ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07431372Be aPiUpdated Sep 11, 2026

Validation of the Shared Happiness Index in Multidisciplinary Primary Care Practices ( Be aPi )

An observational study in Well Being, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Reunion. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
350
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Multi-professional primary care practices (Maisons de Santé Pluriprofessionnelles, MSP) have expanded widely in France over the last decade to respond to increasing healthcare needs, uneven distribution of physicians, and deteriorating working conditions, which were further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. MSPs are expected to offer more collaborative and coordinated care, and to provide a more attractive work environment, particularly for younger healthcare professionals seeking less isolation and better work-life balance.

Well-being at work for healthcare professionals is now recognised as a key determinant of quality and safety of care. Studies have shown links between staff satisfaction, burnout, and patient outcomes, including communication quality, error rates and staff retention. However, research specifically focused on collective well-being or "shared happiness" within multi-professional primary care teams remains limited. Existing work in French MSPs (notably qualitative studies by F. Burté and O. Caillaud) has identified relevant dimensions of "shared happiness" and led to the preliminary construction of a questionnaire named the Shared Happiness Index (Indice de Bonheur Partagé, IBP). To date, no validated, standardised instrument exists to measure this collective well-being in MSPs.

The Be_aPi study aims to validate the IBP questionnaire among healthcare professionals working in MSPs. The study is observational, descriptive and cross-sectional, conducted in several French regions covered by the GIRCI (Groupement Interrégional de Recherche Clinique et Innovation) SOHO (Sud-Ouest Outre-Mer Hospitalier) network (Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Occitanie, Réunion and Mayotte). It comprises three main steps. First, a content validation phase will be carried out with two independent panels of experts. One panel, including psychometrics, methodology and linguistics experts and MSP representatives, will assess face validity by examining each item in relation to the concept of shared happiness in multi-professional primary care. A second panel will be involved in an e-Delphi process to establish consensus validity on the relevance and clarity of items, using Likert-type ratings and iterative feedback.

Second, the psychometric validation phase will recruit approximately 350 professionals from over 100 MSPs. Eligible participants include medical and paramedical professionals, medical-social staff, medical assistants, coordinators, health mediators, adapted physical activity instructors and psychologists, working in MSPs that have been operating for at least one year, with at least one year of seniority in their current MSP. Participants will complete an online survey including the IBP questionnaire and three reference instruments: the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) and the Short Form-12 (SF-12). Internal consistency of the IBP will be assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity will be examined with exploratory factor analysis and correlation patterns with the reference scales, according to a multi-trait multi-method approach.

Third, to evaluate test-retest reliability, participants who completed the initial IBP will be invited to fill in the same questionnaire again after a delay of approximately one month. The stability of scores over time will be assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. Ceiling and floor effects, as well as the distribution of scores across professional categories and organisational characteristics of MSPs (e.g. single-site vs multi-site, role in the organisation, membership in interprofessional associations), will also be analysed.

The expected outcome of Be_aPi is a valid, reliable and transferable Shared Happiness Index specifically tailored to multi-professional primary care practices. This tool should enable regular monitoring of collective well-being, support targeted quality-of-work-life interventions, and ultimately contribute to improving quality and safety of care, staff retention and the long-term sustainability of MSPs. In the longer term, the IBP could inform policy instruments and financing schemes that aim to "take care of those who care," in line with national quality and safety strategies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Well Being

Keywords

  • shared hapiness
  • Primary care
  • Multidisciplinary primary care practices
  • Work-related well-being
  • Quality of work life
  • Burnout
  • Shared happiness
03

In context

Burnout, Psychological

467 studies on the registry are indexed under Burnout, Psychological; 121 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 350 is above the median of 200 across 117 observational studies indexed under Burnout, Psychological.

Browse Burnout, Psychological studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion is the lead sponsor of 141 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

healthcare professionals

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthcare professionals (medical, paramedical) and professionals in the medical-social sector, medical assistants, health coordinators and mediators, as well as adapted physical activity instructors and psychologists
  • who work in healthcare centres that had been operating for more than one year at the start of the study and who themselves had more than one year's seniority in the MSP.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Substitute professionals,
  • Secretaries without coordination or medical assistant duties Professionals belonging to MSPs that had been operating for less than one year at the start of the study and who had less than one year's seniority within the organisation.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
350 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Consensus validity - eDELPHI method

    Evaluation of items in the Shared Happiness Index questionnaire using a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (1 = does not measure the concept studied at all and 5 = measures the concept studied completely) Analysis of responses to identify points of agreement and disagreement, then transmission of an anonymous summary of responses and comments to the entire panel. Repetition of these steps, refining the questionnaire with each round until consensus is reached or feedback converges.

    Time frame: before first participant inclusion

  2. Face validity

    Define each item in the questionnaire by a committee of experts. Analyze the items one by one by the committee and relate them to the concept being studied, shared happiness, in the context of a multi-professional healthcare facility.

    Time frame: Before first participant inclusion

  3. Internal consistency - Cronbach's alpha

    Internal consistency measures the extent to which the items in the test measure the same dimension or concept, in this case shared happiness. Internal consistency is commonly measured by Cronbach's alpha, which ranges from 0 (low) to 1 (high). A high coefficient indicates that the test items are similar in content, i.e. homogeneous. A Cronbach's alpha greater than 0.7 is acceptable.

    Time frame: Month 1

  4. test-retest reliability - intraclass coefficient (ICC)

    Consistency of results over time for the same sample of subjects. This will be assessed by proposing that the initial sample complete the questionnaire again after a period of one month. Estimation by intraclass coefficient. ICC ranges from 0 to 1. An ICC close to 1 indicates a high degree of agreement between measurements. Conversely, an ICC close to 0 indicates low agreement.

    Time frame: month 1

  5. Construct validity - Exploratory Factor Analysis

    Allows us to visualize the construction of the tool and the concept measured by the questionnaire. Construct validity will be assessed across all items selected during the content validation phase. the construct validity will be assessed using exploratory factor analysis

    Time frame: day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07431372
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 24, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

Vanessa PALMA, MD
Contact
vanessa.palma@univ-reunion.fr
+262692211902

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion