An interventional study of Vibrotactile sensory feedback in Phantom Limb Pain After Amputation, Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee and Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee, sponsored by Median. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-07.
Sponsored by Median · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study tests whether a vibration-based feedback device (Suralis) can reduce phantom limb pain in people with lower-leg amputations over 3 weeks. Participants wear the device daily and report pain levels, walking ability, and quality of life - with no known risks, as it's a CE-certified medical device. If pain improves, the study team will help participants apply for insurance coverage to keep using the system long-term. The goal is to offer a simple, non-drug option that may help ease chronic pain and improve daily function for amputees. Participation is voluntary and can be stopped anytime without affecting medical care.
This observational, prospective, single-arm pilot study evaluates the short-term effects of the Suralis vibrotactile feedback system (Saphenus Medical Technology GmbH) on phantom limb pain intensity, gait stability, and perceived quality of life in individuals with unilateral lower-limb amputation. The Suralis system consists of a sensorized insole with four pressure-sensitive zones (toe, forefoot, midfoot, heel), each mapped to a corresponding vibrotactile actuator embedded in a thigh-mounted cuff. Vibration parameters - including onset threshold, intensity (0-100 % amplitude), duration (50-500 ms), and spatial mapping - are individually calibrated via a proprietary iOS/Android app, allowing for personalized somatosensory substitution. The system operates autonomously during ambulation.
The study protocol includes a 3-week baseline phase to confirm persistent phantom pain (VAS ≥ 3/10 daily), followed by 3 weeks of active intervention, and a 3-week washout/follow-up phase to assess sustainability of effects. All assessments are conducted at the study center and include standardized functional tests (TUG, 6MWT), validated German-language questionnaires (DSF, VR-12, DASS, FW7, GCPS), and daily VAS entries captured via paper-based diaries. The system's CE-marked status (UDI: FBS 1 912012142) confirms conformity with EU MDR 2017/746 for Class IIa medical devices; no adverse events related to device use have been reported in prior clinical use. The study design incorporates no control group or randomization, reflecting its exploratory, real-world application focus. Statistical analysis will be descriptive and exploratory, with non-parametric methods applied to ordinal outcomes (Friedman test) and parametric or non-parametric repeated-measures analyses for continuous variables, depending on distribution. No blinding is feasible due to the nature of the intervention. All procedures comply with the Declaration of Helsinki and have been reviewed by the Ethics Committee of the Hessian Medical Association (approval pending).
163 studies on the registry are indexed under Phantom Limb; 35 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 30 across 125 interventional studies indexed under Phantom Limb.
Browse Phantom Limb studies →Median is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
All participants receive a 3-week intervention with the Suralis vibrotactile feedback system, which provides real-time pressure-based sensory feedback via a sensorized insole and thigh-mounted vibrating cuff, calibrated individually via smartphone app to support pain reduction and gait stability.
Device: Vibrotactile sensory feedback
The Suralis system delivers real-time vibrotactile feedback via four pressure sensors embedded in a prosthetic insole, each mapped to a corresponding vibration motor on a thigh cuff. Participants wear the device during daily ambulation for 3 weeks. Vibration parameters (threshold, intensity, duration, spatial mapping) are individually calibrated via a smartphone app to match each user's sensory perception and gait pattern. The system operates autonomously, requires daily charging, and logs usage data via Bluetooth. No additional therapy or medication is administered alongside the device. The intervention aims to modulate cortical reorganization and reduce phantom limb pain while improving gait confidence and safety, particularly under non-visual conditions (e.g., stepping backward or sideways). The device is CE-marked (UDI: FBS 1 912012142) and classified as a Class IIa medical device under EU MDR 2017/746.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Scores range from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 mm = "no phantom pain" and 100 mm = "worst imaginable phantom pain"; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Time frame: Baseline (t1), end of 3-week intervention (t3), and 3-week follow-up (t4) - assessed via daily VAS entries averaged per time point.
German Pain Questionnaire DSF - subscales
A validated, German-language questionnaire that captures pain intensity, quality, chronicity (GCPS), well-being (FW7), psychological status (DASS) and health-related quality of life (VR-12).
Time frame: Baseline (t1), end of 3-week intervention (t3), and 3-week follow-up (t4) - completed in person at study center.
Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) test
Measures dynamic balance and fall risk by timing how long a person rises from a chair, walks 3 m, turns, returns and sits down.
Time frame: Baseline (t1), end of 3-week intervention (t3), and 3-week follow-up (t4) - performed once per visit at study center.
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Assesses ambulatory endurance by recording the total distance walked (meters) in six minutes on a 12-m circuit.
Time frame: Baseline (t1), end of 3-week intervention (t3), and 3-week follow-up (t4) - performed once per visit at study center; distance in meters recorded.
Plan to share: No
Started Apr 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2026, 15 months after the start.
Of 61 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Phantom Limb, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 15 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 64 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 50.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Median