ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07309133LFP-DYTUpdated Dec 30, 2025

Local Field Potentials in Dystonia

An observational study in Dystonia, Dystonia, Focal and Dystonia, Primary, sponsored by Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-30.

Sponsored by Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
25
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether local field potential (LFP) signals recorded from the globus pallidus interna (GPi) using the Medtronic Percept™ deep brain stimulation (DBS) device can help optimize DBS programming for people with dystonia. The study will also explore whether LFP patterns can serve as a biomarker of disease activity and predict treatment response.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do LFP peaks in the alpha-theta range reliably correlate with dystonia severity and clinical characteristics? Can LFP-based programming achieve similar or better clinical outcomes compared to traditional programming methods? How do LFP profiles change with stimulation and other treatments such as botulinum toxin or oral medications?

Researchers will compare two programming approaches:

Traditional programming based on clinical assessment and imaging. LFP-guided programming based on the site and characteristics of LFP peaks

Participants will:

Undergo DBS surgery for dystonia as part of standard clinical care. Attend regular follow-up visits for DBS programming and outcome assessments. Complete clinical rating scales for dystonia severity, quality of life, cognition, and mood.

Take part in neurophysiological assessments, including surface EMG, EEG, and reaction time tasks.

Have LFP recordings collected using the Medtronic Percept™ device during clinic visits and, where possible, at home using device sensing features.

This study will help determine whether LFP analysis can shorten the time to optimal DBS settings and improve outcomes for people with dystonia.

Read the detailed description

Dystonia is a disabling movement disorder characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions that cause abnormal postures and movements. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus interna (GPi) is an established treatment for patients who do not respond adequately to first-line therapies such as botulinum toxin. However, clinical response to DBS in dystonia is highly variable, and optimization of stimulation settings often requires months of trial and error. This delay can prolong disability and increase healthcare burden.

Local field potentials (LFPs) are neural signals recorded from implanted DBS electrodes. In Parkinson's disease, LFP analysis has been used to guide programming and develop adaptive stimulation strategies. In dystonia, early studies suggest that low-frequency LFP peaks (typically in the alpha-theta range) may correlate with disease severity and optimal stimulation sites, but these findings have been limited to short-term recordings using externalized leads. The Medtronic Percept™ DBS system now allows chronic sensing of LFPs during routine clinical care, creating an opportunity to validate these observations and assess their clinical utility.

This single-site, prospective study will evaluate whether LFP profiles recorded from the GPi can guide DBS programming in patients with primary dystonia. The study includes an internal pilot phase followed by two main cohorts. Cohort 2 will undergo traditional programming based on clinical assessment and imaging, with LFP recordings collected at each visit. Cohort 3 will use an LFP-guided approach, selecting contacts and stimulation parameters based on the site and characteristics of LFP peaks. Participants will be followed for up to 12 months, with blinded video assessments and standardized rating scales to compare outcomes between programming strategies. Neurophysiological measures such as surface electromyography (EMG), electroencephalography (EEG), and reaction time tasks will also be collected to explore mechanistic links between stimulation and motor control.

The study aims to determine whether LFP analysis can shorten the time to optimal DBS settings and improve clinical outcomes compared to traditional methods. If successful, this approach could inform future development of adaptive DBS systems for dystonia, reducing variability in care and improving patient quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dystonia
  • Dystonia, Focal
  • Dystonia, Primary

Keywords

  • Deep Brain Stimulation
  • DBS
  • Globus Pallidus Interna
  • Local Field Potentials
  • Neurostimulation
  • Neurophysiology
03

In context

Dystonia

213 studies on the registry are indexed under Dystonia; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 25 is below the median of 78 across 90 observational studies indexed under Dystonia.

Browse Dystonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 67 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults (≥18 years) with a clinical diagnosis of primary dystonia (including idiopathic adult-onset focal cervical dystonia and young-onset generalized dystonia such as DYT1).

All participants are scheduled to undergo deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus interna (GPi) as part of standard clinical care.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older at screening.
  • Clear clinical diagnosis of primary dystonia (idiopathic or genetic forms).
  • Candidate for GPi DBS surgery for dystonia treatment.
  • Able to provide .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant neurological or psychiatric disorder (including dementia) that would interfere with outcome evaluation.
  • Participation in a therapeutic research trial within the last year.
  • Diagnosis of functional (psychogenic) dystonia.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
25 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cohort 1 (Pilot group)

    Description: First 3 participants with primary dystonia undergoing DBS. Used to optimize LFP sensing workflow and confirm the feasibility of data collection. Population: Adults (≥18 years) with primary dystonia scheduled for GPi DBS. Purpose: Workflow development and initial LFP data collection.

    Device: Deep Brain Stimulation System

  • Cohort 2 (Main observational group)

    Description: 8-10 participants with primary dystonia undergoing DBS and programmed using traditional clinical methods. LFP recordings are collected at each visit for correlation analysis. Population: Adults with primary dystonia (including idiopathic cervical dystonia and generalized dystonia). Purpose: Assess the relationship between LFP profiles and optimal stimulation sites determined by standard programming.

    Device: Deep Brain Stimulation System

  • Cohort 3 (Exploratory programming group)

    Description: 10-15 participants with primary dystonia who may receive programming guided by LFP analysis if interim results support feasibility. Population: Adults with primary dystonia undergoing DBS. Purpose: Explore whether LFP-guided programming improves clinical outcomes compared to traditional methods.

    Device: Deep Brain Stimulation System

Interventions

  • DeviceDeep Brain Stimulation System

    The Medtronic Percept™ DBS system will be used as part of standard clinical care for dystonia. The study will utilize the device's sensing capabilities (BrainSense™) to record local field potentials for research purposes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation between GPi LFP peak characteristics and dystonia severity

    Assess whether local field potential (LFP) peaks recorded from the globus pallidus interna using the Medtronic Percept™ DBS system correlate with clinical severity of dystonia as measured by standardized rating scales (e.g., TWSTRS for cervical dystonia, BFMDRS for generalized dystonia).

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-activation) up to 1 year post-DBS activation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in LFP peak amplitude with DBS stimulation

    Assess whether DBS stimulation parameters reduce LFP peak amplitude in the alpha-theta range during programming sessions.

    Time frame: Activation visit and follow-up visits up to 12 months

  2. Relationship between LFP peak location and optimal stimulation contact

    Evaluate whether the electrode contact with the highest LFP peak corresponds to the contact selected as optimal during traditional programming.

    Time frame: Baseline and follow-up to 12 months post-activation

  3. Association between LFP changes and clinical improvement

    Investigate whether suppression or modulation of LFP peaks correlates with improvement in dystonia severity scores.

    Time frame: Baseline and follow-up until 12 months post-activation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Clinical Ageing Research Unit,
    Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear NE4 6BE, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • David Ledingham, MA, MBBS · Contactdavid.ledingham1@nhs.net · +441912336161
    • David Ledingham, MA, MBBS · Principal investigator
    • Nicola Pavese, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Mark Baker, MA, MBBChir · Sub investigator
    • Mohammed Hussain, BSc, MBBS · Sub investigator
    • Claire Nicholson, BSc, BA, MB ChB · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ledingham D, Gibbs M, Mills R, Jenkins A, Nicholson C, Hussain MA, Baker M, Pavese N. Decoding Cervical Dystonia: Insights from Local Field Potentials in a Case Study Utilizing Open-Source Toolboxes. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2025 Oct;12(10):1675-1678. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.70164. Epub 2025 Jun 5. No abstract available. PubMed 40470846 ↗
  • Ledingham D, Baker M, Pavese N. Local field potentials: Therapeutic implications for DBS in dystonia including adaptive DBS for dystonia. Deep Brain Stimulation. 2024;5:4-19. doi:10.1016/j.jdbs.2024.03.003
  • Ledingham D, Mills R, Gibbs M, Maynes M, Pal A, Iredale R, Foster V, Ong S, Sathyanarayana S, Jenkins A, Nicholson C, Hussain M, Baker MR, Pavese N. Prospective multi-phase observational study evaluating local field potentials to guide deep brain stimulation programming in dystonia at a UK Tertiary Neurosciences Centre (LFP-DYT): a protocol. BMJ Open. 2026 May 7;16(5):e117391. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117391. PubMed 42097654 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will be stored securely and used only for approved analyses; summary results will be published.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 39 months after the start.

Of 27 observational studies under Dystonia, half reached primary completion within 72 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 58 and three quarters within 188. This study's planned 39 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 15, 2025
First posted
Dec 30, 2025
StartActual
Sep 4, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Dec 30, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07309133
Lead sponsor
Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust
Collaborators
Medtronic, Dystonia Europe
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 30, 2025
Start date
Sep 4, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 30, 2025

Study contacts

David Ledingham, MA, MBBS
Contact
david.ledingham1@nhs.net
+441912826161

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion