ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07898098Updated Oct 27, 2026

Early Rehabilitation After Transfemoral Amputation in Moderately Active Patients Using the Avior Knee

An interventional study of knee prothesis - Avior and knee prothesis - Kenevo in Transfemoral Amputees, sponsored by Median. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Median · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Oct 27, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
33
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare microprocessor-controlled knee prostheses in early rehabilitation in amputees with transfemoral amputations and low mobility (K I-II). The main question it aims to answer is:

  • Does the Avior knee prosthesis in early rehabilitation improve the mobility and well-being of the patients?
  • Is the Avior knee prothesis suitable for use in early rehabilitation?
  • Is the Avior knee prothesis suitable for use of amputees with low mobility (K I-II?

Researchers will compare the Avior knee prothesis to the Kenevo knee prothesis to see if the preious results are achieved or surpassed.

Participants will:

  • wear the knee protheses to be tested for 6 months
  • complete mobility tests during their 6 weeks stay at the rehabilitation facility (every 3 weeks --> total: 3 times)
  • fill out questionairs concerning their mobilty and pain perception
02

Conditions studied

  • Transfemoral Amputees

Keywords

  • microprocessor-controlled knee protheses
  • early rehabilitation
  • low mobility (K I-II)
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Median is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Inpatient rehabilitation with a primary diagnosis of: transfemoral amputation or knee disarticulation
  • Expected level of mobility I or II
  • Body weight up to 125 kg (maximum body weight for the Avior prosthetic knee joint)
  • Patients who are capable of independently consenting to participate in the study and following the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who are unable to give consent
  • Insufficient knowledge of German to understand the questions in the assessed scores and to follow the study protocol
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
33 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Avior Knee

    This group recieves the Avior-joint as a knee prosthesis and not the Kenevo-joint as the other group. Otherwise all interventions are the same as in the other group.

    Device: knee prothesis - Avior

  • Experimental
    Kenevo-Knee

    This group recieves the Kenevo-joint as a knee prosthesis and not the Avior-joint as the other group. Otherwise all interventions are the same as in the other group. The data of this group is already available and published.

    Device: knee prothesis - Kenevo

Interventions

  • Deviceknee prothesis - Avior

    Usage of the Avior knee prothesis for 6 month during the interim period

  • Deviceknee prothesis - Kenevo

    Usage of Kenevo knee prothesis for the duration of 6 months during the interim period

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mobility of lower-limb prosthesis users: PLUS-M™ 12-Item Short Form T-score

    Mobility of lower-limb prosthesis users is assessed using the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M™) 12-Item Short Form (v1.2). The questionnaire consists of 12 items assessing the participant's ability to perform various mobility-related activities. Each item is rated on a 5-level response scale. The responses are scored according to the PLUS-M™ scoring procedure to obtain a standardized PLUS-M™ T-score. The raw score is used only to determine the corresponding T-score. Higher T-scores indicate greater mobility. Unit of Measure: PLUS-M™ T-score

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation); 12 weeks after baseline (first follow-up); 18 weeks after baseline (second follow-up); and 24 weeks after baseline (last follow-up).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health-related quality of life: EQ-5D-5L index score

    Health-related quality of life is assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The questionnaire assesses five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated on a 5-level scale ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems or unable to perform the activity, as applicable). The responses across the five dimensions are converted into a single EQ-5D-5L index score using the German EQ-5D-5L value set (Ludwig et al., 2018). Unit of Measure: EQ-5D-5L index score

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation); 12 weeks after baseline (first follow-up); 18 weeks after baseline (second follow-up); and 24 weeks after baseline (last follow-up).

  2. Health-related quality of life: EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) score

    Self-rated health status is assessed using the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Participants rate their current health status on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine). Unit of Measure: EQ VAS score (0-100)

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation); 12 weeks after baseline (first follow-up); 18 weeks after baseline (second follow-up); and 24 weeks after baseline (last follow-up).

  3. Reintegration into normal living: Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI) total score

    Reintegration into normal living is assessed using the 11-item Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI). The questionnaire assesses the participant's perceived ability to participate in and manage activities, roles, and relationships in daily life. Each item is rated on a 10-point scale ranging from 0 (does not describe my situation at all) to 10 (describes my situation perfectly). The scores of the 11 items are summed to obtain a total RNLI score ranging from 0 to 110 points. Higher scores indicate greater reintegration into normal living. Unit of Measure: RNLI total score (0-110 points)

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation); 12 weeks after baseline (first follow-up); 18 weeks after baseline (second follow-up); and 24 weeks after baseline (last follow-up).

  4. Locomotor capabilities: Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 (LCI-5) total score

    Locomotor capabilities with a lower-limb prosthesis are assessed using the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 (LCI-5). The questionnaire consists of 14 items assessing the participant's ability to perform basic and advanced locomotor activities while using a prosthesis. Each item is scored from 0 (not able to perform the activity) to 4 (able to perform the activity independently without walking aids). Item scores are summed to obtain the total LCI-5 score. Higher scores indicate greater locomotor capability. Unit of Measure: LCI-5 total score (0-56 points)

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation); 12 weeks after baseline (first follow-up); 18 weeks after baseline (second follow-up); and 24 weeks after baseline (last follow-up).

  5. Independence in activities of daily living: Barthel Index total score

    Independence in activities of daily living is assessed using the Barthel Index. The assessment covers 10 activities of daily living. Individual activities are scored according to the Barthel Index scoring procedure and combined to obtain a total Barthel Index score. Higher scores indicate greater independence in activities of daily living. Unit of Measure: Barthel Index total score (0-100 points)

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation); 12 weeks after baseline (first follow-up); 18 weeks after baseline (second follow-up); and 24 weeks after baseline (last follow-up).

  6. Functional mobility: Timed Up and Go (TUG) test completion time

    Functional mobility is assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The participant starts in a seated position, stands up, walks 3 meters, turns around, walks back, and sits down. The time required to complete the test is measured from initiation of the movement until the participant returns to the seated position. Unit of Measure: Seconds

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; and 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation).

  7. Falls: number of falls

    The occurrence of falls is assessed using a study-specific fall survey. The number of falls experienced by the participant during the specified assessment period is recorded. Unit of Measure: Number of falls

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation); 12 weeks after baseline (first follow-up); 18 weeks after baseline (second follow-up); and 24 weeks after baseline (last follow-up).

  8. Fear of falling: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score

    Fear of falling is assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) included in the study-specific fall survey. The participant rates their fear of falling on the NRS. Unit of Measure: NRS score

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation); 12 weeks after baseline (first follow-up); 18 weeks after baseline (second follow-up); and 24 weeks after baseline (last follow-up).

  9. Residual limb wound healing: Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) total score

    Residual limb wound healing is assessed using the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH). The PUSH assesses three wound characteristics: wound surface area, wound exudate, and wound tissue type. Wound surface area is determined by measuring the maximum wound length and width and calculating length × width. The resulting wound area is categorized and scored from 0 to 10 points. Wound exudate is categorized as none, scant, moderate, or heavy and scored from 0 to 3 points. Wound tissue type is categorized and scored from 0 to 4 points. The three component scores are summed to obtain a total PUSH score ranging from 0 to 17 points. Unit of Measure: PUSH total score (0-17 points)

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; and 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation).

  10. Functional mobility: Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis (AMPPRO) total score

    Functional mobility of lower-limb prosthesis users is assessed using the Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis (AMPPRO). The AMPPRO is a 21-item performance-based assessment evaluating sitting and standing balance, transfers, gait initiation, gait pattern, turning, variable cadence, obstacle negotiation, stair negotiation, and use of walking aids. Individual item scores are combined according to the AMPPRO scoring procedure to obtain a total AMPPRO score ranging from 0 to 47 points. Higher scores indicate better functional mobility. Unit of Measure: AMPPRO total score (0-47 points)

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; and 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation).

  11. Walking capacity: 2-Minute Walk Test distance

    Walking capacity is assessed using the 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT). The distance walked by the participant during 2 minutes is measured. Unit of Measure: Meters (m)

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; and 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation).

  12. Walking capacity: 6-Minute Walk Test distance

    Walking capacity is assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The distance walked by the participant during 6 minutes is measured. Unit of Measure: Meters (m)

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; and 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation).

  13. Phantom limb pain intensity

    Phantom limb pain intensity is assessed during clinical examination using a numerical rating scale (NRS). The participant rates the intensity of phantom limb pain. Unit of Measure: NRS score (0-10)

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; and 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation).

  14. Residual limb pain intensity

    Residual limb pain intensity is assessed during clinical examination using a numerical rating scale (NRS). The participant rates the intensity of pain experienced in the residual limb. Unit of Measure: NRS score (0-10)

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; and 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation).

  15. Other pain intensity

    Pain other than phantom limb pain or residual limb pain is assessed during clinical examination using a numerical rating scale (NRS). The location and description of the pain are documented, and the participant rates its intensity. Unit of Measure: NRS score (0-10)

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; and 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation).

Other outcomes

  1. Residual limb shape

    The shape of the lower-limb residual limb is assessed and documented during clinical examination according to predefined clinical categories. Unit of Measure: Categorical assessment

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; and 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation).

  2. Prosthesis characteristics: study-specific prosthesis questionnaire

    Characteristics of the participant's lower-limb prosthesis are documented using a study-specific prosthesis questionnaire. The questionnaire records predefined prosthesis characteristics and prosthetic components. Unit of Measure: type of prosthetic foot

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation); 12 weeks after baseline (first follow-up); 18 weeks after baseline (second follow-up); and 24 weeks after baseline (last follow-up).

  3. Changes in prosthesis: study-specific prosthesis questionnaire

    Changes to the participant's lower-limb prosthesis and prosthetic components during the study are documented using a study-specific prosthesis questionnaire. Unit of Measure: number of prosthetic component changes

    Time frame: 3 weeks after baseline; 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation); 12 weeks after baseline (first follow-up); 18 weeks after baseline (second follow-up); and 24 weeks after baseline (last follow-up).

  4. Residual limb length

    The length of the lower-limb residual limb is measured during clinical examination. Unit of Measure: Centimeters (cm)

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; and 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation).

  5. Residual limb circumference

    The circumference of the lower-limb residual limb is measured during clinical examination. Unit of Measure: Centimeters (cm)

    Time frame: Baseline (beginning of rehabilitation); 3 weeks after baseline; and 6 weeks after baseline (end of rehabilitation).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • MEDIAN Reha-Zentrum Wiesbaden Sonnenberg
    Wiesbaden, Hesse 65191, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Raisig N, Schröter J, Hahn A, Traub F. Presented at: AOPA National Assembly; 2025 Sep 5; Orlando, USA. "Clinical experience with using MPKs as the first prosthetic knee in patients after transfemoral amputation in Germany"
  • Schröter J, Raisig N, Hahn A, Traub F. Presented at: ISPO World Congress; 2025 Jun 16; Stockholm, Sweden. "Specialized rehabilitation including early MPK mobilization: Impact of quality of life of limited community ambulators after transfemoral amputation"
  • Hafner BJ, Morgan SJ, Askew RL, Salem R. Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(6):797-812. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.12.0228. PubMed 28273329 ↗
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie e.V. (DGOOC) (Hrsg.). Sk2-Leitlinie "Rehabilitation nach Majoramputation an der unteren Extremität (proximal des Fußes)" (AMWFLeitlinienregister Nr. 033-044). Stand 24.06.2019 2019. Accessed 30/10/2025. https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/033-044l_S2k_Rehabilitation_Majoramputation-untere_Extremitaet_2019-09.pdf
  • Chow, S.-C., Shao, J., Wang, H., & Lokhnygina, Y. (2017). Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research (3rd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315183084

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07898098
Lead sponsor
Median
Responsible party
Johannes Schroeter (Dr. med., Median) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Jul 7, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion