CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07433309COMPOSE-PADUpdated Feb 25, 2026

CT Body Composition as Predictor of Exercise Therapy Outcome in Peripheral Arterial Disease

An observational study in Sarcopenia, Body Composition and Sarcopenic Obesity, sponsored by Nemocnice AGEL Trinec-Podlesi a.s.. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-25.

Sponsored by Nemocnice AGEL Trinec-Podlesi a.s. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
128
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Supervised exercise therapy (SET) is the recommended first treatment for patients with leg artery disease (peripheral arterial disease, PAD) causing pain when walking. However, approximately 40% of patients do not benefit meaningfully and go on to require a procedure to open the blocked arteries within three months. This study investigates whether body composition measurements - specifically the quality of muscle and the amount of belly fat - taken from a CT scan already performed as part of routine care, can identify before treatment begins which patients are unlikely to respond to exercise therapy. If confirmed, this approach would allow doctors to use information from a scan patients are already having, with no additional tests, to better match patients to the right treatment from the start.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects approximately 236 million adults worldwide. Intermittent claudication - exertional lower limb ischaemic pain that resolves with rest - is its most prevalent symptomatic form. Three 2024 international guidelines (ACC/AHA, ESC, ESVS) unanimously recommend supervised exercise therapy (SET) as first-line treatment before revascularisation. Two Cochrane systematic reviews confirm that SET significantly improves maximum walking distance and quality of life compared with home-based exercise and walking advice alone. Despite population-level efficacy, individual response is highly heterogeneous: approximately 40% of patients fail to achieve meaningful functional improvement or require revascularisation within three months of initiating SET. Conventional predictors - ankle-brachial index and baseline claudication distance - do not reliably predict the magnitude of SET response. No validated pre-therapy metabolic tool exists to identify patients who lack the biological substrate for aerobic adaptation.

RATIONALE Chronic lower-limb ischaemia causes progressive skeletal muscle remodelling - including intramuscular lipid infiltration, fibre-type shift toward type IIx fibres, and mitochondrial dysfunction - that directly constrains the aerobic adaptation capacity upon which SET depends. CT-derived skeletal muscle attenuation (Hounsfield units, HU) quantifies intramuscular lipid with excellent reproducibility (coefficient of variation \<1%). Single-slice CT analysis at the L3 vertebral level provides whole-body body composition estimates correlated with DXA (r = 0.86-0.94) and is a validated systemic metabolic phenotyping tool - it reflects whole-body metabolic reserve, not ischaemia-specific lower limb myopathology. Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is an independent pro-inflammatory and endocrine compartment that impairs aerobic exercise adaptation through systemic mechanisms. CT angiography (CTA) is routinely performed in symptomatic PAD patients being evaluated for revascularisation; L3 body composition extraction from existing CTA incurs zero additional patient burden. The research group has previously demonstrated that L3 CT body composition parameters predict overall survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the same methodology (Pekar et al., Sci Rep 2024; Kantor et al., Cor Vasa 2025).

STUDY AIMS Primary: To determine whether L3 CT-derived skeletal muscle density and VAT area, extracted opportunistically from existing diagnostic CTA, independently predict composite SET treatment success at three months in patients with Fontaine IIa-IIb intermittent claudication.

Three co-primary hypotheses:

H1: Lower skeletal muscle density (HU) independently predicts SET treatment failure.

H2: Higher VAT area (cm²) independently predicts SET treatment failure. H3: The sarcopenic obesity phenotype (co-occurrence of low muscle density and elevated VAT) is associated with the lowest SET treatment success rates across four body composition phenotype groups.

STUDY DESIGN Prospective, single-centre observational cohort study. February 2023 - December 2026. Complex Cardiovascular Centre, Hospital AGEL Trinec-Podlesi, Trinec, Czech Republic. Ethics approval: EK 314/22. Reported per STROBE and TRIPOD guidelines; SPIRIT 2013 checklist provided as supplementary file.

INTERVENTION (standard clinical care, not study-allocated) 36 supervised exercise sessions (3×/week × 12 weeks), per 2019 AHA Scientific Statement on optimal exercise programmes for PAD. Each session: 60 minutes (45 min structured exercise + 15 min patient education). Treadmill exercise at 3.2 km/h, walking to claudication level 3 on a four-point scale, rest to level 1, five to six cycles per session. Progression: speed +0.3 km/h every two weeks (weeks 1-4, maximum 4.0 km/h); grade +1% every two weeks (weeks 5-8, maximum 3%). Resistance training from week 5 (2 sets × 10 repetitions progressing to 5 sets at \~70% one-repetition maximum, major lower extremity muscle groups). Adequate adherence defined as ≥30 of 36 sessions.

CT BODY COMPOSITION L3 axial CT slice; AutoMATiCA U-Net neural network segmentation; \~350 ms/scan.

  • Skeletal muscle: -29 to +150 HU within muscle fascia mask
  • VAT: -150 to -50 HU within peritoneal cavity mask
  • SAT: -190 to -30 HU exterior to body wall
  • IMAT: -190 to -30 HU within muscle fascia, exterior to individual muscle boundaries Baseline (T0) from existing diagnostic CTA; repeat CT at 3 months (T1) for exploratory analysis.

PRIMARY OUTCOME Composite at 3 months: (a) functional improvement ≥50 m absolute or ≥50% relative MWD gain on standardised treadmill (3.2 km/h); AND (b) revascularisation-free status (no endovascular or surgical lower extremity revascularisation). Treatment success = both criteria met. Revascularisation events adjudicated by vascular surgeon blinded to body composition data.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Multivariable logistic regression; predictors z-score standardised; bootstrap internal validation (1,000 samples); optimism-corrected AUC, calibration slope, calibration-in-the-large. Bonferroni-corrected p \< 0.017 per co-primary hypothesis. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model for competing risks (death). Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE; 20 imputed datasets). Pre-specified sensitivity analyses (n=13) including composite threshold alternatives, component-separate analyses, three-predictor model, alternative HU and VAT thresholds, adherent subgroup analysis.

SAMPLE SIZE Target: 40 treatment failures = 10 events per variable for four-predictor model; yields AUC confidence interval ±0.10. Assuming 40% failure rate and 22% attrition: 128 enrolled → 100 evaluable → 40 failures. Supplementary power: 80% to detect OR ≥2.0 per 10 HU decrease in muscle density (α = 0.05, two-tailed).

DERIVATION STATUS This is an explicit derivation cohort. AUC precision of ±0.10 at 40 events is pre-stated; conclusions will be confined to predictor association direction and magnitude. External multicentre validation is the pre-specified mandatory next step.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sarcopenia
  • Body Composition
  • Sarcopenic Obesity
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease

Keywords

  • Peripheral arterial disease
  • intermittent claudication
  • supervised exercise therapy
  • computed tomography body composition
  • myosteatosis
  • visceral adipose tissue
  • sarcopenic obesity
  • treatment outcome prediction
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Consecutive adult patients with Fontaine IIa-IIb intermittent claudication attending the vascular surgery outpatient clinic at the Complex Cardiovascular Centre, Hospital AGEL Trinec-Podlesi, Trinec, Czech Republic, who are scheduled for the institutional supervised exercise therapy programme and have an existing CT angiography with an analysable L3 axial slice.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Confirmed peripheral arterial disease (PAD) defined by at least one of: resting ankle-brachial index (ABI) ≤0.90, duplex ultrasonography demonstrating ≥50% stenosis in a relevant lower extremity vessel, or CT angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) demonstrating flow-limiting lower extremity arterial disease
  • Fontaine stage IIa or IIb intermittent claudication
  • Scheduled for the institutional 36-session supervised exercise therapy (SET) programme
  • Existing CTA with an axial slice at the L3 vertebral level suitable for automated body composition analysis
  • Capacity to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fontaine stage III or IV peripheral arterial disease (rest pain or tissue loss; critical limb-threatening ischaemia)
  • Ipsilateral lower extremity revascularisation within 6 months prior to enrolment
  • Absolute contraindication to structured exercise (e.g., unstable coronary artery disease, severe pulmonary hypertension, uncontrolled arrhythmia, or other condition precluding participation in a supervised treadmill and resistance exercise programme)
  • Cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score \<24)
  • Active malignancy or systemic condition expected to substantially alter body composition independently of the exercise intervention during the study period
  • Estimated life expectancy less than 12 months
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
128 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Interventions

  • ProcedureSET physiotherapy

    36-session AHA 2019-concordant supervised exercise programme delivered over 12 weeks (3 sessions per week, 60 minutes each). Each session consists of 45 minutes of structured treadmill and resistance exercise plus 15 minutes of patient education on vascular risk factor management. Treadmill protocol: 3.2 km/h, walking to claudication pain level 3 on a four-point scale, resting to level 1, five to six cycles per session. Progression weeks 1-4: speed +0.3 km/h every two weeks (maximum 4.0 km/h); weeks 5-8: grade +1% every two weeks (maximum 3%). Resistance training from week 5 targeting major lower extremity muscle groups (progressing from 2 sets × 10 repetitions to 5 sets at \~70% one-repetition maximum). This is standard clinical care; the study does not allocate participants to exercise.

  • RadiationCT scan

    Single-slice CT body composition analysis at the L3 vertebral level, extracted opportunistically from existing diagnostic CT angiography. Segmentation performed using AutoMATiCA (U-Net convolutional neural network). Compartments quantified: skeletal muscle (-29 to +150 HU within muscle fascia mask), visceral adipose tissue (-150 to -50 HU within peritoneal cavity), subcutaneous adipose tissue (-190 to -30 HU exterior to body wall), and intramuscular adipose tissue (-190 to -30 HU within muscle fascia, exterior to individual muscle boundaries). A second dedicated CT acquisition is performed at 3 months (T1) for exploratory longitudinal analysis.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite supervised exercise therapy treatment success at 3 months

    Binary composite endpoint requiring both: (1) Functional improvement - absolute increase in maximum walking distance (MWD) ≥50 m OR relative increase ≥50% from baseline on standardised graded treadmill testing (3.2 km/h); AND (2) Revascularisation-free status - no endovascular or surgical lower extremity revascularisation during the 3-month programme period. Treatment success = both criteria met; treatment failure = failing either criterion. MWD assessed by trained physiotherapist blinded to CT body composition data. Revascularisation events independently adjudicated by a vascular surgeon blinded to body composition predictor values.

    Time frame: 3 months from enrolment (end of supervised exercise therapy programme)

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Pekar M, Pekarova A, Mohr JA, Blaha L, Kantor M, Ryskova B, Jiravsky O. CT-derived body composition as a predictor of supervised exercise therapy response in intermittent claudication and peripheral arterial disease: COMPOSE-PAD study protocol. Biomol Biomed. 2026 Apr 15;26(10):1652-1663. doi: 10.17305/bb.2026.14062. PubMed 41983648 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared publicly at this stage. Anonymised aggregate summary data supporting the study findings will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author following publication of the primary results, subject to applicable data protection regulations (GDPR).

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07433309
Lead sponsor
Nemocnice AGEL Trinec-Podlesi a.s.
Responsible party
Matej Pekar, MD, PhD (Principal Investigator, Nemocnice AGEL Trinec-Podlesi a.s.) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 25, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 25, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion