CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07193004QualiTAVI-UKUpdated Sep 30, 2025

Quality of Life Improvement After TAVI (QualiTAVI-UK Trial)

An observational study in TAVI(Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation), TAVI and Quality of Life, sponsored by University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-30.

Sponsored by University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an important therapeutic intervention for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are at high surgical risk. While the clinical outcomes of TAVI are well established, there is limited data on the long-term quality of life (QoL) following the procedure. This prospective study will assess QoL in patients undergoing TAVI at Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth, UK. Investigators will employ the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) and Mini-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Mini-MoCA) to evaluate both physical and mental health outcomes, supplemented by an analysis of life expectancy estimated by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Data will be collected at referral, pre-procedural, 30 days, and 3 months post-TAVI. This will be the first prospective trial focused on QoL improvement after TAVI, as all previous studies have been retrospective in nature. The study aims to provide comprehensive insights into the QoL improvements after TAVI, which will guide future clinical decision-making in this population.

Read the detailed description

Study Title uality of Life Improvement after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) in the UK: A Prospective 1-Year Study (QualiTAVI-UK trial)

Study Design This is a prospective, single-center study that will be conducted over 1 year at Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth, UK.

Study Participants The study will include all patients undergoing TAVI for severe AS during this period.

Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Criteria: Patients who were eligible and accepted for TAVI procedure regardless of the patient's age and informed consent provided by the patient for the TAVI procedure.

Exclusion Criteria: Patients who declined enrollment in this research.

Planned Sample Size More than 100 patients

Follow-up Duration 3 months

Planned Study Period 1 year

Primary Objective This study aims to address the knowledge gap regarding the impact of TAVI on Quality of Life (QoL) Secondary Objective -

02

Conditions studied

  • TAVI(Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation)
  • TAVI
  • Quality of Life
  • Mental Health

Keywords

  • Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
  • quality of life
  • Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
  • Mini-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Mini-MoCA)
  • life expectancy
  • Mental health
  • Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)
03

In context

Psychological Well-Being

971 studies on the registry are indexed under Psychological Well-Being; 502 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 235 across 131 observational studies indexed under Psychological Well-Being.

Browse Psychological Well-Being studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who were eligible and accepted for TAVI procedure regardless of the patient's age and informed consent provided by the patient for the TAVI procedure.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who were eligible and accepted for TAVI procedure regardless of the patient's age and informed consent provided by the patient for the TAVI procedure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who declined enrollment in this research.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
3 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • TAVI

    Patients who were eligible and accepted for TAVI procedure regardless of the patient's age and informed consent provided by the patient for the TAVI procedure.

    Behavioral: Quality of Life

Interventions

  • BehavioralQuality of Life

    Measures - We will use the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) to assess QoL, Mini-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Mini-MoCA) to assess cognitive function, the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) to assess frailty status, and life expectancy estimation by the heart team to categorize patients as having: 1-2 years expected survival or more than 2 years expected survival (This will allow for an analysis of how life expectancy correlates with QoL improvements after TAVI). Assessment Timeline - Patients will be assessed at four key time points: at time of referral (baseline assessment), pre-procedure (to assess impact of delay on the patient), 30 days post-TAVI (early follow-up to assess recovery and improvement in QoL), and 3 months post-TAVI (longer-term follow-up to evaluate sustained QoL changes). At each time point, the KCCQ-12, Mini-MoCA, and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) will be administered.

    Also known as: KCCQ-12, CFS, Mini-MoCA

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement of QoL

    This is defined as improvement in QoL scores from baseline to 3 months post-TAVI. Based on KCCQ-12, a change of 5 points (small but clinically important change), 10 points (moderate-to-large), and 20 points (large-to-very large clinical changes). Based on CFS score, worsened frailty is defined as an increase in CFS score of +4, and improved frailty by a decrease of -2.

    Time frame: 30 days post-TAVI (early follow-up to assess recovery and improvement in QoL), and 3 months post-TAVI

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation between life expectancy and QoL improvements

    Correlation between life expectancy and QoL improvements using regression analysis. Mental health and cognitive function (Mini-MoCA scores), frailty status (CFS), will be explored as potential mediators of QoL outcomes.

    Time frame: 30 days post-TAVI (early follow-up to assess recovery and improvement in QoL), and 3 months post-TAVI

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Derriford Hospital
    Plymouth, PL6 8DH, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Monnin C, Besutti M, Ecarnot F, Guillon B, Chatot M, Chopard R, Yahia M, Meneveau N, Schiele F. Prevalence and severity of cognitive dysfunction in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): clinical and cognitive impact at 1 year. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Aug;34(8):1873-1883. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02102-2. Epub 2022 Mar 11. PubMed 35275374 ↗
  • Shimura T, Yamamoto M, Kano S, Kagase A, Kodama A, Koyama Y, Tsuchikane E, Suzuki T, Otsuka T, Kohsaka S, Tada N, Yamanaka F, Naganuma T, Araki M, Shirai S, Watanabe Y, Hayashida K; OCEAN-TAVI Investigators. Impact of the Clinical Frailty Scale on Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Circulation. 2017 May 23;135(21):2013-2024. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025630. Epub 2017 Mar 16. PubMed 28302751 ↗
  • Kennon S, Styra R, Bonaros N, Stastny L, Romano M, Lefevre T, Di Mario C, Stefano P, Ribichini FL, Himbert D, Urena-Alcazar M, Salgado-Fernandez J, Cuenca Castillo JJ, Garcia B, Deutsch C, Sykorova L, Kurucova J, Thoenes M, Luske C, Bramlage P, Frank D. Quality of life after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement using the Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire. Open Heart. 2021 Nov;8(2):e001821. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001821. PubMed 34810276 ↗
  • Gonnah AR, Abdelwahab M, Taylor R, Labib A, Masoud O, Debski M, Abdelaziz HK, Roberts DH. Health-related quality of life following TAVI or cardiac surgery in patients at intermediate and low risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Med (Lond). 2023 Nov;23(6):594-605. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2023-0258. PubMed 38065591 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Relevant information related to the study will be shared

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07193004
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
Responsible party
Ayman Helal (Professor, University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 25, 2025
Start date
Nov 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 30, 2025

Study contacts

Ayman Helal, MD Cardiology
Contact
ayman.helal1@nhs.net
+447376863806
Venkatesan Suresh, MD Cardiology
Contact
vsuresh@nhs.net
+447766460037
Ayman Helal, MD Cardiology
study chair · University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
Ayman Helal, MD Cardiology
principal investigator · University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion