ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07222943Updated Sep 17, 2026

Feasibility Study of a Guided Imagery Therapy Mobile Application for Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders in Children

An interventional study of Guided Imagery Therapy in Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders, Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGIDs), sponsored by Baylor College of Medicine. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Sponsored by Baylor College of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
63
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
7 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic abdominal pain is common among children, and the majority of cases are attributed to functional abdominal pain disorders. One approach to treating these disorders is by using psychological therapies. This clinical trial aims to see how well pre-recorded guided imagery therapy sessions help children's abdominal pain when delivered via a mobile application (app) on a smartphone or tablet.

Participants will complete a baseline abdominal pain and stooling diary to determine eligibility, as well as other surveys. Eligible participants will be given access to the guided imagery therapy mobile application.

This intervention asks participants to listen to a 10- to 15-minute GIT session 5 out of 7 days per week for 8 weeks, in addition to their usual care for their abdominal pain. Then, participants will complete another abdominal pain and stooling diary, along with other psychometric surveys, at the end of this intervention period. Participants will also collect another diary and surveys 3 months post-treatment.

Read the detailed description

After fully disclosing the study design, intervention options, randomization scheme, and potential side effects of the interventions, caregivers and their children will document their respective informed consent and assent electronically. REDCap is a secure web application designed for surveys and databases. All data captured through REDCap will be encrypted and transmitted securely to HIPAA-compliant institutional servers for storage.

Participants and their caregivers will complete the following surveys at baseline, immediately post-therapy (8 weeks after baseline), and 3 months post-treatment through REDCap:

  • 2-week Abdominal Pain and Stooling Diary
  • Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory (child self-report and parent proxy-report)
  • Pain Catastrophizing Scale - Child Version
  • Pain Catastrophizing Scale - Parent Version
  • Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core (child self-report and parent proxy-report)
  • Behavior Assessment System for Children 3rd Ed (child self-report and parent proxy-report)
02

Conditions studied

  • Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
  • Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGIDs)
  • Gastrointestinal and Digestive Disorder
  • Abdominal Pain/ Discomfort
  • Pain
  • Functional Dyspepsia

Keywords

  • abdominal pain
  • irritable bowel syndrome
03

In context

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

1,116 studies on the registry are indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome; 208 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 63 is close to the median of 70 across 896 interventional studies indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Browse Irritable Bowel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Baylor College of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 747 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Of its 84 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 45 (54%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Texas Children's Pediatrics patients 7 to 12 years old at enrollment
  • A Rome IV Functional Abdominal Pain Disorder as defined by a 2-week abdominal pain and stooling diary
  • Both children and their primary caregivers must be able to read and communicate in English proficiently to understand the intervention's audio therapy sessions and psychometric instruments.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous abdominal surgeries
  • Co-morbid conditions associated with abdominal pain (e.g., cystic fibrosis)
  • Autism
  • Significant development delay
  • Psychosis
  • Prior experience with cognitive behavioral therapy or guided imagery therapy to treat chronic abdominal pain
  • Alarm symptoms that warrant further medical evaluation (e.g., blood in stool)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
63 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment

    Participants randomized to the Immediate Treatment arm will receive immediate access to the guided imagery therapy mobile application intervention.

    Behavioral: Guided Imagery Therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralGuided Imagery Therapy

    Participants will be asked to listen to a pre-recorded, 10 to 15 minute guided imagery therapy (GIT) sessions via mobile application 5 out of 7 days per week for 8 weeks in addition to their usual care for their abdominal pain.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Abdominal Pain Intensity

    Average daily abdominal pain severity measured on a 0-10 (10 is most severe) ordinal scale from a self-report 2-week abdominal pain diary

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-intervention (immediately after 8-week intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Abdominal Pain Frequency

    Average number of abdominal pain episodes per day from a self-report 2-week abdominal pain diary

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-intervention (immediately after 8-week intervention)

  2. Anxiety

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Pediatric Anxiety Short Form 8a, t score ranges from approximately 36 to 83, higher scores are worse

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-intervention (immediately after 8-week intervention)

  3. Anxiety

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Parent Proxy Anxiety Short Form 8a, t score ranges from approximately 36 to 84, higher scores are worse

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-intervention (immediately after 8-week intervention)

  4. Depression

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Pediatric Depressive Symptoms Short Form 8a, t score ranges from approximately from 38-82, higher scores are worse

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-intervention (immediately after 8-week intervention)

  5. Depression

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Parent Proxy Depressive Symptoms Short Form 6a, t score ranges from approximately from 36 to 85, higher scores are worse

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-intervention (immediately after 8-week intervention)

  6. Somatization

    Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory child self-report, raw score ranges from 0 to 96, higher scores are worse

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-intervention (immediately after 8-week intervention)

  7. Somatization

    Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory parent-proxy report, raw score ranges from 0 to 96, higher scores are worse

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-intervention (immediately after 8-week intervention)

  8. Pain Catastrophizing Thoughts

    Pain Catastrophizing Scale - Child Version, raw score ranges from 0 to 52, higher scores are worse

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-intervention (immediately after 8-week intervention)

  9. Pain Catastrophizing Thoughts

    Pain Catastrophizing Scale - Parent Version, raw score range from 0 to 52, higher scores are worse

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-intervention (immediately after 8-week intervention)

  10. Health-Related Quality of Life

    Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales 4.0 child self-report, raw score ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores are better

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-intervention (immediately after 8-week intervention)

  11. Health-Related Quality of Life

    Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales 4.0 parent-proxy report, raw score ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores are better

    Time frame: Baseline and Post-intervention (immediately after 8-week intervention)

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital
    Austin, Texas 78759, United States
    Recruiting
  • Baylor College of Medicine / Texas Children's Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07222943
Responsible party
John M Hollier (Associate Professor, Baylor College of Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 30, 2025
Start date
Sep 8, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Study contacts

Hollier, MD
Contact
GITgoStudy@bcm.edu
832-824-3814

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion