ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05916469HMB-BDUpdated Nov 2, 2026

Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Progestin Treatment in Bleeding Disorders Study

An observational study in Heavy Menstrual Bleeding, Bleeding Disorder and Von Willebrand Diseases, sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University. Recruiting at 8 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 10 Years to 24 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by Oregon Health and Science University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Updated Nov 2, 2026Site recruiting status changedSponsor changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
10 Years to 24 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this multicenter prospective observational study and registry of U.S. adolescents and young adults with heritable bleeding disorders is to determine the bleeding outcomes, satisfaction, hemostatic parameter changes, and patient reported quality of life after 6 months of use of either of two commonly used hormonal treatments for menstrual suppression - levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) and norethindrone acetate (NETA). Under this application the study will compare the two treatments and compare outcomes after LNG-IUD treatment results to a control group without a bleeding disorder, with the goal of determining the benefits and expected outcomes of these treatment options for this population.

Read the detailed description

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is common among adolescents and young adults with an inherited bleeding disorder (BD) and negatively impacts health-related quality of life and physical and mental health status. Effective treatment options are available that decrease bleeding and improve quality of life, but were not studied in those with BD, so investigators do not know if there is similar effectiveness in this condition. The impact of treatment on diagnostic testing for BD or on improvement of iron deficiency is also not known. Given these gaps in knowledge, the primary objective of the Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Progestin Treatment in Bleeding Disorders Study is to conduct a multicenter prospective observational cohort study and registry, enrolling adolescents and young adults with heavy menstrual bleeding cared for at collaborating interdisciplinary menstrual clinic sites nationally who are choosing to start use of either of two commonly used progestin menstrual treatment options: levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUD) or oral norethindrone acetate 5 mg daily (NETA) (N=300). In Aim 1, the study will compare outcomes related to (a) bleeding management, (b) quality of life, and (c) repletion of iron storage levels after six months of treatment with either option in those with a diagnosed inherited bleeding disorder. The primary outcome will be treatment success with a Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) score \<50 points by six months. Secondary objectives to assess bleeding management will include need for adjuvant management, change in PBAC from baseline to 6 months, and self-reported treatment success. Quality of life outcomes will include change in validated scales to assess health-related quality of life which are specific to adolescents and young adults in the setting of heavy menstrual bleeding. The study will compare ferritin levels at six months compared to baseline to determine the relative amount of benefit obtained from either treatment option. In Aim 2, the study will compare outcomes after LNG-IUD in those with and without a bleeding disorder, assessing rates of expulsion and method continuation between the two groups in addition to the outcomes assessed for Aim 1. Aim 3 will improve our understanding of the impact of physiological stress on BD diagnostic studies by comparing change in hemostatic parameters before and after successful treatment in those with HMB without a previously diagnosed bleeding disorder. This study will demonstrate the relative benefits of menstrual suppression treatment options for adolescents and young adults with heavy menstrual bleeding and inherited bleeding disorders, will provide population-specific estimates for expected benefit that can be used in treatment counseling, and will highlight the impact of treatment status on diagnostic test results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
  • Bleeding Disorder
  • Von Willebrand Diseases
03

In context

Menorrhagia

206 studies on the registry are indexed under Menorrhagia; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 210 across 47 observational studies indexed under Menorrhagia.

Browse Menorrhagia studies →

Lead sponsor

Oregon Health and Science University is the lead sponsor of 696 studies on the registry; 131 are open to participants now.

Of its 52 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 39 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adolescents and young adults ages 10-24 with and without a heritable bleeding disorder who receive medical care for heavy menstrual bleeding at a participating U.S. clinical site. All clinical sites participate in a national consortium of interdisciplinary hematology-gynecology clinics.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Post-menarcheal
  • Ages 10-24
  • Decision to initiate a trial of progestin therapy with either LNG-IUD or NETA
  • Able to provide assent and written by one parent (ages \<18) or written informed consent (age 18+)
  • Must meet trial criteria for heavy menstrual bleeding
  • Must meet trial criteria for a bleeding disorder or have minimum workup to rule out bleeding disorder

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or seeking pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Bleeding disorder using LNG-IUD

    Adolescents and young adults ages 10-24 with diagnosed bleeding disorder planning use of LNG-IUD.

    Drug: Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System

  • Non-bleeding disorder using LNG-IUD

    Adolescents and young adults ages 10-24 without diagnosed bleeding disorder planning use of LNG-IUD.

    Drug: Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System

  • Bleeding disorder using NETA

    Adolescents and young adults ages 10-24 with diagnosed bleeding disorder planning use of NETA.

    Drug: Norethindrone Acetate

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment success rate

    Proportion with pictorial blood loss assessment score \<50 points

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Median Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) score

    Group median of pictorial blood loss assessment score. PBAC scores start at 0 to represent no bleeding with higher PBAC scores representing heavy menstrual bleeding. There is no maximum PBAC score.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Patient-reported treatment success rate

    Proportion with patient-reported treatment success. Treatment success will be measured with Yes or No bivariate response.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Change in Adolescent Menstrual Bleeding Questionnaire (aMBQ) score

    Group median of individual change in adolescent menstrual bleeding questionnaire score. aMBQ scores can range from 0 to 77 with higher scores representing worse health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

  4. Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-25 or PROMIS-29) scores

    Group median of individual change in patient-reported outcomes measurement information system score after treatment. PROMIS-25 and PROMIS-29 scores are measured on a standardized scale of T-scores with a score of 50 representing the population average and higher scores representing worse outcomes. Participants who will be age 18 or older at six months after treatment initiation will be administered the PROMIS-25 adult version and age \<18 will be administered the PROMIS-29 pediatric version.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

  5. Change in serum ferritin after treatment

    Group median of individual change in ferritin

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

  6. Change in von Willebrand Factor (VWF) levels

    Group median of individual change in von Willebrand Factor levels

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

07

Study locations

6 of 8 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — This study will collect clinical, laboratory, and survey data from participants ages 10-24 at multiple academic clinical sites. Participant-level clinical data will be preserved through deposition of the data in a controlled access public repository. We will make our scientific data as widely and freely available as possible while safeguarding the privacy of participants (de-identified prior to repository submission) and protecting confidential and proprietary data.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Scientific data will be shared as soon as possible following study participant completion. Scientific data included in published manuscripts will be available at the time of publication; all other generated scientific data will be shared no later than the end of the award. The study data will be stored in the repository indefinitely, for at least 5 years.

Access criteria: The study datasets will be collected with the following informed consent: The dataset can only be used for studying health, medical, or biomedical conditions and does not include the study of population origins or ancestry. We will also require all individuals requesting data to enter into a data sharing agreement that: 1) acknowledges the data will be stripped of identifying markers and identification; 2) acknowledges that these data will only be used for research purposes; and 3) requests investigators to reference the seminal publication describing data collection. The dataset can only be used for studying health, medical or biomedical conditions and does not include the study of population origins or ancestry. The requesting institution's IRB or equivalent body must approve the requested use.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 39 months after the start.

Of 21 observational studies under Menorrhagia, half reached primary completion within 61 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 41 and three quarters within 102. This study's planned 39 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 14, 2023
First posted
Jun 23, 2023
StartActual
Sep 24, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2028
CompletionEst.
Jun 2029
Last update
Nov 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
1 site removed. 5 sites changed recruiting status (5 now recruiting)
Show 5 sites
  • Stanford · Palo Alto, United StatesNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  • Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · Aurora, United StatesNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  • Children's Mercy · Kansas City, United StatesNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  • Penn State Health · Hershey, United StatesNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
  • Seattle Children's Hospital · Seattle, United StatesNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
Show 1 removed
  • University of Washington · Seattle, United States
Nov 2, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 1 site. See the sites
Show the site
  • Seattle Children's Hospital · Seattle, United StatesContact added W•••@wacbd.org · •••1200
Nov 2, 2026
Sponsor
Collaborators added: Children's Hospital Colorado; collaborators removed: University of Washington
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    1 site removed. 5 sites changed recruiting status (5 now recruiting)
    Show 5 sites
    • Stanford · Palo Alto, United StatesNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
    • Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · Aurora, United StatesNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
    • Children's Mercy · Kansas City, United StatesNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
    • Penn State Health · Hershey, United StatesNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
    • Seattle Children's Hospital · Seattle, United StatesNot yet recruiting→Recruiting
    Show 1 removed
    • University of Washington · Seattle, United States
    Sponsor Collaborators added: Children's Hospital Colorado; collaborators removed: University of Washington
    Site contacts Changed at 1 site. See the sites
    Show the site
    • Seattle Children's Hospital · Seattle, United StatesContact added W•••@wacbd.org · •••1200
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05916469
Collaborators
NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado
Responsible party
Maureen Baldwin (Associate Professor of Ob/Gyn, Oregon Health and Science University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 23, 2023
Start date
Sep 24, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Study contacts

OHSU Women's Health Research Unit
Contact
whru@ohsu.edu
5034943666
Maureen Baldwin, MD MPH
Contact
schaum@ohsu.edu
5034949762
Maureen Baldwin, MD MPH
principal investigator · Oregon Health and Science University
Allison Wheeler
principal investigator · University of Colorado, Denver

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion