ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06311877Updated Apr 18, 2025

Effects of Flavor Modification for Management of Radiation Induced Dysgeusia

An interventional study of mBerry and No intervention in Dysgeusia, sponsored by University of South Florida. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-18.

Sponsored by University of South Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intervention for dysgeusia in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. This research proposal aims to investigate potential benefits of mBerry in improving quality of life and nutritional outcome in head and neck cancer patients' post-radiation therapy. Our hypothesis is that cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy will benefit from use of miracle berry in treatment of dysgeusia.

Read the detailed description

Dysgeusia, characterized by altered taste, is a common side effect of radiation used in oropharyngeal cancer treatment. Radiation affects taste buds, leading to issues like loss of appetite, malnutrition, dependence on feeding tubes, dysphagia, and impacts social and overall quality of life. Patients often report bitter, metallic or no taste with food after radiation. Miracle berries, known for interacting with sweet taste receptors, could potentially transform acidic tastes into sweet ones.

The aim is to explore mBerry's potential in alleviating dysgeusia, aiding patients in achieving better nutritional status and quality of life.This study includes the use of mBerry tablets, which contain protein within the miracle berry called miraculin, for the treatment of radiation-induced dysgeusia. mBerry is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of radiation-induced dysgeusia. It is being used as part of this research study to find out if mBerry tablets improve taste outcomes among head and neck cancer patients after radiation therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dysgeusia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dysgeusia

52 studies on the registry are indexed under Dysgeusia; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 49 across 28 interventional studies indexed under Dysgeusia.

Browse Dysgeusia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of South Florida is the lead sponsor of 340 studies on the registry; 65 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (24%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Over 18 years
  • Diagnosis of mandibular cancer, tonsillar cancer, and lingual cancer
  • Receiving primary or radiation therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received a total glossectomy or total laryngectomy.
  • Patients with allergies to peanut, latex, peach, or soy will be excluded as they are at increased risk of allergy to mBerry.
  • Diagnosis of diabetes as well as prediabetic patients and those that are taking Metformin.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group given mBerry tablet

    For the experiment group, the clinician will be providing participant with daily 0.4 gram mBerry tablets (total of 112 tablets) to consume twice a day (for two meals) over an 8-week period. The participant will be provided with a log form to track mBerry use for the two meals each day for the 8-week period. They will be requested to bring log to each of the clinical visits which include bi-weekly taste assessments.

    Dietary Supplement: mBerry

  • Active comparator
    Control group not receiving mBerry

    The control group will not be given a placebo. The control group will come to clinic for bi-weekly taste assessments.

    Other: No intervention

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementmBerry

    mBerry tablets (.4 grams), which contain protein within the miracle berry called miraculin.

  • OtherNo intervention

    The control group will not received intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 5-Point Hedonic Rating Scale

    Taste Test Scale used to assessing liking or preference of taste of a product. Dislike Very Much: Assigned a value of 1, this represents strong disliking. Dislike Slightly: Assigned a value of 2, indicating mild disliking. Neither Like nor Dislike: Assigned a value of 3, representing a neutral response. Like Slightly: Assigned a value of 4, indicating mild liking. Like Very Much: Assigned a value of 5, representing strong liking. The higher the number scored indicates the participants enjoyed the taste vs the lower the number participant liked the taste less.

    Time frame: Bi-weekly for 8 weeks

  2. Chemotherapy-induced Taste Alteration Scale (CITAS)

    Perceived taste scale- Self- administered questionnaire of 18 items evaluated on a five-point. Using a Likert scale 1-5 (where 1 = no difficulty or absence of the disturbance and 5 = maximum difficulty or disturbance). Higher scores indicate more severe taste alterations.

    Time frame: Bi-weekly for 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

    Patient questionaire on swallow function. Scored on a scale score from 0 to 100. Lower the scores indicate a greater impact of dysphagia on the patients quality of life.

    Time frame: Bi-weekly for 8 weeks

  2. Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS)

    Level of least restrictive diet- the higher the number the participant is able to eat by mouth the lesser of number the patient might be reliable on a feeding tube

    Time frame: Bi-weekly for 8 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Patients weight measurement

    Weight

    Time frame: Patients will be seen for 4 follow-up appointments in the 8 week time frame of the study. The patient will be weighed at the 1st and 4th follow-up visit.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06311877
Responsible party
Jennifer Larsson (Speech-Language Pathologist, University of South Florida) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 15, 2024
Start date
Sep 8, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 14, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 14, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 18, 2025

Study contacts

Jennifer Larsson
principal investigator · University of South Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion