CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07281183Updated Dec 15, 2025

Reformer Pilates and Manual Therapy in Women With Chronic Low Back Pain

An interventional study of Manual and Physiotherapy Techniques and Manual and Physiotherapy Techniques and Reformer Pilates Group in Low Back Pain and Pilates Exercise, sponsored by Uskudar University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 25 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-15.

Sponsored by Uskudar University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2025, registered Sep 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 55 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of manual therapy alone and manual therapy combined with Reformer Pilates exercises in women with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of manual techniques alone and manual techniques combined with Reformer Pilates exercises in women with chronic low back pain (CLBP), focusing on pain, kinesiophobia, range of motion (ROM), muscle strength, trunk endurance, functional level, and quality of life.

A total of 40 women with CLBP who applied to the Kayroterapi Exercise Center were included. Participants were randomized by odd and even numbers into two groups. The control group (MTG) received a manual techniques protocol once a week for 50 minutes over 8 weeks, while the experimental group (MTRPG) received the same protocol in addition to two 50-minute Reformer Pilates sessions per week. Sociodemographic data were collected through a questionnaire specifically designed for the study. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), kinesiophobia with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), and functional disability with the Functional Low Back Pain Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index. Muscle strength was evaluated using manual muscle testing, ROM with a goniometer, and trunk endurance with the sit-and-reach test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain
  • Pilates Exercise

Keywords

  • pain
  • low back
  • pilates
  • exercise
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 481 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 2,268 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Uskudar University is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 25 and 55 years
  • Female gender
  • Voluntary participation in the study
  • History of low back pain lasting longer than 12 weeks and diagnosis of mechanical low back pain (chronic low back pain)
  • No contraindications to exercise
  • No physical or mental condition preventing participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age below 5 years or above 55 years
  • Low back pain lasting less than 12 weeks
  • Presence of chronic comorbid disease (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, or other systemic conditions)
  • Regular use of medication
  • Presence of a neurological pathology
  • Any contraindication to exercise
  • Inability to establish verbal or visual communication
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Manual Techniques Group ( MTG )

    Within the scope of MTG's treatment program; during the first 20 minutes of the session, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) was applied to the lumbar region with three channels and a total of six electrodes, while infrared therapy was simultaneously combined and applied to the same region. Soft tissue and mobilization techniques were applied to the lumbar region and surrounding tissues for 15 minutes. Cupping massage and cupping therapy were performed for 5 minutes. Soft tissue mobilization with the Graston technique was applied for 5 minutes, and during the last 5 minutes of the session, a portable percussion massage device was used.

    Other: Manual and Physiotherapy Techniques

  • Experimental
    MTRPG ( Manual Techniques and Reformer Pilates Group )

    In the treatment program of the MTRPG group, in addition to the treatment protocol applied in the MTG group, a reformer Pilates exercise program was implemented. Within this program, the session began with the Footwork series as a 5-10 minute warm-up. Subsequently, the exercises included the running exercise, frog exercise, leg circle series (up-down, circle, one leg side stretch), arm circle exercise series, pelvic lift, elephant exercise, and side stretch mermaid exercise, each performed for 10-15 repetitions. The final 5 minutes of the 50-minute reformer Pilates session consisted of child's pose and spinal stretching series.

    Other: Manual and Physiotherapy Techniques and Reformer Pilates Group

Interventions

  • OtherManual and Physiotherapy Techniques

    Within the scope of MTG's treatment program, during the first 20 minutes of the session, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) was applied to the lumbar region with three channels and a total of six electrodes, simultaneously combined with infrared therapy applied to the same area. Soft tissue and mobilization techniques were applied to the lumbar region and surrounding tissues for 15 minutes. Cupping massage and cupping therapy were performed for 5 minutes. The Graston technique was applied for 5 minutes to achieve soft tissue mobilization, and the final 5 minutes of the session were carried out using a portable percussion massage device.

  • OtherManual and Physiotherapy Techniques and Reformer Pilates Group

    n the treatment program of the MTRPG group, in addition to the treatment protocol applied in the MTG group, a reformer Pilates exercise program was implemented. Within this program, the session began with the Footwork series as a 5-10 minute warm-up. Subsequently, the exercises included the running exercise, frog exercise, leg circle series (up-down, circle, one leg side stretch), arm circle exercise series, pelvic lift, elephant exercise, and side stretch mermaid exercise, each performed for 10-15 repetitions. The final 5 minutes of the 50-minute reformer Pilates session consisted of child's pose and spinal stretching series.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale)

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), used to assess pain intensity, is a simple, reliable, and easily applicable method. This scale consists of a standard 10 cm vertical or horizontal straight line, with one end indicating "no pain" (0) and the other end indicating "the most severe pain" (10). The patient is asked to mark a point on the line that best represents their current level of pain. The score is then determined based on the location of the mark. Studies have reported that the VAS is a reliable tool for measuring pain intensity.

    Time frame: 4 months

  2. Oswestry Disability Index: ODI

    This scale, which is widely used to assess the level of functional disability in individuals with low back pain, evaluates daily living activities. It consists of a total of 10 subcategories: pain intensity, degree of pain variation, personal care, lifting, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, traveling, and sexual activity. Each section contains six statements scored from 0 to 5. The individual is asked to choose the statement that best describes their current condition. The total score ranges from 0 to 50. The interpretation of scores is as follows: 1-10 points: Mild functional disability 11-30 points: Moderate functional disability 31-50 points: Severe functional disability The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Yakut et al.

    Time frame: 4 months

  3. Back Pain Functional Scale : FBAS

    This scale is used to assess the extent to which individuals' functional levels are affected by low back pain. The functional areas included in the scale are as follows: work, school, home activities, hobbies, forward bending, putting on shoes or socks, lifting objects from the floor, sleeping, sitting, standing, walking, climbing stairs, and driving. For individuals who do not drive, the last item is answered as "traveling." Each item is scored between 0 and 5. According to the scoring system: (0): Unable to perform the activity 1. : Extremely difficult 2. : Very difficult 3. : Moderately difficult 4. : Slightly difficult 5. : Not difficult The total score ranges from 0 to 60. A score of 60 indicates that the individual can perform all activities without any difficulty.

    Time frame: 4 months

  4. Sit and Reach Test : SRT

    It is a simple and widely used physical assessment test designed to evaluate an individual's level of flexibility. During the test, the individual sits on the floor with both legs extended straight and the soles of the feet placed against a box. A 26 cm ruler is placed on top of the box prepared for the measurement. The participant is asked to reach forward as far as possible without bending the knees. The farthest point reached is held for approximately 2 seconds, and the distance is recorded. The best result from two trials is taken and recorded in centimeters.

    Time frame: 4 months

  5. Range of Motion : ROM

    Goniometric measurement is an objective method used in clinical settings to assess normal joint range of motion. During the measurement, the patient is positioned comfortably and appropriately for the joint being evaluated. Before beginning the assessment, the procedure is explained to the patient. All joints are aligned according to the anatomical position, and measurements are taken based on the zero starting position. Joint movements are generally assessed within a range of motion from 0° to 180°. Normal range of motion values for the upper and lower extremities and the vertebral column may vary depending on the reference source. In clinical practice, the most commonly used reference standards are those published by Kendall and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS).

    Time frame: 4 months

  6. Manual Muscle Testing : MMT

    It is a clinical method used to assess muscle strength. The basis of these tests was developed by Dr. Robert W. Lovett, Professor of Orthopedics at Harvard Medical School, and was first applied in 1912. The evaluation is scored between 0 and 5 based on the muscle's performance against gravity. The interpretation of these scores may vary depending on the specific muscle being tested. 5 (Normal): The muscle completes full range of motion against gravity and maximal external resistance. 4 (Good): The muscle completes full range of motion against gravity but with less than maximal resistance. 3 (Fair): The muscle completes full range of motion against gravity but without any added resistance. 2 (Poor): The muscle completes full range of motion in a gravity-eliminated position. 1 (Trace): Muscle contraction is palpable, but no joint movement occurs. 0 (Zero): No muscle contraction is felt or observed.

    Time frame: 4 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Uskudar University
    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study Design

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07281183
Lead sponsor
Uskudar University
Responsible party
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Muhammed Fatih Kavak (Assistant Professor, Uskudar University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 15, 2025
Start date
Mar 28, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 19, 2025
Completion
Jul 19, 2025
Last update
Dec 15, 2025

Study contacts

Muhammed Fatih Kavak, Assistant Professor
study director · Uskudar University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion