ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07298577STOPHCC-GAADUpdated Apr 24, 2026

Use of Gender, Age, Alfa-fetoprotein (AFP), and Des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin (PIVKA-II) or GAAD Score in Addition to Ultrasound for Surveillance of People At-risk for Developing Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Asia in Order to Detect Early Liver Cancer

An interventional study of PIVKA-II and GAAD score calculation in Liver Cirrhosis, Hepatitis B, Chronic and Hepatitis C, Chronic, sponsored by Siriraj Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Thailand. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-24.

Sponsored by Siriraj Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

HCC surveillance is currently limited by underutilization and the suboptimal performance of AFP. This prospective, single-arm study investigates whether the GAAD score (Gender, Age, AFP, and PIVKA-II) enhances HCC detection when added to standard-of-care surveillance.

High-risk patients will undergo US plus GAAD score testing every six months for two years. The primary analysis compares the relative true positive rate (rTPR) and relative false positive rate (rFPR) of surveillance modalities (US, AFP, GAAD) against combined strategies (US+AFP; US+GAAD), utilizing a 2.57 GAAD cut-off. Secondary endpoints include longitudinal biomarker kinetics, early-stage HCC detection rates, and the impact on downstream imaging (CT/MRI) volume. Ultimately, this study seeks to define the role of GAAD as a surveillance adjunct and inform future clinical guidelines for biomarker-enhanced HCC screening.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, interventional diagnostic utility study Study procedure Upon enrollment, patients will be followed for 2 years. Surveillance visits will take place at every 6 months intervals according to national guidelines and usual clinical practice. Biomarkers will be assessed using routine blood draw taken at each surveillance visit. Hence, no additional blood draw will be required as per study protocol. Blood collection will be conducted according to local's standard procedures.

The following parameters will be assessed at baseline and each follow-up visit.

  • Characteristics (age, sex, height, weight)
  • Blood test results (platelets, liver and kidney function, PT, viral infection, liver fibrosis markers)
  • Fib4
  • BMI
  • Child-Pugh Score
  • AFP, PIVKA, GAAD
  • Ultrasound (US): liver evaluation, including existing liver steatosis and its degree if available (according to local clinical practice and used guidelines)
  • Diabetes type (ICD-10)
  • Dyslipidemia status
  • Diagnostic of Hypertension
  • Central obesity status (defined as waist more than 80 cm - women and 90 cm - male) The Elecsys® AFP, and Elecsys® PIVKA-II will be measured using the Elecsys analyzer, and the GAAD score for each case will be calculated using automatic calculation flow navifyTM Algo Suite.
  • Elecsys® AFP and Elecsys® PIVKA will be tested and interpreted independent of GAAD as per investigators discretion and/or according to local clinical practice.
  • GAAD - calculate using navify AlgoSuite In case of positive biomarker/score or imaging, result patients will be subjected further diagnostic workup (recall procedure) with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI as described below.

Due to its better performance, MRI is the preferred modality but CT can be performed alternatively.

Recall procedure

For MRI/CT, the following protocols must be applied in order to provide optimal diagnostic performance in accordance with local current clinical practice and Guidelines recommendation (AASLD1, EASL2 and APASL3).

The recall procedure with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI will be triggered for each patient fulfilling one of the following criteria:

  • Patients with any suspicious lesion ≥ 1 cm on ultrasound should undergo diagnostic evaluation with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI
  • AFP ≥ 20 ng/ml or rising AFP (on two consecutive tests or doubling of AFP levels)
  • Patients with limited ultrasound visualization may undergo surveillance contrast-enhanced MRI or multiphase CT based on medical evaluation of treating physician in line with local current clinical practice.

For patients with new lesion or lesion \<1 cm lesion on abdominal ultrasound will undergo repeat short-interval evaluation (ultrasound, AFP, PIVKA measurements and GAAD score calculation) in approximately 3-4 months .

As part of the study, PIVKA II and GAAD score will be performed and patients with GAAD score ≥ 2.57 will be followed up with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI as recall procedure.

Clinical decisions will be based on local radiologic assessment. Based on multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI - the diagnosis of HCC will be made in line with current clinical practice:

  • in case of negative results the normal follow up procedure will continue;
  • for positive results / HCC confirmation - adequate diagnostic, clinical and treatment decisions will be made in line with current clinical practice (outside of the study)

For patients with positive findings in any surveillance modality (refers to US, AFP or GAAD; if PIVKA-II alone is above MDP cut-off, this will not be considered a positive case), the following additional parameters will be documented upon diagnostic workup:

  • imaging modality and imaging protocol
  • imaging result
  • pathology result (if applicable)
  • LiRADS Score.

Right to withdraw Subjects have the right to withdraw from the study at any time for any reason. If lost to follow-up, the assigned study staff will try to contact the subject by telephone followed by registered mail to establish and document as completely as possible the reason for the withdrawal.

Subjects will be allowed to miss one scheduled visit. Subjects with >1 missed visits will be excluded from further follow-up.

Subjects will be informed of circumstances under which their participation may be terminated by the responsible investigator without the subject's consent. The investigator may withdraw subjects from the study in the event of intercurrent illness, adverse events, lack of compliance with the study and/or study procedures (e.g., study visits), or any reason where it is felt that it is in the best interest of the subject to be terminated from the study. Any administrative or other reasons for withdrawal will be documented and explained to the subject. If the reason for removal of a subject from the study is an Adverse Event, the principal specific event will be recorded in the medical record.

5. Statistics Primary and secondary endpoint(s) Primary endpoint

Exploratory Clinical performance of Elecsys® AFP, Elecsys® PIVKA-II, GAAD -score for the aid in diagnosis of early and all stages stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC).

Exploratory endpoint

  • To compare the clinical performance of GAAD algorithm versus US, AFP, PIVKA, as standalone and US +AFP (by the stage and etiology).
  • To assess the biomarker kinetics of Elecsys AFP, Elecsys PIVKA-II, GAAD leading up to HCC diagnosis in HCC confirmed cases.
  • Number of additional early-stage HCCs identified through GAAD
  • HCC prevalence
  • Missed surveillance visits/drop-out rate due to missed visit
  • Distribution of GAAD Score among different Child-Pugh subgroups, etiologies and HCC cases and controls
  • Change in GAAD score over time, in relation to development of HCC and potential confounding factors
  • Number of additional CT/MRI imaging triggered positive GAAD, AFP or US and calculation of the relative specificity (rFPR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (using Cheng and Macaluso 1997).

Statistical methods Primary endpoints:

● Exploratory Clinical performance of Elecsys® AFP, Elecsys® PIVKA-II, GAAD -score for the aid in diagnosis of early and all stages stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). - descriptive (PPV, NPV, Sens, Spec AUC/ROC)

Exploratory endpoints,

  • Contingency tables comparing AFP, PIVKA-II, US, and GAAD will be used to investigate all possible combinations (e.g. US vs. GAAD), both for the cases and for the controls. Besides PPV and NPV values for AFP, PIVKA-II, US, and GAAD will be determined as well as ROC curves and AUC values. Time dependent changes in AFP, PIVKA-II, US, and GAAD shall be investigated as an experimental endpoint as well as possible changes in the clinical outcome over the study duration.
  • Incidence of HCC: Cox-regression analysis, log-rank test, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
  • Association of Elecsys AFP, Elecsys AFP-L3, Elecsys PIVKA-II, GAAD -score with HCC detection: Logistic regression analysis, Spearman correlation
  • Besides, the prevalence for HCC and the drop-out rate shall be estimated together with the 95% confidence intervals using binomial distributions.

Sample size, level of significance, and power Sample size estimation:

As HCC has a low annual prevalence (consider 1.5% \& 2% for now), the precision of the sensitivity estimate (i.e., width of the 95% confidence interval) is the main prerequisite for the sample size, as sensitivity is calculated from HCC cases. Assuming a decent target of 20% sensitivity 95% confidence interval width, a true sensitivity of 86.5% (MCE study), and a prevalence of 1.5% \& 2% over two years follow-up, a sample size of 2100 samples would be required to achieve a 95% confidence interval width of 19% (1.5% annual prevalence) and 16% (2% annual prevalence) respectively, which is considered sufficient.

02

Conditions studied

  • Liver Cirrhosis
  • Hepatitis B, Chronic
  • Hepatitis C, Chronic
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Keywords

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cirrhosis, GAAD score
03

In context

Liver Cirrhosis

1,298 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Cirrhosis; 338 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,100 is above the median of 78 across 739 interventional studies indexed under Liver Cirrhosis.

Browse Liver Cirrhosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Siriraj Hospital is the lead sponsor of 95 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed form (ICF).
  • Age above 18 years.
  • Patients with chronic liver disease who have an indication for HCC surveillance, including:

    • Liver cirrhosis of any etiology (e.g., chronic , , NASH, alcohol).
    • Non-cirrhotic chronic liver disease (HCV, MASH, ALD) with evidence of F3 stage fibrosis.
    • Chronic HBV infection with a clinical diagnosis of non-cirrhosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis with any cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer.
  • Pre-existing diagnosed , including previous HCC.
  • of less than 2 years.
  • Use of Vitamin K antagonists within one week before enrolment.
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating.
  • (GFR) \< 60 mL/min/1.73 m².
  • Significant hepatic decompensation or a score of C.
  • Unwillingness or inability to undergo CT and MRI imaging.
  • Unwillingness to participate in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Addition of PIVKA-II and GAAD score to all participants

    Addition of PIVKA-II and GAAD score will probably detect more HCC and compare with ultrasound alone or ultrasound plus AFP

    Diagnostic Test: PIVKA-II and GAAD score calculation

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPIVKA-II and GAAD score calculation

    Measurement of PIVKA-II to routine ultrasound and AFP and calculation of GAAD score

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

    New HCC detected by imaging or pathology

    Time frame: 24 months of follow up

  2. Relative True Positive Rate of Surveillance Modalities

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. Relative False Positive Rate of Surveillance Modalities

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07298577
Lead sponsor
Siriraj Hospital
Collaborators
Roche Global Development
Responsible party
Tawesak Tanwandee (Professor, Siriraj Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 23, 2025
Start date
Feb 2, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 2, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 24, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion