ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07244354Updated Jul 24, 2026

Maternal Hypothermia After Caesarean Section - Implications for Postoperative Recovery

An observational study in Caesarean Section, sponsored by Oslo University Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Norway. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-24.

Sponsored by Oslo University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
700
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 17 studies in Patient Satisfaction with a site in Norway — 2 open to participants now, 3 under way, none of them phase 3. Patient Satisfaction · Norway.

Started
2026
the only one that year
Observational
3 of 17
1 open now
Registered
17th of 17
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 17
Oslo University Hospital

Among the 17 studies in Patient Satisfaction with a site in Norway, this one is the only one that started in 2026, is one of 3 observational ones, and was the 17th registered.

Patient Satisfaction

877 studies on the registry are indexed under Patient Satisfaction; 202 are open to participants now.

Browse Patient Satisfaction studies →

Open to participants now

2 of the 17 studies in Patient Satisfaction with a site in Norway are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 2 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Norway have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Norway →

Who these studies take

Of the 99 Patient Satisfaction studies recruiting now, 61 (62%) set no upper age limit and 30 (30%) stop at 75 or younger; 14 take children under 18; 26 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 50 Years · female.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 17 studies in Patient Satisfaction with a site in Norway, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The aim of the study is to assess patient reported outcomes after caesarean section using self report questionnaire.

Read the detailed description

The project consists of two studies: Study 1 explores patient reported outcomes after caesarean section related to recovery and quality of care. Study 2 explores possible associations between perioperative hypothermia during caesarean section and postoperative infection

03

Conditions studied

  • Caesarean Section

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • patient reported outcome measures
  • quality of care
  • patient satisfaction
  • perioperative hypothermia
  • post caesarean infection
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Females giving birth through caesarean section

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Caesarean section surgery -

Exclusion Criteria: Stillborn baby, baby admitted to neonatal intensive care,

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
700 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherSelf report questionnaire

    No intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient reported recovery after caesarean delivery and symptoms of post caesarean infection

    Data collection using questionnaire

    Time frame: Data collection 24 hours after surgery and 7 days after surgery and 30 days after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2030, 58 months after the start.

Of 105 non-industry observational studies under Patient Satisfaction, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 58 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 111 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 44.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 17, 2025
First posted
Nov 24, 2025
StartActual
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2030
CompletionEst.
Nov 1, 2030
Last update
Jul 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07244354
Responsible party
Elizabeth Reine (Professional development and research nurse, Oslo University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 24, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2026

Study contacts

Elizabeth Reine, PhD
principal investigator · Oslo University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion