ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04113447Updated Jul 20, 2025

Mitochondrial Donation: An 18 Month Outcome Study.

An observational study in Mitochondrial Diseases, sponsored by Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-20.

Sponsored by Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2017; still recruiting 9 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
25
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The Investigator proposes to record the fetal and postnatal development of children conceived using Mitochondrial Donation (MD) and to perform expert assessment of development at 18 months (corrected for gestational age) using the internationally validated Bayley-III developmental assessment tool.

Read the detailed description

To record the fetal and postnatal development of children conceived using Mitochondrial Donation and to perform internationally validated Bayley-III developmental assessment tool at 18 months (corrected for gestational age).

The null hypothesis for this research is that children born following the use of Mitochondrial Donation (IVF) techniques have normal neurodevelopment developmental outcomes at 18 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mitochondrial Diseases
03

In context

Mitochondrial Diseases

189 studies on the registry are indexed under Mitochondrial Diseases; 60 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 25 is below the median of 80 across 65 observational studies indexed under Mitochondrial Diseases.

Browse Mitochondrial Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 67 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Women with mitochondrial disease undergoing mitochondrial donation treatment

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Women will only be eligible if they meet all of the following criteria.

  • Women with confirmed mtDNA mutation
  • Suitable to undergo Mitochondrial Donation as a treatment (in line with HFEA license)
  • for the study obtained before Mitochondrial Donation treatment commences
  • Ability and willingness to adhere to the protocol including evaluation schedule
  • Willingness to make available information collected during pregnancy, delivery and up to the child's age of 18 months (corrected for gestational age)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Women will not be eligible if they meet any of the following criteria

  • Declined Mitochondrial Donation as a treatment (in line with HFEA license)
  • Inability or unwillingness to adhere to the protocol including evaluation schedule
  • Unwillingness to make available information collected during pregnancy, delivery and up to the child's age of 18 months (corrected for gestational age)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
25 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Otherobservational

    observational

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. A normal neurodevelopmental quotient scored using a Bayley-III ( Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition) at 18 months (corrected

    The Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley III) measures physical, motor, sensory, and cognitive development in babies and young children. The scale encompasses five developmental domains - cognitive, language, motor, social-emotional and adaptive behaviour. The structure of the Bayley-III Scales allows clinicians to administer each of the five scales (cognitive, language-receptive and expressive, motor-fine and gross, social-emotional, and adaptive behaviour) independent of others. Higher scores in each scale indicates more advanced development. Performance is summarised via scaled scores for each subtest, and composite scores for each scale, together with percentile ranks, developmental age equivalents, and growth scores. Discrepancy information is used to determine whether there are significant differences between a child's abilities in the domains measured, and how prevalent these differences are in the norming sample. A total score is not provided.

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. 1)Normal hearing as assessed by formal audiology,

    Formal Audiology

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. 2)Normal vision as assessed by ophthalmologist

    Ophthalmology Assessment

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2027, 120 months after the start.

Of 33 observational studies under Mitochondrial Diseases, half reached primary completion within 169 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 26. This study's planned 120 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 13, 2018
First posted
Oct 2, 2019
StartActual
Nov 1, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2027
Last update
Jul 20, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04113447
Lead sponsor
Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust
Collaborators
Wellcome Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 2, 2019
Start date
Nov 1, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 20, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion