ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06244381Updated Feb 19, 2025

Indirect Calorimetry Versus Urea-creatinine Ratio to Evaluate Catabolism in Critically Ill Patients

An observational study in Critically Ill, sponsored by Hospital Sao Domingos. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-19.

Primary conditionCritical Illness(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?Critical Illness is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by Hospital Sao Domingos · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of the urea/creatinine ratio as a catabolism marker compared to indirect calorimetry to optimize nutritional support in critically ill patients.

Read the detailed description

The most recent ESPEN guideline on nutritional support in critically ill patients identifies 3 phases in the evolution of critically ill patients: the early acute phase (formerly EBB Phase), characterized by endogenous energy production and activation of autophagy that limits full caloric-protein intake; the late period of the acute phase, when endogenous energy production has reduced to a basal level and autophagy is no longer manifested, and the late or rehabilitation phase. The identification of each of these moments is not based on precise elements. Despite this division into phases, there is no clear evidence of metabolic behavior, especially in the second and third phases, when the catabolic state gives way to anabolism.

Currently, monitoring catabolism is complicated since there is no available biomarker with acceptable sensitivity and specificity. 3-methyl histidine and nitrogen balance are not available in everyday life. As catabolism is not measured, its presence and severity only become apparent when muscle loss and weakness set in.

Recently, Haines et al., analyzing a population of patients with persistent severe disease, who are patients with prolonged hospitalization and with no resolution in the ICU, showed that continued catabolism is their metabolic hallmark and was measured by the urea/creatinine ratio persistently high.

The phases of severe illness could then be defined based on the UCR relationship. The ratio must be high in the early acute and late acute phases and may be a marker of the beginning of the late phase of recovery and anabolism.

Indirect calorimetry, the gold standard for determining energy expenditure energy, has revealed in studies that it can be the marker of the beginning of the anabolic when energy expenditure increases rapidly. This behavior of indirect calorimetry was observed in COVID-19 but has also been demonstrated in other patient populations.

Although indirect calorimetry can represent a reliable measure for determining the beginning of the anabolic phase, it is not a widely available measurement in ICUs, unlike urea and creatinine measurements that are part of routine daily exams in ICUs.

The urea/creatinine ratio may be an efficient catabolism marker to guide nutritional therapy in critically ill patients. Evidence to confirm this hypothesis can be obtained by comparing the urea/creatinine ratio with indirect calorimetry, which is the gold standard for evaluating energy expenditure and catabolism in these patients.

The primary objective will be to correlate the behavior of the urea/creatinine ratio with the energetic expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry in patients with severe forms of COVID-19 to identify the beginning of the anabolic phase that would be translated by a reduction in UCR and an increase in energy expenditure in IC. Secondarily, correlate other catabolism markers with calorimetry results. They are serum albumin, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critically Ill

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Catabolism
  • Indirect calorimetry
  • Urea/creatinine ratio
  • Critically ill
  • COVID-19
03

In context

Critical Illness Unverified

1,780 studies on the registry are indexed under Critical Illness; 442 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 140 across 814 observational studies indexed under Critical Illness.

Browse Critical Illness studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Sao Domingos is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Compared within Critical Illness, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Twenty critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to a 35-bed ICU intended for patients with COVID-19 from April to August 2021 and who underwent determination of energy expenditure with indirect calorimetry on days 1, 4, 7, 9, 14, 17, and 20 days after admission, and who did not have serum creatinine > 4.0 mg/dL upon admission, were not chronic dialysis patients and did not undergo dialysis treatment during the study period. The urea, creatinine, C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, and albumin results will be obtained from the hospital's electronic medical record during the study period.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients with severe COVID-19 submitted to determination of energetic expenditure between the first and twentieth day of ICU stay -

Exclusion Criteria: patients who, upon arrival at the hospital, had a serum creatinine level above 4.0 mg°/dL, chronic kidney disease patients undergoing dialysis, and patients undergoing dialysis treatment during their stay in the ICU.

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Urea/creatinine ratio

    Compare urea/creatinine ratio with indirect calorimetry to determine catabolism and optimize nutritional support in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Serum albumin

    Compare albumin with indirect calorimetry to determine catabolism and optimize nutritional support in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Hemoglobin concentration

    Compare hemoglobin concentration with indirect calorimetry to determine catabolism and optimize nutritional support in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. C-reactive protein

    Compare C-reactive protein with indirect calorimetry to determine catabolism and optimize nutritional support in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Sao Domingos
    São Luiz, MA 65075775, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Calder PC, Casaer M, Hiesmayr M, Mayer K, Montejo-Gonzalez JC, Pichard C, Preiser JC, Szczeklik W, van Zanten ARH, Bischoff SC. ESPEN practical and partially revised guideline: Clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2023 Sep;42(9):1671-1689. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Jul 15. PubMed 37517372 ↗
  • Long CL, Dillard DR, Bodzin JH, Geiger JW, Blakemore WS. Validity of 3-methylhistidine excretion as an indicator of skeletal muscle protein breakdown in humans. Metabolism. 1988 Sep;37(9):844-9. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(88)90118-7. PubMed 3138511 ↗
  • Haines RW, Zolfaghari P, Wan Y, Pearse RM, Puthucheary Z, Prowle JR. Elevated urea-to-creatinine ratio provides a biochemical signature of muscle catabolism and persistent critical illness after major trauma. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Dec;45(12):1718-1731. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05760-5. Epub 2019 Sep 17. PubMed 31531715 ↗
  • Niederer LE, Miller H, Haines KL, Molinger J, Whittle J, MacLeod DB, McClave SA, Wischmeyer PE. Prolonged progressive hypermetabolism during COVID-19 hospitalization undetected by common predictive energy equations. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Oct;45:341-350. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.07.021. Epub 2021 Aug 3. PubMed 34620338 ↗
  • Long CL, Schaffel N, Geiger JW, Schiller WR, Blakemore WS. Metabolic response to injury and illness: estimation of energy and protein needs from indirect calorimetry and nitrogen balance. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1979 Nov-Dec;3(6):452-6. doi: 10.1177/014860717900300609. PubMed 575168 ↗
  • Monk DN, Plank LD, Franch-Arcas G, Finn PJ, Streat SJ, Hill GL. Sequential changes in the metabolic response in critically injured patients during the first 25 days after blunt trauma. Ann Surg. 1996 Apr;223(4):395-405. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199604000-00008. PubMed 8633918 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2024 to primary completion in Jun 2024, 3 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 29, 2024
First posted
Feb 6, 2024
StartActual
Mar 1, 2024
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2024
CompletionActual
Oct 1, 2024
Last update
Feb 19, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06244381
Lead sponsor
Hospital Sao Domingos
Responsible party
José Raimundo Araujo de Azevedo (Clinical Researcher, Hospital Sao Domingos) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 6, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2024
Completion
Oct 1, 2024
Last update
Feb 19, 2025

Study contacts

JOSE AZEVEDO, MD, PhD
study director · Hospital São Domingos

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion