ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07415421Para-KiTUpdated Jun 26, 2026

Parathyroidectomy After Kidney Transplantation

An interventional study of Subtotal Parathyroidectomy and Conservative Management in Hyperparathyroidism and Kidney Transplantation Recipients, sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-26.

Sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
85
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to clarify whether surgical treatment of persistent hyperparathyroidism after kidney transplantation offers clinically meaningful benefits compared with a conservative treatment strategy.

Kidney transplant recipients (>6 mo after transplantation) with persistent hyperparathyroidism (elevated PTH and either hypercalcemia or hypophosphatemia) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either subtotal parathyroidectomy or conservative management according to standard clinical practice. The study is conducted as an open-label, randomized controlled pilot trial with a 12-month follow-up period.

Outcomes include bone density, physical function, quality of life and symptom burden.

Read the detailed description

Persistent hyperparathyroidism is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation. Despite improved kidney function, many transplant recipients continue to have elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, often accompanied by hypercalcemia and/or hypophosphatemia. These disturbances are associated with adverse effects on skeletal health and have been linked to increased risk of fractures, graft dysfunction, and mortality.

Currently, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the optimal management of persistent hyperparathyroidism after kidney transplantation. Conservative management with biochemical monitoring and supportive medical therapy is commonly used, while surgical parathyroidectomy is typically reserved for patients with severe biochemical abnormalities. Although parathyroidectomy is effective in normalizing PTH, calcium, and phosphate levels, and observational data suggest beneficial effects on bone mineral density, randomized controlled trials comparing surgical and conservative management strategies in this population are lacking.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of subtotal parathyroidectomy compared with conservative management in kidney transplant recipients with persistent hyperparathyroidism.

The study is conducted as an open-label, randomized controlled pilot trial with a 12-month follow-up period. Kidney transplant recipients (>6 mo after transplantation, no upper limit) with persistent hyperparathyroidism (elevated PTH and either hypercalcemia or hypophosphatemia) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either subtotal parathyroidectomy or conservative management according to standard clinical practice. Controls will be treated with calcium, vitamin D and phosphate supplements as needed. Calcimimetic use is not mandated for controls, but can be utilized at the discretion of the treating physician.

The primary objective is to assess the change in bone mineral density at the total hip after 12 months.

Secondary objectives include evaluation of changes in mineral metabolism parameters, bone turnover markers, bone microarchitecture, physical function and muscle strength, quality of life and symptom burden, kidney graft function, and safety outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hyperparathyroidism
  • Kidney Transplantation Recipients

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Persistent hyperparathyroidism
  • Kidney transplant recipients
  • Parathyroidectomy
  • Bone mineral density
  • Muscle function
  • Quality of life
  • Randomized controlled trial
03

In context

Hyperparathyroidism

110 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperparathyroidism; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 85 is above the median of 53 across 67 interventional studies indexed under Hyperparathyroidism.

Browse Hyperparathyroidism studies →

Lead sponsor

Aarhus University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 298 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years and legally competent and able to understand spoken and written Danish
  • Kidney transplantation ≥6 months prior (no upper limit of time after transplantation)
  • Stable kidney graft function, defined as estimated ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m3
  • On minimum two separate biochemical measurements:

PTH > upper normal limit of assay and

  • serum ionized calcium ≥1.33 mmol/L or
  • serum total calcium ≥2.60 mmol/L or
  • serum phosphate ≤0.60 mmol/L despite sufficient dietary intake

with measurements obtained within

  • 3 months in patients 6-12 months post-transplant
  • 6 months in patients >12 months post-transplant

and not attributable to calcium supplementation or treatment with thiazide diuretics or lithium.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to provide written,
  • Current anti-resorptive therapy (bisphosphonate, denosumab)
  • Current bone anabolic therapy (teriparatide, romosozumab)
  • Previous surgical parathyroidectomy
  • Not considered fit for surgery (including pregnancy)
  • Ionized calcium ≥1.50 mmol/L or albumin-corrected calcium ≥3.00 mmol/L despite discontinuation of calcium supplements.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
85 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Surgery group

    Participants assigned to this arm will undergo subtotal parathyroidectomy performed according to standard surgical practice. The procedure involves removal of the majority of parathyroid tissue with preservation of a small remnant. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurements will be used to guide the extent of resection, in accordance with standard surgical principles. Surgery will be performed by experienced ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgeons. Participants will receive standard perioperative care and postoperative follow-up.

    Procedure: Subtotal Parathyroidectomy

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive conservative management according to standard clinical practice. This includes regular clinical follow-up and biochemical monitoring of calcium, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone levels. Medical treatment, such as calcium or vitamin D supplementation and/or calcimimetic therapy, may be initiated or adjusted at the discretion of the treating physician. No parathyroid surgery will be performed during the 12-month study period.

    Other: Conservative Management

Interventions

  • ProcedureSubtotal Parathyroidectomy

    Subtotal parathyroidectomy performed according to standard surgical practice. The procedure involves removal of the majority of parathyroid tissue with preservation of a small remnant. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurements are used to guide the extent of resection. Standard perioperative care and postoperative follow-up are provided.

  • OtherConservative Management

    Conservative management according to standard clinical practice, including regular clinical follow-up and biochemical monitoring of calcium, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone levels. Medical treatment, such as calcium or vitamin D supplementation and/or calcimimetic therapy, may be initiated or adjusted based on clinical judgment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the total hip

    Bone mineral density (BMD) at the total hip will be measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) according to standardized procedures. Measurements will be performed at baseline and after 12 months. The primary outcome is the change in bone mineral density from baseline to 12 months.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture

    Bone microarchitecture will be assessed using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) at baseline and after 12 months. Parameters will include measures of trabecular and cortical bone structure. The outcome is the change in these parameters from baseline to 12 months.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months

  2. Mineral metabolism: Change in plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH)

    Plasma plasma parathyroid hormone PTH \[pmol/L\] will be measured at baseline and 12 months. Outcome is change from baseline to 12 months.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months

  3. Mineral metabolism: Changes in serum ionized calcium and phosphate

    Serum ionized calcium \[mmol/L\] and phosphate \[mmol/L\] will be measured at baseline and 12 months. Outcome is change from baseline to 12 months.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months

  4. Mineral metabolism: Change in plasma fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23)

    Plasma fibroblast growth factor 23 FGF23 \[ng/L\] will be measured at baseline and 12 months. Outcome is change from baseline to 12 months

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months

  5. Bone turnover marker: Change in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP)

    Bone-specific alkaline phosphataseBALP \[µg/l\] will be measured at baseline and 12 months. Outcome is change from baseline to 12 months.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months

  6. Bone turnover marker: Change in plasma C-terminal crosslinks (CTX)

    CTX \[µg/L\] will be measured at baseline and 12 months. Outcome is change from baseline to 12 months.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months

  7. Bone turnover marker: Change in plasma procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP, intact and total forms)

    Plasma procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP, intact and total forms) \[µg/L\] will be measured at baseline and 12 months. Outcome is change from baseline to 12 months.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months

  8. Bone turnover marker: Change in plasma tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRAP5b).

    Plasma TRAP5b \[U/L\] will be measured at baseline and 12 months. Outcome is change from baseline to 12 months

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months

  9. Kidney function: Stability of kidney graft function based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) slope

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months

  10. Change in lower extremity function measured by the 30-second Chair Stand Test at 12 months

    Lower extremity function will be assessed using the 30-second Chair Stand Test at baseline and after 12 months. The outcome is the change in the number of repetitions from baseline to 12 months, where a higher number of repetitions indicates better performance.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months.

  11. Change in isometric lower extremity muscle strength

    Isometric lower extremity muscle strength will be assessed using a dynamometer chair at baseline and after 12 months. The outcome is the change in maximal isometric strength from baseline to 12 months, where higher values indicate greater muscle strength.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months

  12. Change in mobility measured by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test

    Mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test at baseline and after 12 months. The outcome is the change in time (seconds) from baseline to 12 months, where a shorter time indicates better performance.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months.

  13. Change in handgrip strength

    Handgrip strength (HGS) test will be performed using a hand dynamometer at baseline and after 12 months. Handgrip strength will be measured in kilograms. The outcome is the change in handgrip strength from baseline to 12 months, where higher values indicate greater muscle strength.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months.

  14. Change in quality of life measured by the Primary Hyperparathyroidism Quality of Life questionnaire (PHPQoL)

    Quality of life will be assessed using the Primary Hyperparathyroidism Quality of Life questionnaire (PHPQoL) at baseline and after 12 months. The PHPQoL consists of 16 items assessing health-related quality of life in patients with hyperparathyroidism. Items are scored from 0 to 4 and summed to a total score of 0-64, which is subsequently normalized to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. The outcome is the change in normalized PHPQoL total score from baseline to 12 months.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months.

  15. Change in symptom burden measured by the Parathyroidectomy Assessment of Symptoms (PAS) score

    Symptom burden will be assessed using the Parathyroidectomy Assessment of Symptoms (PAS) score at baseline and after 12 months. The PAS score consists of 13 symptom items, each scored from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (maximum symptom severity), where higher scores indicate greater symptom burden. The outcome is the change in PAS total score from baseline to 12 months.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months.

  16. Change in post-transplant quality of life measured by a SONG (Standardised Outcomes in Nephrology) -based questionnaire

    Post-transplant quality of life will be assessed using a questionnaire developed for the post-transplant setting in collaboration with patient representatives (SONG initiative) at baseline and after 12 months. Items are scored using a five-point Likert scale with the response options: Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Usually, Always, with an additional Not applicable option. The outcome is the change in questionnaire score from baseline to 12 months.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of study at 12 months.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Departement of Nephrology, Aarhus University hospital
    Aarhus, Central Jutland 8200, Denmark
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bandirali M, Lanza E, Messina C, Sconfienza LM, Brambilla R, Maurizio R, Marchelli D, Piodi LP, Di Leo G, Ulivieri FM, Sardanelli F. Dose absorption in lumbar and femoral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations using three different scan modalities: an anthropomorphic phantom study. J Clin Densitom. 2013 Jul-Sep;16(3):279-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Mar 25. PubMed 23535250 ↗
  • Cianciolo G, Tondolo F, Barbuto S, Angelini A, Ferrara F, Iacovella F, Raimondi C, La Manna G, Serra C, De Molo C, Cavicchi O, Piccin O, D'Alessio P, De Pasquale L, Felisati G, Ciceri P, Galassi A, Cozzolino M. A roadmap to parathyroidectomy for kidney transplant candidates. Clin Kidney J. 2022 Feb 23;15(8):1459-1474. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac050. eCollection 2022 Aug. PubMed 35892022 ↗
  • Jorgensen HS, Claes K, Smout D, Naesens M, Kuypers D, D'Haese P, Cavalier E, Evenepoel P. Associations of Changes in Bone Turnover Markers with Change in Bone Mineral Density in Kidney Transplant Patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):483-493. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000368. Epub 2023 Nov 29. PubMed 38030558 ↗
  • Jorgensen HS, Behets G, Bammens B, Claes K, Meijers B, Naesens M, Sprangers B, Kuypers DRJ, Cavalier E, D'Haese P, Evenepoel P. Natural History of Bone Disease following Kidney Transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Mar;33(3):638-652. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021081081. Epub 2022 Jan 19. PubMed 35046132 ↗
  • Abdelhadi M, Nordenstrom J. Bone mineral recovery after parathyroidectomy in patients with primary and renal hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998 Nov;83(11):3845-51. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.11.5249. PubMed 9814456 ↗
  • Tong A, Budde K, Gill J, Josephson MA, Marson L, Pruett TL, Reese PP, Rosenbloom D, Rostaing L, Warrens AN, Wong G, Craig JC, Crowe S, Harris T, Hemmelgarn B, Manns B, Tugwell P, Van Biesen W, Wheeler DC, Winkelmayer WC, Evangelidis N, Sautenet B, Howell M, Chapman JR. Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Transplantation: A Global Initiative to Develop a Core Outcome Set for Trials in Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Direct. 2016 May 19;2(6):e79. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000593. eCollection 2016 Jun. PubMed 27500269 ↗
  • Cheng SP, Lee JJ, Liu TP, Yang TL, Chen HH, Wu CJ, Liu CL. Parathyroidectomy improves symptomatology and quality of life in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 2014 Feb;155(2):320-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Sep 11. PubMed 24035616 ↗
  • Pasieka JL, Parsons LL. A prospective surgical outcome study assessing the impact of parathyroidectomy on symptoms in patients with secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 2000 Oct;128(4):531-9. doi: 10.1067/msy.2000.108117. PubMed 11015085 ↗
  • Bislev LS, Langagergaard Rodbro L, Sikjaer T, Rejnmark L. Effects of Elevated Parathyroid Hormone Levels on Muscle Health, Postural Stability and Quality of Life in Vitamin D-Insufficient Healthy Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2019 Dec;105(6):642-650. doi: 10.1007/s00223-019-00612-2. Epub 2019 Sep 14. PubMed 31522253 ↗
  • Amstrup AK, Rejnmark L, Vestergaard P, Sikjaer T, Rolighed L, Heickendorff L, Mosekilde L. Vitamin D status, physical performance and body mass in patients surgically cured for primary hyperparathyroidism compared with healthy controls - a cross-sectional study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011 Jan;74(1):130-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2010.03906.x. PubMed 21044111 ↗
  • Diaz-Tocados JM, Rodriguez-Ortiz ME, Almaden Y, Pineda C, Martinez-Moreno JM, Herencia C, Vergara N, Pendon-Ruiz de Mier MV, Santamaria R, Rodelo-Haad C, Casado-Diaz A, Lorenzo V, Carvalho C, Frazao JM, Felsenfeld AJ, Richards WG, Aguilera-Tejero E, Rodriguez M, Lopez I, Munoz-Castaneda JR. Calcimimetics maintain bone turnover in uremic rats despite the concomitant decrease in parathyroid hormone concentration. Kidney Int. 2019 May;95(5):1064-1078. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Mar 12. PubMed 30878213 ↗
  • Collaud S, Staub-Zahner T, Trombetti A, Clerici T, Marangon N, Binet I, Myers PO, Rizzoli R, Martin PY, Robert JH, Triponez F. Increase in bone mineral density after successful parathyroidectomy for tertiary hyperparathyroidism after renal transplantation. World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1795-801. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9495-y. PubMed 18311499 ↗
  • Moreno P, Coloma A, Torregrosa JV, Montero N, Francos J, Codina S, Manonelles A, Bestard O, Garcia-Barrasa A, Melilli E, Cruzado JM. Long-term results of a randomized study comparing parathyroidectomy with cinacalcet for treating tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Clin Transplant. 2020 Aug;34(8):e13988. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13988. Epub 2020 Jun 3. PubMed 32438479 ↗
  • Cruzado JM, Moreno P, Torregrosa JV, Taco O, Mast R, Gomez-Vaquero C, Polo C, Revuelta I, Francos J, Torras J, Garcia-Barrasa A, Bestard O, Grinyo JM. A Randomized Study Comparing Parathyroidectomy with Cinacalcet for Treating Hypercalcemia in Kidney Allograft Recipients with Hyperparathyroidism. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Aug;27(8):2487-94. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015060622. Epub 2015 Dec 8. PubMed 26647424 ↗
  • Evenepoel P, Cooper K, Holdaas H, Messa P, Mourad G, Olgaard K, Rutkowski B, Schaefer H, Deng H, Torregrosa JV, Wuthrich RP, Yue S. A randomized study evaluating cinacalcet to treat hypercalcemia in renal transplant recipients with persistent hyperparathyroidism. Am J Transplant. 2014 Nov;14(11):2545-55. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12911. Epub 2014 Sep 15. PubMed 25225081 ↗
  • van der Plas WY, Gomes Neto AW, Berger SP, Pol RA, Kruijff S, Bakker SJL, de Borst MH. Association of time-updated plasma calcium and phosphate with graft and patient outcomes after kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2021 Jul;21(7):2437-2447. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16457. Epub 2021 Jan 12. PubMed 33331113 ↗
  • Perrin P, Caillard S, Javier RM, Braun L, Heibel F, Borni-Duval C, Muller C, Olagne J, Moulin B. Persistent hyperparathyroidism is a major risk factor for fractures in the five years after kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013 Oct;13(10):2653-63. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12425. Epub 2013 Aug 26. PubMed 24034142 ↗
  • Wang R, Price G, Disharoon M, Stidham G, McLeod MC, McMullin JL, Gillis A, Fazendin J, Lindeman B, Ong S, Chen H. Resolution of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism After Kidney Transplantation and the Effect on Graft Survival. Ann Surg. 2023 Sep 1;278(3):366-375. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005946. Epub 2023 Jun 16. PubMed 37325915 ↗
  • Jorgensen HS, Behets G, Bammens B, Claes K, Meijers B, Naesens M, Sprangers B, Kuypers DRJ, D'Haese P, Evenepoel P. Patterns of renal osteodystrophy 1 year after kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021 Nov 9;36(11):2130-2139. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab239. PubMed 34383929 ↗
  • Evenepoel P, Meijers BK, de Jonge H, Naesens M, Bammens B, Claes K, Kuypers D, Vanrenterghem Y. Recovery of hyperphosphatoninism and renal phosphorus wasting one year after successful renal transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Nov;3(6):1829-36. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01310308. Epub 2008 Oct 15. PubMed 18922992 ↗
  • Viaene L, Evenepoel P, Bammens B, Claes K, Kuypers D, Vanrenterghem Y. Calcium requirements after parathyroidectomy in patients with refractory secondary hyperparathyroidism. Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;110(2):c80-5. doi: 10.1159/000151722. Epub 2008 Sep 1. PubMed 18758187 ↗
  • Tantiyavarong P, Kramer A, Heaf JG, Finne P, Asberg A, Cases A, Caskey FJ, Massy ZA, Jager KJ, Noordzij M. Changes in clinical indicators related to the transition from dialysis to kidney transplantation-data from the ERA-EDTA Registry. Clin Kidney J. 2019 Jul 1;13(2):188-198. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfz062. eCollection 2020 Apr. PubMed 32296524 ↗
  • Duque EJ, Elias RM, Moyses RMA. Parathyroid Hormone: A Uremic Toxin. Toxins (Basel). 2020 Mar 17;12(3):189. doi: 10.3390/toxins12030189. PubMed 32192220 ↗
  • Ketteler M, Block GA, Evenepoel P, et al. Executive summary of the 2017 KDIGO Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD) Guideline Update: what's changed and why it matters. Kidney Int. 2017;92:26-36. Kidney Int. 2017 Dec;92(6):1558. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.10.001. No abstract available. PubMed 29153145 ↗
  • Baia LC, Heilberg IP, Navis G, de Borst MH; NIGRAM investigators. Phosphate and FGF-23 homeostasis after kidney transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015 Nov;11(11):656-66. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.153. Epub 2015 Sep 29. PubMed 26416497 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data that underlie the results reported in publications will be shared. This includes demographic data, baseline characteristics, outcome measures, and relevant laboratory and imaging data used for primary and secondary analyses. Data will be shared in an anonymized format to protect participant confidentiality. Only data necessary to reproduce the reported results will be made available. Additional data not included in publications will not be routinely shared. Data sharing will be conducted in accordance with applicable data protection regulations and national legislation.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: Beginning after publication of the primary study results and available until December 2035.

Access criteria: De-identified (pseudo-anonymized) individual participant data and supporting documents will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. Requests must include a methodologically sound research proposal. Access will be subject to approval by the principal investigator and relevant institutional authorities. Data sharing will require a data transfer agreement in accordance with the Danish Data Protection Act and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), including Chapter V concerning transfers to third countries. Data will be shared in a secure manner and solely for research purposes.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2030, 57 months after the start.

Of 18 interventional studies with no phase under Hyperparathyroidism, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 57 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 23, 2026
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
StartActual
Mar 3, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
Last update
Jun 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07415421
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
Start date
Mar 3, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 26, 2026

Study contacts

Hanne S Jørgensen, MD, PhD
Contact
hsjorgensen@clin.au.dk
+45 51 41 35 41
Amal Derai, MD
Contact
amader@rm.dk
+45 51 36 03 80
Hanne S Jørgensen, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Department of Nephrology, Aarhus University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion