ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07431944SILENCE-NEUROMUpdated Feb 25, 2026

Silencing Neuroma Pain-Botulinum Toxin Versus Local Anesthetic Injection

An interventional study of Botulinium toxin type A injection and Local Anesthesia in Pain Management, Pain and Phantom Limb Pain, sponsored by Charitable Organisation Charitable Fund Superhumans (Co Cf Superhumans). Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Ukraine. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-25.

Primary conditionPhantom LimbRegistry: PainReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Pain — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Phantom Limb
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Phantom Limb, a narrower term within Pain.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Charitable Organisation Charitable Fund Superhumans (Co Cf Superhumans) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2026, 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Neuroma-related pain is a frequent and disabling condition after limb trauma and amputation. Available treatments often provide short-lasting or insufficient analgesia. The SILENCE-NEUROMA Trial is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A versus local anesthetic injection for the treatment of neuroma-related pain. The primary outcome is pain reduction at 8 weeks after treatment.

Read the detailed description

Neuroma pain following limb trauma or amputation is characterized by focal neuropathic pain, trigger-point tenderness, and significant functional impairment. Local anesthetic injections are commonly used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes but typically provide only transient relief. Botulinum toxin type A has demonstrated analgesic properties through inhibition of neurotransmitter release and neurogenic inflammation, potentially offering longer-lasting pain relief.

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial will enroll adults with clinically and imaging-confirmed neuroma-related pain persisting for at least 3 months after limb trauma or amputation. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection or ultrasound-guided local anesthetic injection using an identical technique and volume.

Participants will be followed for 24 weeks. Pain intensity will be assessed using a numerical rating scale at predefined intervals. Secondary outcomes include responder rates, neuropathic pain characteristics, pain interference, functional outcomes, analgesic consumption, durability of pain relief, and safety. The study aims to provide high-quality evidence to guide interventional pain management strategies for neuroma-related pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain Management
  • Pain
  • Phantom Limb Pain
  • Phantom Limb Pain After Amputation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Neuroma pain
  • Local anesthetic
  • Chronic pain
  • Limb trauma
  • Amputation
  • Botulinum toxin
  • Ultrasound-guided injection
03

In context

Phantom Limb Reclassified

163 studies on the registry are indexed under Phantom Limb; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 30 across 125 interventional studies indexed under Phantom Limb.

Browse Phantom Limb studies →

Lead sponsor

Charitable Organisation Charitable Fund Superhumans (Co Cf Superhumans) is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Compared within Phantom Limb, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Pain. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • History of limb trauma and/or limb amputation at least 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Clinical diagnosis of neuroma-related pain with focal tenderness and positive - - Tinel sign
  • Imaging confirmation of neuroma by ultrasound or MRI
  • Average pain intensity ≥4 on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) during the week prior to screening
  • Stable analgesic regimen for at least 14 days prior to enrollment
  • Ability to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic pain condition unrelated to neuroma that predominates clinical symptoms
  • infection at or near the planned injection site
  • Known neuromuscular junction disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Botulinum toxin treatment within the previous 4-6 months
  • Planned surgical neuroma revision during the study period
  • allergy or to botulinum toxin or local anesthetics
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Botulinum Toxin Type A

    Single ultrasound-guided perineural injection of botulinum toxin type A (100 units diluted in 2.0 mL saline) administered around the confirmed neuroma using a standardized grid injection technique.

    Drug: Botulinium toxin type A injection

  • Active comparator
    Local Anesthetic (Active Control)

    Single ultrasound-guided perineural injection of local anesthetic (ropivacaine 0.2%, 2.0 mL or bupivacaine 0.25%, 2.0 mL) administered around the confirmed neuroma using the identical technique and volume.

    Drug: Local Anesthesia

Interventions

  • DrugBotulinium toxin type A injection

    A single ultrasound-guided perineural injection of botulinum toxin type A (100 units diluted in 2.0 mL sterile normal saline) administered circumferentially around the imaging-confirmed neuroma using a standardized grid injection technique. The procedure is performed under sterile conditions with real-time ultrasound visualization to ensure accurate perineural placement. No additional corticosteroids or anesthetics are co-administered.

  • DrugLocal Anesthesia

    A single ultrasound-guided perineural injection of local anesthetic (ropivacaine 0.2%, 2.0 mL or bupivacaine 0.25%, 2.0 mL) administered circumferentially around the imaging-confirmed neuroma using the identical injection technique and volume as the experimental arm. The procedure is performed under sterile conditions with real-time ultrasound guidance. No corticosteroids are administered.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in neuroma-related pain intensity from baseline to Week 8 measured using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Description Neuroma-related pain intensity will be assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst imaginable pain. The outcome measure is the mean change in NRS score from baseline (pre-injection assessment) to Week 8 following injection. Higher NRS scores indicate greater pain intensity. Negative values reflect improvement (pain reduction). Between-group differences (botulinum toxin type A versus local anesthetic) will be analyzed.

    Time frame: Baseline (prior to injection) and Week 8 (56 ± 7 days) after injection

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dmytriiev D, Liu W, Barsa M, Khomenko A, Strokan A, Pasquina PF, Cohen SP. Perineuromal hydrodissection for acute postamputation pain? An observational study in a time of war. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2026 Jul 6;51(7):795-804. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-106307. PubMed 39971386 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be publicly shared due to patient privacy considerations and the sensitive nature of trauma-related clinical data. De-identified data may be made available upon reasonable request and approval by the study steering committee under a formal data use agreement.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Feb 2026; primary completion for Feb 2026, 0 months later.

Of 61 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Phantom Limb, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 0 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 64 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 14, 2026
First posted
Feb 25, 2026
StartEst.
Feb 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 15, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 15, 2026
Last update
Feb 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07431944
Lead sponsor
Charitable Organisation Charitable Fund Superhumans (Co Cf Superhumans)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 25, 2026
Start date
Feb 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 25, 2026

Study contacts

Dmytro Dmytriiev, PhD.Professor
Contact
d.dmytriiev@superhumans.com
+380674309449

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion