ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07401407APENERASUpdated Nov 6, 2026

RICA (ERAS) Pathway Adherence and Early Discharge Feasibility After Urgent Uncomplicated Appendectomy (APENERAS)

An observational study in Acute Appendicitis, Appendectomy and Ambulatory Surgery, sponsored by Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo. Completed at 4 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo · Observational

Updated Nov 6, 2026Enrollment updatedPrimary outcomes revisedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
199
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This multicenter, prospective observational study (APENERAS) evaluates adherence to the RICA (ERAS Zaragoza 2022) perioperative care pathway in adults undergoing urgent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The study aims to describe real-world adherence to the pathway across participating hospitals and to explore its association with patient safety and recovery outcomes.

Key outcomes include postoperative complications (including severity), length of hospital stay, and readmissions within 30 days. Patient-reported satisfaction is also assessed using a structured survey. In addition, the study evaluates the feasibility of early discharge/ambulatory management by intention-to-treat, using a standardized checklist of clinical, functional, and social discharge criteria assessed during the first 24 hours after surgery.

No changes to usual clinical care are introduced. Data are collected from routine perioperative management and follow-up.

Read the detailed description

APENERAS is a prospective, multicenter observational study conducted in adult patients undergoing urgent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The study assesses real-world adherence to the RICA (ERAS Zaragoza 2022) pathway, a structured set of perioperative recommendations intended to optimize recovery and standardize care in urgent surgery settings.

The primary objective is to quantify overall adherence and adherence by individual components of the pathway. Secondary objectives include evaluating the association between adherence and (1) postoperative safety outcomes (complications and severity classification), (2) efficiency outcomes (length of stay), (3) unplanned healthcare use (readmissions within 30 days), and (4) patient experience (satisfaction survey completed at discharge). In addition, feasibility of early discharge/ambulatory management is assessed by intention-to-treat using a standardized discharge-readiness checklist (clinical stability, pain control with oral analgesia, oral tolerance, mobilization, spontaneous urination, wound status, and social support), evaluated during the first postoperative day.

Candidate profiles for early discharge are also explored using established clinical prediction tools (e.g., Saint-Antoine Score), together with demographic and clinical covariates. Follow-up is performed up to 30 days after surgery to capture postoperative events and readmissions.

This study does not involve any experimental intervention, drug, or device, and does not require changes to standard clinical practice. It is based on systematic data collection from routine care processes and clinical records in each participating center.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Appendicitis
  • Appendectomy
  • Ambulatory Surgery

Keywords

  • ERAS
  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • RICA
  • urgent surgery
  • uncomplicated appendicitis
  • laparoscopic appendectomy
  • clinical pathway
  • adherence
  • early discharge
  • 30-day outcomes
  • patient satisfaction
  • Recuperación intensificada en Cirugía del Adulto
03

In context

Appendicitis

419 studies on the registry are indexed under Appendicitis; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 199 is close to the median of 200 across 151 observational studies indexed under Appendicitis.

Browse Appendicitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo is the lead sponsor of 30 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults aged 18-75 years undergoing urgent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in participating hospitals. The study evaluates adherence to the RICA (ERAS Zaragoza 2022) pathway in routine clinical practice, early discharge feasibility (8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery), and safety outcomes (complications, readmissions, reinterventions, and mortality) up to 30 days after surgery. No experimental intervention is introduced.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years.
  • Immunocompetent patients.
  • I-III.
  • Preoperative diagnosis of uncomplicated acute appendicitis (based on clinical assessment, laboratory tests, and imaging such as ultrasound and/or CT according to availability).
  • Indication for urgent appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis.
  • Laparoscopic approach.
  • Expected operative time \< 90 minutes.
  • Cooperative patient able to understand and follow instructions.
  • Voluntary participation and written .
  • Adequate social/family support (availability of a responsible adult for transport home and support during the first postoperative days).
  • Travel time from home to hospital \< 1 hour and access to transportation.
  • Acceptable home environment for recovery (telephone access and basic habitability/hygiene).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • IV.
  • Age \< 18 years or > 75 years.
  • > 35 kg/m² with significant respiratory or cardiovascular complications.
  • Ischemic heart disease class IV or acute myocardial infarction within the last 6 months.
  • Congestive heart failure class III-IV.
  • Sleep apnea or severe , or need for home oxygen therapy.
  • Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus.
  • Severe psychiatric disorders, drug addiction, or severe alcoholism.
  • History of major anesthesia-related complications or malignant hyperthermia.
  • Epilepsy.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Use of anticoagulants, MAO inhibitors, systemic , or drugs.
  • Complicated appendicitis (gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, abscess, diffuse peritonitis).
  • Severe sepsis.
  • Primary open appendectomy or conversion to open surgery.
  • Positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR or symptoms compatible with COVID-19.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
199 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Urgent Uncomplicated Appendectomy Cohort

    Adults undergoing urgent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in participating hospitals. Perioperative management follows routine clinical practice. The adherence to the RICA (ERAS) pathway items is assessed, along with safety outcomes and early discharge feasibility.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall adherence to the RICA (ERAS Zaragoza 2022) pathway

    Overall adherence will be quantified as the proportion (%) of prespecified RICA (ERAS Zaragoza 2022) items fulfilled per participant and overall, using the study case report form. Adherence will be reported as a global percentage and by individual pathway components.

    Time frame: From day of surgery through postoperative day 1 or hospital discharge (whichever occurs first).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Early discharge feasibility at 8, 12 and 24 hours after surgery

    Feasibility of early discharge will be assessed by intention-to-treat using a standardized discharge-readiness checklist (clinical stability, respiratory stability, orientation, mobility, oral intake, urination, wound status, and social support/logistics). The proportion of patients meeting all criteria at each timepoint (8h, 12h, 24h) will be reported.

    Time frame: 8, 12 and 24 hours after surgery.

  2. Postoperative complications and severity (Clavien-Dindo)

    Postoperative complications will be recorded and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.

  3. Length of hospital stay

    Length of stay will be measured as time from surgery to hospital discharge (reported in days and/or hours as available).

    Time frame: From surgery to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.

  4. Readmission within 30 days

    Unplanned readmissions for any cause will be recorded.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.

  5. Patient satisfaction score

    Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a structured survey delivered at hospital discharge and collected during postoperative follow-up. The overall satisfaction score (0-10 scale) and relevant domains will be analyzed. Higher scores indicate greater patient satisfaction.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.

  6. Saint-Antoine Score for early discharge eligibility prediction within 24 hours after surgery

    The Saint-Antoine Score is a 5-point preoperative clinical score (range: 0 to 5) calculated at baseline (immediately before surgery) as the sum of five low-risk criteria (each criterion = 1 point; total score 0-5). Higher scores indicate a greater likelihood of eligibility for unplanned early discharge within 24 hours (better discharge readiness/lower-risk profile). Lower scores indicate a lower likelihood of early discharge eligibility. Predictive performance will be described (e.g., proportion eligible across score categories and discrimination metrics, as applicable).

    Time frame: Baseline (preoperative; assessed immediately before surgery).

  7. Reintervention within 30 days

    Any unplanned reintervention after the index appendectomy, including surgical reoperation (e.g., re-laparoscopy/laparotomy) and other invasive procedures (e.g., percutaneous drainage), will be recorded.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.

  8. All-cause mortality within 30 days

    All-cause mortality will be recorded.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Hospital General Universitario de Elche
    Elche, Alicante 03203, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari d'Igualada
    Igualada, Barcelona 08700, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí
    Sabadell, Barcelona 08208, Spain
  • Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo
    Galdakao, Vizcaya 48960, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Postigo-Morales S, Ugarte-Sierra B, San-Juan-Gonzalez M, Ramirez-Rodriguez JM. [Implementation of the ERAS pathway in emergency surgery: adherence, barriers and facilitators]. J Healthc Qual Res. 2026 Jan-Feb;41(1):101170. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101170. Epub 2025 Oct 31. Spanish. PubMed 41175821 ↗
  • Scott MJ, Aggarwal G, Aitken RJ, Anderson ID, Balfour A, Foss NB, Cooper Z, Dhesi JK, French WB, Grant MC, Hammarqvist F, Hare SP, Havens JM, Holena DN, Hubner M, Johnston C, Kim JS, Lees NP, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Mohseni S, Ordonez CA, Quiney N, Sharoky C, Urman RD, Wick E, Wu CL, Young-Fadok T, Peden CJ. Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society Recommendations Part 2-Emergency Laparotomy: Intra- and Postoperative Care. World J Surg. 2023 Aug;47(8):1850-1880. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07020-6. Epub 2023 Jun 5. PubMed 37277507 ↗
  • Raimbert P, Voron T, Laroche S, O'Connell L, Debove C, Challine A, Parc Y, Lefevre JH. Ambulatory appendectomy for acute appendicitis: Can we treat all the patients? A prospective study of 451 consecutive ambulatory appendectomies out of nearly 2,000 procedures. Surgery. 2023 May;173(5):1129-1136. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Feb 10. PubMed 36775758 ↗
  • Gignoux B, Blanchet MC, Lanz T, Vulliez A, Saffarini M, Bothorel H, Robert M, Frering V. Should ambulatory appendectomy become the standard treatment for acute appendicitis? World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Jun 28;13:28. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0191-4. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29988464 ↗
  • Ruiz-Tovar J, Llavero C, Perez-Lopez M, Garcia-Marin A. Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for acute complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Sep;25(9):1073-1078. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02484-x. Epub 2021 Jun 26. PubMed 34173925 ↗
  • Trejo-Avila ME, Romero-Loera S, Cardenas-Lailson E, Blas-Franco M, Delano-Alonso R, Valenzuela-Salazar C, Moreno-Portillo M. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol allows ambulatory laparoscopic appendectomy in uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):429-436. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6315-9. Epub 2018 Jul 9. PubMed 29987566 ↗
  • Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A, Boermeester M, Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Tarasconi A, De' Angelis N, Weber DG, Tolonen M, Birindelli A, Biffl W, Moore EE, Kelly M, Soreide K, Kashuk J, Ten Broek R, Gomes CA, Sugrue M, Davies RJ, Damaskos D, Leppaniemi A, Kirkpatrick A, Peitzman AB, Fraga GP, Maier RV, Coimbra R, Chiarugi M, Sganga G, Pisanu A, De' Angelis GL, Tan E, Van Goor H, Pata F, Di Carlo I, Chiara O, Litvin A, Campanile FC, Sakakushev B, Tomadze G, Demetrashvili Z, Latifi R, Abu-Zidan F, Romeo O, Segovia-Lohse H, Baiocchi G, Costa D, Rizoli S, Balogh ZJ, Bendinelli C, Scalea T, Ivatury R, Velmahos G, Andersson R, Kluger Y, Ansaloni L, Catena F. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3. PubMed 32295644 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in publications will be shared. The shared dataset will contain coded study IDs and will exclude direct identifiers (e.g., name, medical record number, address). Variables will be minimized/modified as needed to reduce re-identification risk in accordance with GDPR and institutional policies.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Available beginning 12 months after publication of the primary results and for 5 years thereafter.

Access criteria: Access will be granted to researchers with a clear research question and an appropriate analysis plan, subject to review and approval by the study team and compliance with GDPR and applicable institutional policies. Data will be provided in de-identified form after completion of a data sharing agreement. Requests should be submitted by email to: estudioapeneras@gmail.com

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Enrollment
193→199
Nov 6, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 time frame changed
What changed in the outcomes
  • Time frameOverall adherence to the RICA (ERAS Zaragoza 2022) pathwayFrom day of surgery through postoperative day 2 or hospital discharge (whichever occurs first). → From day of surgery through postoperative day 1 or hospital discharge (whichever occurs first).
Nov 6, 2026
Secondary outcomes
2 time frame changed, 1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • Time frameLength of hospital stayTime from surgery (Day 0) to hospital discharge (index hospitalization); assessed at discharge (followed until discharge, up to 30 days post-surgery). → From surgery to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.
  • Time frameReadmission within 30 daysUp to 30 days after discharge. → Up to 30 days after surgery.
  • DescriptionPatient satisfaction score: how it is measured was reworded
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    Enrollment 193→199
    Primary outcomes 1 time frame changed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • Time frameOverall adherence to the RICA (ERAS Zaragoza 2022) pathwayFrom day of surgery through postoperative day 2 or hospital discharge (whichever occurs first). → From day of surgery through postoperative day 1 or hospital discharge (whichever occurs first).
    Secondary outcomes 2 time frame changed, 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • Time frameLength of hospital stayTime from surgery (Day 0) to hospital discharge (index hospitalization); assessed at discharge (followed until discharge, up to 30 days post-surgery). → From surgery to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.
    • Time frameReadmission within 30 daysUp to 30 days after discharge. → Up to 30 days after surgery.
    • DescriptionPatient satisfaction score: how it is measured was reworded
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07401407
Lead sponsor
Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo
Collaborators
Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal
Responsible party
Susana Postigo Morales (Staff Anesthesiologist, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 10, 2026
Start date
Dec 7, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 27, 2025
Completion
Feb 26, 2025
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Bakarne Ugarte-Sierra, PhD
study director · Grupo español de rehabilitación multimodal (GERM)
José Manuel Ramírez-Rodríguez, PhD
study director · Grupo español de rehabilitación multimodal (GERM)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion