ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07228182HITACSRCT-GDUpdated Jun 10, 2026

Effect of High-Intensity Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Gambling Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of HI-tACS and Sham stimulation in Gambling Disorder, sponsored by Shanghai Mental Health Center. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-10.

Sponsored by Shanghai Mental Health Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators assume that High-intensity transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (HI-tACS) could improve gambling disorder patients' executive-control function by modulating abnormal neural activity, particularly gamma-band oscillations, which are closely associated with executive-control deficits. This study intends to validate the effect of HI-tACS treatment, which has been discovered in the previous pilot study. A three-month follow-up assessment will be conducted to test the changes in executive-control function and its underlying mechanism.

Read the detailed description

Gambling disorder has become a major social and public health problem in China. Executive-control dysfunction is the main symptom of behavioral addictions such as gambling disorder. Previous studies have demonstrated that abnormal neural activity is distributed across multiple brain regions and networks throughout the whole brain. Research has shown that abnormal neural activity, particularly in the gamma band, contributes to executive-control deficits. High-intensity transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (HI-tACS) has been found to improve executive-control function by modulating this abnormal gamma-band activity. However, this has not yet been verified in gambling disorder patients. The investigators assume that HI-tACS could improve gambling disorder patients' executive-control function by modulating abnormal gamma-band neural activity, which is closely associated with executive-control deficits. This study intends to test the effect of HI-tACS treatment, which was discovered in a previous pilot study. A three-month follow-up assessment will be conducted to examine changes in executive-control function and its underlying mechanism. This study will provide a practical and theoretical basis for developing a novel treatment for gambling disorder.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gambling Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • High-Intensity Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation, Gambling disorder.
03

In context

Gambling

158 studies on the registry are indexed under Gambling; 42 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 66 across 128 interventional studies indexed under Gambling.

Browse Gambling studies →

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Mental Health Center is the lead sponsor of 272 studies on the registry; 91 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-60, male or female, with 9 or more years of education, and able to complete questionnaire evaluation and behavioral tests;
  • Meet (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders,DSM) diagnostic criteria for gambling disorder;
  • Have gambled for at least one year (at least once a week);
  • Normal vision and hearing, or within the normal range after correction;
  • Agree to cooperate in the follow-up evaluation;
  • No metal implantation in the head, no history of nerve problems or head injury, and no skin sensitivity.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have severe cognitive impairment, such as a history of head trauma, -cerebrovascular disease, epilepsy, etc.;
  • Have used drugs promoting cognitive function in the last 6 months;
  • Have impaired intelligence (Intelligence Quotient\<70);
  • Abuse or dependence of psychoactive substances (except nicotine) in the last 5 years.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group for gambling disorder

    A 40-minute transcranial alternating current stimulus intervention of real stimulus is conducted twice a day (at least 3 hours apart) for a total of 10 days in the intervention group of gambling disorder.

    Device: HI-tACS

  • Sham comparator
    Sham stimulation

    A 40-minute transcranial alternating current stimulus intervention of sham stimulus is conducted twice a day (at least 3 hours apart) for a total of 10 days in the intervention group of gambling disorder.

    Device: Sham stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceHI-tACS

    Three conductive electrodes are placed overhead. In the 10/20 international placement system, a 4.45 9.53 cm electrode is placed on the forehead corresponding to Fpz, Fp1 and Fp2. Two 3.18 3.81 cm electrodes are placed on the mastoid region of each side. The tACS stimulation waveform includes ramp-up and ramp-down periods of 180 and 12 s, respectively. The frequency of stimulation is 77.5Hz, and the current is 15mA.

  • DeviceSham stimulation

    Three conductive electrodes are placed overhead. In the 10/20 international placement system, a 4.45 9.53 cm electrode is placed on the forehead corresponding to Fpz, Fp1 and Fp2. Two 3.18 3.81 cm electrodes are placed on the mastoid region of each side. The appearance of the above-mentioned equipment is identical to that of the real stimulation group devices, but it only simulates the electrical sensation produced at the beginning and end of stimulation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of the gambling symptoms

    Gambling symptom severity will be measured by the Pathological Gambling Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (PG-YBOCS). The total score of PG-YBOCS ranges from 0 to 40, in which higher scores indicate more severe pathological gambling symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of depressive symptoms

    Depressive symptoms will be measured by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17). The total score of HAMD-17 ranges from 0 to 52, in which higher scores mean a higher severity of depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

  2. Change of anxiety symptoms

    Anxiety symptoms will be measured by the 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14). The total score of HAMA-14 ranges from 0 to 56, in which higher scores mean a higher severity of anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

  3. Change of the sleep quality

    Sleep quality will be measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The total score of PSQI ranges from 0 to 21, in which higher scores mean poorer sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

  4. Change of the gambling craving

    Gambling craving will be measured by the gambling craving Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The total score of VAS ranges from 0 to 10, in which higher scores mean a higher level of gambling craving.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

  5. Side effect of the modulation

    Side effects will be assessed using a standardized adverse reaction evaluation form. The total score varies depending on symptom severity, with higher scores indicating more significant adverse reactions.

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention

  6. Change of the self-control ability

    Self-control ability will be measured by the Self-Control Scale (SCS). Higher scores of SCS indicate better self-regulation and impulse control.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

  7. Change of the gambling symptom severity

    Gambling symptom severity will be measured by the Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS). The total score of G-SAS ranges from 0 to 48, in which higher scores mean more severe gambling-related symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

  8. Change of the risky decision-making performance

    Risky decision-making performance will be assessed using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Higher average pumps in the BART indicate greater risk-taking propensity. Electroencephalography (EEG) will be used to measure neural electrical signals, where increases in relevant electrophysiological indicators may reflect heightened individual sensitivity to negative feedback. Pig dice game will be administered during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning to assess risk-taking decision-making. Higher frequency of continued dice rolls indicates greater risk propensity. Neural activity features related to the task will be analyzed, with specific patterns associated with risk evaluation and reward processing.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention.

  9. Change of the inhibitory control performance

    The stop-signal task (SST) will be employed to measure inhibitory control, with longer stop-signal reaction times (SSRT) indicating poorer response inhibition. Concurrent EEG recording will be performed, and changes in relevant electrophysiological indicators can serve as electrophysiological markers of increased cognitive conflict and reduced inhibitory processing efficiency.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention.

  10. Change of the resting state neural activity.

    Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) will be used to assess intrinsic brain connectivity. Resting-state electroencephalography (rsEEG) will be employed to measure spontaneous neural oscillations.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention.

Other outcomes

  1. Individualized Electric Field Simulation and Dose Estimation

    Structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) with T1-weighted imaging, along with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), will be employed to construct individualized head models for simulating the electric field distribution of HI-tACS. This approach will allow us to estimate the individualized stimulation intensity and assess the optimal dose for each participant.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention.

  2. Change of the molecular-level neurochemistry

    SPICE fast spectroscopic imaging will be employed to measure molecular-level neurochemical metabolites. This technique enables simultaneous acquisition of spatial distribution and concentration changes of multiple metabolites and neurotransmitter-related indicators within a single clinically acceptable scan time, allowing for assessment of brain molecular metabolic spectrum remodeling before and after the intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for Nov 2026, 5 months later.

Of 47 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Gambling, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 47 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 51.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 10, 2025
First posted
Nov 14, 2025
StartEst.
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 28, 2026
Last update
Jun 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07228182
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 14, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 28, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 10, 2026

Study contacts

Jiang Du, MD, PhD.
Contact
dujiangdou@163.com
+8602164906315

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion