ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06669416TASUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Taste Alterations Study

An interventional study of Taste Alteration Self-Assessment and Taste Alternation Self-Management in Chemotherapy Side Effects and Taste, Altered, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2024; still recruiting 1 year 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does completing a standard assessment increase the detection of chemotherapy induced taste changes compared with usual care (no assessment)? What TA are experienced? Are there any patterns in TA symptom occurrence based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, cancer type, chemotherapy agent, etc.
  2. Do patients take action to deal with the TA? What strategies are used? Do patients in the intervention group use the assessments to select interventions?
  3. Do the interventions lessen TA symptoms and maintain food intake? Is the treatment (in-depth assessment and education) more effective in lessening the intensity of TA than usual care? Which level of assessment is needed to support symptom management to reduce symptom severity?

Participants will:

Complete baseline assessment before starting their initial chemotherapy infusion (all patients) Participate in baseline patient education based on assigned intervention (usual care vs. treatment) Engage in TA management between chemotherapy infusion clinic visits based on education Visit the clinic for chemotherapy infusions as scheduled; Complete TA assessments and reporting based on intervention; Work with nurse coaches to answer questions and help with the intervention.

Complete study data collection on the 4th chemotherapy cycle (but continue intervention) Complete final data collection at 6 months

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Chemotherapy-induced taste alteration (TA) is a common problem for cancer patients with reported prevalence ranging from 35% to 69%. TA systems are associated with decreased dietary intake, malnutrition, and decreased quality of life with no known treatment. Researchers have demonstrated that breast cancer patients were able to control TA with the use of patient self-monitoring and self-management strategies, but these strategies are relatively untested. Research is needed to confirm the effectiveness of this nurse-led intervention when delivered by clinicians with a heterogeneous patient population.

PURPOSE To increase our understanding of the patient experience with TA during chemotherapy and test if adding steps to assess and lessen taste alterations works better than usual care. The infusion clinics will be randomly assigned and trained to provide usual care or usual care with added strategies. Patients receive care method based on clinic assignment (control/treatment). The study does not involve the use of experimental drugs, devices, or procedure.

METHOD: This prospective cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) is designed to enroll consenting adult cancer patients (n=50/clinic x 8 clinics; N=400) who initiate chemotherapy to evaluate the effect of a nurse-led intervention to engage patients in assessing and self-managing taste alterations (TA) during the first (4) chemotherapy cycles with six months.

INTERVENTION: The nurse-led intervention involves using a single item TA assessment question and an intervention tracking process to evaluate change in outcomes for both groups. The intervention involves using a more extensive valid/reliable assessment tool (Chemotherapy-induced Taste Alterations Scale (CiTAS) teaching the patient to use the findings and the evidence-based Patient Education sheet to select assessment-driven interventions to manage TA symptoms.

OUTCOMES: TA severity (single item and scale); Interventions Used; Patient-reported Effect; Dietary Intake, and BMI.

This study will advance the science by designing and testing the effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention to support infusion clinic patients in TA self-monitoring and management for a heterogenous patient populations beyond breast cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chemotherapy Side Effects
  • Taste, Altered

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • self-management
  • cluster randomized control trial
03

In context

Dysgeusia

52 studies on the registry are indexed under Dysgeusia; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 49 across 28 interventional studies indexed under Dysgeusia.

Browse Dysgeusia studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,351 studies on the registry; 201 are open to participants now.

Of its 332 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 251 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Medical diagnosis of cancer with types limited to the top cancer types [Note: Cancer types that are rare will be excluded]
  • Initiating chemotherapy (first day/first cycle) at participating clinics
  • English speaking/reading (without an interpreter)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Substitute decision-maker (activated)
  • History of head/neck cancer or irradiation
  • Known genetic/metabolic disorder impacting taste (preexisting dysgeusia)
  • Known eating disorder
  • Receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition (special nutritional needs)
  • Pregnant women (unique needs)
  • Patients with medical orders for end of life/hospice care
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control/Usual Care

    Chemotherapy infusion clinics deliver infusion services based on the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) Chemotherapy Administration Safety Standards (2020) including standard toxicity screening and providing standard chemotherapy patient education with general information for managing nausea and other gastrointestinal side effects and nutrition tips. Usual care patients will be supplemented with a single-item question to evaluate taste alteration severity and to gather information about what they are doing and their diet intake.

  • Experimental
    Treatment - TA Self-monitoring and Self-management

    The nurse-led intervention involves using a valid/reliable TA assessment tool (Chemotherapy-induced Taste Alterations Scale (CiTAS) and teaching the patient to use the assessments and the evidence-based Patient Education Sheet to select assessment-driven interventions to manage TA symptoms. Data is collected about the specific actions prescribed in the teaching tool to identify which interventions were used and their overall impact.

    Behavioral: Taste Alteration Self-Assessment · Behavioral: Taste Alternation Self-Management

Interventions

  • BehavioralTaste Alteration Self-Assessment

    The nurse-led intervention involves using a valid/reliable TA assessment tool (Chemotherapy-induced Taste Alterations Scale (CiTAS) and teaching the patient to select assessment-driven interventions to manage TA symptoms.

  • BehavioralTaste Alternation Self-Management

    The nurse-led intervention involves teaching the patient to use the assessments and the evidence-based Patient Education Sheet to select assessment-driven interventions to manage their symptoms. Data will be collected about the specific actions prescribed in the teaching tool and to identify which interventions were used and their overall impact.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Taste Alteration Severity

    A single item question with ordinal rating will be used to confirm taste alterations and evaluate severity of TA (control) The CiTAS tool (18 item ordinal rating tool) will be used to confirm taste alterations and evaluate severity of TA (treatment)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months.

  2. Body mass index (BMI)

    BMI is measured to monitor for changes in weight relative to height; It is used to monitor for changes in weight that may indicate that patient is experiencing weight loss during chemotherapy treatment.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months.

  3. Dietary intake

    All patients will be asked to report number of meals/day, number of snacks/day, and number of supplements per day as an estimate of food intake during chemotherapy.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kano T, Kanda K. Development and validation of a chemotherapy-induced taste alteration scale. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Mar;40(2):E79-85. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.E79-E85. PubMed 23448748 ↗
  • Kinjo T, Kanda K, Fujimoto K. Effects of a self-monitoring intervention in breast cancer patients suffering from taste alterations induced by chemotherapy: A randomized, parallel-group controlled trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Jun;52:101956. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101956. Epub 2021 Apr 14. PubMed 33940487 ↗
  • Asano S, Sawatari H, Mentani H, Shimada Y, Takahashi M, Fudano K, Sasaki K, Niitani M, Tanabe K, Kataoka T. Taste Disorders: Effect of Education in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Jun 1;24(3):265-271. doi: 10.1188/20.CJON.265-271. PubMed 32441675 ↗
  • Barlow LA. The sense of taste: Development, regeneration, and dysfunction. WIREs Mech Dis. 2022 May;14(3):e1547. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1547. Epub 2021 Nov 30. PubMed 34850604 ↗
  • Braud A, Boucher Y. Taste disorder's management: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jun;24(6):1889-1908. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03299-0. Epub 2020 May 8. PubMed 32385655 ↗
  • Buttiron Webber T, Briata IM, DeCensi A, Cevasco I, Paleari L. Taste and Smell Disorders in Cancer Treatment: Results from an Integrative Rapid Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 28;24(3):2538. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032538. PubMed 36768861 ↗
  • Joseph PV, Nolden A, Kober KM, Paul SM, Cooper BA, Conley YP, Hammer MJ, Wright F, Levine JD, Miaskowski C. Fatigue, Stress, and Functional Status are Associated With Taste Changes in Oncology Patients Receiving Chemotherapy. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Aug;62(2):373-382.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.029. Epub 2020 Nov 28. PubMed 33259906 ↗
  • von Grundherr J, Koch B, Grimm D, Salchow J, Valentini L, Hummel T, Bokemeyer C, Stein A, Mann J. Impact of taste and smell training on taste disorders during chemotherapy - TASTE trial. Cancer Manag Res. 2019 May 16;11:4493-4504. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S188903. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31191011 ↗
  • Kumbargere Nagraj S, George RP, Shetty N, Levenson D, Ferraiolo DM, Shrestha A. Interventions for managing taste disturbances. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 20;12(12):CD010470. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010470.pub3. PubMed 29260510 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 23 months after the start.

Of 18 interventional studies with no phase under Dysgeusia, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 16. This study's planned 23 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 25, 2024
First posted
Nov 1, 2024
StartActual
Dec 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 2026
Last update
Sep 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06669416
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 1, 2024
Start date
Dec 1, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Mary L Hook, PhD, RN
Contact
mary.hook@aah.org
414-218-0990
Mary L Hook, PhD, RN
principal investigator · Aurora Sinai Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion