ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07372300mEHTUpdated Jan 28, 2026

Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia in Combination With Multimodal Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of Hyperthermia in Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma, sponsored by Shih-Kai Hung. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-28.

Sponsored by Shih-Kai Hung · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2025, registered Jan 2026).
  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
126
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate if the addition of modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) improves tumor down-staging and pathological response in adult patients (20 years and above) with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (cT3N0M0 with high risk of recurrence, cT3N1-2M0, or cT4N0-2M0). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the addition of mEHT to the Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) regimen significantly increase the rate of tumor down-staging (ypT and ypN) compared to TNT alone?
  • Does the combination therapy improve the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and long-term outcomes (such as disease-free survival) compared to standard TNT?

Researchers will compare participants randomized to receive Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) plus mEHT using the Oncotherm EHY-2030 device to participants receiving TNT alone to see if the adjunctive mEHT therapy enhances tumor regression and improves patient prognosis. Participants will be randomized (1:1) into one of the two groups and will undergo the following regimen:

  • Receive standard TNT, which includes 5-6 weeks of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by 4-6 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Patients in the experimental group will receive mEHT twice a week during the CRT period.
Read the detailed description

This study is designed as a pivotal Phase 3, open-label, two-treatment group, multi-institute randomized control trial (1:1).

Study Population \& Allocation:

Participants with pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma who are recommended for TNT by a specialist surgeon will be included. Patients are randomly allocated (1:1) into either the Experimental Arm (TNT + mEHT combination) or the Control Arm (TNT alone).

Intervention and Device:

Modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT, trade name Oncotherm) will be delivered using the Oncotherm EHY-2030 device. This technique uses electromagnetic waves at 13.56 MHz and incorporates a low-frequency current wave to deliver energy selectively to the cancerous area. The Oncotherm computer system automatically adjusts the optimal frequency, introducing random resonance to heat the tumor tissue and improve the tumor microenvironment. Local hyperthermia is intended to control tumors by raising the local body temperature to 39℃-42℃.

We hypothesized that the combination of hyperthermia with other treatments (such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy) can improve treatment outcome without additional toxicity. Patients in the Experimental Arm will receive mEHT twice a week specifically during the CRT period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma

Keywords

  • Rectal cancer
  • Hyperthermia
  • Neoadjuvant
  • Radiotherapy
  • Downstaging
03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

2,400 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 587 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 126 is above the median of 65 across 1,751 interventional studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Shih-Kai Hung as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age: 20 years and above
  2. Gender: Not restricted
  3. Initial pathological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum
  4. Expected survival ≥ six months
  5. Clinical staging of cT3N0 with high recurrence risk or cT3N1-2 or cT4N0-2 rectal cancer, requiring therapy, without distant ; must meet the following tumor definitions [staging system according to the 8th edition of the AJCC staging manual]:

    1. cT3: Tumor invades through the muscularis propria into pericolorectal tissues
    2. cT4a: Tumor invades through the visceral peritoneum (including gross perforation of the bowel through tumor and continuous invasion of tumor through areas of inflammation to the surface of the visceral peritoneum)
    3. cT4b: Tumor directly invades or adheres to adjacent organs or structures *High recurrence risk factors: cT3 tumor ≤ 5 cm from the anal verge or MRI showing circumferential resection margin (CRM) \< 0.2 cm; cT4 tumor or cN2, presence of MRI showing extramural vascular invasion.

7. performance status: 0 - 2 8. Healthy condition suitable for standard treatment, including 25 to 30 fractions of long-course radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy (capecitabine or fluorouracil) and subsequent 4- to 6-month chemotherapy, including modified FOLFOX-6 or CAPEOX 9. Willingness to participate in the clinical trial and signed the form for the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (e) Active infection or severe underlying disease making the patient unsuitable for the trial treatments
  • Known infection
  • Untreated thyroid disease
  • Active Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis
  • Other systemic diseases 9. History of any physical or mental disorder resulting the patient unable to understand or comply with trial requirements, or diminished social communication ability, or unable to provide 10. Known allergic reaction to trial medications 11. Pregnant or breastfeeding women 12. Substance or alcohol dependence within six months before screening 13. Inability to comply with treatment, assessments, or follow-up
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
126 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TNT + mEHT

    Participants receive standard TNT with modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT). This includes long-course CRT with concurrent mEHT, twice weekly, for 5-6 weeks, followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (4-6 months), and finally surgery. Chemoradiation therapy phase Drug: Capecitabine or Tegafur/ Uracil or Fluorouracil (5-FU) + Leucrorin (LV) concomitant with RT Procedure: Radiotherapy Total radiation dose of 45-50.4 Gy delivered in 25-28 fractions to the pelvis, and the dose of 52-56 Gy for gross tumor volumes and positive lymph nodes. Device: Oncotherm Modulated EHY-2030 Oncotherm device is working on a radiofrequency of 13.56 MHz. Treatments are administered twice weekly during the 5-6-week CRT phase. Each session lasts 60 minutes Neoadjuvant systemic therapy: 4-6 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using CAPEOX or mFOLFOX 6 regimens following CRT Surgery: Total mesorectal excision (TME) performed after the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

    Device: Hyperthermia

  • No intervention
    TNT alone

    Participants receive standard TNT without modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT). This includes long-course CRT with concurrent mEHT, twice weekly, for 5-6 weeks, followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (4-6 months), and finally surgery. Chemoradiation therapy phase Drug: Capecitabine or Tegafur/ Uracil or Fluorouracil (5-FU) + Leucrorin (LV) concomitant with RT Procedure: Radiotherapy Total radiation dose of 45-50.4 Gy delivered in 25-28 fractions to the pelvis, and the dose of 52-56 Gy for gross tumor volumes and positive lymph nodes. Device: Oncotherm Modulated EHY-2030 Neoadjuvant systemic therapy: 4-6 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using CAPEOX or mFOLFOX 6 regimens following CRT Surgery: Total mesorectal excision (TME) performed after the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Interventions

  • DeviceHyperthermia

    Modulated electro-hyperthermia, 2 times weekly for 6 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Down-staging Rate

    Evaluation of the decrease in ypT and ypN staging for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following the current recommended treatment method, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). The ycT and ycN staging will be assessed using MRI within three months post-treatment for patients who do not undergo surgery.

    Time frame: Time Frame: 9 months from the date of randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate.

    A pCR must include no gross or microscopic tumor identified anywhere within the surgical specimen. This must include: * No evidence of malignant cells in the primary tumor specimen AND * No evidence of malignant cells in the lymph nodes.

    Time frame: 9 months from the date of randomization

  2. Treatment Response Patterns

    Using the Dworak Scale, defined as "good tumor shrinkage" with Grade 3 and Grade 4.

    Time frame: 9 months

  3. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS is defined as time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause.

    Time frame: 12, 36, 60 months from the date of randomization

  4. Disease-Free Survival (DFS)

    DFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of local recurrence, regional recurrence, distant recurrence or death due to all causes whichever comes first. Patients who fail to return for evaluation after beginning therapy will be censored for DFS on the last day of therapy.

    Time frame: 12, 36, 60 months from the date of randomization

  5. Local Control Rate (LCR)

    LCR is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documentation of local recurrence.

    Time frame: Time Frame: 12, 36, 60 months from the date of randomization.

  6. Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS)

    DMFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documentation of distant metastasis.

    Time frame: 12, 36, 60 months from the date of randomization

  7. Colostomy-Free Survival (CFS)

    CFS is defined as being alive without a colostomy, excluding colostomies reversed during follow-up.

    Time frame: 12, 36, 60 months from the date of randomization.

  8. Comparison of Surgery Rates

    Comparison of Surgery Rates is defined as the rate of patients who receive TME between two groups after TNT.

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Surgical Techniques

    Surgical Techniques to be recorded: Total Mesorectal Excision (TME), local excision or other (specify).

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Number of Hyperhermia

    For the optimal treatment, patients in experimental arm receive hyperthermia by using Oncotherm EHY-2030 device, with a planned power output of 60 minutes. The number of treatment where this optimal output could not be reached must be recorded and reported.

    Time frame: 9 months

  11. Adverse Effects Assessment

    Using CTCAE v5.0, scored 0 - 5, with higher scores indicating more severe adverse effects. The items include: radiation dermatitis, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, dysuria, hematuria, and fatigue. All items are planned to be evaluated at the initiation of treatment (week 1), and subsequently at the week 6, week 9, week 28, week 42, week 48, week 60, week 72, week 84, and week 96 (+/- 3 weeks is permitted).

    Time frame: 2, 36, 60 months

  12. The effect of treatment on white blood cell count

    Recording total white cell counts, absolute neutrophil counts, and absolute lymphocyte counts of all patients. Blood samples are obtained at the initiation of treatment (week 1), and subsequently at the week 6, week 9, week 28, week 42, week 48, week 60, week 72, week 84, and week 96 (+/- 3 weeks is permitted).

    Time frame: 2, 36, 60 months

  13. The effect of treatment on hemoglobin level

    Recording hemoglobin levels of all patients. Blood samples are obtained at the initiation of treatment (week 1), and subsequently at the week 6, week 9, week 28, week 42, week 48, week 60, week 72, week 84, and week 96 (+/- 3 weeks is permitted).

    Time frame: 2, 36, 60 months

  14. The effect of treatment on platelet count

    Recording platelet counts of all patients. Blood samples are obtained at the initiation of treatment (week 1), and subsequently at the week 6, week 9, week 28, week 42, week 48, week 60, week 72, week 84, and week 96 (+/- 3 weeks is permitted).

    Time frame: 2, 36, 60 months

  15. Late Radiation Therapy Adverse Effects

    Using the LENT/SOMA scoring system, evaluating symptoms such as tenesmus, mucosal loss, sphincter control, stool frequency, pain, bleeding, ulceration, stricture, etc., scored 1 - 4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Time frame: 36, 60 months

  16. Quality of Life Analysis

    Quality of Life (QoL) assessment is mandatory for all eligible patients randomized into the trial. QoL will be evaluated using the total score of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). A printed questionnaire will be administered in the clinic by a CRA or study nurse at the following time points: * Baseline (at the time of randomization, prior to treatment initiation). * The last week of neoadjuvant CRT with or without mEHT. * Nine months after the completion of the TNT course (approximately 42 weeks ± 3 weeks post-randomization).

    Time frame: 12 months.

  17. Rectal Cancer Quality of Life Analysis

    Rectal Cancer Quality of Life (QoL) assessment is mandatory for all eligible patients randomized into the trial. QoL will be evaluated using the total score of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CR29). A printed questionnaire will be administered in the clinic by a CRA or study nurse at the following time points: * Baseline (at the time of randomization, prior to treatment initiation). * The last week of neoadjuvant CRT with or without mEHT. * Nine months after the completion of the TNT course (approximately 42 weeks ± 3 weeks post-randomization).

    Time frame: 12 months.

  18. Functional Assessment Post Rectal Cancer Surgery

    Using the LAR score. The QoL evaluation focus on functional outcome will be evaluated using LAR score. This assessment is mandatory for all eligible patients randomized into the trial. A printed questionnaire will be administered in the clinic by a CRA or study nurse at the following time points: * Baseline (at the time of randomization, prior to treatment initiation). * The last week of neoadjuvant CRT with or without mEHT. * Nine months after the completion of the TNT course (approximately 42 weeks ± 3 weeks post-randomization).

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital
    Chiayi City, Dalin Township 600401, Taiwan
    Recruiting
    • Pei-Yu Hsu Research Assistant, Master's degree · Contactdorishsu1071013@gmail.com · +886+5+2648000
    • Shih Kai Hung, Doctor's degree · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Garcia-Aguilar J, Patil S, Gollub MJ, Kim JK, Yuval JB, Thompson HM, Verheij FS, Omer DM, Lee M, Dunne RF, Marcet J, Cataldo P, Polite B, Herzig DO, Liska D, Oommen S, Friel CM, Ternent C, Coveler AL, Hunt S, Gregory A, Varma MG, Bello BL, Carmichael JC, Krauss J, Gleisner A, Paty PB, Weiser MR, Nash GM, Pappou E, Guillem JG, Temple L, Wei IH, Widmar M, Lin S, Segal NH, Cercek A, Yaeger R, Smith JJ, Goodman KA, Wu AJ, Saltz LB. Organ Preservation in Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma Treated With Total Neoadjuvant Therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2546-2556. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00032. Epub 2022 Apr 28. PubMed 35483010 ↗
  • Park JH, Yoon SM, Yu CS, Kim JH, Kim TW, Kim JC. Randomized phase 3 trial comparing preoperative and postoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer. Cancer. 2011 Aug 15;117(16):3703-12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25943. Epub 2011 Feb 15. PubMed 21328328 ↗
  • Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):922-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824f1c21. PubMed 22504191 ↗
  • Shen MH, Chen LP, Ho TF, Shih YY, Huang CS, Chie WC, Huang CC. Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 to assess quality of life in colorectal cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4312-y. PubMed 29606101 ↗
  • Rubin P, Constine LS, Fajardo LF, Phillips TL, Wasserman TH. RTOG Late Effects Working Group. Overview. Late Effects of Normal Tissues (LENT) scoring system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar 30;31(5):1041-2. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00057-6. No abstract available. PubMed 7713774 ↗
  • Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A. Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12(1):19-23. doi: 10.1007/s003840050072. PubMed 9112145 ↗
  • De Haas-Kock DF, Buijsen J, Pijls-Johannesma M, Lutgens L, Lammering G, van Mastrigt GA, De Ruysscher DK, Lambin P, van der Zee J. Concomitant hyperthermia and radiation therapy for treating locally advanced rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD006269. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006269.pub2. PubMed 19588384 ↗
  • Liu S, Jiang T, Xiao L, Yang S, Liu Q, Gao Y, Chen G, Xiao W. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) versus Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oncologist. 2021 Sep;26(9):e1555-e1566. doi: 10.1002/onco.13824. Epub 2021 Jun 7. PubMed 33987952 ↗
  • Conroy T, Bosset JF, Etienne PL, Rio E, Francois E, Mesgouez-Nebout N, Vendrely V, Artignan X, Bouche O, Gargot D, Boige V, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Louvet C, Morand C, de la Fouchardiere C, Lamfichekh N, Juzyna B, Jouffroy-Zeller C, Rullier E, Marchal F, Gourgou S, Castan F, Borg C; Unicancer Gastrointestinal Group and Partenariat de Recherche en Oncologie Digestive (PRODIGE) Group. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (UNICANCER-PRODIGE 23): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 May;22(5):702-715. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00079-6. Epub 2021 Apr 13. PubMed 33862000 ↗
  • Jin J, Tang Y, Hu C, Jiang LM, Jiang J, Li N, Liu WY, Chen SL, Li S, Lu NN, Cai Y, Li YH, Zhu Y, Cheng GH, Zhang HY, Wang X, Zhu SY, Wang J, Li GF, Yang JL, Zhang K, Chi Y, Yang L, Zhou HT, Zhou AP, Zou SM, Fang H, Wang SL, Zhang HZ, Wang XS, Wei LC, Wang WL, Liu SX, Gao YH, Li YX. Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Trial of Short-Term Radiotherapy Plus Chemotherapy Versus Long-Term Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (STELLAR). J Clin Oncol. 2022 May 20;40(15):1681-1692. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01667. Epub 2022 Mar 9. PubMed 35263150 ↗
  • Dijkstra EA, Nilsson PJ, Hospers GAP, Bahadoer RR, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Roodvoets AGH, Putter H, Berglund A, Cervantes A, Crolla RMPH, Hendriks MP, Capdevila J, Edhemovic I, Marijnen CAM, van de Velde CJH, Glimelius B, van Etten B; Collaborative Investigators. Locoregional Failure During and After Short-course Radiotherapy Followed by Chemotherapy and Surgery Compared With Long-course Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery: A 5-Year Follow-up of the RAPIDO Trial. Ann Surg. 2023 Oct 1;278(4):e766-e772. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005799. Epub 2023 Jan 20. PubMed 36661037 ↗
  • Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B, Marijnen CAM, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, Roodvoets AGH, Nagtegaal ID, Beets-Tan RGH, Blomqvist LK, Fokstuen T, Ten Tije AJ, Capdevila J, Hendriks MP, Edhemovic I, Cervantes A, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJH, Hospers GAP; RAPIDO collaborative investigators. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):29-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30555-6. Epub 2020 Dec 7. PubMed 33301740 ↗
  • Dewdney A, Cunningham D, Tabernero J, Capdevila J, Glimelius B, Cervantes A, Tait D, Brown G, Wotherspoon A, Gonzalez de Castro D, Chua YJ, Wong R, Barbachano Y, Oates J, Chau I. Multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial comparing neoadjuvant oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and preoperative radiotherapy with or without cetuximab followed by total mesorectal excision in patients with high-risk rectal cancer (EXPERT-C). J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 10;30(14):1620-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.6036. Epub 2012 Apr 2. PubMed 22473163 ↗
  • Ma B, Gao P, Wang H, Xu Q, Song Y, Huang X, Sun J, Zhao J, Luo J, Sun Y, Wang Z. What has preoperative radio(chemo)therapy brought to localized rectal cancer patients in terms of perioperative and long-term outcomes over the past decades? A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 41,121 patients. Int J Cancer. 2017 Sep 1;141(5):1052-1065. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30805. Epub 2017 Jun 8. PubMed 28560805 ↗
  • Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O'Connell MJ, Yothers G, Deutsch M, Allegra CJ, Kahlenberg MS, Baez-Diaz L, Ursiny CS, Petrelli NJ, Wolmark N. Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;27(31):5124-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467. Epub 2009 Sep 21. PubMed 19770376 ↗
  • Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Quirke P, Couture J, de Metz C, Myint AS, Bessell E, Griffiths G, Thompson LC, Parmar M. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2009 Mar 7;373(9666):811-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60484-0. PubMed 19269519 ↗
  • Wo JY, Anker CJ, Ashman JB, Bhadkamkar NA, Bradfield L, Chang DT, Dorth J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Goff D, Jacqmin D, Kelly P, Newman NB, Olsen J, Raldow AC, Ruiz-Garcia E, Stitzenberg KB, Thomas CR Jr, Wu QJ, Das P. Radiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan-Feb;11(1):13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Oct 21. PubMed 33097436 ↗
  • Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694. PubMed 15496622 ↗
  • Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hess C, Becker H, Raab HR, Villanueva MT, Witzigmann H, Wittekind C, Beissbarth T, Rodel C. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1926-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836. Epub 2012 Apr 23. PubMed 22529255 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 27 months after the start.

Of 73 non-industry phase 3 interventional studies under Rectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 76 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 38 and three quarters within 104. This study's planned 27 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 81 studies reached it within 59 months; a quarter within 37 and three quarters within 95.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 8, 2026
First posted
Jan 28, 2026
StartActual
Sep 23, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Jan 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07372300
Lead sponsor
Shih-Kai Hung
Collaborators
Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation
Responsible party
Shih-Kai Hung (Director of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 28, 2026
Start date
Sep 23, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 28, 2026

Study contacts

Pei-Yu Hsu, Master
Contact
dorishsu1071013@gmail.com
+886+5+2648000 ext. 5668

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion