ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07379008Updated Jan 30, 2026

Safety and Efficacy of Non-Setting Paste in Bone Defect Reconstruction

An interventional study of Non-setting paste in Bone Diseases, Bone Cysts and Bone Neoplasm, sponsored by Biovico Sp. z o.o.. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-30.

Sponsored by Biovico Sp. z o.o. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2023, registered Jan 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel bone substitute material for the treatment of bone defects in patients requiring defect filling following the excision of benign bone tumors, cysts, or similar lesions.

A total of 29 patients will undergo surgical intervention during which the bone substitute paste is applied to the defect site. Patients will be followed for 12 months, with radiographic assessments to monitor bone healing. The primary objectives of the study are to assess the adequacy of bone regeneration and to evaluate the safety profile of the material.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, non-randomized, unblinded clinical trial evaluates a non-setting paste for bone defect reconstruction. The study is conducted at two centers in Poland (Gdańsk and Zgorzelec).

The study enrolls 29 patients aged 18-75 years who require bone defect filling following curettage of benign bone tumors and tumor-like lesions (cysts, chondromas, enchondromas). Patients with inflammatory conditions, autoimmune diseases, hypersensitivity to any components, or those using medications affecting bone remodeling are excluded.

Bone remodeling is assessed radiologically at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months using the modified four-grade Neer classification. Success is defined as achieving Grade I (>75% remodeling) or Grade II (51-75% remodeling) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include safety monitoring and patient satisfaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bone Diseases
  • Bone Cysts
  • Bone Neoplasm
  • Enchondromatosis
  • Bone Defects

Keywords

  • Bone substitute
  • Bone defect reconstruction
  • Benign bone tumor
  • Bone regeneration
  • Osteoconductivity
  • Injectable bone graft
  • Bone remodeling
03

In context

Bone Diseases

177 studies on the registry are indexed under Bone Diseases; 38 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 53 across 113 interventional studies indexed under Bone Diseases.

Browse Bone Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Biovico Sp. z o.o. is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Qualified for bone defect filling procedures of various origins (e.g., bone void reconstruction following curettage of benign bone tumors, cysts, chondromas)
  • Age 18 to 75 years
  • Signed form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute or chronic inflammatory conditions in the surgical area
  • Systemic inflammatory and diseases
  • Severe degenerative diseases
  • Confirmed to product components
  • Skin inflammation or dermatological disease at the surgical site
  • Use of medications that may affect bone remodeling (e.g., bisphosphonates)
  • Use of -based medications
  • Participation in another clinical trial
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding status
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Study group

    A total of 29 patients, aged 18 to 75, who required bone defect filling following curettage of benign bone tumors or tumor-like lesions, underwent surgical implantation of a non-setting bone substitute paste to fill the resulting defects.

    Device: Non-setting paste

Interventions

  • DeviceNon-setting paste

    Non-setting paste is injected into bone defects during surgical procedures for bone void reconstruction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of Non-setting Paste in Bone Defect Remodeling at 12 Months

    Success is defined as achieving Grade I (\>75% bone remodeling with \>75% material resorption) or Grade II (51-75% bone remodeling with 51-75% material resorption) according to the modified four-grade Neer classification system, assessed by radiographic examination with independent expert review.

    Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety profile assessment

    Comprehensive monitoring of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) using the MedDRA classification system.

    Time frame: Throughout 12-month study period

  2. Bone remodeling progression at 6 weeks and 6 months

    Assessment using modified Neer classification (Grade I-IV) by radiographic examination at 6 weeks and 6 months post-surgery to evaluate the progression of bone healing over time.

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 6 months post-implantation

  3. Patient Satisfaction

    Evaluation of patient satisfaction with clinical trial participation and treatment outcomes using structured questionnaires.

    Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

  4. Treatment discontinuation rate

    Number and percentage of patients who discontinue treatment due to device-related adverse events.

    Time frame: Throughout 12-month study period

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Gdansk
    Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship 80-803, Poland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2023 to primary completion in Nov 2025, 32 months.

Of 25 interventional studies with no phase under Bone Diseases, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 54. This study's 32 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 23, 2026
First posted
Jan 30, 2026
StartActual
Feb 28, 2023
Primary completionActual
Nov 12, 2025
CompletionActual
Nov 12, 2025
Last update
Jan 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07379008
Lead sponsor
Biovico Sp. z o.o.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 30, 2026
Start date
Feb 28, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 12, 2025
Completion
Nov 12, 2025
Last update
Jan 30, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion