CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07345507Updated Jan 21, 2026

Comparison of Efficacy of Metformin Gel 30% vs Triple Combination Cream (Hydroquinone 4%, Flucinolone Acetonide 0.01%, Tretinoin 0.025%) in Treatment of Melasma in Tertiary Care Hospital Karachi

An interventional study of Metformin gel, 30% and Triple combination cream (hydroquinone 2% + tretinoin 0.025% + fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%) in Melasma, sponsored by Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-21.

Sponsored by Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2025, registered Jul 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare two topical treatments for melasma. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either triple combination cream (hydroquinone 2% + tretinoin 0.025% + fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%) or 30% metformin gel, applied once nightly for 12 weeks. All participants will use broad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF ≥30) during the daytime throughout the treatment period. Melasma severity will be assessed using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI), and the study will determine which treatment is more effective and better tolerated at the end of 12 weeks.

Read the detailed description

This randomized, parallel-group clinical trial will be conducted at the Department of Dermatology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC), Karachi, Pakistan, after approval from the Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee of JPMC. Eligible patients presenting with clinically diagnosed melasma will be screened and enrolled after obtaining written informed consent.

Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment arms using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Group A (active comparator) will receive topical triple combination cream containing hydroquinone 2%, tretinoin 0.025%, and fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, applied once nightly to affected facial areas for 12 weeks. Group B (experimental) will receive topical metformin gel 30%, applied once nightly to melasma-affected areas for 12 weeks. All participants in both arms will be advised to apply broad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF ≥30) during daytime throughout the treatment period.

Melasma severity will be assessed using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) at baseline and during follow-up visits over the 12-week treatment period. The primary outcome will be the proportion of participants achieving at least a 50% reduction in total MASI score from baseline at week 12. Safety and tolerability will be monitored throughout the study by documenting adverse effects reported by participants or observed on clinical examination.

02

Conditions studied

  • Melasma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Melasma
  • Efficacy
  • METFORMIN GEL
  • HYDROQUINONE 2%
  • TRETINOIN 0.025%
03

In context

Melanosis

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanosis; 38 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 40 across 139 interventional studies indexed under Melanosis.

Browse Melanosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre is the lead sponsor of 38 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18- 60 years of either gender.
  • Diagnosed with melasma based on clinical examination and Wood's lamp assessment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to any study medication components.
  • Patients currently on other melasma treatments or those with other dermatologic conditions affecting pigmentation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A (TRIPLE COMBINATION THERAPY GROUP)

    Triple combination cream (hydroquinone 2% + tretinoin 0.025% + fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%) applied nightly for 12 weeks. All participants also used broad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF ≥30) during daytime.

    Drug: Triple combination cream (hydroquinone 2% + tretinoin 0.025% + fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%) · Drug: Broad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF ≥30)

  • Experimental
    Group B ( METFORMIN 30% GEL THERAPY GROUP )

    Participants will apply 30% metformin gel topically to melasma-affected areas once nightly for 12 weeks. All participants will also use broad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF ≥30) during daytime.

    Drug: Metformin gel, 30% · Drug: Broad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF ≥30)

Interventions

  • DrugMetformin gel, 30%

    Participants will apply 30% metformin gel topically to melasma-affected areas once nightly for 12 weeks. All participants will also use broad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF ≥30) during daytime.

  • DrugTriple combination cream (hydroquinone 2% + tretinoin 0.025% + fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%)

    Topical triple combination cream containing hydroquinone 2%, tretinoin 0.025%, and fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, applied once nightly to affected facial areas for 12 weeks

  • DrugBroad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF ≥30)

    Applied during daytime throughout the 12-week treatment period (both arms)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants with ≥50% reduction in MASI score from baseline at 12 weeks.

    The Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) will be used to assess the severity of melasma. The MASI score is calculated based on the area of involvement, darkness, and homogeneity on four facial regions. Participants achieving ≥50% reduction in total MASI score from baseline at week 12 will be classified as treatment responders. Data will be reported as the number and percentage of responders in each treatment arm and compared between arms.

    Time frame: 12 weeks (end of treatment)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean change in MASI score from baseline to 12 weeks.

    MASI score will be measured at baseline and at week 12. The mean change in MASI score from baseline to week 12 will be calculated for each treatment arm.

    Time frame: 2 weeks (end of treatment)

  2. Frequency of treatment-related adverse effects during the 12-week treatment period.

    Adverse effects (e.g., erythema, burning, irritation, dryness) will be assessed and recorded at follow-up visits during the treatment period. Results will be summarized as the number and percentage of participants experiencing any adverse effect in each arm

    Time frame: 12 weeks (during treatment)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • JPMC
    Karachi, Sindh 7550, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Grimes PE, Pandya AG, Taylor SC, Rendon MI. Challenges in melasma treatment: need for standardization and multicenter RCTs. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(1):e15234. doi:10.1111/dth.15234
  • Steiner D, Pandya AG. Melasma and hormonal imbalance: an evidence-based review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(8):1630-40. doi:10.1111/jdv.17123
  • Del Rosario E, Florell SR, Zone JJ. Gender and hormonal differences in melasma pathogenesis. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2023;9(2):95-103. doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2023.02.004
  • Coondoo A, Phiske M, Verma S, Lahiri K. Side-effects of topical steroids: A long overdue revisit. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2014 Oct;5(4):416-25. doi: 10.4103/2229-5178.142483. PubMed 25396122 ↗
  • Misitzis D, Georgala S, Katoulis AC. Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of triple combination cream vs hydroquinone monotherapy in melasma. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(9):3882-7. doi:10.1111/jocd.14278
  • Frances L, Cuesta L, Leiva-Salinas M, Banuls J. Secondary mucinous carcinoma of the skin. Dermatol Online J. 2014 Apr 16;20(4):22361. PubMed 24746304 ↗
  • Lima EVA, Lima MA, Paixão MP, Miot HA. Assessment of the efficacy of a triple combination cream for melasma in different populations: a literature review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020;13:505-10. doi:10.2147/CCID.S238536
  • Pomeranz MK, Belsito DV. Mechanisms of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and therapeutic strategies. Clin Dermatol. 2020;38(1):64-72. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.06.009
  • Lee AY. Anti-melanogenic effects of metformin: beyond diabetes. J Dermatol Sci. 2021;104(1):1-8. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2021.06.002
  • González-Pedraza A, Salazar-Aranda R, Pérez-Herrera P, Torres-Torres Y. Metformin as an adjuvant in dermatology: molecular mechanisms and clinical applications. Int J Dermatol. 2023;62(2):132-40. doi:10.1111/ijd.16391
  • Mahmoud MMY, Kamel AM, Galal SA. Evaluation the efficacy of microneedling with topical metformin solution compared with microneedling with topical vitamin C solution in treatment of melasma. Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Oct 5;316(9):662. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03355-9. PubMed 39369111 ↗
  • Ali Mapar M, Namdari G. Efficacy of topical metformin 15% vs placebo in melasma: RCT over 12 weeks. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(5):1357-63. doi:10.1111/jocd.12904
  • Gan C, Rodrigues M. An Update on New and Existing Treatments for the Management of Melasma. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2024 Sep;25(5):717-733. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00863-2. Epub 2024 Jun 19. PubMed 38896402 ↗
  • AboAlsoud ES, Eldahshan RM, AbouKhodair Mohammed H, Elsaie ML. Safety and efficacy of topical metformin 30% cream versus triple combination cream (Kligman's formula) in treating melasma: A randomized controlled study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Jun;21(6):2508-2515. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14953. Epub 2022 Apr 9. PubMed 35357753 ↗
  • Mapar MA, Hemmati AA, Namdari G. Comparing the efficacy of topical metformin and placebo in the treatment of melasma: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. J Pharm Res Int. 2019;30(4):1-8. doi:10.9734/JPRI/2019/v30i430276
  • Banavase Channakeshavaiah R, Andanooru Chandrappa NK. Topical metformin in the treatment of melasma: A preliminary clinical trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 May;19(5):1161-1164. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13145. Epub 2019 Sep 10. PubMed 31502392 ↗
  • Mongkhon P, Ruengorn C, Awiphan R, Phosuya C, Ruanta Y, Thavorn K, Jamjanya S, Chuamanochan M, Nochaiwong S. Efficacy and safety of metformin for melasma treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2023 Dec 13;14:1281050. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1281050. eCollection 2023. PubMed 38192412 ↗
  • Ahmad Nasrollahi S, Sabet Nematzadeh M, Samadi A, Ayatollahi A, Yadangi S, Abels C, Firooz A. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a triple combination cream (hydroquinone, tretinoin, and fluocinolone) for treatment of melasma in Middle Eastern skin. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2019 Jun 10;12:437-444. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S202285. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31354327 ↗
  • Atwa MA, Ahmed AH, Nada HA, Refaey SM, Jafferany M, Elsaie ML. Combined chemical peels versus trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for treating melasma: a split face study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 Mar;33(2):959-964. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1793888. PubMed 32649234 ↗
  • Passeron T. Melasma pathogenesis and updated treatment options. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(6):859-68. doi:10.1111/jdv.18101
  • Neagu N, Conforti C, Agozzino M, Marangi GF, Morariu SH, Pellacani G, Persichetti P, Piccolo D, Segreto F, Zalaudek I, Dianzani C. Melasma treatment: a systematic review. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 Jun;33(4):1816-1837. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1914313. Epub 2022 Mar 23. PubMed 33849384 ↗
  • Rahman A, Basit A, Mohsin S, Ahmed N, Tahir M, Ishfaq A. Quality of life of melasma patients in Pakistan. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2022;72(1):307-10.
  • Handel AC, Miot LD, Miot HA. Melasma: a clinical and epidemiological review. An Bras Dermatol. 2014 Sep-Oct;89(5):771-82. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143063. PubMed 25184917 ↗
  • Kang HY, Ortonne JP. Melasma update. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2009;18(2):137-42
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07345507
Lead sponsor
Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre
Responsible party
Dr Summiya Shakeel Ahmed (FCPS part 2 Trainee dermatology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 15, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2025
Completion
Aug 30, 2025
Last update
Jan 21, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion