An interventional study of Graded motor imagery mobile app in Phantom Limb Pain, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 89 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-02.
Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Rich TL, Cristan KG, Truty TP, Hansen AH, Ackland PE. HUMAN CENTERED DESIGN: VETERAN TESTING OF A MOBILE APP WITH AUGMENTED REALITY FOR PHANTOM LIMB PAIN. Proc…PubMed 41836102 ↗; 1 more
Nearly 60-85% of Veterans with amputations experience pain at the location of the amputated limb called phantom limb pain (PLP). PLP is a major problem and can have a profound impact on Veteran's daily function and ability to fully participate in life. Although several rehabilitation interventions are promising, advances in novel rehabilitation interventions are limited. The objective of this project is to refine a mobile app for graded motor imagery in 12 Veterans with amputations and test the mobile app with 36 Veterans with amputations. For this pilot project, the investigators will measure the preliminary feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Knowledge from this project will provide evidence to guide future larger studies of this graded motor imagery intervention. Developing novel strategies for chronic pain in this population will positively impact quality of life for Veterans with amputations.
Background: Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) is a form of unpredictable neuropathic pain in Veterans with amputation. Current non-medication treatments for PLP are limited and more interventions are needed that take into consideration the unique needs of the Veteran population. PLP significantly impairs rehabilitation outcomes and community participation. One non-medication intervention is graded motor imagery (GMI). GMI consists of sequentially progressing from limb laterality training, to motor imagery, and then mirror therapy (i.e., observing movement using the visual illusion of an intact limb in a mirror). Although clinicians report benefit from use of the technique, barriers exist to supporting at-home use of the intervention.
Research Questions (Objectives) - This VA Career Development Award-2 proposal focuses on refining a mobile app for GMI (VA-GMI) (Aim 1) and then pilot testing serial sessions of mobile app use in a sample of Veterans with lower limb amputation and moderate to severe PLP in their home setting (Aim 2).
Relevance to VA - There is a growing population of Veterans with amputation in the VA system. Many of whom will experience amputation pain, like phantom limb pain, and other amputation-related experiences. There are currently limited non-drug treatment options for phantom limb pain. Graded Motor Imagery could be one tool as a part of a comprehensive treatment plan for phantom limb pain. With the support of the expert mentor team in place, this work will incorporate Veteran input into the design of a novel intervention with high translational value. This work will lead to future investigations of optimized GMI intervention for the reduction of PLP in Veterans with amputations.
Number of Research Participants (Sample Size) - For Aim 1 that involves refining the mobile app, the investigators will recruit 12 Veterans. For Aim 2 that involves the clinical trial, the investigators will recruit 36 Veterans with unilateral below knee amputation to participate in the pilot testing of serial sessions.
Participating Sites - Minneapolis VA Health Care System
Duration of Participant Intake (Study Duration) - This project is projected to occur over 5 years. This project will begin with a 1 year refinement of the investigators' Graded Motor Imagery mobile app with 12 Veterans with amputation and moderate to severe PLP. In years 2-5, the investigators will conduct a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention with 36 Veterans with amputation and moderate to severe PLP. The investigators will conduct this study virtually with all Veterans in their home environment. All Veterans will receive twelve intervention sessions. Recruitment will conclude with 6-months remaining in the study timeline, which will be used for the dissemination of results and closure of the project.
Treatment (follow-up) - The Veterans in the pilot study will have 12 sessions of Graded Motor Imagery using the mobile app. The investigators will then follow Veterans for 3 and 6 month follow ups to learn more about their perspective of the Graded Motor Imagery mobile app.
Endpoints - The primary outcomes for this study are acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure) and secondary measures of health outcomes, specifically pain interference (Amputation Related Pain and Experiences).
Qualitative Data - In addition to measuring acceptability and pain interference, the investigators will conduct semi-structured interviews with participants to develop further understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of Graded Motor Imagery in the home setting, using the mobile app.
163 studies on the registry are indexed under Phantom Limb; 35 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 36 is above the median of 30 across 125 interventional studies indexed under Phantom Limb.
Browse Phantom Limb studies →VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,771 studies on the registry; 392 are open to participants now.
Of its 213 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 185 (87%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The criteria were revised on the registry on Oct 2, 2026. See what changed
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Veterans will trial the Graded Motor Imagery mobile application.
Device: Graded motor imagery mobile app
The Graded Motor Imagery mobile app is a mobile app designed for intervention in phantom limb pain.
Acceptability of Intervention Measure
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure is a measure of the acceptability of the intervention sessions and if acceptability changes over time. This measure will evaluate the acceptability of using a mobile app with a telehealth platform. Minimum score: 12, maximum score: 60. A higher score indicates greater acceptability of the intervention, a lower score indicates lower acceptability of the intervention.
Time frame: 6-week post-test
Change from 6-week post-test on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure to 6 months
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure is a measure of the acceptability of the intervention sessions and if acceptability changes over time. This measure will evaluate the acceptability of using a mobile app with a telehealth platform. Minimum score: 12, maximum score: 60. A higher score indicates greater acceptability of the intervention, a lower score indicates lower acceptability of the intervention.
Time frame: 6 month follow up (an average of 24 weeks from 6-week post test)
Change from baseline Amputation Related Pain and Experiences to 6-weeks (post-test)
The Amputation Related Pain and Experiences is a measure to differentiate types of amputation-related pain and measure intensity, frequency, and pain interference with residual limb, phantom sensation, and phantom limb pain. For each section of residual limb pain, phantom sensation, and phantom limb pain, the minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score indicates greater pain or sensation in each of the categories and a lower score indicates lower pain or sensation in each of the categories.
Time frame: Baseline, 6-week Post-Test
Change from 6-week post-test on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure at 3 months
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure is a measure of the acceptability of the intervention sessions and if acceptability changes over time. This measure will evaluate the acceptability of using a mobile app with a telehealth platform. Minimum score: 12, maximum score: 60. A higher score indicates greater acceptability of the intervention, a lower score indicates lower acceptability of the intervention.
Time frame: 3 month follow up (an average of 12 weeks after baseline)
Change from 6-week post-test Amputation Related Pain and Experiences to 3 months
The Amputation Related Pain and Experiences is a measure to differentiate types of amputation-related pain and measure intensity, frequency, and pain interference with residual limb, phantom sensation, and phantom limb pain. For each section of residual limb pain, phantom sensation, and phantom limb pain, the minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score indicates greater pain or sensation in each of the categories and a lower score indicates lower pain or sensation in each of the categories.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 month follow up (an average of 12 weeks from baseline)
Change from baseline Amputation Related Pain and Experiences to 6 months
The Amputation Related Pain and Experiences is a measure to differentiate types of amputation-related pain and measure intensity, frequency, and pain interference with residual limb, phantom sensation, and phantom limb pain. For each section of residual limb pain, phantom sensation, and phantom limb pain, the minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 60. A higher score indicates greater pain or sensation in each of the categories and a lower score indicates lower pain or sensation in each of the categories.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 month follow up (an average of 24 weeks from baseline)
Plan to share: No
Started Apr 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2028, 55 months after the start.
Of 61 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Phantom Limb, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 55 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 64 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 50.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Rich TL, Cristan KG, Truty TP, Hansen AH, Ackland PE. HUMAN CENTERED DESIGN: VETERAN TESTING OF A MOBILE APP WITH AUGMENTED REALITY FOR PHANTOM LIMB PAIN. Proc…PubMed 41836102 ↗; 1 more
Rich TL, Cristan KG, Truty TP, Hansen AH, Ackland PE. HUMAN CENTERED DESIGN: VETERAN TESTING OF A MOBILE APP WITH AUGMENTED REALITY FOR PHANTOM LIMB PAIN. Proc…PubMed 41836102 ↗; 1 more
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
VA Office of Research and Development →