ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07317752GustiAmoUpdated Jan 5, 2026

Incidence of Dysgeusia in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

An observational study in Taste Disorders, Breast Cancer and Quality of Life, sponsored by Azienda Sanitaria Locale CN2 Alba-Bra. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-05.

Primary conditionDysgeusiaRegistry: Taste DisordersReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Taste Disorders — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Dysgeusia
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Dysgeusia, a narrower term within Taste Disorders.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Azienda Sanitaria Locale CN2 Alba-Bra · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to examine how frequently changes in taste occur in people with early-stage breast cancer who receive chemotherapy. It will also look at how these taste changes affect nutrition and quality of life. The main questions this study aims to answer are:

  • How many participants develop changes in taste during chemotherapy?
  • How do these changes affect eating habits, nutrition, and daily life?

Participants are women with non-metastatic breast cancer who are receiving chemotherapy before or after surgery.

Researchers will use standardized taste tests to measure how well participants can perceive different flavors. These tests are designed to provide accurate and reproducible results.

Participants will:

  • Take part in taste tests during their chemotherapy treatment
  • Have their nutritional status evaluated
  • Answer questions about their quality of life
Read the detailed description

Dysgeusia, defined as an altered perception of taste, is a frequent but understudied adverse effect of several chemotherapy regimens used for the treatment of breast cancer. Taste alterations may arise from direct cytotoxic effects on taste receptor cells, changes in saliva composition, mucosal inflammation, altered signal transduction, or central nervous system effects. These disturbances can lead to reduced food enjoyment, alterations in dietary patterns, and potential deterioration of nutritional and functional status.

Although dysgeusia is commonly reported in clinical practice, estimates of its prevalence vary widely due to heterogeneous methodologies and the predominant reliance on self-reported symptoms rather than standardized sensory testing. Studies that objectively quantify changes in taste recognition thresholds during chemotherapy are limited, and little is known about specific aspects such as umami perception or chemesthetic sensitivity. Furthermore, factors that may predispose individual patients to developing dysgeusia-such as baseline taster status, nutritional condition, or specific treatment characteristics-remain poorly characterized.

This observational pilot study was designed to provide objective, reproducible data on taste function in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer receiving standard neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. A combination of validated sensory tools, including taste strips and chemesthetic tests, is used to measure changes in taste perception over the course of treatment. Standardized methods were selected to ensure high sensitivity and repeatability and to allow quantitative comparison across different time points.

The study also integrates nutritional assessment and quality-of-life evaluation to explore the broader clinical implications of dysgeusia. Particular attention is given to potential associations between objective taste alterations, patient-reported symptoms, and parameters such as nutritional status, dietary intake, and functional well-being. Given the scarcity of comprehensive, methodologically rigorous studies in this area, the data generated may help clarify the clinical burden of dysgeusia and inform strategies to mitigate its impact on patients undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Taste Disorders
  • Breast Cancer
  • Quality of Life
  • Taste Perception
  • Dysgeusia
  • Chemotherapy Effects
  • Nutritional Status
  • Sensory Testing

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dysgeusia
  • Taste disorders
  • Breast cancer
  • Quality of life
  • Taste perception
  • Chemotherapy effects
  • Nutritional status
  • Sensory testing
03

In context

Dysgeusia Reclassified

52 studies on the registry are indexed under Dysgeusia; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 104 across 22 observational studies indexed under Dysgeusia.

Browse Dysgeusia studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda Sanitaria Locale CN2 Alba-Bra is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Compared within Dysgeusia, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Taste Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This group includes male and female participants diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer who are receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy according to standard clinical practice. Participants are treated at the Oncology Unit of Michele and Pietro Ferrero Hospital in Verduno. Eligible participants are those for whom chemotherapy is indicated as part of their routine care, and who are willing and able to complete sensory tests, nutritional assessments, and quality of life questionnaires during the study period.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosis of non- breast cancer
  • Indication for or adjuvant chemotherapy as part of standard clinical practice
  • Chemotherapy-naïve patients (no chemotherapy received in the previous 12 months)
  • Signed written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Terminal or disease
  • Pre-existing taste or smell disorders (e.g., anosmia, dysgeusia, neurological syndromes, etc.)
  • Known allergies to any substances used in taste and chemesthetic function tests (e.g., quinine dihydrochloride, monosodium L-glutamate, capsaicin, etc.)
  • Receiving or adjuvant chemotherapy within research protocols
  • Lack of signed written
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

    This group includes male and female participants diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer who are receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy according to standard clinical practice. All participants are treated at the Oncology Unit of Michele and Pietro Ferrero Hospital in Verduno. Eligible participants are those for whom chemotherapy is indicated as part of routine care and who are willing and able to complete sensory tests, nutritional assessments, and quality-of-life questionnaires during the study period.

    Other: Taste Assessment / Nutritional Assessment / Quality of Life Assessment

Interventions

  • OtherTaste Assessment / Nutritional Assessment / Quality of Life Assessment

    Participants will undergo additional procedures as part of the study to assess taste function, nutritional status, and quality of life. These procedures include: * Taste assessment using standardized taste strips to measure recognition thresholds for the five basic tastes (sweet, sour, salty, bitter, umami) and chemesthetic sensitivity using strips impregnated with capsaicin. * Questionnaires to evaluate chemotherapy-induced taste alterations (CiTAS) and general quality of life (FACT-G). * Nutritional assessment, including evaluation of caloric and macronutrient intake using 24-hour dietary recalls, assessment of nutritional status according to GLIM criteria, and measurement of phase angle through bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). All procedures are non-invasive and performed in addition to the participants' standard chemotherapy treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of dysgeusia during chemotherapy

    The primary endpoint is the incidence of dysgeusia after the start of chemotherapy in participants with non-metastatic breast cancer. Taste perception will be evaluated using standardized taste strips to determine recognition thresholds for four basic tastes (sweet, sour, salty, and bitter). Dysgeusia will be considered present if the total taste strip score is lower than 9 at any of the evaluated time points.

    Time frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after the completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quantitative changes in taste recognition thresholds

    Quantitative evaluation of recognition thresholds for the five basic tastes (sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami) to assess changes in taste perception during and after chemotherapy.

    Time frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy

  2. Chemesthetic sensitivity assessed by capsaicin strips

    Evaluation of chemesthetic function using strips impregnated with capsaicin at four increasing concentrations to assess oral sensitivity to chemical stimuli.

    Time frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy

  3. Taster status assessment

    Assessment of participants' "taster status" (ability to detect bitter compounds) to evaluate its potential correlation with the subsequent development of dysgeusia.

    Time frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy

  4. Chemotherapy-induced taste alteration (CiTAS) questionnaire

    Evaluation of participant-reported taste alterations using the Chemotherapy-Induced Taste Alteration Scale (CiTAS) and comparison with objective sensory test findings. Score range: 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate more severe taste alterations.

    Time frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy

  5. Nutritional status assessment

    Evaluation of nutritional status using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria and measurement of phase angle using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).

    Time frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy

  6. Caloric and macronutrient intake

    Assessment of caloric and macronutrient intake using 24-hour dietary recall interviews to determine changes during and after chemotherapy.

    Time frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy

  7. Quality of life assessment (FACT-G)

    Evaluation of quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) questionnaire. The total score is derived by summing scores from four domains (physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being). Each item is scored on a 5-point scale from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much").

    Time frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sawicki CM, Janal MN, Nicholson SJ, Wu AK, Schmidt BL, Albertson DG. Oral cancer patients experience mechanical and chemical sensitivity at the site of the cancer. BMC Cancer. 2022 Nov 11;22(1):1165. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10282-3. PubMed 36368973 ↗
  • Turcott JG, Juarez-Hernandez E, De la Torre-Vallejo M, Sanchez-Lara K, Luvian-Morales J, Arrieta O. Value: Changes in the Detection and Recognition Thresholds of Three Basic Tastes in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Cisplatin and Paclitaxel and Its Association with Nutritional and Quality of Life Parameters. Nutr Cancer. 2016;68(2):241-9. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2016.1144075. Epub 2016 Mar 4. PubMed 26943275 ↗
  • Epstein JB, de Andrade E Silva SM, Epstein GL, Leal JHS, Barasch A, Smutzer G. Taste disorders following cancer treatment: report of a case series. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Dec;27(12):4587-4595. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04758-5. Epub 2019 Mar 29. PubMed 30927113 ↗
  • Nolden AA, Hwang LD, Boltong A, Reed DR. Chemosensory Changes from Cancer Treatment and Their Effects on Patients' Food Behavior: A Scoping Review. Nutrients. 2019 Sep 24;11(10):2285. doi: 10.3390/nu11102285. PubMed 31554217 ↗
  • Landis BN, Welge-Luessen A, Bramerson A, Bende M, Mueller CA, Nordin S, Hummel T. "Taste Strips" - a rapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based on impregnated filter papers. J Neurol. 2009 Feb;256(2):242-8. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-0088-y. Epub 2009 Feb 7. PubMed 19221845 ↗
  • Mueller CA, Pintscher K, Renner B. Clinical test of gustatory function including umami taste. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 Jun;120(6):358-62. doi: 10.1177/000348941112000602. PubMed 21774441 ↗
  • Mueller C, Kallert S, Renner B, Stiassny K, Temmel AF, Hummel T, Kobal G. Quantitative assessment of gustatory function in a clinical context using impregnated "taste strips". Rhinology. 2003 Mar;41(1):2-6. PubMed 12677732 ↗
  • Buttiron Webber T, Briata IM, DeCensi A, Cevasco I, Paleari L. Taste and Smell Disorders in Cancer Treatment: Results from an Integrative Rapid Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 28;24(3):2538. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032538. PubMed 36768861 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 23 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 5, 2025
First posted
Jan 5, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Jan 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07317752
Lead sponsor
Azienda Sanitaria Locale CN2 Alba-Bra
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 5, 2026
Start date
Jan 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 5, 2026

Study contacts

Cloè Dalla Costa, MD
Contact
cdallacosta@aslcn2.it
+39.0172.1408493

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion