ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07399626Updated Feb 10, 2026

Adaptation and Validation of the Hypomanic Personality Scale (HPS-6) to Romanian

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Hypomanic Personality Scale - 6 in Bipolar Disorder (BD), sponsored by Babes-Bolyai University. Recruiting at 1 site in Romania. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-10.

Sponsored by Babes-Bolyai University · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2025, registered Jan 2026).
  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The HPS-6 (Hypomanic Personality Scale, 6 item version) could prove to be a valuable candidate for screening measures of high risk individuals. In the following study, we aim to validate and adapt the HPS-6 for the Romanian population.

Read the detailed description

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic, debilitating disorder, affecting approximately 2.4% of the global population. Inaccurate diagnosis leads to inappropriate management of the disorder as well as unsuitable medication prescription. On average, it can take a BD individual 5 to 10 years to receive an accurate diagnosis and receive competent treatment. Across the European Union (EU) Romania has the lowest prevalence of psychiatric disorders, 14.3%. Unfortunately, these positive estimates are related to the severe stigma linked to poor mental health in the Romanian population. Although the average length of a psychiatric stay in the EU spans across 24.3 days, Romania's average is 17.7. Poor infrastructure and lack of personnel in the Romanian healthcare system might be partially responsible. Therefore, brief, validated screening measures for complex diagnoses are necessary.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bipolar Disorder (BD)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • bipolar disorder
  • manic-depression
  • cyclothymia
03

In context

Bipolar Disorder

1,683 studies on the registry are indexed under Bipolar Disorder; 266 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 64 across 1,279 interventional studies indexed under Bipolar Disorder.

Browse Bipolar Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Babes-Bolyai University is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-50 years of age
  • Not at high risk of suicide (current)
  • Not high SUDs / AUDs (current)
  • Native Romanian speaker
  • Cognitive abilities intact (reading comprehension of items)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High risk of suicide (current)
  • High SUDs / AUDs (current)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Community Piloting

    Meant for piloting scale, EFA

    Diagnostic Test: Hypomanic Personality Scale - 6

  • Other
    Clinical / Risk Group

    Formally clinically evaluated sample, used for CFA

    Diagnostic Test: Hypomanic Personality Scale - 6

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testHypomanic Personality Scale - 6

    A brief instrument, such as the HPS-6, with high specificity can help navigate specialists towards a correct diagnosis or recognize risk patterns in Bipolar Spectrum Individuals.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hypomanic Personality Scale - 6 (HPS-6)

    The main instrument of the study, the HPS-6 is used to assess bipolar spectrum disorder risk due to and individual's phenotype. The scale contains 6 items and has a binary rating scale ("TRUE" / "FALSE"). The original authors used a cut-off of 3 or higher to represent possible risk for the disorder. Minimum score possible is 0, while the highest is 6.

    Time frame: Baseline and one month later for re-test measures (in order to account for test-retest reliability)

  2. Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ)

    In order to check for convergent validity, the Mood Disorder Questionnaire was administered as well. The instrument screens for a history of manic or hypomanic symptoms. It contains 13 yes or no items created based on the DSM-IV, followed by a 4-point Likert question on the level of impairment; "no problem" to "serious problem" and a 15th item asking is symptoms happened simultaneously. Studies recommend a cut-off of \>5 for high risk bipolar populations. The original cut-off of the scale is \>7, but it has been criticized for high specificity. The total score is 13 (MIN: 0, MAX: 13).

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Behavioral Inhibition System / Behavioral Activation System scales (BISBAS)

    The BIS / BAS scales assess two motivational systems, the Behavioral Inhibition System and the Behavioral Activation System. The scale contains 20 items in total. The BAS system, or the approach tendency, is hypothesized to facilitate goal-motivated behavior when presented with incentives, generating an increase in behaviors oriented towards goals, while the BIS motivational system activates inhibition tendencies. Higher scores indicate sensitivity to threats, non-reward (BIS) or the sensitivity towards reward and goal striving (BAS). Total possible score for the BIS subscale is 28 (MIN: 7, MAX: 28), while for the BAS subscale the total possible is 91 (MIN: 13, MAX: 91).

    Time frame: One month after Baseline

  4. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)

    The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report measure assessing positive and negative affect. Participants rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("very slightly or not at all") to 5 ("extremely"). Each subscale has a possible score range of 10 to 50. Higher PA scores reflect greater energy and concentration, whereas higher NA scores indicate greater levels of distress.

    Time frame: One month after Baseline.

  5. Negative Urgency, Premeditation, Perseverance, Sensations Seeking, and Positive Urgency - Impulsive Behavior Scale (UPPS-P)

    The UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale assesses positive and negative emotional urgency along with multiple dimensions of impulsivity. The full instrument includes 59 items across five subscales: Negative Urgency, Positive Urgency, (Lack of) Premeditation, (Lack of) Perseverance, and Sensation Seeking. A scoping review has shown that individuals with bipolar disorder exhibit elevated impulsivity during both positive and negative emotional states, with particularly large effect sizes observed for positive urgency. Because the HPS-6 focuses on positively valenced experiences, only the Positive Urgency subscale was administered in this study. Scores on this subscale range from 14 to 56, with higher average scores indicating greater impulsive tendencies.

    Time frame: One month after Baseline

  6. Affective Lability Scale - Short Form (ALS-18)

    The ALS-18 is an 18-item measure designed to assess shifts between neutral states and intense affect, emphasizing emotional variability rather than current symptom severity. It comprises three main subscales: Anxiety/Depression Shift (5 items), Depression/Elation Shift (8 items), and Anger (5 items). Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("very uncharacteristic of me") to 3 ("very characteristic of me"). The total raw score ranges from 0 to 54, with higher scores indicating greater affective lability, reflected in more frequent and intense mood shifts.

    Time frame: One month after Baseline

  7. Positive Overgeneralization (POG)

    The Positive Overgeneralization Scale (POG) measures the "tendency to generalize good experiences in one domain to broader aspects of life". it contains 3 subscales (lateral generalization, upward generalization and social generalization), comprising altogether 16 items. Lower scores represent a higher predisposition towards that type of positive overgeneralization (Subscale 1 - Lateral generalization: MAX - 30, MIN: 6 , Subscale 2 - Upward generalization: MAX - 25, MIN - 5, Subscale 3 - Social generalization: MAX - 25, MIN - 5).

    Time frame: One month after Baseline.

  8. Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale (ASRM)

    The instrument evaluates manic symptom presence and their severity using 5 items, rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Total scores span from 0 to 20, and scores of 6 or above suggest a possible presence of hypomanic or manic symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Food Neophobia Scale (FNS)

    The scale measures one's reluctance to try new or unfamiliar foods. The FNS consists of 10 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale. It has been widely used internationally across diverse fields. Five items assess neophobic behavior, defined as fear of new or unfamiliar experiences, while the remaining five assess neophilic behavior, reflecting interest in and enthusiasm for novelty. Higher FNS scores indicate greater levels of neophobia (MIN: 10, MAX: 70).

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 is a diagnostic tool for depression based on DSM-IV criteria. It includes nine items rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 3 ("Nearly every day"). Using the algorithm method, a diagnosis is indicated when five or more symptoms have been present for more than half of the days over the past two weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 21. Alternatively, the summed-item approach involves adding the item scores, with a commonly used cutoff of 10 points to indicate major depressive disorder.

    Time frame: Baseline

  11. Importance of Olfaction (IOS)

    The Importance of Olfaction scale assesses core olfactory functions. It consists of 18 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"). The scale was designed for use across different cultures and age groups. It includes five subscales reflecting various domains of the importance of smell (e.g., mating and bonding). Total scores range from 18 to 90, with higher scores indicating a greater personal importance attributed to the sense of smell.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ)

    We used 12 of the 13 subscales of the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ) to screen for additional psychiatric conditions. The depression subscale was excluded because depressive symptoms were assessed separately with the PHQ-9, and participants also underwent a formal clinical evaluation in which depression was examined in greater detail. The PDSQ is a self-administered screening instrument for common mental health disorders. The Romanian version includes 125 items, with higher scores indicating a greater risk for the respective disorder. Using these subscales, we assessed risk for PTSD, bulimia nervosa, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, psychosis, agoraphobia, social phobia, alcohol use disorder, medication abuse, generalized anxiety disorder, and hypochondria (health anxiety).

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Suicide Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R)

    The SBQ-R is a brief, four-item measure that assesses multiple dimensions of suicidality and provides an overall suicide risk score. Scores of 7 or higher indicate elevated risk in non-clinical samples, whereas a cutoff of 8 or higher is used for clinical samples. Participants were not excluded based on suicide risk, as doing so could introduce bias into the research. Total scores range from 3 to 18.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wang HR, Woo YS, Ahn HS, Ahn IM, Kim HJ, Bahk WM. THE VALIDITY OF THE MOOD DISORDER QUESTIONNAIRE FOR SCREENING BIPOLAR DISORDER: A META-ANALYSIS. Depress Anxiety. 2015 Jul;32(7):527-38. doi: 10.1002/da.22374. Epub 2015 May 22. PubMed 26010478 ↗
  • Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (1999). Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). APA PsycTests, 10. https://doi.org/10.1037/t06165-000
  • Manea L, Gilbody S, McMillan D. A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Jan-Feb;37(1):67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 23. PubMed 25439733 ↗
  • Levis B, Benedetti A, Thombs BD; DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration. Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019 Apr 9;365:l1476. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1476. PubMed 30967483 ↗
  • Pliner P, Hobden K. Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite. 1992 Oct;19(2):105-20. doi: 10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w. PubMed 1489209 ↗
  • Rabadán, A., & Bernabéu, R. (2021). A systematic review of studies using the Food Neophobia Scale: Conclusions from thirty years of studies. Food Quality and Preference, 93, 104241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104241
  • Sorokowski, P., Sorokowska, A., Misiak, M., & Roberts, S. C. (2023). Developmental changes in food and non-food odor importance-Data from Scotland and Pakistan. Food Quality and Preference, 111, 104963.
  • Meyer, T. D., & Baur, M. (2009). Positive and negative affect in individuals at high and low risk for bipolar disorders. Journal of Individual Differences, 30(3), 169-175.
  • Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. PubMed 3397865 ↗
  • Teh WL, Si SY, Liu J, Subramaniam M, Ho R. The clinical significance of emotional urgency in bipolar disorder: a scoping review. BMC Psychol. 2024 May 15;12(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01700-1. PubMed 38750587 ↗
  • Eisner LR, Johnson SL, Carver CS. Cognitive responses to failure and success relate uniquely to bipolar depression versus mania. J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 Feb;117(1):154-63. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.1.154. PubMed 18266493 ↗
  • Johnson, S. L., Turner, R. J., & Iwata, N. (2003). BIS/BAS levels and psychiatric disorder: An epidemiological study. Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 25(1), 25-36.
  • Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(2), 319.
  • Osman A, Bagge CL, Gutierrez PM, Konick LC, Kopper BA, Barrios FX. The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): validation with clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment. 2001 Dec;8(4):443-54. doi: 10.1177/107319110100800409. PubMed 11785588 ↗
  • Kwapil TR, Miller MB, Zinser MC, Chapman LJ, Chapman J, Eckblad M. A longitudinal study of high scorers on the hypomanic personality scale. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 May;109(2):222-6. PubMed 10895560 ↗
  • Schalet BD, Durbin CE, Revelle W. Multidimensional structure of the Hypomanic Personality Scale. Psychol Assess. 2011 Jun;23(2):504-22. doi: 10.1037/a0022301. PubMed 21480726 ↗
  • Berson TR, Sperry SH, Walsh MA, Kwapil TR. A critical examination of multidimensionality within the Hypomanic Personality Scale. Compr Psychiatry. 2022 May;115:152306. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2022.152306. Epub 2022 Mar 12. PubMed 35315343 ↗
  • Eckblad M, Chapman LJ. Development and validation of a scale for hypomanic personality. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986 Aug;95(3):214-22. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.95.3.214. No abstract available. PubMed 3745642 ↗
  • Matza LS, Rajagopalan KS, Thompson CL, de Lissovoy G. Misdiagnosed patients with bipolar disorder: comorbidities, treatment patterns, and direct treatment costs. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;66(11):1432-40. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n1114. PubMed 16420081 ↗
  • Miller CJ, Johnson SL, Kwapil TR, Carver CS. Three studies on self-report scales to detect bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2011 Feb;128(3):199-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 8. PubMed 20696479 ↗
  • Zhong Y, Chen Y, Su X, Wang M, Li Q, Shao Z, Sun L. Global, regional and national burdens of bipolar disorders in adolescents and young adults: a trend analysis from 1990 to 2019. Gen Psychiatr. 2024 Feb 21;37(1):e101255. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2023-101255. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38390238 ↗
  • Iovu MB, Breaz MA. The prevalence and burden of mental and substance use disorders in Romania: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Psychiatr Danub. 2019 Dec;31(4):457-464. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2019.457. PubMed 31698402 ↗
  • Iaru I, Bucsa C, Farcas A, Pop C, Cristina A, Armean S, Brumboiu I, Vostinaru O, Mogosan C. Utilization of psychotropic medicines in Romania during 1998-2018. Front Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 27;14:1157231. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1157231. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37050903 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Ethics regarding the limited clinical sample.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2026, 8 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 27, 2026
First posted
Feb 10, 2026
StartActual
Sep 22, 2025
Primary completionEst.
May 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 2026
Last update
Feb 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07399626
Lead sponsor
Babes-Bolyai University
Responsible party
Renata Gheorghiu (Principal Investigator, Babes-Bolyai University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 10, 2026
Start date
Sep 22, 2025
Primary completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 10, 2026

Study contacts

Renata Gheorghiu, PhD Student
Contact
renata.gheorghiu@ubbcluj.ro
Romania: 0731 739 485

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion