ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07183930TUBELESSUpdated Aug 26, 2026

Tubeless vs Tube PCNL in Pediatric Nephrolithiasis

An interventional study of Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and Standard Tube Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in Nephrolithiasis and Pediatric Nephrolithiasis, sponsored by Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-26.

Sponsored by Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2024, registered Sep 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
640
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed to compare two surgical techniques for removing kidney stones in children and adolescents (ages 6-18 years). Both methods are types of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), a standard procedure for kidney stones larger than 10 mm.

In the traditional method, a temporary tube (nephrostomy tube) is left in the kidney after surgery to drain urine. In the newer "tubeless" method, the tube is not used, and only a small internal stent may be placed. We want to find out if the tubeless method is as safe and effective as the traditional method, and whether it reduces pain, hospital stay, and the need for blood transfusions. The study involves 640 patients at Khyber Teaching Hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan. Each participant is randomly assigned to one of the two techniques.

Read the detailed description

Pediatric kidney stones are increasingly common and often require surgical management when stones are larger than 10 mm or fail to pass with conservative treatment. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard for such cases. Traditionally, PCNL involves the placement of a nephrostomy tube to ensure postoperative drainage. However, this tube can increase discomfort, lengthen hospital stay, and sometimes lead to bleeding.

Recent advances in adult populations suggest that "tubeless" PCNL-where no external drainage tube is left-may reduce postoperative pain, decrease hospital stay, and improve recovery, without compromising safety. Evidence in children remains limited, mostly from small retrospective series.

This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, between October 2024 and March 2025. A total of 640 pediatric patients aged 6-18 years with renal stones >10 mm were randomized into two groups: Group A (Tubeless PCNL, n=320) and Group B (Tube PCNL, n=320). All procedures were performed by a single experienced pediatric urologist using standardized mini-PCNL techniques.

The primary outcomes include operative time, hospital stay, blood transfusion requirement, and stone-free status on discharge. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, analgesic use, complications (graded by Clavien-Dindo classification), time to resumption of normal activities, and patient/family satisfaction.

By directly comparing the two approaches in a large pediatric cohort, this study provides high-quality evidence to determine whether tubeless PCNL should be considered the preferred technique in appropriately selected children.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nephrolithiasis
  • Pediatric Nephrolithiasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Blood transfusion
  • Kidney stone surgery
  • Tubeless PCNL
  • PCNL
  • Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • Stone-free rate
03

In context

Nephrolithiasis

324 studies on the registry are indexed under Nephrolithiasis; 90 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 640 is above the median of 92 across 257 interventional studies indexed under Nephrolithiasis.

Browse Nephrolithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 6 to 18 years
  • Either gender
  • Renal calculi larger than 10 mm on imaging
  • Failed conservative management or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)
  • Normal renal function
  • from parents/guardians
  • Assent from children aged 12 years and above

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior renal surgery or ureteral stenting
  • Congenital urological anomalies
  • Active urinary tract infection at the time of surgery
  • Known bleeding disorders or use of anticoagulant medication
  • Significant comorbid medical conditions
  • Pregnancy (in adolescent females)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
640 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tubeless PCNL

    Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) performed without nephrostomy tube placement. After complete stone clearance and confirmation of hemostasis, only a double-J stent is placed; the access tract is left to seal naturally.

    Procedure: Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

  • Active comparator
    Tube PCNL

    Standard PCNL performed with placement of a nephrostomy tube following stone clearance, along with a double-J stent.

    Procedure: Standard Tube Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Interventions

  • ProcedureTubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

    Mini-PCNL with tract dilation up to 18 Fr and stone fragmentation by pneumatic lithotripsy. Following clearance, a double-J stent is placed; no nephrostomy tube is inserted.

  • ProcedureStandard Tube Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

    Mini-PCNL with tract dilation up to 18 Fr and stone fragmentation by pneumatic lithotripsy. Following clearance, a 14 Fr nephrostomy tube and a double-J stent are placed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of hospital stay (days)

    Number of days from the date of surgery until discharge from hospital.

    Time frame: From surgery to discharge (up to 7 days).

  2. Operative time (minutes)

    Duration of the surgical procedure measured from skin incision to skin closure, recorded in minutes.

    Time frame: During surgery (single procedure).

  3. Blood transfusion requirement (%)

    Proportion of participants requiring perioperative blood transfusion, as documented in patient records.

    Time frame: surgery through hospital discharge (up to 7 days).

  4. Stone-free status (%)

    Proportion of patients with no residual stone fragments \>2 mm on postoperative imaging (ultrasound or CT).

    Time frame: At hospital discharge (within 48 hours after surgery).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain score (Visual Analog Scale)

    Pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain. Higher scores indicate worse pain. The score will be averaged over the first 24 hours after surgery.

    Time frame: First 24 hours post-surgery

  2. Analgesic requirement (morphine equivalents, mg)

    Total opioid dose used postoperatively in the first 48 hours, converted to morphine equivalents and measured in milligrams.

    Time frame: First 48 hours post-surgery

  3. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification)

    Number and severity of complications graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

    Time frame: surgery to discharge (up to 7 days)

  4. Time to return to normal activity (days)

    Number of days from surgery until the patient resumes routine daily activities, as reported by patient/parent.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days post-surgery

  5. Patient and family satisfaction score

    Satisfaction with overall care and outcome, measured using a 10-point Likert scale questionnaire completed at discharge.

    Time frame: At hospital discharge (within 7 days post-surgery)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar
    Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 25000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Data sharing plans have not been finalized. This will depend on journal requirements, funding agency policies, and institutional guidelines at the time of publication.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07183930
Lead sponsor
Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan
Collaborators
Khyber Teaching Hospital
Responsible party
Dr. Waseem Ullah (Assistant Professor, Khyber Teaching Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 10, 2025
Completion
Sep 10, 2025
Last update
Aug 26, 2026

Study contacts

Tariq Ahmad, MBBS, FCPS
principal investigator · Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion