ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07282639AB-CDEUpdated Sep 23, 2026

App-Based Certified Diabetes Education Therapy (AB-CDE)

An interventional study of DailyDose in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University. Recruiting at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
99
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 20 studies in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 by Oregon Health and Science University — 5 open to participants now, 5 under way, none of them phase 3. Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 · Oregon Health and Science University.

Planned enrollment
Largest of 18
99 · median 26
Started
2026
with 2 others
No phase
16 of 20
3 open now
Registered
18th of 20
by date

Among the 20 studies in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 by Oregon Health and Science University, this one has the largest planned enrollment of the 18 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2026, is one of 16 with no phase, and was the 18th registered.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,754 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 600 are open to participants now.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Open to participants now

5 of the 20 studies in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 by Oregon Health and Science University are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 5 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 411 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies recruiting now, 128 (31%) set no upper age limit and 257 (63%) stop at 75 or younger; 184 take children under 18; 64 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 20 studies in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 by Oregon Health and Science University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to learn more about a smartphone application (app) called DailyDose, an investigational decision support tool that may help in managing your diabetes. DailyDose tracks your continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data, insulin use, and exercise, and uses this information to provide personalized recommendations for insulin dosing and carbohydrate intake during exercise or low blood sugar events. We want to find out if DailyDose can help lower blood sugar levels as measured by the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) test.

Read the detailed description

Participants will be on study for 38 weeks (2-week run-in period and 36 weeks of intervention). Participants will begin the study with a training visit on the Dexcom G6 CGM system, the insulin dose capture system, and the Data-logging Mode of DailyDose. Participants will be provided with Novalog InPens for use with the insulin dose capture system. Participants will also receive an iPhone and Apple smart watch for acquiring sleep metrics and exercise data. Participants will use these devices during the next 14 days at home (2-week run-in). At the end of the run-in, participants will start the intervention. They will be trained at Visit 3 on using the DailyDose system. Participants will then use the DailyDose system for 12 weeks. Sensor glucose, exercise, insulin and meal data will be collected during the DailyDose portion of the study in order to produce recommendations for insulin dosing. Participants will wear the Dexcom G6 for the entire study. Insulin data will be collected using the insulin dose capture system (InPens). Participants will be instructed to use the bolus calculator within the DailyDose app. Participants will be asked to complete a 30-minute aerobic exercise video at home once per week starting with the first 12-week period. After 12 weeks, time in range (70-180 mg/dL, TIR) and time in hypoglycemia (\<70 mg/dL) will be assessed from the prior 4 weeks based on the Dexcom G6. Participants that have TIR ≥ 60% and time in hypoglycemia \<4% will continue with use of DailyDose. Those that have TIR \< 60% and/or time in hypoglycemia ≥ 4% will receive DSMES and, if recommended, behavioral health based on the T1-Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T1-DDAS) for the next 12 weeks. Additionally, if the DSMES provider feels the participant would benefit from behavioral health intervention, they can refer the participant for this even if T1-DDAS scores do not meet the cut off. All participants will then be followed for a final 12-week period using DailyDose alone to assess sustainability of any improvements in glycemic outcomes.

03

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)

Keywords

  • AB-CDE
  • DailyDose
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus for at least 1 year.
  2. Age 18 years and older.
  3. Able to read, write and understand spoken English
  4. or GMI 7.5- 11.5% at screening. GMI (%) = 3.31 + 0.02392 × [mean glucose in mg/dL] based on prior 30 days of CGM data with at least 70% time CGM active[6]
  5. Use of multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) for at least 30 days at the time of screening visit.
  6. Willing to use the approved study insulin and devices while on study - Humalog and Basaglar Tempo pens, Dexcom G6 CGM, study iPhone, Apple watch
  7. Willingness and ability to independently follow all study procedures, including attending all clinic and DSMES and behavioral health visits.
  8. Total daily insulin requirements of less than 200 units

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Female of who is pregnant or intending to become pregnant or breast-feeding or is not using adequate methods. Acceptable contraception includes birth control pill / patch / vaginal ring, Depo-Provera, Norplant, an IUD, the double barrier method (the woman uses a diaphragm and spermicide, and the man uses a condom), or abstinence.
  2. History of stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, or coronary arterial bypass graft or angioplasty.
  3. Renal insufficiency ( \< 60 ml/min, using either MDRD** or CKD-EPI# equation as reported by the laboratory).
  4. Liver failure, cirrhosis, or any other liver disease that compromises liver function as determined by the investigator.
  5. History of severe hypoglycemia during the 3 months prior to screening or hypoglycemia unawareness as judged by the investigator. Participants will complete a hypoglycemia awareness questionnaire. Participants will be excluded for four or more R responses.
  6. History of diabetes ketoacidosis during the 3 months prior to screening, as diagnosed on hospital admission or as judged by the investigator.
  7. History of psychiatric admission during the 6 months prior to screening.
  8. Adrenal insufficiency.
  9. Any active infection.
  10. Known or suspected abuse of alcohol, narcotics, or illicit drugs.
  11. Uncontrolled seizure disorder.
  12. Active foot ulceration.
  13. Severe peripheral arterial disease characterized by ischemic rest pain or severe claudication.
  14. Major surgical operation within 30 days prior to screening.
  15. Use of an drug within 30 days prior to screening.
  16. Chronic usage of any medication (such as cyclosporine, azathioprine, sirolimus, or tacrolimus).
  17. Bleeding disorder, treatment with warfarin, or count below 50,000.
  18. Allergy to Humalog or Basaglar insulin.
  19. Current chronic administration of oral or parenteral .
  20. Any life-threatening disease, including malignant neoplasms and medical history of malignant neoplasms within the 5 years prior to screening (except basal and squamous cell skin cancer).
  21. Initiation or titration of any medication used to lower glucose other than insulin in the 6 weeks prior to screening (e.g. metformin or semaglutide). Participants will not be excluded if they are non-insulin glucose lowering medication at a stable dose with no plans for discontinuation or dose modification during the course of the study). A positive response to any of the questions from the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (see Appendix A) with one exception: participant will not be excluded if taking a single blood pressure medication and blood pressure is controlled on the medication (blood pressure is less than 140/90 mmHg).
  22. Any chest discomfort with physical activity, including pain or pressure, or other types of discomfort.
  23. Gastroparesis.
  24. On a very low carbohydrate diet (less than 50g per day)
  25. Taking part in another diabetes or obesity-related treatment study.
  26. Any disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may jeopardize the participant's safety or compliance with the protocol.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
99 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    AB-CDE intervention using DailyDose, study CGM, and CDE and BH counselling if indicated

    Device: DailyDose

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Usual care including MDI insulin therapy with study CGM and DailyDose in Data-logging Mode.

Interventions

  • DeviceDailyDose

    Our team has developed a smartphone-based application, DailyDose Decision Support Tool (DailyDose), that combines continuous glucose monitoring data and insulin data to provide decision support for people living with T1D taking MDI. DailyDose is an iPhone application that is designed to support this population by 1) allowing for bolus calculation based on inputs including carbohydrate intake, CGM value and trend, and exercise information, 2) providing recommendations for carbohydrate intake based on exercise type, intensity, and duration, and 3) providing weekly recommendations for adjustments in insulin doses at specific times of day, including basal insulin dose, carbohydrate ratios or fixed mealtime doses, and correction factors .

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to 24 weeks

    Hemoglobin A1c will be processed by a central lab. Lower values generally indicate better glucose control.

    Time frame: Enrollment and 24 weeks after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to 36 weeks

    Hemoglobin A1c will be processed by a central lab.

    Time frame: Enrollment and 36 weeks

  2. Change in percent of time in range (70-180 mg/dL) from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. Percent of time in this range during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  3. Change in percent of time in range (70-180 mg/dL) from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. Percent of time in this range during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  4. Change in percent of time in tight range (70-140 mg/dL) from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. Percent of time in this range during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  5. Change in percent of time in tight range (70-140 mg/dL) from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. Percent of time in this range during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  6. Change in percent of time in low glucose range (<70 mg/dL) from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. Percent of time in this range during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  7. Change in percent of time in low glucose range (<70 mg/dL) from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. Percent of time in this range during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  8. Change in percent of time in very low glucose range (<54 mg/dL) from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. Percent of time in this range during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  9. Change in percent of time in very low glucose range (<54 mg/dL) from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. Percent of time in this range during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  10. Change in percent of time in high glucose range (>180 mg/dL) from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. Percent of time in this range during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  11. Change in percent of time in high glucose range (>180 mg/dL) from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. Percent of time in this range during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  12. Change in percent of time in extreme high glucose range (>250 mg/dL) from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. Percent of time in this range during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  13. Change in percent of time in extreme high glucose range (>250 mg/dL) from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. Percent of time in this range during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  14. Change in mean blood glucose from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. The average of values collected during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing mean glucose at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  15. Change in mean blood glucose from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. The average of values collected during the two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing mean glucose at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  16. Change in coefficient of variation of blood glucose from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. The coefficient of variation (CV) of CGM values is calculated as SD / mean \* 100, where SD = standard deviation. The two weeks before a study time point will be used to represent that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  17. Change in coefficient of variation of blood glucose from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (CGM) values are recorded every 5 minutes. The coefficient of variation (CV) of CGM values is calculated as SD / mean \* 100, where SD = standard deviation. The two weeks before a study time point will be used to represent that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  18. Change in Low Blood Glucose Index (LBGI) from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    The Low Blood Glucose Index (LBGI) is designed to reflect the risk of hypoglycemia and increases with the extent and frequency of hypoglycemic excursions. It is calculated by first taking f(BG) = (ln(BG)\^1.084 - 5.381) for each blood glucose (BG) reading, then calculating rl(BG) = 22.7 \* f(BG)\^2 if f(BG) ≤ 0 and rl(BG) = 0 otherwise, and finally, by taking the average of the calculated rl(BG) values over all of the glucose readings measured in mg/dL.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  19. Change in Low Blood Glucose Index (LBGI) from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    The Low Blood Glucose Index (LBGI) is designed to reflect the risk of hypoglycemia and increases with the extent and frequency of hypoglycemic excursions. It is calculated by first taking f(BG) = (ln(BG)\^1.084 - 5.381) for each blood glucose (BG) reading, then calculating rl(BG) = 22.7 \* f(BG)\^2 if f(BG) ≤ 0 and rl(BG) = 0 otherwise, and finally, by taking the average of the calculated rl(BG) values over all of the glucose readings measured in mg/dL.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  20. Change in High Blood Glucose Index (HBGI) from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    The High Blood Glucose Index (HBGI) is designed to reflect the risk of hyperglycemia and increases with the extent and frequency of hyperglycemic excursions. It is calculated by first taking f(BG) = (ln(BG)\^1.084 - 5.381) for each blood glucose (BG) reading, then calculating rh(BG) = 22.7 \* f(BG)\^2 if f(BG) \> 0 and rh(BG) = 0 otherwise, and finally, by taking the average of the calculated rh(BG) values over all of the glucose readings measured in mg/dL.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  21. Change in High Blood Glucose Index (HBGI) from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    The High Blood Glucose Index (HBGI) is designed to reflect the risk of hyperglycemia and increases with the extent and frequency of hyperglycemic excursions. It is calculated by first taking f(BG) = (ln(BG)\^1.084 - 5.381) for each blood glucose (BG) reading, then calculating rh(BG) = 22.7 \* f(BG)\^2 if f(BG) \> 0 and rh(BG) = 0 otherwise, and finally, by taking the average of the calculated rh(BG) values over all of the glucose readings measured in mg/dL.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  22. Change in T1-DDAS Core Score from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    The Type 1 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T1-DDAS) Core Score is the average of 8 items on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is low distress and 5 is high distress associated with having type 1 diabetes.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  23. Change in T1-DDAS Core Score from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    The Type 1 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T1-DDAS) Core Score is the average of 8 items on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is low distress and 5 is high distress associated with having type 1 diabetes.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  24. Change in T1-DDAS Management Difficulties Source Score from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    The Type 1 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T1-DDAS) Management Difficulties Source Score is the average of 3 items rated from 1 to 5, where 1 is low distress and 5 is high distress. A higher score reflects higher distress related to management of type 1 diabetes.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  25. Change in T1-DDAS Management Difficulties Source Score from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    The Type 1 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T1-DDAS) Management Difficulties Source Score is the average of 3 items rated from 1 to 5, where 1 is low distress and 5 is high distress. A higher score reflects higher distress related to management of type 1 diabetes.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  26. Change in T1-DDAS Hypoglycemia Concerns Source Score from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    The Type 1 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T1-DDAS) Hypoglycemia Concerns Source Score is the average of 2 items rated from 1 to 5, where 1 is low distress and 5 is high distress. A higher score reflects higher distress related to hypoglycemia.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  27. Change in T1-DDAS Hypoglycemia Concerns Source Score from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    The Type 1 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T1-DDAS) Hypoglycemia Concerns Source Score is the average of 2 items rated from 1 to 5, where 1 is low distress and 5 is high distress. A higher score reflects higher distress related to hypoglycemia.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  28. Change in T1-DDAS Technology Challenges Source Score from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    The Type 1 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T1-DDAS) Technology Challenges Source Score is the average of 3 items rated from 1 to 5, where 1 is low distress and 5 is high distress. A higher score reflects higher distress related to using devices to manage type 1 diabetes.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  29. Change in T1-DDAS Technology Challenges Source Score from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    The Type 1 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T1-DDAS) Technology Challenges Source Score is the average of 3 items rated from 1 to 5, where 1 is low distress and 5 is high distress. A higher score reflects higher distress related to using devices to manage type 1 diabetes.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Change in mean number of low glucose events / week from baseline to 24 weeks after randomization

    A single low glucose event is defined to start when the CGM drops below 70 mg/dL for at least three measurements and ends when the CGM rises above 69 mg/dL for at least three measurements. The two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  2. Change in mean number of low glucose events / week from baseline to 36 weeks after randomization

    A single low glucose event is defined to start when the CGM drops below 70 mg/dL for at least three measurements and ends when the CGM rises above 69 mg/dL for at least three measurements. The two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing blood glucose control at that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  3. Change in total daily dose of insulin (units) from baseline to 24 weeks

    Insulin use will be tracked using bluetooth-enabled insulin pens. The two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 24 after randomization compared with baseline

  4. Change in total daily dose of insulin (units) from baseline to 36 weeks

    Insulin use will be tracked using bluetooth-enabled insulin pens. The two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  5. Change in total daily dose of insulin per kilogram (units/kg) from baseline to 36 weeks

    Insulin use will be tracked using bluetooth-enabled insulin pens. The two weeks before a study time point will be treated as representing that study time point.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

  6. Change in body weight measured at 36 weeks after randomization

    Maintaining or losing weight, rather than gaining, would be considered a positive outcome.

    Time frame: Week 36 after randomization compared with baseline

07

Study locations

6 of 6 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD cannot be shared due to concerns about participant privacy and confidentiality.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 12 months after the start.

Of 844 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 38. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 949 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 5, 2025
First posted
Dec 15, 2025
StartActual
Jul 8, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 15, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 15, 2027
Last update
Sep 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07282639
Collaborators
Leona M. & Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
Responsible party
Linda Lester (Associate Professor, Oregon Health and Science University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 15, 2025
Start date
Jul 8, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Study contacts

Linda Lester, MD
Contact
lesterl@ohsu.edu
503-418-8478
Samrita Thapa, MPH
Contact
thapasa@ohsu.edu
503-494-8421
Peter Jacobs, PhD
study chair · Oregon Health and Science University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion