ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07284940Updated Jul 7, 2026

Cognitive-Integrated Soccer Training and Performance

An interventional study of Cognitively Engaging Soccer Practice and Conventional Soccer Practice in Executive Function (Cognition), Soccer Training and Performance, sponsored by Fan Mao. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to male participants aged 16 Years to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Fan Mao · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2024, registered Nov 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 18 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study will examine whether an 8-week soccer-specific cognitive-motor training program can improve executive functions, decision-making, and soccer skill performance in youth soccer players. Soccer players often need to scan the field, process information quickly, choose appropriate actions, and perform technical skills under pressure. The training program is designed to combine soccer skills with game-like cognitive demands, such as recognizing opponents' movement, selecting passing or dribbling options, and responding to changing play situations.

Participants will be randomly assigned to either a soccer-specific cognitive-motor training group or an active control technical training group. Both groups will train three times per week for eight weeks in addition to their usual soccer training. The study will compare changes in soccer decision-making, executive functions, and skill performance from baseline to post-intervention and to a four-week retention test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Executive Function (Cognition)
  • Soccer Training
  • Performance
  • Motor Development

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cognitive promotion
  • dribbling
  • soccer
03

In context

Sialorrhea

60 studies on the registry are indexed under Sialorrhea; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is above the median of 31 across 44 interventional studies indexed under Sialorrhea.

Browse Sialorrhea studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Fan Mao as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male adolescents aged 16-18 years;
  • Healthy students with no recent injury affecting movement or physical activity;
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision;
  • Not taking any medication during the study period;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed neurological disorders;
  • Diagnosed musculoskeletal disorders;
  • Use of medications known to affect cognitive function
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Care provider)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cognitively Engaging Soccer Training

    Participants assigned to the experimental arm will receive soccer-specific cognitive-motor training in addition to their usual soccer training. The program will last 8 weeks, with 3 sessions per week and approximately 45 minutes per session. Each session will combine soccer technical practice with game-like cognitive demands, including scanning before receiving the ball, recognizing opponent pressure, identifying target players, selecting between passing, dribbling, or shooting options, responding to transition cues, and performing under time or opponent pressure. Training tasks will progress from constrained perception-action drills to conditioned small-sided games. The intervention is designed to improve executive functions, decision-making, and soccer skill performance under representative match-like conditions.

    Behavioral: Cognitively Engaging Soccer Practice

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Soccer Training

    Participants assigned to the control arm will receive active technical training in addition to their usual soccer training. The program will last 8 weeks, with 3 sessions per week and approximately 45 minutes per session. Training will include conventional soccer technical drills, such as passing patterns, dribbling circuits, receiving and turning exercises, ball-control activities, and finishing practice. The control sessions will be matched with the experimental arm for training duration, session frequency, general soccer content, and approximate physical workload. However, they will not systematically include game-like cognitive-motor constraints such as opponent-pressure recognition, target-player identification, decision-switching cues, or structured pass/dribble/shoot choice demands.

    Behavioral: Conventional Soccer Practice

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitively Engaging Soccer Practice

    This intervention integrates cognitive elements into basic soccer skill practice. Participants engage in 20-minute soccer dribbling sessions that include decision-making tasks, attention control, and working memory challenges embedded within motor actions. For example, players must react to color or number cues while performing dribbling drills. The purpose is to enhance both motor learning and cognitive performance through dual-task engagement.Cognitively Engaging Soccer Practice

  • BehavioralConventional Soccer Practice

    This intervention consists of traditional soccer dribbling training without added cognitive tasks. Participants perform the same duration and frequency of soccer skill practice (20 minutes) focusing purely on motor performance and technique refinement. No external cognitive demands are introduced.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Video-Based Soccer Decision Accuracy

    Video-based soccer decision accuracy will be used as the primary outcome to assess soccer-specific decision-making performance. Participants will view attacking and transition scenarios from a field-player perspective. Each video will be occluded at a critical decision point, and participants will select the most appropriate action, such as pass, dribble, shoot, switch play, or retain possession. Decision accuracy will be calculated as the percentage of responses that match the expert consensus answer. Higher scores indicate better soccer-specific decision-making performance.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the 8-week intervention, and 4-week retention follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dribbling performance time

    Dribbling performance time will be measured as the total time (in seconds) required to complete a standardized cone-dribbling course.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the 8-week intervention, and 4-week retention follow-up.

  2. Reaction time on cognitive tasks (Stroop task and 2-back task)

    Reaction time (in milliseconds) will be recorded for correct responses during computerized Stroop and 2-back tasks. Mean reaction time across trials will be calculated separately for each task at each assessment time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the 8-week intervention, and 4-week retention follow-up.

  3. Response accuracy on cognitive tasks (Stroop task and 2-back task)

    Response accuracy will be calculated as the percentage of correct responses during computerized Stroop and 2-back tasks.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the 8-week intervention, and 4-week retention follow-up.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Qingdao University, School of Physical Education
    Qingdao, Shandong 266071, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alesi M, Bianco A, Padulo J, Luppina G, Petrucci M, Paoli A, Palma A, Pepi A. Motor and cognitive growth following a Football Training Program. Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 27;6:1627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01627. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26579014 ↗
  • Mao F, Li Z, Qiu C, Fang Q. Developing integrative practice on basic soccer skills to stimulate cognitive promotion for children and adolescents. Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 19;15:1348006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1348006. eCollection 2024. No abstract available. PubMed 38708011 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — de-identified data available upon reasonable request

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2024 to primary completion in May 2024, 3 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 20, 2025
First posted
Dec 16, 2025
StartActual
Feb 15, 2024
Primary completionActual
May 23, 2024
CompletionActual
Jun 27, 2024
Last update
Jul 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07284940
Lead sponsor
Fan Mao
Responsible party
Fan Mao (Clinical Professor, Qingdao University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 16, 2025
Start date
Feb 15, 2024
Primary completion
May 23, 2024
Completion
Jun 27, 2024
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion