ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07650435TiPEUpdated Jun 25, 2026

Thrombectomy in Pulmonary Embolism

An observational study in Pulmonary Embolism and Thrombosis, sponsored by University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-25.

Sponsored by University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pulmonary embolism is a blood clot on the lung, which can cause death or significant reduced quality of life. Sucking the clot out with a special tube (catheter) is a relatively new procedure that can be performed but doesn't have the data required to properly support its use in some patients. We know this procedure works in patients who have no other options and would almost certainly die without intervention. We currently don't know how well this procedure is tolerated, how well it works and what its complications are in patients who are moderately to severely unwell. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE), an advisory body, suggests more data is required to support its use in patients who are sick or very sick. This registry aims to support this growing evidence base to workout if the treatment is effective and the associated risks that come with using it. We are collecting data about this procedure and other treatments patients get offered to better inform clinicians and researchers.

Read the detailed description

Acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) and high-risk PE can be life threatening. The incidence of PE is increasing , and patients who survive the acute presentation may experience significant morbidity including reduced exercise tolerance, and decreased quality of life (QoL). Often patients are treated with anticoagulation to stop the clot getting worse and encourage the body to slowly break up the clot. However in more severe cases thrombolysis medication can be given to actively break up the clot. Catheter directed thrombolysis can be used to target the lytic medication into the pulmonary arteries and reduced the systemic effects. Percutaneous thrombectomy is a newer treatment option that aspirates the clot, providing a faster and potentially lytic free solution to sick patients. Pulmonary artery thrombectomy (PAT) is a treatment option that is variably utilised and has unclear evidence base . The penumbra device uses a computer modulated vacuum aspiration system to both fatigue, breakup and aspirate the clot. This has been shown to be safe and effective in small cohorts. CAVT can prevent acute hemodynamic decompensation, alleviate acute PE-related symptoms, accelerate right ventricular recovery, and improve quality of life as measured by patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Despite existing literature addressing clinical outcomes with PE treatment, comprehensive data on PE-related morbidity, PROs and longer-term outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy are still lacking.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Embolism and Thrombosis

Keywords

  • PE
  • Thrombectomy
03

In context

Pulmonary Embolism

832 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Embolism; 171 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 361 across 366 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Embolism.

Browse Pulmonary Embolism studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with PE \<14 days and evidence of right heart strain

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical signs and symptoms consistent with acute pulmonary embolism with duration of 14 days or less
  • Patients who present with computed tomography confirmed pulmonary embolism
  • Defined as intermediate or high-risk pulmonary embolism (according to European Society of Cardiology guidelines)
  • Date of computed tomography imaging from within a two-year period
  • Patient is greater than or equal to 18 years of age
  • obtained
  • Evidence of cardiac dysfunction (either biochemical or imaging features of right heart strain)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known serious, uncontrolled sensitivity to radiographic agents
  • Computed tomography not available to evaluate pulmonary embolism
  • Low-risk pulmonary embolism as defined by European Society of Cardiology guidelines
  • Current participation in another drug or device study that may confound the results of this study. Studies requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational but have since become commercially available are not considered investigational
  • Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude the patient from appropriate consent, could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study, including compliance with follow-up requirements, or that could impact the scientific integrity of the study

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical signs and symptoms consistent with acute PE with duration of 14 days or less
  2. Patients who present with CT confirmed PE
  3. Defined as intermediate or high-risk PE (according to ESC guidelines1)
  4. Date of CT imaging from within a two-year period
  5. Patient is ≥ 18 years of age
  6. Informed consent obtained
  7. Evidence of cardiac dysfunction (Either biochemical or imaging features of RHS)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Known serious, uncontrolled sensitivity to radiographic agents 2. CT not available to evaluate PE 3. Low Risk PE as defined by ESC guidelines1 4. Current participation in another investigational drug or device study that may confound the results of this study. Studies requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational but have since become commercially available are not considered investigational studies 5. Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, precludes the patient from appropriate consent, could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study, including compliance with follow-up requirements, or that could impact the scientific integrity of the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • CAVT thrombectomy

    PE with evidence of right heart strain and thrombectomy with 16Fr CAVT

  • PE with evidence of right heart strain

    PE with evidence of right heart strain

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. LV/RV ratio

    1\. To evaluate the effectiveness of PE CAVT as a treatment for intermediate and high-risk PE as measured by change pulmonary arterial pressure and in RV/LV (Right Ventricle to Left Ventricle diameter) ratio at 48 (+ 48 /- 24) hours post procedure.

    Time frame: 48 (+ 48 /- 24) hours post procedure.

  2. Morbidity and mortality

    Ascertain the mortality and morbidity profile for CAVT within intermediate and high-risk PE, within 48 (± 12) hours post procedure, 30 (± 7) days, 90 (± 14) days and at 6months (+/- 30 days).

    Time frame: within 48 (± 12) hours post procedure, 30 (± 7) days, 90 (± 14) days and at 6months (+/- 30 days).

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
    Plymouth, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • 11. National institute of Clinical Excellence. Pulmonary embolism: what are the risk factors. NICE guidelines. https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/pulmonary-embolism/background-information/risk-factors/
  • Noble S, Lewis R, Whithers J, Lewis S, Bennett P. Long-term psychological consequences of symptomatic pulmonary embolism: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2014 Apr 2;4(4):e004561. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004561. PubMed 24694625 ↗
  • Danielsbacka JS, Rostberg L, Olsen MF, Mannerkorpi K. "Whole life changed" - Experiences of how symptoms derived from acute pulmonary embolism affects life. A qualitative interview study. Thromb Res. 2021 Sep;205:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Jul 5. PubMed 34247098 ↗
  • 8. Perkowski, Paul et al Computer-aided Mechanical Aspiration Thrombectomy with the Indigo Lightning 12 Aspiration System for the Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Interim Analysis of the STRIKE-PE Study.Journal of Vascular Surgery, Volume 77, Issue 4, 52S - 53S
  • Moriarty JM, Dohad SY, Schiro BJ, Tamaddon H, Heithaus RE, Iliadis EA, Dexter DJ 2nd, Shavelle DM, Leal SRN, Attallah AS, West FM, Keeling WB, Sharp ASP, Weinberg I. Clinical, Functional, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes after Computer Assisted Vacuum Thrombectomy for Pulmonary Embolism: Interim Analysis of the STRIKE-PE Study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024 Aug;35(8):1154-1165.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.04.028. Epub 2024 May 9. PubMed 38729421 ↗
  • Mathews SJ. Mechanical Thrombectomy of Pulmonary Emboli With Use of the Indigo System and Lightning 12 Intelligent Aspiration. Tex Heart Inst J. 2021 Nov 1;48(5):e217571. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-21-7571. No abstract available. PubMed 34911082 ↗
  • Gotzinger F, Lauder L, Sharp ASP, Lang IM, Rosenkranz S, Konstantinides S, Edelman ER, Bohm M, Jaber W, Mahfoud F. Interventional therapies for pulmonary embolism. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Oct;20(10):670-684. doi: 10.1038/s41569-023-00876-0. Epub 2023 May 12. PubMed 37173409 ↗
  • Giri J, Sista AK, Weinberg I, Kearon C, Kumbhani DJ, Desai ND, Piazza G, Gladwin MT, Chatterjee S, Kobayashi T, Kabrhel C, Barnes GD. Interventional Therapies for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Current Status and Principles for the Development of Novel Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019 Nov 12;140(20):e774-e801. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000707. Epub 2019 Oct 4. PubMed 31585051 ↗
  • Sista AK, Miller LE, Kahn SR, Kline JA. Persistent right ventricular dysfunction, functional capacity limitation, exercise intolerance, and quality of life impairment following pulmonary embolism: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Vasc Med. 2017 Feb;22(1):37-43. doi: 10.1177/1358863X16670250. Epub 2016 Oct 5. PubMed 27707980 ↗
  • Konstantinides SV, Barco S, Lankeit M, Meyer G. Management of Pulmonary Embolism: An Update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;67(8):976-990. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.061. PubMed 26916489 ↗
  • Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing GJ, Harjola VP, Huisman MV, Humbert M, Jennings CS, Jimenez D, Kucher N, Lang IM, Lankeit M, Lorusso R, Mazzolai L, Meneveau N, Ni Ainle F, Prandoni P, Pruszczyk P, Righini M, Torbicki A, Van Belle E, Zamorano JL; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 21;41(4):543-603. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405. No abstract available. PubMed 31504429 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Requests for data sharing can be made after publication of the primary results paper. Requests should be made to the Chief Investigator in the first instance. Requesters will be asked to complete an application form detailing specific requirements, rationale, and proposed usage. The CI and study sponsor (including the sponsor's Research Governance Manager (or deputy), the Information Governance Team, Calidcott Guardian, IM\&T Security Officer and the researcher funder, as appropriate) will review all requests. Consideration will be given to: The viability and suitability of the request Appropriate steps have been taken to minimise the risk of identifying participants Data security policies and procedures of recipient organisation (including country if abroad) and other regulatory requirements are applicable The credentials of the requestor Where access to requested data is granted, requesters organisation must sign a data sharing agreement before they can access any data.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2029, 43 months after the start.

Of 135 non-industry observational studies under Pulmonary Embolism, half reached primary completion within 49 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 119. This study's planned 43 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 160 studies reached it within 47 months; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 105.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 10, 2026
First posted
Jun 16, 2026
StartActual
May 11, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 11, 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 11, 2029
Last update
Jun 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07650435
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 16, 2026
Start date
May 11, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 11, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 11, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 25, 2026

Study contacts

Paul Jenkins
Contact
plh-tr.tipe@nhs.net
01752438000
Thomas Mindos Trial Manager
Contact
plh-tr.tipe@nhs.net
01752438000

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion