ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07400198Updated Mar 18, 2026

Gait and Bone Health in SMA

An observational study in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3 and Ambulatory Spinal Muscular Atrophy, sponsored by Jacqueline Montes. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-18.

Sponsored by Jacqueline Montes · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
22
Ages
8 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to understand how spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters are associated with bone health in pwSMA who are receiving DMT. We hypothesize that gait parameters are associated with BMD and can determine fracture risk in pwSMA. This is an observational study that involves one in-clinic visit (approximately 3 hours) with remote follow-up visits (approximately 15 minutes) every 3 months for 1 year to collect fracture and medical history. Each of the assessments included in this study are non-interventional and are not intended as a treatment nor are they at the level of standard of care.

Read the detailed description

Addressing bone health is a high priority and remains a concern for the SMA community despite the availability of DMTs. Fractures often have devastating, irrecoverable impacts on function, especially in ambulatory pwSMA. While the most recent standards of care for SMA recommend annual screening, supportive treatments are not recommended until there has been a fracture, a reactive approach which may not be enough to mitigate LBM. Implementing novel, wearable technology and machine learning (ML) models to identify fracture risk will lead to a proactive approach to manage bone health and attenuate the negative sequalae of fractures. This is an observational cross-sectional study of ambulatory children and adults with SMA. The aims of this study are to (1) Identify gait-related digital biomarkers of bone health in ambulatory pwSMA, (2) Determine the ability of digital biomarkers to differentiate between pwSMA with and without a history of fractures, and (3) Investigate the ability of risk profiles derived from the digital biomarkers to predict prospective fractures over one year.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 3
  • Ambulatory Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Keywords

  • spinal muscular atrophy
  • SMA
  • instrumented insole
  • bone health
  • fracture
  • bone mineral density
  • gait
  • low bone mass
03

In context

Spinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood

61 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 22 is below the median of 82 across 19 observational studies indexed under Spinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood.

Browse Spinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Jacqueline Montes as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study sample will include 22 ambulatory SMA participants.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed diagnosis of 5qSMA
  • Between 8 and 50 years of age
  • Able to walk 10 meters without support or an assistive device
  • All participants who meet the inclusion criteria regardless of treatment status will be included, including those on therapies, whether or approved

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Injury or surgery within previous 3 months that would impact ability to perform in-clinic gait assessments
  • Unwilling or unable to comply with all study procedures
  • Age less than 8 or over 50 years
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
22 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy

    Ambulatory children and adults at least 8 years old by the time of enrollment with genetically confirmed SMA.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA)

    Bone mineral density (BMD), a measure of the mineral content in bones is assessed using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA can be used to identify individuals with low bone mass (LBM). DXA uses low-power x-ray and is a safe and reliable measure validated to diagnose osteoporosis. DXA provides a t-score and z-score so that based on age, low bone mass can be appropriately determined. DXA also provides a subtotal BMD score as well as scores specific to certain body regions, both of which will be utilized in the first aim.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Blood collection

    Blood will be collected to assess for routine markers related to bone mineral density. Blood will be tested for levels of calcium, vitamin D, bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP), and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx). The amount of blood collected will be within hospital rules for children. The total amount of blood will be approximately 2 mL or 1/2 a teaspoon. BALP is a bone formation marker while CTx is a bone resorption marker. Calcium and vitamin D are known to be positively associated with BMD.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Fracture history

    Details regarding lifetime fracture history will be collected via questioning at the in-clinic visit and during remote follow up visits, every three months for one year. The participant will be asked to describe each incident separately, including the age at fracture, mechanism of injury (how it happened, its nature, and force), any preceding events like falls or dizziness, and associated symptoms. Fractures will be characterized by location, type and treatment (surgical or conservative).

    Time frame: Baseline, months 3, 6, 9, and 12

  4. Fall history

    Details regarding falls, that occurred within the past year, will be collected using a structured questionnaire at the in-clinic visit and during the one-year follow-up. Falls will be described by mechanism, environment and outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, months 3, 6, 9 and 12

  5. Collection of spatiotempoal and kinetic gait parameters using instrumented insoles (AI-Sole)

    Stride-by-stride spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters will be collected with AI-Sole continuously during the 6MWT. Spatiotemporal parameters included stride length (SL), stride velocity (SV), percent time in stance phase (%St), and percent time in terminal double support (%DS). Kinetic parameters included the anteroposterior (AP-COP) and mediolateral (ML-COP) ranges of the center-of-pressure normalized by shoe size, as well as the Absolute COP-Cyclogram Asymmetry Index (\|ASI\|).

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Six Minute Walk Test

    Participants will complete the six minute walk test in a corridor which includes the instrumented walkway, while wearing the insoles. This is to measure spatial parameters, kinetic parameters, temporal parameters, and metrics of cumulative activity in order to compare against the gold standard instrumented walkway. The six minute walk test is an objective evaluation of functional exercise capacity, and measures the maximum distance a person can walk in six minutes over a 25 meter course.

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. IPAQ-SF

    A quantitative assessment of usual physical activity will be captured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF).The IPAQ-SF is a commonly used self-administered questionnaire designed to obtain internationally comparable data on health-related physical activity. The IPAQ-SF is composed of seven questions from four domains of physical activity, including vigorous and moderate physical activity, walking physical activity, and sitting time. A weighted total from vigorous physical activity, moderate physical activity, and walking physical activity is calculated to produce a total amount of physical activity in MET-min/week.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ten Meter Walk Run (10MWR)

    The 10MWR is an objective evaluation of function that measures the speed at which an individual can complete 10 meters. Gait speed is a commonly used indicator in NMD, and this test can be done by either walking or running. The 10MWR has been demonstrated to be safe to administer in individuals with SMA.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)

    The TUG test, a method to assess balance and mobility, measures the time it takes an individual to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, and sit down in the same chair. In SMA, TUG scores are associated with total leg and knee flexor strength, gross motor function, the 10-meter walk/run, and 6MWT. TUG test is a sensitive and reliable measure of functional impairment in inherited neuromuscular disorders.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. 30 Second Sit to Stand (30-STS)

    The 30-STS test is used to evaluate basic muscle power and function. The participant is to complete as many sit-to-stands as possible, with or without using their hands for support, in 30 seconds.

    Time frame: Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. SMA EFFORT

    The SMA EFFORT is a perceived physical fatigability patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that provides a percent (PPF%) total score to each participant based on their participation over the past 30 days. PPF% total scores are calculated as the sum of activity item ratings divided by the number of items rated multiplied by five (highest rating on Likert scale), with higher scores indicating greater perceived physical fatigability (PPF).Participants are instructed to not endorse any item that has not been performed in the past 30 days, ensuring a PPF% total score that is unique to their current level of function. In addition to the PPF% total score (across all activities performed), PPF% subscale scores corresponding to the specific activities across 4 different domains of function are similarly derived (Exercise/Recreation, Mobility, Postural Control, and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07400198
Lead sponsor
Jacqueline Montes
Collaborators
Biogen
Responsible party
Jacqueline Montes (Professor of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 10, 2026
Start date
Mar 5, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 18, 2026

Study contacts

Cara Kanner, PT, DPT, EdD
Contact
chy2112@cumc.columbia.edu
516-581-8150

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion