ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07301164Updated Sep 23, 2026

Clinical Study of BCT301 Cell Injection Therapy for Refractory Autoimmune Diseases

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of BCT301 in System Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) and Inflammatory Myositis, sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Sponsored by Peking University Third Hospital · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study primarily involves the use of BCT301, an anti-CD19 Chemically induced pluripotent stem cell (CiPSC)-derived CAR-iT cells, for the treatment of patients with refractory autoimmune diseases, aiming to evaluate its safety, tolerability, and dose-limiting toxicities(DLT), and to determine the recommended therapeutic dose for further investigation. Additionally, the study assesses the efficacy of BCT301 cell injection in refractory autoimmune diseases, as well as the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics in study participants.

Read the detailed description

Autoimmune diseases are a class of disorders caused by abnormal immune responses against the body's own tissues or organs. Although significant therapeutic advances have been made, such as the use of biologics (e.g., rituximab), most available drugs can only alleviate symptoms or slow disease progression, rather than achieve a complete cure.BCT301 cell injection is a CD19-targeted CAR-iT (chemically induced T-cell) therapy derived from human chemically induced pluripotent stem cells (CiPSCs) through chemical reprogramming technology. Starting from healthy donor cells, human CiPSCs are generated via small molecule-based reprogramming, followed by induced hematopoietic differentiation, iT-cell differentiation and expansion, and finally CAR lentiviral transduction to produce the off-the-shelf, CD19-targeted CAR-iT cell product (BCT301 cell injection). This approach holds promise as a potentially effective treatment strategy.

02

Conditions studied

  • System Lupus Erythematosus
  • Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)
  • Inflammatory Myositis
  • Antiphospholipid Syndrome
  • ANCA Associated Vasculitis
  • Sjogren Syndrome
03

In context

Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

1,207 studies on the registry are indexed under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; 405 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 52 across 876 interventional studies indexed under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic.

Browse Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking University Third Hospital is the lead sponsor of 752 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

General Inclusion Criteria

  1. Voluntarily sign the form.
  2. Male or female, aged 18-80 years (inclusive), with a body weight ≥40 kg.
  3. Female participants of and male participants with female partners of childbearing potential must use medically approved methods or practice abstinence during the treatment period and for at least 6 months after the end of the treatment. Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test within 7 days prior to enrollment and must not be breastfeeding.
  4. Participants currently receiving one or more of the following treatments at stable doses: , antimalarials, :

    1. If the participant is receiving glucocorticoid therapy, the following conditions must be met: the maximum dose at screening and during the screening period is 30 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent). The dose must have been stable for ≥7 days prior to screening, and adjustments during the screening period must not exceed 5 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent);
    2. If the participant is receiving antimalarials and/or conventional immunosuppressants: the treatment must have been initiated ≥12 weeks prior to screening. The dose must have been stable for ≥8 weeks prior to screening and remain stable during the screening period;
    3. If biological agents (belimumab, telitacicept, rituximab, etc.) were used prior to the screening period, a of at least 5 half-lives must be completed before screening.
  5. Peripheral blood B cells must show positive CD19 expression as detected by flow cytometry.

Disease-Specific Inclusion Criteria

1. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

  1. Meet the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for SLE.
  2. Have moderate to severe disease activity at screening, with a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2000) score >6.
  3. Have inadequate response to conventional therapy or experience disease relapse after remission. Conventional therapy includes glucocorticoids (at full or pulse doses), two or more immunosuppressants, or biologic agents for at least 6 months, including cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine, leflunomide, methotrexate, belimumab, telitacicept, and rituximab.
  4. Have positive serological autoantibody tests: positive antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and/or anti-ds-DNA antibodies and/or anti-Sm antibodies.

2. Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)

  1. Meet the 2013 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SSc.
  2. Fulfill either (a) or (b) below:

    1. Inadequate response to conventional therapy or disease relapse after remission. Conventional therapy includes glucocorticoids (at full or pulse doses), two or more immunosuppressants, or biologic agents for at least 6 months, including cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine, leflunomide, methotrexate, belimumab, telitacicept, and rituximab.
    2. Disease progression: skin progression with a modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) ≥10; and/or interstitial lung disease evidenced by ground-glass opacities on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT); a decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥10%, or a decline in FVC ≥5% accompanied by a decline in diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≥15%.
  3. Have positive SSc-related autoantibodies. 3. Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS)

1) Meet the 2006 Sydney criteria for primary antiphospholipid syndrome. 2) Have medium to high titers of antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LA], anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 [β2GP1] IgG/IgM, or anti-cardiolipin [aCL] IgG/IgM); 3) Fulfill either (a) or (b) below:

  1. Receiving standard treatment with warfarin or alternative vitamin K antagonists (maintaining target [INR]), or standard therapeutic doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and/or glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants/biologics (e.g., cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, rituximab, etc.).
  2. Meet all four criteria for catastrophic APS:

i) Involvement of three or more organs, systems, and/or tissues; ii) Development of manifestations within one week; iii) Histopathological confirmation of small vessel occlusion in at least one organ or tissue; iv) Positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL).

4. Inflammatory Myopathy (IM)

  1. Meet the 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathy (including dermatomyositis, polymyositis, anti-synthetase syndrome, and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy).
  2. Have positive myositis-specific autoantibodies.
  3. For participants with muscle involvement: a Manual Muscle Test-8 (MMT-8) score \<142, and at least two of the following five core abnormalities: Physician Global Assessment ≥2, Patient Global Assessment ≥2, or extramuscular disease activity score ≥2; Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) total score ≥0.25; muscle enzyme levels ≥1.5 times the ; or MMT-8 ≥142 but with active interstitial lung disease (ground-glass opacities on HRCT).

5. Sjögren's Syndrome (SS)

  1. Meet the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome.
  2. Have a EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) score ≥5.
  3. Have positive anti-SSA/Ro antibodies.
  4. Have inadequate response to conventional therapy or disease relapse after remission. Conventional therapy includes glucocorticoids (at full or pulse doses), two or more immunosuppressants, or biologic agents for at least 6 months, including cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine, leflunomide, methotrexate, belimumab, telitacicept, and rituximab.

6. Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis (AAV)

  1. Meet the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), including microscopic polyangiitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
  2. Have a history of or currently positive ANCA.
  3. Have a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) ≥15 (total score 63).
  4. Have inadequate response to conventional therapy or disease relapse after remission. Conventional therapy includes glucocorticoids (at full or pulse doses), two or more immunosuppressants, or biologic agents for at least 6 months, including cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine, leflunomide, methotrexate, belimumab, telitacicept, and rituximab.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Study participants who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:

  1. Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would contraindicate participation in the study, such as a life-threatening illness.
  2. Decreased organ function reserve not attributable to the primary disease:

    a) \<1×10⁹/L; lymphocyte count \<0.3×10⁹/L; \<70 g/L; count \<50×10⁹/L; b) (ALT) >3 × (ULN); aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3 × ULN; total >2 × ULN; c) \<40 mL/min; estimated (eGFR) \<30 mL/min/1.73 m²; or serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL; d) (LVEF) \<45% as measured by echocardiography; e) Oxygen saturation \<92% on room air.

  3. History of alcohol or substance abuse within the past 24 weeks.
  4. History of other than B-cell lymphoma.
  5. Presence of infections including (HIV), hypogammaglobulinemia, T-cell deficiency, syphilis, chronic or C, or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
  6. Known active tuberculosis (TB) infection or active bacterial infection.
  7. History of myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty or stenting, unstable angina, arrhythmia, or other clinically significant cardiac disease within 6 months prior to screening.
  8. Symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism within 6 months prior to screening, except in cases of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).
  9. History of severe allergic reaction to any component of cellular therapy or other immunotherapeutic agents.
  10. Prior organ transplant requiring ongoing therapy.
  11. Concurrent participation in another clinical trial that may interfere with disease assessment or study treatment.
  12. Prior treatment with CD19- and/or BCMA-targeted therapy or any CAR-T cell product; except in cases where prior therapy is deemed to have clearly failed (e.g., no response, short duration of response, or disease progression) as assessed by the investigator, the current disease state warrants the study treatment, and there is no clear evidence that toxicity from prior therapy would compromise the safety of the current study.
  13. Severe psychiatric disorder or significant cognitive impairment.
  14. Pregnancy, lactation, or planned pregnancy.
  15. Any other condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the participant unsuitable for enrollment in this clinical trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(20)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Washout period

A planned gap after a treatment, so that its effects can lessen before the study treatment or a study assessment. Ask the study team and the doctor who prescribed it before changing any medicine.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BCT301

    Biological: BCT301

Interventions

  • BiologicalBCT301

    BCT301, an anti-CD19 Chemically induced pluripotent stem cell (CiPSC)-derived CAR-iT cells.Participants will receive a single infusion of BCT301 cell injection at escalating dose levels.Prior to infusion, patients undergo a lymphodepleting conditioning regimen with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide given intravenously for three consecutive days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dose-limiting toxicities of BCT301

    Adverse events occurring within 28 days post-infusion that were possibly, probably, or definitely related to BCT301 cell injection (per NCI-CTCAE v5.0).

    Time frame: 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of refractory systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE)- The change of SLEDAI-2K

    The primary efficacy endpoint will be the change from baseline in the SLEDAI-2K score. The SLEDAI-2K is a validated index for assessing SLE disease activity, with scores ranging from 0 to 105. A higher score indicates worse disease activity.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  2. Efficacy of refractory SLE-The change of PGA

    The Physician Global Assessment (PGA) will be used to evaluate overall SLE disease activity. The PGA is a clinician's determination of disease activity based on history and physical exam, independent of laboratory results. It is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, where a higher score indicates worse disease activity.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  3. Efficacy of refractory SLE-The change of SF36

    The SF-36 health survey will be employed as a patient-reported outcome to assess health-related quality of life. This 36-item questionnaire generates scores from 0 to 100 across eight health domains and two summary components (Physical and Mental). A lower score indicates a worse health state

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  4. Efficacy of refractory SLE-The change of antibodies

    Changes in autoantibody titers (e.g., anti-dsDNA) will be assessed as a serological outcome. A higher autoantibody titer reflects more severe underlying immunologic activity

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  5. Efficacy of refractory systemic sclerosis (SSc)-The change of mRSS

    The modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) will be the primary endpoint to assess skin disease activity. The mRSS evaluates skin thickness in 17 body areas, with each scored from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe thickening). The total score ranges from 0 to 51, where a higher score indicates worse skin involvement and a poorer prognosis.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  6. Efficacy of refractory SSc-The change of CRISS

    The Combined Response Index for Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) will be used as the primary composite endpoint. This index calculates a probability of improvement (score from 0.0 to 1.0) by integrating changes in skin thickness (mRSS), physician and patient global assessments, functional ability (HAQ-DI), and the absence of new organ damage. A higher score indicates a better treatment response, while a score of 0 indicates treatment failure.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  7. Efficacy of refractory SSc-The change of antibodies

    Changes in autoantibody titers (e.g., anti-SCL70) will be assessed as a serological outcome. A higher autoantibody titer reflects more severe underlying immunologic activity.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  8. Efficacy of refractory Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS)-new onset thrombotic event

    The primary efficacy endpoint is the time to first new objectively confirmed arterial or venous thrombotic event. The occurrence of a new thrombotic event is considered a treatment failure, as it directly demonstrates the failure of the therapy.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  9. Efficacy of refractory APS-The change of antibodies

    Reduction in titers of antiphospholipid antibodies (aCL, anti-β2GPI, and LA) will be assessed as a key biomarker of response. A decrease in these antibody levels is interpreted as evidence of a positive immunologic treatment effect.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  10. Efficacy of refractory APS-The change of platelet

    In patients with baseline thrombocytopenia, an increase in platelet count is considered a positive indicator of treatment efficacy, signifying control of the underlying autoimmune and consumptive processes in APS.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  11. Efficacy of refractory APS- The change of fibrinogen

    In patients with baseline hypofibrinogenemia, an increase in fibrinogen level is considered a positive indicator of treatment efficacy

    Time frame: 90、180、360 days

  12. Efficacy of refractory inflammatory myositis (IM)-The change of TIS

    Total Improvement ScoreThe Total Improvement Score (TIS) will be the primary endpoint to define treatment response. The TIS is a composite score (range 0-15) quantifying improvement from baseline across six core domains: muscle strength, physical function, physician and patient global assessments, muscle enzymes, and extramuscular activity. A TIS of ≥ 20 is defined as a clinically meaningful treatment response, with a higher score indicating a greater magnitude of improvement.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  13. Efficacy of refractory IM-The change of CK

    Serum Creatine Kinase (CK) level will be assessed as a key biomarker of muscle inflammation. A reduction in CK from baseline, is a defined indicator of positive biochemical treatment response.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  14. Efficacy of refractory IM-The change of antibodies

    Reduction in titers of antibodies (e.g. anti-MDA5) will be assessed as a key biomarker of response. A decrease in these antibody levels is interpreted as evidence of a positive immunologic treatment effect.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  15. Efficacy of refractory Sjögren's Disease(SjD)-The change of ESSDAI

    The EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) will be the primary endpoint to assess systemic disease activity. The ESSDAI scores 12 organ domains, with a total range from 0 (no activity) to 123 (maximal activity). A reduction in the ESSDAI score of ≥3 points from baseline defines a clinically meaningful treatment response, indicating effective suppression of systemic disease.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  16. Efficacy of refractory SjD- Achieving STAR response or not

    The Sjögren's Tool for Assessing Response (STAR) will be used as a key patient-reported outcome. The STAR quantifies symptom burden on a scale from 0 (none) to 10 (worst imaginable). A decrease from baseline of ≥1 point in the STAR score defines a clinically meaningful treatment response, indicating a significant reduction in the patient's experience of core symptoms like dryness, fatigue, and pain.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  17. Efficacy of refractory SjD-The change of antibodies

    Changes in autoantibody titers (e.g., anti-SSA) will be assessed as a serological outcome. A reduction in titer is considered a favorable immunologic response to therapy.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  18. Efficacy of refractory SjD-The change of immune globulin

    Changes in immune globulin will be assessed as a serological outcome. A reduction in titer is considered a favorable immunologic response to therapy.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  19. Efficacy of refractory ANCA associated vasculitis (AAV)-The change of BVAS

    The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) will be the primary endpoint to assess disease activity. The BVAS quantifies new or worsening vasculitis symptoms across nine organ systems. The total score ranges from 0 (no activity) to over 50, where a higher score indicates worse disease. A reduction in BVAS, particularly to 0, defines treatment response.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  20. Efficacy of refractory AAV-The change of antibody

    Serial quantitative ANCA titers (anti-PR3 and anti-MPO) will be assessed as a serological biomarker of response. A significant decrease in ANCA titer is considered a favorable indicator of treatment efficacy.

    Time frame: 90, 180, 360 days

  21. pharmacokinetic (PK)

    time to peak (Tmax)

    Time frame: 0-28 days

  22. pharmacokinetic (PK)

    peak concentration (Cmax)

    Time frame: 0-28 days

  23. pharmacokinetic (PK)

    area under the concentration-time curve

    Time frame: 0-28 days

  24. pharmacokinetic (PK)

    area under the concentration-time curve

    Time frame: 0-90 days

  25. pharmacodynamic (PD)

    The count of B cells in peripheral blood post-infusion.

    Time frame: 0-28 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to share IPD.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 146 phase 1 interventional studies under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 17, 2025
First posted
Dec 24, 2025
StartActual
Dec 11, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Sep 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07301164
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 24, 2025
Start date
Dec 11, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion