CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06446297Updated Jun 21, 2024

Generational Diversity in the Medical Profession

An observational study in Generation Gap, Generations and Intergenerational Relations, sponsored by University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-21.

Sponsored by University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2024, 2 years ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this work is to investigate how post-graduate doctors in training (PGDiTs) experience generational diversity with their colleagues in the workplace. The investigators want to explore and understand how PGDiTs perceive and experience generational diversity in the workplace and look into where these differences between generations could come from.

The research team wants to do this by running focus groups. These focus groups would be made up of PGDiTs that are working within one hospital. The doctors will be split into the different generations (i.e. generation X, Y and Z). A set list of questions will be used to prompt and guide the focus group conversations. Each focus group will be audio-recorded using an electronic device and then analysed with the aid of computer software. The investigators will then generate themes from the data and use this to create an overall story of the data.

It is hoped that this research can help inform supervisors and employers of the impact of generational diversity on on PGDiTs. This may be used to help develop ways of improving working relationships for PGDiTs with their supervisors and employers.

Read the detailed description

The different generations and the differences between them has provided considerable interest within the media, organisations and academia. A new generation entering the workforce often prompts new conversations about the differences between all generations. Investigating these generational differences has been attempted with mixed levels of success. Some organisations have made suggestions to overcome these generational differences and improve the workplace environment. The National Health Service (NHS) is one of the largest organisations in England, but very limited research investigating generational differences in the NHS has been done.

Post-graduate doctors in training (PGDiTs) are doctors working in recognised training schemes in the NHS. These doctors range from newly qualified doctors working in the Foundation Year training scheme to doctors with over a decade of experience working in their specialist areas. The last two decades have witnessed a number of changes to these doctors' working lives, some positive and some negative. The impact of generational diversity amongst these doctors has not been looked at. These doctors are likely to experience generational diversity with their supervisors, who may have completed training several years previously.

Research Question and Objectives:

The investigators want to answer the question: how do PGDiTs experiences generational diversity in an NHS hospital? The objectives are to explore and understand the concept, perceptions, experiences and sources of generational diversity of PGDiTs working in the NHS.

Study Design:

This study will involve the use of qualitative semi-structured face-to-face focus groups to explore and understand the concept, perceptions, experiences and sources of generational differences amongst PGDiTs. The focus groups will be stratified according to the generational cohorts of the participants. The study methodology supporting our study design is pragmatic with components of grounded theory and interpretative phenomenological analysis being used. Inductive thematic analysis will be used as our method of data analysis.

Contingency arrangements are also available for certain situations. In the event that face-to-face group meetings are not practically possible due to logistical reasons then virtual meetings will be arranged. If insufficient numbers of participants are recruited to conduct focus groups then semi-structured interviews will be conducted.

The consent process has been directed by the HRA's consent and participation guidance. Prior to participating in the study, all participants must electronically agree via email. All potential participants will receive an electronic copy of the informed consent form and participant information sheet (PIS) and be provided with an opportunity to ask any question of the research team. This opportunity for questions can occur via phone call, email or as a face-to-face meeting. Participants will be asked via email to confirm their participation in the research study and willingness to complete the consent form. On the day of the focus group, each participant will be provided with a printed version of the informed consent form and asked to complete it.

Data analysis:

Each focus group will be directed primarily by the interview schedule. Each focus group will be electronically audio-recorded and subsequently transcribed. Data analysis will be conducted using thematic analysis with the generation of codes and themes. Data analysis software will be used for thematic analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Generation Gap
  • Generations
  • Intergenerational Relations

Keywords

  • Generation
  • Generation Gap
  • Generational Diversity
  • Intergenerational workforce
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study participants must a postgraduate doctor-in-training working within a recognised training programme in the Southwest of England and currently based at University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust. This will range from newly qualified doctors that are working within the foundation programme to doctors that are working in higher specialty training programmes.

Eligibility criteria

The following criteria must all be met to permit inclusion in the research study:

  • Any medically qualified healthcare professional with a General Medical Council (GMC) registration number, AND
  • Currently working in a recognised training programme in the Southwest (i.e. foundation year training, integrated medical training, core surgical training, acute care common stem training, higher specialty training), AND
  • Currently based at University Hospitals Plymouth (UHP), AND
  • Consents to being interviewed and recorded for the purposes of the study.

An individual will be excluded from the study if any of the following criteria are met:

  • Any medically qualified professional with a GMC registration number that is not currently enrolled within a recognised training programme at UHP, OR
  • any medical professional working outside of UHP, OR
  • employed as an Allied Health Professional, Advanced Clinical Practitioner, Advanced Critical Care Practitioner or Physician Associate will not be eligible for inclusion in the study, OR
  • any individual eligible for inclusion into the study that does NOT consent to being interviewed OR recorded.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Generational X

    Date of Birth (DOB) categorisation of Generation X: 1st January 1965 - 31st December 1980. PGDiTs recruited from the local hospital will be stratified into generational groups according to their date of birth. The investigators anticipate on having approximately two focus groups per generation.

    Other: Focus Group.

  • Generation Y

    DOB categorisation of Generation Y: 1st January 1981 - 31st December 1995. PGDiTs recruited from the local hospital will be stratified into generational groups according to their date of birth. The investigators anticipate on having approximately two focus groups per generation.

    Other: Focus Group.

  • Generation Z

    DOB categorisation of Generation Z: 1st January 1996 - 31st December 2010. PGDiTs recruited from the local hospital will be stratified into generational groups according to their date of birth. The investigators anticipate on having approximately two focus groups per generation.

    Other: Focus Group.

Interventions

  • OtherFocus Group.

    Participants in each focus group will attend a face-to-face (or virtual) meeting that lasts approximately 90 minutes. This will be composed of a briefing period, interview period supported and guided by an interview schedule and finishing with a debrief period. The same process will be followed if individual semi-structured interviews are undertaken.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Thematic Analysis

    Qualitative data analysis will be conducted using thematic analysis to generate a number of codes and themes from the transcripts generated from focus groups and semi-structured interviews.

    Time frame: 4 months.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will be collected and retained in accordance with the United Kingdom Data Protection Act (2018) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR, 2016). Given the nature of the data that is collected, we do not plan on making individual participant data available to other researchers. The final data set will be anonymised and shared with the relevant members of the study research team only. The anonymised data (i.e. anonymised transcripts and the thematically analysed data) will be archived by the Research and Development Department of University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust (Plymouth, United Kingdom). The investigators will only report or publish non-identifiable and anonymised sections of individuals' transcripts.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06446297
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
Collaborators
University of Plymouth, Health Education England, Wessex
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 6, 2024
Start date
Aug 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 21, 2024

Study contacts

Matthew A Boissaud-Cooke, MBChB MRCS
Contact
matthew.boissaud-cooke@nhs.net
01752437339
Jane Thurlow, MBChB FRCA
Contact
jane.thurlow@nhs.net
Matthew A Boissaud-Cooke, MBChB MRCS
principal investigator · NHS England South West, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion