ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07240519LASERUpdated Nov 26, 2025

To Compare Inflammatory Biomarkers Before and After Treatment With Clobetasol or Fractional CO2 Laser, in Women With Histologically Confirmed Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus, Without Prior Corticosteroid Treatment.

An interventional study of Fractional microablative CO2 Laser in Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus, sponsored by Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-26.

Sponsored by Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2022, registered Nov 2025).
  • Started Jun 2022; still recruiting 4 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The present study is a Clinical trial that compares clobetasol ointment versus Fractional CO2 laser for vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLE) treatment confirmed by histology, with no previous treatment. Lichen sclerosus is a chronic inflamatory disease that affects the vulvar skin in the majority of cases, generally in peri and post menopause. The main symptom is pruritus, along with dispareunia and vulvar pain. If not treated, it can leads to vulvar anatomy distortion and altough small, there is risk of neoplastic transformation towards pre cancer and invasive vulvar cancer. Clobetasol ointment is the standard treatment, but prolonged use can cause some adverse effects, such as thinning the skin, fungal infections, and exacerbation of symptoms. Forty participants are being randomized to clobetasol group, three months with reducing frequency and the other group of participants, to fractional dioxid carbon (CO2) laser for three sessions four weeks apart. At the beggining and three months after the completion of each treatment, a punch biopsy will be taken for every participant. The principal aim is to compare some inflamatory biomarkers before and after each treatment and compare them by imunohistoquemestry at Imunology and Imunogenetic Laboratory in Fiocruz, Rio de janeiro, Brazil.

Secondary outcomes include clinical response and changes in vulvar anatomy, assessed using the Sheinis \& Selk questionnaire before and after each treatment, as well as the evaluation of some clinical aspects, such as improvement in itching, dyspareunia and appearance of the vulva, along with satisfaction with the treatment, using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 1 to 10.

With this study, the investigators want to know if fractional CO2 laser can reduce the inflammatory process and symptoms in vulvar lichen sclerosus such as itching, and if this could be an alternative treatment for this condition.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus

Keywords

  • CO2 laser
  • vulvar lichen sclerosus
03

In context

Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus

33 studies on the registry are indexed under Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is close to the median of 39 across 30 interventional studies indexed under Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus.

Browse Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro is the lead sponsor of 123 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Women older than 21 years; histological diagnostic of vulvar lichen sclerosus and no previous treatment with topic corticoesteroid

Exclusion Criteria: Women that don't agree in taking part of the study; other concomitant vulvar diseases; pre malignant vulvar disease HPV dependent and independent; previous pelvic radiotherapy

-

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Paricipants randomized for Clobetasol ointment group

    Participants in this group will apply clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment to the vulvar affected area in an amount sufficient to cover the finger tip according to standard treatment protocol: every day in the first month every other day in the second month twice a week (for example: Mondays and Thursdays) in the third month

    Device: Fractional microablative CO2 Laser

  • Experimental
    Participants randomized for Fractional Carbon dioxide (CO2 ) laser group treatment

    Fractional microablative CO2 laser An anesthetic ointment provided by the principal investigator, applied on vulva skin, perineal area and vulvar vestibule 30 - 45 minutes before the Session of CO2 laser. Three sessions spaced four weeks apart, with instructions after each session, such as avoiding sexual intercourse for five days and using a product like petroleum jelly for relief for a few days.

    Device: Fractional microablative CO2 Laser

Interventions

  • DeviceFractional microablative CO2 Laser

    In this study the investigators use the laser device without any topic esteroid previous or during the period of laser sessions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation and comparison of inflammatory biomarkers before and after treatment with clobetasol or CO2 laser.

    Before and after each of the two treatments, a vulvar punch biopsy will be performed. The fragment will then be analyzed using immunohistochemistry to assess changes in inflammatory biomarkers.

    Time frame: Each participant will be monitored from registration, throughout treatment, and up to three months after the end of treatment.

  2. To evaluate the performance of CO2 laser in vulvar lichen sclerosus in relation to inflammatory skin markers and compare to clobetasol

    In vulvar skin fragment obtained by punch biopsy, some inflammatory biomarkers such as TGF-β, INF-γ, VEGF, and IL-10 will be evaluated before and three months after the last laser session. The biomarkers will be quantified by immunohistochemistry at the Immunology and Immunogenetics Laboratory of Fiocruz. For the count, a compound optical microscope will be used, consisting of a 40x objective lens and a 10x grating eyepiece. The total number of cells positive for the marker being analyzed will be recorded in each field.

    Time frame: From enrollment to a second biopsy 3 months after treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Institute of Gynecology of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
    Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20211 340, Brazil
    Recruiting
    • Yara Lúcia M Furtado de Melo, PhD · Contactyarafurtadorj@gmail.com · + 55 21 99982 6257
    • Yara Lúcia M Furtado de Melo, PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Krause E, Neumann S, Maier M, Imboden S, Knabben L, Mueller MD, Kuhn A. LASER treatment in gynaecology -A randomized controlled trial in women with symptomatic lichen sclerosus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Aug;287:171-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.003. Epub 2023 Jun 8. PubMed 37352640 ↗
  • Preti M, Vieira-Baptista P, Digesu GA, Bretschneider CE, Damaser M, Demirkesen O, Heller DS, Mangir N, Marchitelli C, Mourad S, Moyal-Barracco M, Peremateu S, Tailor V, Tarcan T, De EJB, Stockdale CK. The clinical role of LASER for vulvar and vaginal treatments in gynecology and female urology: An ICS/ISSVD best practice consensus document. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Mar;38(3):1009-1023. doi: 10.1002/nau.23931. Epub 2019 Feb 11. PubMed 30742321 ↗
  • Tasker F, Kirby L, Grindlay DJC, Lewis F, Simpson RC. Laser therapy for genital lichen sclerosus: A systematic review of the current evidence base. Skin Health Dis. 2021 Jun 15;1(3):e52. doi: 10.1002/ski2.52. eCollection 2021 Sep. PubMed 35663131 ↗
  • Burkett LS, Siddique M, Zeymo A, Brunn EA, Gutman RE, Park AJ, Iglesia CB. Clobetasol Compared With Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser for Lichen Sclerosus: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun 1;137(6):968-978. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004332. PubMed 33957642 ↗
  • Filippini M, Sozzi J, Farinelli M, Verdelli A. Effects of Fractional CO2 Laser Treatment on Patients Affected by Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: A Prospective Study. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021 Dec;39(12):782-788. doi: 10.1089/photob.2021.0053. PubMed 34878932 ↗
  • Singh N, Ghatage P. Etiology, Clinical Features, and Diagnosis of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: A Scoping Review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2020 Apr 21;2020:7480754. doi: 10.1155/2020/7480754. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32373174 ↗
  • Farrell AM, Dean D, Millard PR, Charnock FM, Wojnarowska F. Cytokine alterations in lichen sclerosus: an immunohistochemical study. Br J Dermatol. 2006 Nov;155(5):931-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07414.x. PubMed 17034521 ↗
  • Krapf JM, Mitchell L, Holton MA, Goldstein AT. Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Current Perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2020 Jan 15;12:11-20. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S191200. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32021489 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Sociodemographic data such as age, race, marital status, education. Clnical data such as parity, mode of delivery, active or inactive sexual life, period of reproductive life and current contraception, presence of autoimmune diseases, comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, regular medications and smoking

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: Data becomes available 6 months after publication.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2022 to primary completion in Sep 2025, 38 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 16, 2025
First posted
Nov 21, 2025
StartActual
Jun 22, 2022
Primary completionActual
Sep 10, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 2026
Last update
Nov 26, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07240519
Responsible party
Andréa Cytryn (Principal investigator, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 21, 2025
Start date
Jun 22, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 10, 2025
Completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 26, 2025

Study contacts

Andréa Cytryn, Master Degree
Contact
andreacytryn@hotmail.com
+55 21 98123 0332
Yara Lúcia M. Furtado de Melo, PhD in Surgical Sciences
Contact
yarafurtadorj@gmail.com
+ 55 21 999826257
Andrea Cytryn, Master of Science in Health
principal investigator · Department of Gynecology, Institute of Gynecology, Federal University of Rio de janeiro

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion