CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07294378Updated Dec 29, 2025

Dental Changes Following the Traction of Impacted Maxillary Canines

An interventional study of Corticotomy and Conventional traction in Impaction of Tooth, sponsored by Damascus University. Completed at 1 site in Syria. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 28 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-29.

Sponsored by Damascus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 28 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The impaction of maxillary canines is a challenge for orthodontists. Recently, new methods have been proposed to accelerate canine withdrawal. The associated dental changes between the conventional and accelerated methods of canine traction have not yet been assessed.

Read the detailed description

Impacted canines are defined as those that have not erupted within 6 six months after completing the formation of their roots or that were not present within the dental arch during their eruption phase. Upper Impacted canines are present in 2% of the general population and occur in females at a rate of 1.17%, which is almost twice the incidence in males. The incidence of palatal impaction ranges from 60% to 80% and is present bilaterally with a rate of 75-95%. The upper canines usually erupt at an average age of 10.5 years in females and 11.5 years in males, with an individual difference of 3-4 years. Eruption failure of the upper canines occurs because of hard or soft tissue obstructions or an abnormal eruption pathway.

The most important causes of palatally impaction of upper canines are dental arch length deficiency, over-retained primary teeth, and trauma during the canine formation stage. One local mechanical cause is a decrease in the width of the upper dental arch. McConnell et al. reported that patients with upper impacted canines had a reduction in dental arch width, especially in the anterior region. On the other hand, unilateral or bilateral upper canine impaction can affect upper dental arch width and alter smile symmetry.

The impaction of the upper canine is also considered as one of the causes that lead to a lack of transverse development of the maxillary dental arch, especially the inter-premolar width. This is supported by the functional matrix theory, which considers that the presence of the organ stimulates bone growth. Thus, the natural eruption of the canine stimulates the normal transverse growth of the dental arch.

Many treatment strategies were used to treat impacted canine cases, but orthodontic traction after surgical exposure was the most commonly recommended method in the literature, given the great aesthetic and functional value of the upper canines. Two main surgical methods are used for this purpose: the open and closed surgical approaches.

Several mechanical means have been used to obtain the traction force. However, choosing the appropriate mechanical method that produces the least undesirable effects on adjacent teeth was a challenge for the clinical practitioner.

Many factors could result in unwanted changes in the spatial position of the adjacent teeth, such as the use of an open coil spring, direct reliance on these teeth to tract the impacted canine, the type of baseline orthodontic archwire used, and the type of orthodontic anchorage means. These side effects on adjacent teeth can be minimized by using techniques such as the segmented archwire technique and temporary anchorage devices (TADs).

02

Conditions studied

  • Impaction of Tooth

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 28 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. patients' ages ranged from 18 to 28 years old
  2. unilaterally palatally or mid-alveolar upper impacted canine
  3. patients who have never received orthodontic treatment previously
  4. mild crowding of the maxillary arch (less than 4 mm) and class I first molars relation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. bilateral or buccal canine impaction
  2. patients who have a contraindication to perform oral surgery under local anesthesia (social, psychological, mor edical)
  3. more than 45-degree angle between the longitudinal axis of the impacted canines and the facial midline
  4. bad oral health
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Accelerated canine traction group

    Perforations of the bone surrounding the impacted canine will be conducted at the time of canine exposure. Two months later, another flapless corticotomy procedure will be performed during the withdrawal of the impacted canine.

    Procedure: Corticotomy

  • Active comparator
    Conventional canine traction

    The canines will be withdrawn to the dental arch using the conventionnal method without subjecitng the patient to any additional surgical intervention.

    Procedure: Conventional traction

Interventions

  • ProcedureCorticotomy

    During the surgical exposure phase in the acceleration group, the cortical bone will be perforated around the exposed canine crown (6-8 holes) wherever possible-this procedure aims to accelerate the withdrawal movement of the impacted canine. A 1 mm round bur will be used to create circular holes (1 mm in diameter, 1-2 mm in depth, and spaced about 1.5 mm apart). After two months of the surgical exposure, the second acceleration procedure will be performed. Two or three vertical incisions (8 mm height) will be made using a surgical scalpel at the buccal side of the impaction area. The cortical cuts (2-3 mm in depth, 1 mm in width, and spaced about 2 mm apart) will be performed using a flapless piezosurgery technique along the vertical lines.

    Also known as: flapless corticotomy, piezocision, piezosurgery

  • ProcedureConventional traction

    The canines will be withdrawn using conventional methods without any surgical acceleration.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the upper dental midline deviation

    The deviation of the upper dental midline will be measured in millimeters as the distance from the maxillary central incisors contact point to the maxillary model midline. This will be performed on the plaster models.

    Time frame: T1: before the commencement of canine traction (expected to occur within 3-5 months following the beginning of fixed orthodontic treatment). T2: at the end of the canine traction stage (expected to occur with 5-8 months after T1)

  2. Change in the rotation of the lateral incisor.

    The rotation will be measured in degrees as the angle between the maxillary model midline and the line connecting the mesial-distal marginal points of the adjacent lateral incisor.

    Time frame: T1: before the commencement of canine traction (expected to occur within 3-5 months following the beginning of fixed orthodontic treatment). T2: at the end of the canine traction stage (expected to occur with 5-8 months after T1)

  3. Change in the rotation of the first premolar

    The rotation will be measured in degrees as the angle between the maxillary model midline and the line connecting the mesial-distal marginal points of the adjacent first premolar.

    Time frame: T1: before the commencement of canine traction (expected to occur within 3-5 months following the beginning of fixed orthodontic treatment). T2: at the end of the canine traction stage (expected to occur with 5-8 months after T1)

  4. Change in the inter-premolar width

    Inter-premolar width will be measured in millimeters as the distance from the deepest point in the central groove of the adjacent first premolar and its counterpart on the contralateral side

    Time frame: T1: before the commencement of canine traction (expected to occur within 3-5 months following the beginning of fixed orthodontic treatment). T2: at the end of the canine traction stage (expected to occur with 5-8 months after T1)

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Orthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry
    Damascus, Rif-dimashq Governorate DM20AM19, Syria
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Fischer TJ. Orthodontic treatment acceleration with corticotomy-assisted exposure of palatally impacted canines. Angle Orthod. 2007 May;77(3):417-20. doi: 10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0417:OTAWCE]2.0.CO;2. PubMed 17465647 ↗
  • Alyafrusee ES, Zheng B, Almashraqi AA, Almaqrami BS, Yang X, Xu H, Alhammadi MS, Liu Y. Three-dimensional dentoalveolar characteristics of a labially impacted dilacerated maxillary central incisor using cone-beam computed tomography. Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 9;15(1):24669. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10043-9. PubMed 40634539 ↗
  • Hocevar M, Ovsenik M, Golez A. Position of Maxillary Lateral Incisor and First Premolar in Impaction of Maxillary Canines: A Controlled Clinical CBCT and 3D Study Model Analysis. Dent J (Basel). 2025 Oct 27;13(11):497. doi: 10.3390/dj13110497. PubMed 41294478 ↗
  • Mousa MR, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Heshmeh O. Adult periodontal comparison after treatment of palatally impacted canines aligned by conventional or accelerated minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic traction: A randomized controlled trial. Int Orthod. 2023 Sep;21(3):100785. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100785. Epub 2023 Jun 15. PubMed 37329591 ↗
  • Mousa MR, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Heshmeh O, Alam MK. The effectiveness of minimally-invasive corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted canines compared to the traditional traction method in terms of treatment duration, velocity of traction movement and the associated dentoalveolar changes: A randomized controlled trial. F1000Res. 2023 Jun 19;12:699. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.135338.1. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37920456 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07294378
Lead sponsor
Damascus University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 19, 2025
Start date
Mar 2, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 15, 2024
Completion
Jan 19, 2025
Last update
Dec 29, 2025

Study contacts

Mahran Raheel Mousa, DDS, MSc, PhD
principal investigator · Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Hawash Private University, Homs, Syria
Mohammad Younis Hajeer, DDS, MSc, PhD
study director · Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University
Omar Ahmad Heshmeh, DDS, MSc, PhD
study director · Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion