CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07304453Updated Dec 26, 2025

Nucleo CMP and Neurorubine Versus Carbamazepine for Classical Trigeminal Neuralgia

A Phase 2 interventional study of Conventional Carbamazepine Therapy and Nucleo CMP and Neurorubine Combination in Trigeminal Neuralgia and Neuropathic Pain, sponsored by Karbala University. Completed at 1 site in Iraq. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-26.

Sponsored by Karbala University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2024, registered Nov 2025).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Trigeminal neuralgia is a severe facial pain condition that significantly impacts quality of life. While the standard medication, carbamazepine, provides relief, it is often associated with side effects and rapid pain recurrence upon discontinuation. This randomized clinical trial compares the efficacy and safety of conventional carbamazepine therapy against a novel combination therapy consisting of Nucleo CMP (cytidine monophosphate) and Neurorubine (Vitamin B complex). The study aims to evaluate pain reduction during active treatment and the sustainability of pain control after treatment cessation.

Read the detailed description

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe neuropathic pain disorder characterized by paroxysmal electric shock-like pain in the trigeminal nerve distribution. While anticonvulsants, particularly carbamazepine, are the first-line treatment, they often provide incomplete relief, are associated with dose-limiting side effects (sedation, dizziness), and may lead to tolerance over time. This study investigates a novel therapeutic approach targeting nerve regeneration rather than solely symptom suppression.

This randomized, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, active-controlled clinical trial evaluates the efficacy, safety, and long-term sustainability of a combination therapy consisting of Nucleo CMP (cytidine monophosphate) and Neurorubine (Vitamin B complex: B1, B6, B12) compared to conventional carbamazepine therapy.

The study enrolled 38 patients diagnosed with classical trigeminal neuralgia according to International Headache Society criteria. Participants were randomized to one of two arms:

Control Group: Received Carbamazepine initiated at 100mg twice daily, titrated based on response and tolerability up to 400mg twice daily.

Intervention Group: Received a combination protocol. For weeks 1-6, participants took two capsules of Nucleo CMP and two tablets of Neurorubine daily. For weeks 7-9, participants entered a maintenance phase taking one tablet of Neurorubine daily.

The primary objective is to assess pain reduction using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary objectives include the frequency of pain attacks per day, safety/tolerability profiles, and the sustainability of pain control following the cessation of active treatment. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 weeks following treatment cessation. The study hypothesizes that the neuroprotective and neuroregenerative properties of the combination therapy will provide superior sustained pain control compared to the symptomatic relief provided by carbamazepine.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trigeminal Neuralgia
  • Neuropathic Pain

Keywords

  • Trigeminal Neuralgial
  • Nucleo CMP
  • Neurorubine
  • Carbamazepine
03

In context

Trigeminal Neuralgia

135 studies on the registry are indexed under Trigeminal Neuralgia; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 38 is close to the median of 40 across 92 interventional studies indexed under Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Browse Trigeminal Neuralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Karbala University is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

.• Age between 18-80 years

  • Clinical diagnosis of classical trigeminal neuralgia according to International
  • Headache Society (IHS) diagnostic criteria
  • Pain duration of at least 3 months
  • Baseline Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score greater than or equal to 4
  • Ability to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures
  • No contraindications to study medications

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary trigeminal neuralgia due to underlying pathology
  • Atypical facial pain or other orofacial pain conditions
  • Significant cardiovascular, hepatic, or renal disease
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Current use of anticonvulsants or other neuropathic pain medications
  • History of allergic reactions to study medications
  • Cognitive impairment preventing reliable pain assessment
  • Concurrent participation in other clinical trials
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Carbamazepine Therapy

    Participants received conventional carbamazepine tablets administered orally with meals. Treatment was initiated at 100 mg twice daily, with dose titration based on clinical response and tolerability up to a maximum of 400 mg twice daily.

    Drug: Conventional Carbamazepine Therapy

  • Experimental
    Nucleo CMP and Neurorubine Combination

    participants received a combination regimen administered orally with meals. During Weeks 1-6, patients took two capsules of Nucleo CMP daily plus two tablets of Neurorubine daily. During Weeks 7-9 (maintenance phase), patients took one tablet of Neurorubine daily.

    Drug: Nucleo CMP and Neurorubine Combination

Interventions

  • DrugConventional Carbamazepine Therapy

    Carbamazepine (Control): An anticonvulsant that acts primarily by blocking sodium channels to reduce nerve hyperexcitability. It provides symptomatic relief by suppressing pain transmission.

  • DrugNucleo CMP and Neurorubine Combination

    Nucleo CMP + Neurorubine (Experimental): A combination of nucleotides (cytidine monophosphate) and neurotropic B-vitamins (B1, B6, B12). This intervention aims to be neuroregenerative, promoting myelin formation and axonal repair rather than just suppressing pain signals.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Intensity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

    Pain intensity was assessed using a standardized 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients indicated their pain level on a continuous line anchored by 0 and 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst possible pain." Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. Assessments were recorded at Baseline, Week 3, Week 6, and Week 9 (3 weeks post-treatment cessation).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6, and Week 9 (3 weeks post-treatment cessation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency of Pain Attacks

    The average number of paroxysmal pain attacks occurring per day, recorded by patients in daily diaries. Higher numbers indicate higher disease burden.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 3, Week 6, and Week 9 (3 weeks post-treatment cessation)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Oral Medicine Clinic, College of Dentistry, University of Kerbala
    Karbala, Kerbala, Iraq
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07304453
Lead sponsor
Karbala University
Responsible party
Salah M. Ibrahim (Chief oral surgery department, Kufa University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 26, 2025
Start date
Jan 7, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 14, 2024
Completion
Sep 30, 2024
Last update
Dec 26, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion