEP in Patients With ARDS Exhibiting Intense Inspiratory Effort During Assisted Ventilation: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Chest. 2024 Jun;165(6):1392-1405. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.01.040. Epub 2024 Jan 29. PubMed 38295949 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07437846
Lead sponsor
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Collaborators
Clínica Universidad de los Andes
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 27, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 27, 2026

Study contacts

Diego Lopez Arnello, Physioterapy
Contact
diegon.lopez@uc.cl
+56973805897
Felipe Damiani, PhD, Msc, Physioterapy
Contact
+56 9 6669 8823
Roque Basoalto, PhD, Msc, Physioterapy
principal investigator · Pontifica Universidad Catolica de Chile
Sebastian Morales, Physician
study chair · Pontifica Universidad Catolica de Chile
Alejandro Bruh Bruhn
principal investigator · Pontifica Universidad Catolica de Chile

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion