An interventional study of Cultural Sensitivity Training Program in Cultural Competency and Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, sponsored by Giresun University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-23.
Sponsored by Giresun University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
This randomized controlled experimental study aims to determine the effect of a cultural sensitivity training program on nursing students' cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness, and ethnocentrism levels. Fourth-year nursing students at Giresun University Faculty of Health Sciences are randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group using simple randomization. The experimental group receives a 4-week cultural sensitivity training program (2 hours per week) including interactive lectures, discussions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing activities. The control group continues with the standard nursing curriculum. Data are collected using the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale, Intercultural Awareness Scale, and Ethnocentrism Scale at baseline (pre-test) and after the intervention (post-test). The primary hypothesis is that participants receiving the training will show significant improvements in cultural sensitivity and awareness and a significant decrease in ethnocentrism compared to the control group.
Background: Cultural sensitivity and awareness are essential competencies for nursing professionals providing care to diverse patient populations. Ethnocentrism, the tendency to view one's own culture as superior, can negatively affect patient care quality. Structured educational interventions during undergraduate nursing education may enhance culturally competent care delivery.
Study Design: This is a randomized controlled experimental study conducted at Giresun University Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, during April-May 2025. Fourth-year nursing students were selected because they have accumulated both theoretical knowledge and clinical experience and have interacted with individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds.
Sample Size: Power analysis was performed using G*Power 3.1. Based on the effect size of 0.685 reported by Topcu (2019), with 95% power and 5% significance level, a minimum of 60 participants (30 per group) was required. To account for potential attrition, 71 students were enrolled (35 experimental, 36 control). Three students in the experimental group were excluded due to non-attendance, resulting in a final sample of 67 participants (32 experimental, 35 control).
Randomization: Participants were assigned to groups using simple random randomization. An independent biostatistician generated the randomization table using an online calculator (calculatorsoup.com). Groups had only one common class day per week, minimizing cross-contamination risk. Participants were verbally instructed not to share intervention content.
Intervention: The experimental group received a 4-week Cultural Sensitivity Training Program delivered in classroom settings every Monday (11:00-13:00) in two 50-minute sessions. The program content included: Week 1 - Culture concepts, cultural elements, and the relationship between society and culture; Week 2 - Health, illness, and culture relationships including cultural factors in health behaviors and nutrition; Week 3 - Cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness, and ethnocentrism concepts with strategies for reducing ethnocentrism; Week 4 - Transcultural nursing and cultural care models including Leininger's Sunrise Model, Giger and Davidhizar's Transcultural Assessment Model, and Purnell's Cultural Competence Model. Teaching methods included interactive lectures with PowerPoint presentations, group discussions, question-and-answer sessions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing scenarios. The training content was validated by field experts using the DISCERN quality assessment tool.
Control Group: The control group received no cultural sensitivity intervention during the study period. After post-test data collection, the control group also received the Cultural Sensitivity Training Program for ethical considerations.
Outcome Measures: Three validated instruments were used - (1) Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (Chen and Starosta, 2000; Turkish adaptation by Bulduk, Tosun and Ardic, 2010): 24-item, 5-point Likert scale measuring five emotional dimensions of intercultural sensitivity (Cronbach alpha=0.90); (2) Ethnocentrism Scale (Neuliep and McCroskey, 2001; Turkish adaptation by Ustun, 2011): 20-item, 5-point Likert scale (Cronbach alpha=0.92); (3) Intercultural Awareness Scale (Rozaimie et al.; Turkish adaptation by Yakar Karabuga and Alpar, 2017): 9-item, 5-point Likert scale with three sub-dimensions (Cronbach alpha=0.73). A 17-item Descriptive Characteristics Form was also administered.
Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0. Normality was assessed using skewness and kurtosis coefficients (within ±1.5 range). Parametric tests were used including paired samples t-test for within-group comparisons, independent samples t-test for between-group comparisons, and chi-square test (with Fisher's Exact Test when necessary) for demographic homogeneity. Statistical significance was set at p\<0.05. Instrument reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficients.
Ethics: The study was approved by Karadeniz Technical University Health Sciences Scientific Research Ethics Committee (Decision No: 158, Date: December 12, 2024). Institutional permission was obtained from Giresun University Rectorate (Decision No: E-13301833-100-55965, Date: December 13, 2024). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
371 studies on the registry are indexed under Behavior; 158 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 67 is below the median of 120 across 295 interventional studies indexed under Behavior.
Browse Behavior studies →Giresun University is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Withdrawal Criteria:
Fourth-year nursing students receiving a 4-week cultural sensitivity training program consisting of two 50-minute interactive sessions per week, including lectures, discussions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing activities.
Behavioral: Cultural Sensitivity Training Program
Fourth-year nursing students continuing with the standard nursing curriculum without any additional cultural sensitivity training during the study period. The training program was provided to this group after post-test data collection.
A structured 4-week educational program delivered in classroom settings (Mondays 11:00-13:00). Week 1: Culture concepts and society-culture relationship. Week 2: Health, illness and culture relationship. Week 3: Cultural sensitivity, cultural awareness and ethnocentrism. Week 4: Transcultural nursing and cultural care models (Leininger's Sunrise Model, Giger-Davidhizar's Transcultural Assessment Model, Purnell's Cultural Competence Model). Teaching methods include PowerPoint presentations, group discussions, Q\&A sessions, case studies, video demonstrations, and role-playing scenarios.
Change in Intercultural Sensitivity Scale Score
Measured using the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (Chen and Starosta, 2000; Turkish adaptation by Bulduk, Tosun and Ardic, 2010). A 24-item, 5-point Likert scale measuring five emotional dimensions: interaction engagement, respect for cultural differences, interaction confidence, interaction enjoyment, and interaction attentiveness. Items 2, 4, 7, 9, 12, 15, 18, 20, and 22 are reverse scored. Higher scores indicate greater intercultural sensitivity. Cronbach's alpha = 0.90.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)
Change in Ethnocentrism Scale Score
Measured using the Ethnocentrism Scale (Neuliep and McCroskey, 2001; Turkish adaptation by Ustun, 2011). A 20-item, 5-point Likert scale with a score range of 20-100. Items 4, 7, 9, 12, 15, and 19 are reverse scored. Higher scores indicate higher levels of ethnocentrism. Cronbach's alpha = 0.92.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)
Change in Intercultural Awareness Scale Score
Measured using the Intercultural Awareness Scale (Rozaimie et al.; Turkish adaptation by Yakar Karabuga and Alpar, 2017). A 9-item, 5-point Likert scale with three sub-dimensions: existing cultural awareness (items 1, 6, 8, 9), felt cultural awareness (items 3, 5), and cultural communication awareness (items 2, 4, 7). Score range is 9-45. Lower scores indicate greater intercultural awareness. Cronbach's alpha = 0.73.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-test, before intervention) and 4 weeks (post-test, immediately after completion of the training program)
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Giresun University