CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07301021VPIMMAUpdated Mar 20, 2026

Velopharyngeal Insufficiency After Maxillomandibular Advancement Osteotomy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients

An observational study in Velopharyngeal Insufficiency, Swallowing and Nasality, sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA). Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-20.

Sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
28
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to gain insight into the development of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in patients who have undergone maxillomandibular advancement osteotomy (MMA) as a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). A speech therapist evaluates nasality, speech, and swallowing before and after the surgery.

Read the detailed description

This study will be conducted at Amsterdam UMC. Adult patients with mild to severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) who are eligible for maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) surgery will be invited to participate in this prospective cohort study. Patients will be evaluated by two speech therapists at four different time points: before surgery (T0), 6 weeks after surgery (T1), 3 months after surgery (T2), 6 months after surgery (T3) and 1 year after surgery (T4).

Patients will undergo objective assessments focusing on three components: nasality, speech, and swallowing. The Nasometer, a non-invasive analysis tool, will be used to measure the presence of nasality in speech production. Speech will be scored using the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech - Augmented (CAPS-A), an instrument where speech therapists evaluate various aspects of speech performance. Swallowing will be assessed using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), a scoring system that evaluates patients' swallowing abilities. Additionally, the swallowing speed/volume test will measure how quickly and how much water a patient can swallow. Thereby, for the subjective evaluation patients will receive the following questionnaires by email: OHIP-14 (oral health related quality of life), FOSQ (functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire), and the NSD (neurosensory disturbance questionnaire.

02

Conditions studied

  • Velopharyngeal Insufficiency
  • Swallowing
  • Nasality
  • Speech

Keywords

  • maxillomandibular advancement
  • obstructive sleep apnea
  • velopharyngeal insufficiency
  • speech therapy
  • swallowing
  • nasality
  • speech
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

OSA patients who undergo a maxillomandibular advancement

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • Mild to severe OSA
  • Indication for MMA for OSA treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who underwent other adjunctive procedures at the time of MMA (e.g., multipiece le Fort osteotomy, TMJ reconstruction
  • Previous history of orthognathic surgery
  • Previous history of orthognathic surgery
  • Previous history of oropharyngeal surgery (UPPP or multi-level surgery)
  • Cleft palate and syndromic patients
  • Neuromusculair diseases which causes VPI, dysphagia or dysarthria
  • Incapacity
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
2 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • OSA patients after an MMA

    Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who underwent a maxillomandibular advancement (MMA)

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Nasality

    Nasality is measured using the Nasometer. The outcome consists of three scores: oral, nasal, and mixed. The nasality score is expressed as a percentage (0-100%), where a higher score indicates greater nasality. These scores will be compared across five time points.

    Time frame: Timpoints: T0 preoperative, T1 6 weeks after surgery, T2 3 months after surgery, T3 6 months after surgery, T4 1 year after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Swallowing

    FOIS (functional oral intake scale), swallow volume and swallow time will be evaluated by the speech therapist. The FOIS is used to describe the level of oral food and liquid intake in individuals with swallowing difficulties. The scale ranges from 0 to 7, where: 0: Nothing by mouth (NPO) - the individual does not take any food or liquid orally. 1. Tube dependent with minimal attempts of food or liquid - primarily tube-fed but may have some minimal oral intake. 2. Tube dependent with consistent oral intake of food or liquid - mostly tube-fed but regularly takes some oral intake. 3. Tube dependent with oral intake of food or liquid without special preparation - mostly tube-fed but oral intake is not modified. 4. Total oral diet of a single consistency - the individual eats only one consistency of food or liquid. 5. Total oral diet with multiple consistencies but requiring special preparation or compensations - eats various consistencies but with mod

    Time frame: T0 preoperative, T1 6 weeks after surgery, T2 3 months after surgery, T3 6 months after surgery, T4 1 year after surgery

  2. Speech

    The Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech - Adult (CAPS-A) is a standardized assessment tool designed to evaluate speech outcomes in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. It focuses on identifying speech characteristics commonly affected by cleft conditions, such as resonance, nasal emission, articulation, and overall speech intelligibility. What CAPS-A measures: Resonance: The degree of nasal quality in the voice (e.g., hypernasality or hyponasality). Nasal Emission: The presence of air escaping through the nose during speech, which can affect clarity. Articulation: Accuracy and clarity of speech sounds, especially those that may be distorted due to structural or functional issues. Overall Intelligibility: How well the speech can be understood by listeners. Outcome measures: CAPS-A uses a 5-point scale to rate the severity of certain speech characteristics, such as resonance and nasal emission, ranging from no impairment to severe impairment. Additionally, the presence or absen

    Time frame: T0 preoperative, T1 6 weeks after surgery, T2 3 months after surgery, T3 6 months after surgery, T4 1 year after surgery

  3. Subjective outcomes: The Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ)

    Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) The Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the impact of excessive daytime sleepiness on daily activities and quality of life. It evaluates how sleep disorders affect a person's ability to carry out routine tasks and engage in social and occupational activities. What it measures: The FOSQ covers multiple domains including general productivity, activity level, vigilance, social outcomes, and intimacy/sexual relationships. It reflects the functional limitations caused by sleepiness rather than just sleep symptoms alone. Outcome measures: The FOSQ produces a total score and subscale scores for each domain. Scores typically range from 0 to 4 or 5 per item, with higher scores indicating better functional status and less impact of sleepiness. The total score summarizes overall functional status related to sleepiness, with lower scores reflecting greater impairment.

    Time frame: T0 preoperative, T1 6 weeks after surgery, T2 3 months after surgery, T3 6 months after surgery, T4 1 year after surgery

  4. Subjective outcome: Neuro Sensory Disturbance Questionnaire

    Neuro Sensory Disturbance Questionnaire The Neuro Sensory Disturbance Questionnaire is used to assess sensory symptoms related to neurological conditions, such as numbness, tingling, burning, or altered sensation. It helps to quantify the presence and severity of sensory disturbances that may affect daily functioning. What it measures: The questionnaire evaluates the type, frequency, and intensity of sensory symptoms. It may also include questions on the impact of these symptoms on daily activities and quality of life. Outcome measures: Scores are often based on ordinal scales (e.g., 3- or 5-point scales) rating severity or frequency of symptoms. The questionnaire may provide subscale scores for different sensory modalities (e.g., pain, numbness). A total score can be calculated to reflect overall neuro-sensory disturbance, with higher scores indicating more severe or frequent symptoms.

    Time frame: T0 preoperative T1 +6 weeks post op T2 +3 months post op T3 +6 months post op T4 +12 months post op

Other outcomes

  1. Descriptive data

    AHI = apnea/hypoapnea index: Normal: AHI \< 5 events/hour Mild sleep apnea: AHI 5-14 events/hour Moderate sleep apnea: AHI 15-29 events/hour Severe sleep apnea: AHI ≥ 30 events/hour Higher AHI values indicate more severe sleep-disordered breathing. Age: in years Weight: in KG Hight: in cm BMI: Underweight: BMI \< 18.5 Normal weight: BMI 18.5-24.9 Overweight: BMI 25-29.9 Obesity: BMI ≥ 30 Gender: male/female

    Time frame: Pre operative data extraction

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Amsterdam UMC
    Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Kummer AW, Marshall JL, Wilson MM. Non-cleft causes of velopharyngeal dysfunction: implications for treatment. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Mar;79(3):286-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.12.036. Epub 2015 Jan 5. PubMed 25604261 ↗
  • Li KK, Troell RJ, Riley RW, Powell NB, Koester U, Guilleminault C. Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty, maxillomandibular advancement, and the velopharynx. Laryngoscope. 2001 Jun;111(6):1075-8. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200106000-00027. PubMed 11404624 ↗
  • Kummer AW. Types and causes of velopharyngeal dysfunction. Semin Speech Lang. 2011 May;32(2):150-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1277717. Epub 2011 Sep 26. PubMed 21948641 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The IPD will be shared with other researches: speech therapist and my supervisor.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07301021
Lead sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Responsible party
Prof. dr. J. de Lange, MD DMD (Prof.dr. Jan de Lange, Head of Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Amsterdam UMC), Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 24, 2025
Start date
May 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 20, 2026

Study contacts

Misha Tan, PhD student
Contact
m.l.tan@amsterdamumc.nl
+31613125803

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion