ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07412366Updated Feb 17, 2026

Urea-to-Creatinine Ratio as a Marker of Metabolic Transition in Septic Shock: A Comparison With Indirect Calorimetry

An observational study in Septic Shock, sponsored by Hospital Sao Domingos. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-17.

Sponsored by Hospital Sao Domingos · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Urea-to-Creatinine Ratio as a Marker of Metabolic Transition in Septic Shock: A Comparison with Indirect Calorimetry.

This study investigates whether the urea-to-creatinine ratio can serve as a simple marker of metabolic state in patients with septic shock. Septic shock is associated with hypermetabolism and severe protein catabolism, which worsen outcomes. Although indirect calorimetry is the gold standard for measuring energy expenditure and metabolic demand in critically ill patients, its availability in ICUs is limited.

The authors hypothesize that the urea-to-creatinine ratio reflects protein catabolism and correlates with energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry, making it a potential tool to identify the transition from the catabolic to the anabolic phase and to guide nutritional therapy. The primary objective is to assess the correlation between the urea-to-creatinine ratio and energy expenditure in septic shock patients. Secondary objectives include evaluating changes in systemic inflammation over time using C-reactive protein (CRP).

This is a prospective observational cohort study of adult patients with septic shock admitted to a medical-surgical ICU who require at least three days of mechanical ventilation and undergo indirect calorimetry. Energy expenditure will be measured at predefined intervals during the ICU stay, while urea, creatinine, and CRP levels will be collected regularly. Patients with severe renal dysfunction, renal replacement therapy, or high oxygen requirements will be excluded.

Data will be analyzed across three time periods during mechanical ventilation to examine trends in energy expenditure, urea-to-creatinine ratio, and inflammation. Demographic and clinical variables will also be collected. The study aims to determine whether changes in the urea-to-creatinine ratio mirror metabolic transitions detected by indirect calorimetry, potentially offering a practical alternative for metabolic monitoring in septic shock patients.

Read the detailed description

Urea-to-Creatinine Ratio as a Marker of Metabolic Transition in Septic Shock: A Comparison with Indirect Calorimetry

INTRODUCTION: Patients with septic shock develop profound metabolic alterations characterized by hypermetabolism and accelerated protein catabolism, leading to loss of lean body mass and worse clinical outcomes. Indirect calorimetry is the gold standard for assessing energy expenditure and metabolic demand in critically ill patients; however, it is not widely available in ICUs.

The urea-to-creatinine ratio has been proposed as a simple and readily available marker of protein catabolism. Nevertheless, its relationship with measured energy expenditure remains unclear.

HYPOTHESIS: The urea/creatinine ratio may be an efficient catabolism marker to guide nutritional therapy in critically ill patients. Evidence to confirm this hypothesis can be obtained by comparing the urea-to-creatinine ratio with indirect calorimetry, which is the gold standard for evaluating energy expenditure and metabolic demands in these patients.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the correlation between the urea-to-creatinine ratio and energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry in patients with septic shock, in order to identify the transition from the catabolic to the anabolic phase. This transition is expected to be reflected by a reduction in the urea-to-creatinine ratio accompanied by a decrease in measured energy expenditure.

Secondary objectives include the analysis of inflammatory activity over time, as assessed by C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.

METHODS: This is a prospective observational cohort study including adult patients with septic shock, defined according to Sepsis-3 criteria, admitted to a 53-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit between April 2026 and March 2027. Eligible patients will be required to have undergone invasive mechanical ventilation for at least three consecutive days and to have had energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry.

Indirect calorimetry assessments will be performed on days 1, 4, 7, 11, 14, 17, and 20 after ICU admission. Patients will be excluded if they had a serum creatinine level greater than 4.0 mg/dL at hospital admission, chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis, initiation of renal replacement therapy during ICU stay, or if they require an inspired oxygen fraction (FiO₂) greater than 70% on the fourth day of mechanical ventilation.

Energy expenditure measurements will be obtained using the E-COVX module integrated into the Carescape B650 monitor (GE Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland). Urea and creatinine levels will be collected daily, and the urea-to-creatinine rati calculated accordingly. CRP levels will also be measured as an indicator of systemic inflammation.

For analysis, energy expenditure, urea-to-creatinine ratio, and CRP values will be grouped into three time periods based on days since initiation of mechanical ventilation: days 1-4, days 7-11, and days 14-20.

Demographic and clinical data to be collected include age, sex, Simplified Acute Physiology Score III (SAPS III), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at admission, admission category (medical or surgical), the sepsis focus and relevant comorbidities. Data will be collected prospectively using standardized case report forms.

Written informed consent will be obtained from patients or their legal representatives. The study protocol will be submitted for approval to the Research Ethics Committee of Hospital São Domingos

02

Conditions studied

  • Septic Shock

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • urea-to-creatinine ratio
  • Indirect calorimetry
  • Septic shock
  • ICU
  • Catabolism
03

In context

Shock, Septic

1,078 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 232 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 108 across 406 observational studies indexed under Shock, Septic.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Sao Domingos is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with septic shock, defined according to Sepsis-3 criteria, admitted to a 53-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit between April 2026 and March 2027. Eligible patients will be required to have undergone invasive mechanical ventilation for at least three consecutive days and to have had energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients with septic shock, defined according to Sepsis-3 criteria, admitted to a 53-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit between April 2026 and March 2027. Eligible patients will be required to have undergone invasive mechanical ventilation for at least three consecutive days -

Exclusion Criteria:Patients will be excluded if they had a serum creatinine level greater than 4.0 mg/dL at hospital admission, chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis, initiation of renal replacement therapy during ICU stay, or if they require an inspired oxygen fraction (FiO₂) greater than 70% on the fourth day of mechanical ventilation.

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
28 Days
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Septic shock patients

    Patients will be submmited to determinations os indirect calorimetry and urea-to-creatinine ratio on days 1, 4, 7, 11, 14, 17 and 20

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Urea-to-creatinine ratio and energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry

    To evaluate the correlation between the urea-to-creatinine ratio and energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry in patients with septic shock, in order to identify the transition from the catabolic to the anabolic phase. Urea and creatinine will be determined on days 1,4,7,11, 14,17 and 20. In the same period patients will be submmited to determination of energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry using the E-COVX module integrated into the Carescape B650 monitor (GE Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland).

    Time frame: 20 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Analysis of inflammatory activity over time, as assessed by C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.

    Time frame: 20 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Monk DN, Plank LD, Franch-Arcas G, Finn PJ, Streat SJ, Hill GL. Sequential changes in the metabolic response in critically injured patients during the first 25 days after blunt trauma. Ann Surg. 1996 Apr;223(4):395-405. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199604000-00008. PubMed 8633918 ↗
  • Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. PubMed 26903338 ↗
  • Paulus MC, Melchers M, van Es A, Kouw IWK, van Zanten ARH. The urea-to-creatinine ratio as an emerging biomarker in critical care: a scoping review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2025 May 2;29(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05396-6. PubMed 40317012 ↗
  • Haines RW, Zolfaghari P, Wan Y, Pearse RM, Puthucheary Z, Prowle JR. Elevated urea-to-creatinine ratio provides a biochemical signature of muscle catabolism and persistent critical illness after major trauma. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Dec;45(12):1718-1731. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05760-5. Epub 2019 Sep 17. PubMed 31531715 ↗
  • Niederer LE, Miller H, Haines KL, Molinger J, Whittle J, MacLeod DB, McClave SA, Wischmeyer PE. Prolonged progressive hypermetabolism during COVID-19 hospitalization undetected by common predictive energy equations. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Oct;45:341-350. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.07.021. Epub 2021 Aug 3. PubMed 34620338 ↗
  • Long CL, Schaffel N, Geiger JW, Schiller WR, Blakemore WS. Metabolic response to injury and illness: estimation of energy and protein needs from indirect calorimetry and nitrogen balance. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1979 Nov-Dec;3(6):452-6. doi: 10.1177/014860717900300609. PubMed 575168 ↗
  • Israfilov E, Kir S. Comparison of Energy Expenditure in Mechanically Ventilated Septic Shock Patients in Acute and Recovery Periods via Indirect Calorimetry. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021 Sep;45(7):1523-1531. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2063. Epub 2021 Feb 16. PubMed 33314315 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Apr 2026; primary completion for Mar 2027, 11 months later.

Of 189 non-industry observational studies under Shock, Septic, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 202 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 9, 2026
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
StartEst.
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 2027
Last update
Feb 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07412366
Lead sponsor
Hospital Sao Domingos
Responsible party
José Raimundo Araujo de Azevedo (Attending physician, Hospital Sao Domingos) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 17, 2026

Study contacts

JOSE AZEVEDO, MD, PhD
Contact
jrazevedo47@gmail.com
+55 98 991375595
JOAMMA QUARIGUASI, MD
Contact
joamaq@gmail.com
+55 98 98418-6565
JOSE AZEVEDO, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Sao Domingos

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion