ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07280975PolySutureUpdated Dec 15, 2025

Comparing Polyglactin vs Polypropylene Sutures for Rectus Sheath Closure

An interventional study of Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) Suture and Polypropylene (Prolene) Suture in Chronic Pain, Wound Dehiscence and Surgical Site Infection (SSI), sponsored by Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-15.

Sponsored by Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
156
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the outcomes of Polyglactin (Vicryl) versus Polypropylene (Prolene) sutures for rectus sheath closure in patients undergoing midline laparotomy. The study will evaluate the rates of incisional hernia, surgical site infection (SSI), wound dehiscence, chronic pain, and suture sinus formation. Participants aged 18-70 years, undergoing either elective or emergency laparotomy, will be randomly assigned to receive either Polyglactin or Polypropylene sutures. The primary outcome measure is the incidence of incisional hernia at 6 months, with secondary outcomes including SSI, wound complications, and chronic pain. The study is particularly important in the context of Pakistan, where such comparative data is limited, and aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for optimal suture material selection in general surgery.

Read the detailed description

Study Design This randomized controlled trial is designed to compare the outcomes of two suture materials-Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) and Polypropylene (Prolene)-for rectus sheath closure after midline laparotomy. The study will be conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, over 12 months. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (Polyglactin) and Group B (Polypropylene). The primary outcome is the rate of incisional hernia at 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include surgical site infection (SSI), wound dehiscence, chronic pain, and suture sinus formation.

■ Participants The study will include patients aged 18 to 70 years undergoing elective or emergency midline laparotomy with clean or clean-contaminated wounds (CDC Class I or II).

Inclusion Criteria:

Aged 18-70 years

Elective or emergency laparotomy

Clean or clean-contaminated wounds

Ability to provide informed consent

Availability for 6-month follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

Contaminated or dirty wounds (CDC Class III or IV)

Immunocompromised patients (e.g., on steroids, chemotherapy, HIV)

Prior midline laparotomy with incisional hernia

Severe malnutrition (BMI \<16 kg/m² or albumin \<2.5 g/dL)

Pregnancy

Requirement for temporary abdominal closure or planned reoperation

■ Interventions

Polyglactin (Vicryl): A synthetic absorbable braided suture composed of glycolide and lactide copolymers. It is absorbed by hydrolysis over 56-70 days, providing temporary wound support during healing.

Polypropylene (Prolene): A synthetic non-absorbable monofilament suture known for its permanent tensile strength and excellent biocompatibility, offering long-term mechanical support and minimal tissue reaction.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome:

Incidence of incisional hernia at 6 months, confirmed by clinical examination and ultrasound if necessary.

Secondary Outcomes:

Surgical Site Infection (SSI): Defined as an infection occurring within 30 days post-surgery, classified as superficial, deep, or organ/space.

Wound Dehiscence: Partial or complete disruption of the abdominal wall closure within 30 days post-surgery.

Chronic Pain: Persistent pain at the surgical site lasting more than 3 months, assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Suture Sinus Formation: Chronic draining tract related to the suture material.

Statistical Analysis Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 26. Chi-square tests will compare proportions of complications between the two groups, and relative risk will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Stratified analysis will assess the impact of potential modifiers such as age, gender, and comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, hypertension).

Potential Impact The findings from this study aim to improve surgical outcomes in Pakistan and similar settings. By identifying the more effective suture material for rectus sheath closure, this research will help guide clinical practices, reducing common complications like incisional hernia and infection. It may also contribute to better surgical standards in regions lacking high-quality comparative data.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain
  • Wound Dehiscence
  • Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
  • Incisional Hernia
  • Rectus Sheath Closure
  • Abdominal Surgery

Keywords

  • Polyglactin Sutures
  • Polypropylene Sutures
  • Non-Absorbable Sutures
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Midline Laparotomy
03

In context

Chronic Pain

3,227 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 729 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 156 is above the median of 60 across 2,388 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age: 18-70 years.
  2. Type of Surgery: Patients undergoing elective or emergency midline laparotomy.
  3. Wound Classification: Clean or clean-contaminated wounds (CDC Class I or II).
  4. Ability to Provide : Participants must be able to understand and sign the informed consent form.
  5. Availability for Follow-Up: Participants must be available for 6 months follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contaminated or Dirty Wounds: Patients with CDC Class III or IV wounds.
  2. Conditions: Patients on , chemotherapy, or those with .
  3. Previous Midline Laparotomy with Incisional Hernia: Patients who have a history of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy.
  4. Severe Malnutrition: Patients with \< 16 kg/m² or albumin \< 2.5 g/dL.
  5. Emergency Laparotomy with Hemodynamic Instability: Patients who are unstable or in a critical condition.
  6. Pregnancy: Pregnant women.
  7. Need for Temporary Abdominal Closure or Planned Reoperation: Patients requiring staged reoperation or temporary closure.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
156 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) Suture for Rectus Sheath Closure

    In this arm, participants will undergo rectus sheath closure using polyglactin 910 (Vicryl), a synthetic absorbable braided suture. This material is designed to provide temporary wound support during the healing process, with predictable hydrolytic degradation over 56-70 days. The intervention involves continuous suturing of the rectus sheath, with the suture size being 1 (USP). The primary aim is to evaluate postoperative outcomes such as incisional hernia, surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, and chronic pain, using polyglactin sutures for abdominal wall closure.Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) Suture for Rectus Sheath Closure

    Procedure: Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) Suture

  • Active comparator
    Polypropylene (Prolene) Suture for Rectus Sheath Closure

    In this arm, participants will undergo rectus sheath closure using polypropylene (Prolene), a non-absorbable monofilament suture. Polypropylene is known for its high tensile strength and biocompatibility, providing long-term mechanical support without being absorbed by the body. The intervention will involve continuous suturing of the rectus sheath, using a size 1 (USP) suture. The main focus will be to assess the incidence of complications such as incisional hernia, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, and chronic pain following closure with polypropylene sutures.

    Procedure: Polypropylene (Prolene) Suture

Interventions

  • ProcedurePolyglactin 910 (Vicryl) Suture

    Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) is an absorbable synthetic multifilament suture material used for rectus sheath closure following laparotomy. This suture material undergoes hydrolytic degradation over a period of 56-70 days and retains approximately 75% of its tensile strength at 2 weeks and 50% at 3 weeks, which aligns with the typical biological timeline for fascial healing. It is used to approximate the anterior rectus sheath with a continuous suturing technique.

  • ProcedurePolypropylene (Prolene) Suture

    Polypropylene (Prolene) is a non-absorbable monofilament suture material used for rectus sheath closure following laparotomy. It provides long-term mechanical support for abdominal wall closure and does not degrade over time. The suture material maintains its tensile strength indefinitely and is known for its high biocompatibility, minimal tissue reaction, and resistance to infection due to its monofilament structure. It is applied using a continuous suturing technique.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incisional Hernia rate

    The primary outcome will assess the rate of incisional hernia at 6 months post-surgery in patients who undergo rectus sheath closure with either Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) or Polypropylene (Prolene) sutures.

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Rate

    This outcome will measure the occurrence of any surgical site infection (SSI) within 30 days postoperatively.

    Time frame: 30 days post-surgery

  2. Suture Sinus Formation

    The occurrence of chronic draining tracts at the incision site, which are associated with the suture material.

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  3. Chronic Pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS ≥4)

    The presence of chronic pain at the surgical site lasting more than 3 months postoperatively, assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where the VAS is a 10-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A score of 4 or higher indicates the presence of clinically significant chronic pain.

    Time frame: 3 months post-surgery

  4. Wound Dehiscence

    The occurrence of wound dehiscence, defined as partial or complete disruption of the rectus sheath, within 30 days post-surgery.

    Time frame: 30 days post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The individual participant data (IPD) that will be shared includes de-identified demographic information, surgical details, treatment outcomes, and relevant follow-up data (e.g., wound healing, incidence of complications, pain scores, and hernia occurrence). This will provide valuable insight into the comparative efficacy of polyglactin versus polypropylene sutures for rectus sheath closure. The data will be available to qualified researchers after the primary results have been published and the study is concluded.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: The IPD and supporting information will be accessible to qualified researchers affiliated with academic, medical, or research institutions who are involved in the study of similar surgical outcomes or suture materials. These researchers will be able to access: De-identified patient data (demographic, clinical outcomes, complications) Study protocol, SAP, ICF, CSR, and analytic code

Access criteria: Access will be granted through a secure online platform (such as a data repository) after a formal request and approval by the institution's data access committee. Researchers will be required to adhere to confidentiality agreements and data protection regulations.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Apr 2026; primary completion for Jun 2027, 14 months later.

Of 1,295 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Chronic Pain, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 39. This study's planned 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,378 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 28, 2025
First posted
Dec 15, 2025
StartEst.
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 30, 2027
Last update
Dec 15, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07280975
Lead sponsor
Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan
Responsible party
Dr. Waseem Ullah (Registrar, General Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 15, 2025
Start date
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 15, 2025

Study contacts

Dr. Atta Ullah Arif Associate Professor, MBBS, FCPS
Contact
attaullah.arif@Irh.edu.pk
+92 333 9126978

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion