ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07352644Updated Jan 20, 2026

Factors Affecting Attachment Loss in Clear Aligner Treatment

An interventional study of Clear Aligners with Composite Attachments in Malocclusion, Crowded Teeth and Attachment, sponsored by Bezmialem Vakif University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-20.

Sponsored by Bezmialem Vakif University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2022, registered Jan 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 30 studies in Malocclusion with a site in Turkey — 7 open to participants now, 8 under way, none of them phase 3. Malocclusion · Turkey.

Enrollment
17th of 17
4 · median 35
Started
2022
the only one that year
No phase
17 of 30
1 open now
Registered
23rd of 30
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 30
Bezmialem Vakif University

Among the 30 studies in Malocclusion with a site in Turkey, this one is the 17th largest by enrollment of the 17 interventional ones, is the only one that started in 2022, is one of 17 with no phase, and was the 23rd registered.

By phase

30 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study17 · 1 open
Observational13 · 6 open

By the year they started

First in 2017; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2022.

What they test

Size and results

Median enrollment 35 across the 17 interventional studies, 70 across the 13 observational. Of the 22 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 30 studies in Malocclusion with a site in Turkey, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This prospective clinical study evaluated the incidence of composite attachment loss in patients undergoing clear aligner treatment and identified patient-, tooth-, and treatment-related factors associated with attachment debonding. Twenty-one patients were followed for six months, and attachment failures were recorded at routine visits. Outcomes were compared according to attachment type (conventional vs. optimized), attachment size, tooth type, dental arch, and patient-related factors.

Read the detailed description

Composite attachments are integral to clear aligner therapy for improving force delivery, retention, and control of complex tooth movements. Despite their biomechanical importance, attachment loss remains a common clinical challenge and may compromise treatment efficiency and predictability. In this prospective study, attachments were bonded following the manufacturer's protocol using a high-viscosity composite. Patients were followed for six months, and attachment failures were documented with respect to type, size, tooth position, and patient-related behaviors. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of attachment loss and to identify factors associated with debonding, thereby contributing to clinical strategies that may reduce attachment failure and enhance treatment outcomes.

03

Conditions studied

  • Malocclusion
  • Crowded Teeth
  • Attachment

Keywords

  • ATTACHMENT
  • ATTACHMENT LOSS
  • c
  • CLEAR ALIGNER TREATMENT
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Permanent dentition. Mild to moderate crowding. No history of previous orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances or clear aligners

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Poor oral health. Bruxism. Crown restorations. Dental fluorosis. Enamel hypoplasia or other structural abnormalities affecting attachment bonding

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
4 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Clear Aligner Treatment

    Participants received clear aligner therapy (Invisalign®) with composite attachments bonded according to the manufacturer's protocol. Both conventional and optimized attachment types were used as part of the planned orthodontic treatment, and attachment loss was prospectively evaluated over a 6-month follow-up period.

    Device: Clear Aligners with Composite Attachments

Interventions

  • DeviceClear Aligners with Composite Attachments

    Participants received clear aligner therapy (Invisalign®, Align Technology, San Jose, CA, USA). Composite attachments were bonded according to the manufacturer's protocol using a high-viscosity composite. Both conventional and optimized attachment types were used as part of the planned orthodontic treatment, and attachment loss was prospectively evaluated during a 6-month follow-up period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Attachment Loss Rate

    Proportion of composite attachments exhibiting complete detachment or partial debonding (irregular residual composite) during routine follow-up visits. Attachment loss was assessed by direct intraoral examination and tactile verification using a dental explorer.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bezmialem Vakif University
    Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2022 to primary completion in Jun 2022, 5 months.

Of 153 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Malocclusion, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 30. This study's 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 163 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 32.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 12, 2026
First posted
Jan 20, 2026
StartActual
Jan 1, 2022
Primary completionActual
Jun 1, 2022
CompletionActual
Jun 1, 2022
Last update
Jan 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07352644
Responsible party
Şerife Şahin (Assistant Professor, Bezmialem Vakif University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 20, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2022
Completion
Jun 1, 2022
Last update
Jan 20, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion