ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07378904ISWI-MorphUpdated Jan 30, 2026

Sterile Water Injection vs Morphine for Renal Colic

An interventional study of Single Intradermal Sterile Water Injection and Multiple Intradermal Sterile Water Injections in Renal Colic and Urolithiasis, sponsored by University Tunis El Manar. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Tunisia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-30.

Sponsored by University Tunis El Manar · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to compare intradermal sterile water injections (ISWI) with intravenous morphine for pain relief in adults with acute renal colic caused by urinary stones. Renal colic is a common emergency characterized by sudden, severe flank pain. Rapid and effective pain control is critical for proper diagnosis and treatment.

Traditional pain management uses NSAIDs or opioids like morphine, which can cause side effects or be limited in certain patients. ISWI is a simple, low-cost, non-systemic method that may provide rapid pain relief by stimulating skin nerves, which can reduce pain signals in the spinal cord and brain.

In this randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, adult patients with confirmed renal stones and pain ≥4/10 on the visual analog scale (VAS) will be assigned to one of three groups:

  1. Single ISWI injection
  2. Four ISWI injections
  3. Intravenous morphine

Pain will be measured at 5, 30, 45, and 90 minutes after treatment. The main goal is to determine whether ISWI is not inferior to morphine in reducing pain at 30 minutes. Secondary goals include comparing the speed and intensity of pain relief between one versus four injections, the need for additional pain medication, and patient satisfaction.

All patients will be monitored for safety, and adverse effects will be recorded. The study follows strict ethical guidelines, including informed consent.

If successful, ISWI could provide a safe, effective, and easily available alternative to morphine for rapid pain relief in renal colic, with minimal side effects, and guide the best injection strategy for optimal patient comfort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Renal Colic
  • Urolithiasis

Keywords

  • Renal Colic
  • Urinary Stones
  • Intradermal Sterile Water Injection
  • Intravenous Morphine
  • Pain Management
03

In context

Renal Colic

79 studies on the registry are indexed under Renal Colic; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 118 across 60 interventional studies indexed under Renal Colic.

Browse Renal Colic studies →

Lead sponsor

University Tunis El Manar is the lead sponsor of 74 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Acute renal colic with pain score ≥ 4 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
  • Urolithiasis confirmed by low-dose abdominopelvic CT scan
  • Ability to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of urinary stones on imaging
  • Known allergy or to morphine or sterile water injection
  • Severe renal failure
  • Local skin infection at the injection site
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Inability to understand the study or provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Single Intradermal Sterile Water Injection (1 ISWI)

    Participants receive 0.5 ml of sterile water injected intradermally at the point of maximal pain in the thoraco-lumbar region (T11-L4). Pain relief is assessed at 5, 30, 45, and 90 minutes.

    Procedure: Single Intradermal Sterile Water Injection

  • Experimental
    Multiple Intradermal Sterile Water Injections (4 ISWI)

    Participants receive 1 ml of sterile water divided into four intradermal injections of 0.25 ml each, spaced around the point of maximal pain in the thoraco-lumbar region (T11-L4). Pain relief is assessed at 5, 30, 45, and 90 minutes.

    Procedure: Multiple Intradermal Sterile Water Injections

  • Active comparator
    Intravenous Morphine

    Participants receive intravenous morphine at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg, administered according to local emergency protocols. Pain relief is assessed at 5, 30, 45, and 90 minutes.

    Drug: Intravenous Morphine

Interventions

  • ProcedureSingle Intradermal Sterile Water Injection

    single 0.5 ml sterile water injection is administered intradermally at the point of maximal pain in the thoraco-lumbar region (T11-L4). Pain will be assessed at 5, 30, 45, and 90 minutes.

  • ProcedureMultiple Intradermal Sterile Water Injections

    1 ml sterile water is divided into four intradermal injections of 0.25 ml each, spaced around the point of maximal pain in the thoraco-lumbar region (T11-L4). Pain will be assessed at 5, 30, 45, and 90 minutes.

  • Morphine is administered intravenously at 0.1 mg/kg according to local emergency protocols. Pain will be assessed at 5, 30, 45, and 90 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Reduction at 30 Minutes (VAS)

    Change in pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from baseline (before intervention) to 30 minutes after treatment. A decrease of ≥2 points on the VAS is considered effective analgesia.

    Time frame: 30 minutes after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Reduction at Other Time Points (VAS)

    Proportion of participants requiring additional pain medication during the 90-minute observation period after the assigned intervention.

    Time frame: 5, 45, and 90 minutes after intervention

  2. Need for Rescue Analgesics

    Proportion of participants requiring additional pain medication during the 5, 30, 45, and 90 minutes observation period after the assigned intervention.

    Time frame: 5, 30, 45, and 90 minutes after intervention

  3. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient-reported satisfaction with pain management, measured on a 5-point Likert scale at the end of observation (90 minutes).

    Time frame: 90 minutes after intervention

  4. Adverse Events

    All treatment-related adverse events, including injection site pain, nausea, hypotension, or other complications, monitored at 5, 30, 45, and 90 minutes post-intervention.

    Time frame: 5, 30, 45, and 90 minutes after intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Comparison of Analgesic Effect: Single vs Four ISWI

    Change in pain intensity (VAS) at 5, 30, 45, and 90 minutes comparing participants receiving a single intradermal sterile water injection (0.5 ml) versus four injections (0.25 ml each, total 1 ml). This assesses whether multiple injections provide faster or greater pain relief than a single injection.

    Time frame: 5, 30, 45, and 90 minutes after intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Habib Thameur Teaching Hospital
    Tunis, Tunis Governorate 1008, Tunisia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Golcuk Y, Demir A, Yildirim B, Acar E. Intradermal sterile water injection in acute renal colic. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Feb;40:204. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.060. Epub 2020 May 25. No abstract available. PubMed 32571630 ↗
  • Perros I, Sokhal BS, Swift C, Kitchen M, Mallen C, Somani B. Sterile water injections for analgesia in renal colic: a meta-analysis of level 1 evidence. World J Urol. 2025 Sep 16;43(1):557. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05920-x. PubMed 40956348 ↗
  • Aykanat MC, Kilic M, Cimilli Ozturk T, Ustaalioglu I, Ak R. The efficacy of intradermal sterile water application in severe renal colic: a randomised clinical trial. Urolithiasis. 2023 Oct 12;51(1):121. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01496-6. PubMed 37823931 ↗
  • Moussa M, Papatsoris AG, Chakra MA. Intradermal sterile water injection versus diclofenac sodium in acute renal colic pain: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;44:395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.079. Epub 2020 Apr 29. PubMed 32444296 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 5 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 22, 2026
First posted
Jan 30, 2026
StartActual
Jan 20, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 30, 2026
Last update
Jan 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07378904
Lead sponsor
University Tunis El Manar
Responsible party
Sami Chebbi (Dr, University Tunis El Manar) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 30, 2026
Start date
Jan 20, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 30, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion