ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07918222STATRSUpdated Nov 5, 2026

Sequential Treatment Approaches for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia

A Phase 3 interventional study of [Phase 1] Clozapine and [Phase 1] Aripiprazole in Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia, sponsored by Shanghai Mental Health Center. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Shanghai Mental Health Center · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Updated Nov 5, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to optimize treatment strategies for Chinese patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). It will compare two types of treatment:

  1. Drug therapy with clozapine alone or in combination with other medications.
  2. Neuromodulation therapy, modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT) or magnetic seizure therapy (MST).

The study aims to determine which approach provides better symptom improvement, fewer cognitive side effects, and greater overall safety. The results may provide important clinical evidence to guide future treatment decisions for patients with TRS.

Read the detailed description

This is a sequential, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial in Chinese patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). The study consists of two treatment components.

First, clozapine-naive TRS participants will enter an 8-week pharmacological optimization phase and be assigned to one of three treatment groups: clozapine monotherapy, clozapine plus amisulpride, or clozapine plus aripiprazole.

Second, eligible participants will enter a 4-week assessor-blinded neuromodulation phase comparing modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT) and magnetic seizure therapy (MST). Participants for this phase are either (1) patients who have previously received clozapine and are hospitalized due to symptom exacerbation, or (2) participants who completed the pharmacological optimization phase and showed inadequate response, defined as less than 25% reduction in PANSS total score at Week 8.

The study is expected to provide evidence on the effectiveness, cognitive safety, and overall tolerability of these treatments for TRS. The project has important clinical significance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia

Keywords

  • Tratment-resistant schizophrenia
  • Clozapine combination therapy
  • Neuromodulation
03

In context

Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant

53 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 60 across 46 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant.

Browse Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant studies →

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Mental Health Center is the lead sponsor of 272 studies on the registry; 91 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

General inclusion criteria applicable to all participants:

  • Aged 18 to 55 years at the time of .
  • Participants must meet diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia.
  • Meet TRRIP-based criteria for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, defined as inadequate response to at least two different antipsychotic treatment trials, each administered at an adequate dose equivalent to ≥600 mg/day chlorpromazine for a minimum duration of 6 weeks. Have moderate or greater functional impairment, operationalized as a Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) score ≤70. Treatment adherence will be evaluated based on available medical records, prescription history and caregiver report.

Eligibility for the pharmacological optimization phase:

  • Participants eligible for the pharmacological optimization phase must meet the general TRS criteria above and must be clozapine-naive.

Eligibility for the neuromodulation phase:

  • Participants eligible for the neuromodulation phase must meet the TRS criteria described above.
  • Participants may enter the neuromodulation phase through either of the following pathways:

    1. Participants who have previously received clozapine treatment and are hospitalized due to symptom exacerbation or clinical worsening.
    2. Clozapine-naive TRS participants who complete the pharmacological optimization phase and show inadequate response, defined as less than 25% reduction in PANSS total score at Week 8.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Organic brain disease or neurological disorder that may account for psychotic symptoms, including epilepsy where .
  • Current psychoactive substance dependence or substance-related disorder.
  • Intellectual disability or Mental retardation.
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planning pregnancy during the study period.
  • Severe physical illness or medical to study medication, MECT, MST.
  • Extreme agitation, stupor, active suicidal risk, severe non-cooperation, or high-risk conditions.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    [Phase 1] Clozapine Monotherapy

    Phase 1 of the trial is an 8-week randomized controlled trial(RCT); patients will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms with different oral antipsychotics, one is Clozapine Monotherapy. Non-responders in phase 1 will switch to phase 2.

    Drug: [Phase 1] Clozapine

  • Experimental
    [Phase 1] Clozapine + Aripiprazole

    Phase 1 of the trial is a 8-week randomized controlled trial(RCT); patients will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms with different oral antipsychotics, one of which is 'Clozapine + Aripiprazole'. Non-responders in phase 1 will switch to phase 2.

    Drug: [Phase 1] Clozapine · Drug: [Phase 1] Aripiprazole

  • Experimental
    [Phase 1] Clozapine + Amisulpride

    Phase 1 of the trial is a 8-week randomized controlled trial(RCT); patients will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms with different oral antipsychotics, one of which is 'Clozapine + Amisulpride'. Non-responders in phase 1 will switch to phase 2.

    Drug: [Phase 1] Clozapine · Drug: [Phase 1] Amisulpride

  • Active comparator
    [Phase 2] Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy (MECT)

    CRS participants will receive modified electroconvulsive therapy while maintaining stable pharmacological treatment. The treatment course consists of 3 times per week for the first two weeks, followed by 2 times per week for the next two weeks, totaling 10 times per month, which is the same number of treatment sessions as the MST group.

    Device: [Phase 2] Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy (MECT)

  • Experimental
    [Phase 2] Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST)

    CRS participants will receive magnetic seizure therapy while maintaining stable pharmacological treatment. The treatment course consists of 3 times per week for the first two weeks, followed by 2 times per week for the next two weeks, totaling 10 times per month, which is the same number of treatment sessions as the MECT group.

    Device: [Phase 2] Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST)

Interventions

  • Drug[Phase 1] Clozapine

    Initial dose: 25-50 mg/day orally. Clozapine will be individually titrated over 8 weeks, with a usual target dose of 300-450 mg/day and a target steady-state trough plasma concentration of ≥350 ng/mL. Plasma clozapine concentration will be assessed at Week 4. If the concentration is \<350 ng/mL, the dose will be further increased as clinically tolerated. A dose of ≥300 mg/day is not required if the target plasma concentration is achieved at a lower dose. Participants who cannot reach either 300 mg/day or the target plasma concentration because of intolerance may remain on their maximum tolerated dose below 300 mg/day.

    Also known as: Clo

  • Drug[Phase 1] Aripiprazole

    Initial dose: 5-10 mg/day. Aripiprazole recommended dosage:10-15 mg/day. dosage form:po.duration:8 weeks

    Also known as: Ari

  • Drug[Phase 1] Amisulpride

    Initial dose: 200-400 mg/day. Amisulpride recommended dosage: 400-800 mg/day. dosage form:po.duration:8 weeks

    Also known as: Ami

  • Device[Phase 2] Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy (MECT)

    MECT will be administered using a Thymatron System IV device. The electrical charge will be determined according to the participant's age and body weight, with treatment parameters adjusted according to the study protocol and clinical response. Participants will continue the pharmacotherapy regimen received before Phase 2. Medication doses will remain stable whenever clinically feasible; changes will be permitted only when clinically necessary for safety or tolerability and will be documented.

    Also known as: MECT

  • Device[Phase 2] Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST)

    MST will be administered using a MagPro X100 magnetic stimulator equipped with the MagOption MST module. The stimulation frequency will be set at 100 Hz and output intensity at 100% of device output. Stimulation duration will be titrated according to the study protocol and individual participant response. Participants will continue the pharmacotherapy regimen received before Phase 2. Medication doses will remain stable whenever clinically feasible; changes will be permitted only when clinically necessary for safety or tolerability and will be documented.

    Also known as: MST

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PANSS reduction rate at Week 8 during the pharmacological optimization phase

    Percentage reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score from baseline to Week 8. The PANSS scale consists of 30 items, and each item is rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (no symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe). The PANSS reduction rate is calculated as: (baseline PANSS total score - Week 8 PANSS total score) / (baseline PANSS total score - 30) × 100%.

    Time frame: Baseline of pharmacological optimization phase and Week 8

  2. PANSS reduction rate at Week 4 during the neuromodulation phase

    Percentage reduction in PANSS total score from baseline of the neuromodulation phase to Week 4. The PANSS scale consists of 30 items, and each item is rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (no symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe). The PANSS reduction rate is calculated as: (baseline PANSS total score - Week 4 PANSS total score) / (baseline PANSS total score - 30) × 100%.

    Time frame: Baseline of neuromodulation phase and Week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in CGI-S score

    Change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) score from baseline to the end of assigned treatment. The scale provides an assessment of both disease severity and overall efficacy.The severity of the disease was scored on an eight-point scale ranging from 0 (not rated) to 7 (extremely severe). The overall efficacy was assessed on an 8-point scale ranging from 0 (not assessed) to 7 (significant deterioration).

    Time frame: Pharmacological optimization: baseline and Week 8; Neuromodulation: baseline and Week 4.

  2. Trajectory of PANSS total score improvement during the neuromodulation phase

    Rate of change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score during the 4-week neuromodulation treatment course. The PANSS scale consists of 30 items, and each item is rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (no symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe). Repeated PANSS assessments will be used to compare the trajectory and speed of symptom improvement between the MECT and MST groups.

    Time frame: Baseline of the neuromodulation phase and weekly during the 4-week neuromodulation treatment course

  3. Change in AMT specificity score during the neuromodulation phase

    Change in Autobiographical Memory Test(AMT) specificity score from baseline of the neuromodulation phase to Week 4. The AMT specificity score is defined as the number of specific autobiographical memories retrieved in response to 12 cue words, with scores ranging from 0 to 12 and higher scores indicating better autobiographical memory specificity. Change is calculated as Week 4 AMT specificity score minus baseline AMT specificity score; negative values indicate decline in autobiographical memory specificity.

    Time frame: Baseline of the neuromodulation phase and Week 4

  4. Change from baseline in cognitive function: MCCB

    MATRICS consensus cognitive battery (MCCB) consists of 10 tests that assess cognitive performance in 7 domains, including processing speed, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal memory, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition.The MCCB T-score is calculated based on a Chinese community sample, with a normative mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate a better neurocognitive outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 2 during the pharmacological optimization phase; and Week 4 of the neuromodulation phase.

  5. Change in visuospatial working memory during the neuromodulation phase

    Change in visuospatial working memory from baseline to Week 4, assessed using the Wechsler Memory Scale-III Spatial Span subtest (WMS III). The WMS III total score ranges from 0 to 32, with higher scores indicating better visuospatial working memory performance.

    Time frame: Baseline of the neuromodulation phase and weekly during the 4-week neuromodulation phase

  6. Change in visual learning during the neuromodulation phase

    Change in visual learning from baseline to Week 4, assessed using the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R).The BVMT-R total recall score ranges from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate better visual learning ability.

    Time frame: Baseline of the neuromodulation phase and weekly during the 4-week neuromodulation phase

  7. Change in personal and social functioning

    Change in Personal and Social Performance Scale(PSP) score from baseline to the end of the corresponding treatment phase.The PSP score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better personal and social functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 of the pharmacological optimization phase and Week 4 of the neuromodulation phase

  8. Extrapyramidal adverse effects: The Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS)

    The Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS) will be used to evaluate objective performance and subjective experience of akathisia, scored from 0 to 3, and the overall clinical evaluation of akathisia is scored from 0 to 5. The higher scores mean a more serious side effect.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 during the pharmacological optimization phase and Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 during the neuromodulation phase

  9. Extrapyramidal adverse effects: Simpson-Angus Extrapyramidal Side Effects Scale (SAS)

    Simpson-Angus Extrapyramidal Side Effects Scale (SAS) consists of 10 items, each scored from 0 to 4. The higher scores mean a more serious side effect.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 during the pharmacological optimization phase and Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 during the neuromodulation phase

  10. Extrapyramidal adverse effects: Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)

    Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) consists of 12 items. The first 10 of 12 items is scored from 0 to 4, and the last 2 is scored from 0 to 1. The higher scores mean the more obvious abnormal involuntary movement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 during the pharmacological optimization phase and Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 during the neuromodulation phase

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200030, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared because the study involves sensitive clinical, cognitive, imaging, and biological data from patients with schizophrenia, and data sharing is limited by participant consent and institutional ethics requirements. Only aggregate study results will be reported.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07918222
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

DengTang Liu, MD, PhD
Contact
erliu110@126.com
+86-18017311138
DengTang Liu
principal investigator · Shanghai Mental Health Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion