ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06851910Updated Sep 15, 2026

Intravenous Lacosamide for the Treatment of Acute Pain in Trigeminal Neuralgia

An observational study in Trigeminal Neuralgia, sponsored by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2025; still recruiting 1 year 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective observational study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of intravenous lacosamide as a rescue treatment for acute pain in patients presenting to the emergency department with trigeminal neuralgia

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective observational investigation evaluating the effectiveness and safety of intravenous lacosamide as a rescue treatment for acute pain exacerbations in trigeminal neuralgia. The trial will be conducted at Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge over a two-year period, enrolling approximately 20 patients who present to the emergency department with acute TN pain and receive intravenous lacosamide based on the treating physician's discretion.

Trigeminal neuralgia is characterized by severe, paroxysmal facial pain, often resistant to conventional therapies. While sodium channel blockers such as carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine are first-line treatments, many patients experience refractory pain or unacceptable side effects. Evidence supporting intravenous options for acute exacerbations remains limited, with studies suggesting potential benefits of phenytoin, lidocaine, and lacosamide. Lacosamide, a voltage-gated sodium channel modulator with a slow inactivation mechanism, has demonstrated efficacy in neuropathic pain and retrospective analyses of TN cases. However, no prospective studies have systematically evaluated its impact in the acute setting.

Data collection will include demographic and clinical variables, TN characteristics, prior treatments, lacosamide infusion parameters, and concurrent medication use. Pain response will be assessed using an 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at baseline, 2 hours post-infusion, at ED discharge, and at 24 hours and 7 days. Additional outcomes include changes in attack frequency, interference with daily activities (Brief Pain Inventory-Facial), patient satisfaction (PGIC), duration of pain relief, and adverse events at multiple time points.

Lacosamide will be administered intravenously per standard clinical practice, with continuous hemodynamic monitoring during and after infusion. Patients will be followed in the ED for at least 2 hours, with structured telephone follow-ups at 24 hours and 7 days post-infusion.

This study aims to generate real-world data on the effectiveness of intravenous lacosamide in acute TN exacerbations. Given the lack of high-quality evidence for emergency pain management in TN, findings may inform future controlled trials and refine clinical recommendations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trigeminal Neuralgia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • trigeminal neuralgia
  • lacosamide
  • acute treatment
  • rescue treatment
03

In context

Trigeminal Neuralgia

140 studies on the registry are indexed under Trigeminal Neuralgia; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 84 across 38 observational studies indexed under Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Browse Trigeminal Neuralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge is the lead sponsor of 120 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients diagnosed with primary trigeminal neuralgia

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

All patients diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia who present to the emergency department of Hospital de Bellvitge for an acute pain exacerbation and are prescribed intravenous lacosamide as symptomatic pain treatment, according to the treating physician's discretion, will be considered for inclusion.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of classical or idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia according to the criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3).
  • Age over 18 years.
  • Signed .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • for treatment with lacosamide (previous reaction, known atrioventricular block).
  • Mental or psychiatric illness that interferes with the ability to understand and sign the .
  • Language barrier.
  • Lack of cooperation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Patients will be included if they are prescribed intravenous lacosamide for their trigeminal neuralgia exacerbation

    Also known as: Vimpat

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain relief

    Measured by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). A decrease of ≥50% from baseline indicates improvement in pain intensity.

    Time frame: 2 hours post-infusion

  2. Adverse effects

    Incidence of adverse effects

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sustained pain relief

    ≥30%, ≥50% and 75% changes in the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Reduction in the number of paroxysms.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week

  2. Impact on daily activities

    Assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory-Facial (BPI-Facial), a 14-question scale measuring pain interference with daily activities. Each question is rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference), with higher scores indicating greater impairment.

    Time frame: After 7 days

  3. Patient Global Impression of Change

    Measured using the 7-point Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, which ranges from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Lower scores indicate greater perceived improvement.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospital de Bellvitge
    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona 08907, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Albert Muñoz Vendrell, PhD · Contactunitatcefalea@bellvitgehospital.cat · +34932607412
    • Albert Muñoz Vendrell, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Mariano Huerta Villanueva, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Sergio Campoy, MD · Sub investigator
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 32 months after the start.

Of 19 observational studies under Trigeminal Neuralgia, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 32 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 20, 2025
First posted
Feb 28, 2025
StartActual
Apr 21, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06851910
Responsible party
Albert Muñoz Vendrell (Principal Investigator, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 28, 2025
Start date
Apr 21, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Albert Muñoz Vendrell, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion