ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07203014PEARUpdated Oct 26, 2026

Parent-Educator Action Response

An interventional study of Parent-Educator Action Response (PEAR) and Daily Report Card in Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, sponsored by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.

Sponsored by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 26, 2026Now Active, not recruitingPrimary completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new adjunctive intervention, Parent-Educator Action Response (PEAR), works to improve teacher and family engagement in school-based interventions for child attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and disruptive behavior symptoms. This clinical trial will also be used to refine implementation procedures to inform a larger clinical trial.

Read the detailed description

School-based behavioral interventions are well-established treatments for preschool children who display elevated ADHD symptoms, regardless of a diagnosis, and are the recommended first line of treatment according to the American Academy of Pediatrics. However, teachers and families face barriers to implementing behavioral interventions with the recommended frequency and fidelity. The investigators are proposing to test a new adjunctive intervention that is aimed at improving teacher and family implementation of school-based interventions for preschool disruptive behavior and ADHD symptoms. The investigators will be testing PEAR plus a school-based intervention (Daily Report Card; DRC) in a pilot roll-out implementation optimization (ROIO) trial with three clusters (groups of schools) across two years.

Adjunctive Intervention (PEAR). All participating parents and teachers will complete PEAR. PEAR consists of three group sessions (one for caregivers and one for educators) followed by a meeting with each caregiver-educator dyad.

Daily Report Card. The primary goal of PEAR is to improve teacher and family implementation of an evidence-based practice for ADHD symptoms in preschool. The investigators have decided to focus on implementation of the Daily Report Card. Following consent, teachers will receive handouts on the Daily Report Card and will be asked to implement it for the child whose parents are in PEAR. Teachers and parents will be asked to complete weekly reports measuring teacher and family daily use of the DRC starting at BL through the 4-week follow up (8 weeks total).

Assessment Procedures. Assessments will be completed at three time points: BL (week 0), post-PEAR (4 weeks from BL), and follow-up (8 weeks from BL). At each assessment, participating legal guardians and teachers will complete rating scales electronically via RedCap, a scalable, secure, enterprise-level application for data collection. Interviews: Qualitative interviews with parents and teachers who participate in PEAR will be conducted to understand their experiences and identify potential areas for improvement.

Analytic Approach. This clinical trial will specifically examine the acceptability, feasibility and promise of PEAR and refine and optimize trial procedures. Basic data screening and descriptive analyses will be conducted for all variables, and the investigators will screen for errors, distributional form, and missing data. For all models, the investigators will check assumptions to ensure that results are not an artifact of violations. Below are analytic details for each aim of the trial:

Is PEAR and the implementation strategies acceptable and feasible? Overall, PEAR acceptability and feasibility for all participants will be evaluated by examining the mean parent and teacher ratings of satisfaction, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Consumer fit will be considered acceptable if scores are above the neutral point of the scale for all measures except fidelity, which the investigators will consider 80% as the target point. The investigators will also examine whether acceptability and feasibility indices vary by classroom and participant demographics by treating these predictors as fixed effects in regression analyses.

Are the ROIO trial procedures acceptable and feasible? This aim is focused on (a) refining recruitment procedures and study protocol to obtain an adequate sample of parents, (b) optimizing screening and assessment procedures in preschool, and (c) optimizing procedures for sustaining participants in PEAR (i.e., minimizing drop-out).

Does PEAR improve teacher and family fidelity to the Daily Report Card? The investigators will collect daily (weekdays only) counts of family and teacher implementation of the Daily Report Card starting at BL through follow-up (8 weeks total). Fidelity will be defined as the proportion of weekdays the Daily Report Card is implemented at home, school, and both. The investigators are interested in examining the change in fidelity across time. Hierarchical multi-level models will be used to ensure inclusion of random effects, variations between clusters, variation between times within cluster, and fixed effects of time which will be estimated independently of treatment effect, so that systematic change over time will not be mistaken for the effect of treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

Keywords

  • adjunctive intervention
  • Preschool ADHD symptoms
  • Disruptive Behavior
  • Parent-teacher relationship
  • Daily Report Card
03

In context

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

60 studies on the registry are indexed under Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 48 is below the median of 100 across 51 interventional studies indexed under Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders.

Browse Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 180 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Teacher or legal guardian/caregiver of a preschool-aged child between 2-5 years old
  • Child has behavioral challenges in the classroom or needs support with social-emotional development
  • Teacher participants must be fluent in English
  • Caregiver participants may be fluent in English or Spanish.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Teacher or legal guardian/caregiver of a child who is not 2-5 years old
  • Child does not have behavioral challenges or does not need support with social-emotional development
  • Teacher participants who are not fluent in English
  • Caregiver participants who are not fluent in either English or Spanish
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
48 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PEAR intervention group

    All participants will receive the Daily Report Card plus PEAR. PEAR is delivered via group sessions in which participants will be guided through content with a licensed clinical psychologist and will complete activities and receive handouts for reference.

    Behavioral: Parent-Educator Action Response (PEAR) · Behavioral: Daily Report Card

Interventions

  • BehavioralParent-Educator Action Response (PEAR)

    PEAR is a novel adjunctive intervention aimed at improving teacher and family implementation of classroom-based interventions for child ADHD symptoms and disruptive behavior in preschool.

  • BehavioralDaily Report Card

    The Daily Report Card is a behavioral intervention for children with challenging behaviors, and provides a structure for teachers and caregivers to support a child with reducing challenging behaviors and increasing positive behaviors. The DRC has been shown to be highly effective in reducing ADHD symptoms.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Daily Report Card Check-In

    The Daily Report Card (DRC) check-in is a weekly survey developed by the investigators that measures daily uptake of DRC usage among parents and teachers across home and school.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8-week follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Preschool Pediatric Symptom Checklist

    Teachers and parents will complete the Preschool Pediatric Symptom Checklist to evaluate overall child behavior. The Preschool Pediatric Symptom Checklist is an 18-item scale with answer choices of 0 = Not at all to 2 = Very much. Items are summed to obtain a score; authors recommend a clinical cutoff score of 9 (highest possible score is 36).

    Time frame: Baseline, 4-week, 8-week follow-ups.

  2. Preschool ADHD Rating Scale Version IV (ADHD-RS-IV)

    Teachers and parents will complete the Preschool ADHD-RS-IV to measure child ADHD symptoms of children 3-5 years old. The Preschool ADHD-RS-IV is an 18-item scale with answer choices from 0 = rarely or never to 3 = very often. Total score is the sum of all 18 items, odd numbered items measure inattention and even numbered items measure hyperactivity/inactivity. 93rd percentile cutoff scores for boys are as follows: 32 (parent) and 38 (teacher); 93rd percentile cutoff scores for girls are as follows: 24 (parent) and 24 (teacher).

    Time frame: Baseline, 4-week, 8-week follow-ups.

  3. Teacher-Parent Joining

    Teachers and parents will complete the Parent-Teacher Relationship Scale II to measure the quality of parent-teacher relationships. This 24-item scale includes answer choices from 1 = almost never to 5 = almost always.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4-week, 8-weeks follow-ups.

  4. Teacher Self-Efficacy for Classroom Behavior Management

    Teachers will complete the Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale - Classroom Management measure to rate their self-efficacy in managing classroom behaviors. The 8-item scale ranges from 1 = Nothing to 9= A great deal; higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4-week, 8-week follow-ups.

  5. Teacher Burnout

    Teachers will complete the West Virginia Teacher Burnout Scale to measure teacher burnout. This 20-item scale uses a 5 item Likert scale of 1= strongly disagree to 5= strongly agree. Scores range from 20-80; higher scores indicate greater feelings of burnout.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4-week, 8-week follow-ups.

  6. Racial Awareness, Beliefs, and Attitudes

    Teachers will complete a three-part measure to assess their racial awareness, beliefs, and attitudes. Part 1 has 10 items and uses a 4-point Likert scale from 1= strongly disagree to 4= strongly agree; part 2 has 20 items and uses a 6-point Likert scale from 1= strongly disagree to 6=strongly agree; part 3 has 12 items and uses a 6-point Likert scale from 1= strongly disagree to 6=strongly agree.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4-week, 8-week follow-ups.

  7. Parent Self-Efficacy

    Parents will complete the Tool to Measure Parenting Self-Efficacy (TOPSE) subscales of discipline/setting boundaries and control to measure parenting self-efficacy around conflict. The subscales have 6 items each on a 0-10 point scale, and higher scores indicate greater parenting self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4-week, 8-week follow-ups.

  8. Parenting Stress

    Parents will complete the Parental Stress Scale to measure parental stress. The scale is composed of 18 items, with answers from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Scores range from 18-90, with higher scores indicating greater levels of stress.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4-week, 8-week follow-ups.

  9. Top Problems

    Parents and teachers will complete the Top Problems scale (developed by the investigators) to rate child behavior on the top three behaviors selected to monitor on the Daily Report Card plus overall behavior. Items are scored with a 7-point Likert scale from -3 = much worse to 3 = much better.

    Time frame: 4-week and 8-week follow-ups.

  10. Expulsion Risk

    Teachers will complete the Preschool Expulsion Risk Measure to evaluate perceptions of child expulsion risk. The measure has 12 items, with answer choices on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4-week, 8-week follow-ups.

  11. Implementation Outcomes

    Participants will complete an Implementation Outcomes survey to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of PEAR and provide feedback on potential changes in the procedures.

    Time frame: 4-week follow-up.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Eisenman SR, Vanegas J, Cicchetti C, Compton SN, Gilliam WS, Iruka IU, Lyon AR, Wakschlag LS, Smith JD, Spencer AE, Zulauf-McCurdy CA. A pilot Roll-Out Implementation Optimization trial of an adjunctive intervention to improve teacher and caregiver uptake and adherence to a behavioral intervention for externalizing problems in preschool: a study protocol of Parent-Educator Action Response (PEAR). Implement Sci Commun. 2026 Apr 22;7(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s43058-026-00938-7. PubMed 42021370 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Enrolling by invitation→Active, not recruiting
changed Oct 26, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 2027→Dec 2026
Oct 26, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 26, 2026
    Enrolling by invitation→Active, not recruiting
    Primary completion Feb 2027→Dec 2026

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07203014
Responsible party
Courtney Zulauf-McCurdy (Assistant Professor, Pritzker Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 2, 2025
Start date
Sep 2, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 26, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion