CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07191938PinEAPPLEUpdated Sep 25, 2025

Posthectomy in Pediatric Elective Surgery : a Comparison of Perioperative Analgesia Using Echo-guided Penile Block and Pudendal Block With neurostimuLation Technique

An interventional study of Ultrasound guided penile block and Neurostimulation guided pudendal block in Postoperative Care, Analgesia Assessment and Posthectomy, sponsored by University Hospital, Caen. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to male participants aged 12 Weeks to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-25.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Caen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
240
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Weeks to 18 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Context : Posthectomy is a surgical procedure that concerns around 30% of the male population, mainly in pediatrics. As this procedure is mainly performed on an outpatient basis, the implementation of an enhanced rehabilitation protocol after surgery in pediatrics helps to reduce the incidence of postoperative pain, notably by providing multimodal analgesia, including locoregional anesthesia. Current recommendations from pediatric locoregional anesthesia societies favor penile block and the use of ultrasound in pediatric anesthesia to reduce anesthetic set-up time and the volume of local anesthetic, but also to increase the duration of sensory block and the success rate. However, several studies have shown the inferiority of penile block in anatomical landmarks compared with pudendal block under neurostimulation. As a result, pediatric anesthesiologists at Caen University Hospital prefer to use pudendal blocks under neurostimulation for posthectomy surgery. To date, no study has compared penile block under ultrasound with pudendal block under neurostimulation for postoperative analgesia after posthectomy surgery. On the other hand, a study of postoperative analgesia in hypospadias surgery showed a clear superiority of penile block under ultrasound over pudendal block in terms of both immediate postoperative pain and duration of postoperative analgesia. It therefore seems pertinent to compare these two techniques in posthectomy surgery.

Objective: We propose a prospective, open-label, non-inferiority study with the primary objective of comparing the efficacy of echo-guided penile block versus pudendal block in neurostimulation for posthectomy surgery.

Methods: This randomized, single-center study will include 240 patients divided into two groups. The experimental group will receive optimized medical and surgical management, with a penile block under ultrasound, while the control group will receive a pudendal block under neurostimulation. The planned duration of the study is 3 years.

Hypothesis tested: We hypothesize that ultrasound-guided penile block is non-inferior to neurostimulated pudendal block for postoperative analgesia in scheduled posthectomy surgery. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the time taken to perform the block, the volume of local anesthetic used, the need for sufentanil reinjection intraoperatively, the quantitative evaluation of analgesia using the EVENDOL score, the consumption of nalbuphine in the post anesthesia care unit, the occurrence of postoperative vomiting, and the length of stay in the post anesthesia care unit. The rate of complications related to the performance of locoregional anesthesia is also observed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Care
  • Analgesia Assessment
  • Posthectomy
  • Postoperative Analgesia

Keywords

  • Neurostimulation guided pudendal block
  • US guided penile block
  • Security
  • Efficiency
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Caen is the lead sponsor of 505 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Weeks to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All children aged over 3 months or 60 weeks post-conceptional age scheduled for outpatient posthectomy surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent airway infection.
  • Contraindication to locoregional anesthesia: infection and/or loss of substance at the puncture site, congenital or acquired coagulopathy, product allergy.
  • Contraindication to outpatient treatment: age \< 12 weeks for healthy children or 60 weeks corrected age for premature babies, unbalanced pre-existing pathology (respiratory), ability to understand and comply with instructions (pre-operative fasting, taking painkillers at home and resumption of feeding), inability to ensure the presence of 2 adults including 1 parent on the return journey by car for children \< 10 years old, easy access to care close to home.
  • Emergency surgery.
  • Coupled surgery (posthectomy + other surgery).
  • Parents' refusal to participate in the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
240 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ultrasound guided penile block

    The penile block is performed supine. After skin disinfection, the Buck's fascia is sonographically located, and the local anesthetic is injected close to the dorsal nerve of the penis in the plane after a negative aspiration test. The recommended dose is 0.1 ml/kg per side of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml. Injection is performed bilaterally. A subcutaneous injection of 1ml ropivacaine 2mg/ml is made at the base of the penis to ensure blockage of the perineal fibers.

    Procedure: Ultrasound guided penile block

  • Active comparator
    Neurostimulation guided pudendal block

    The pudendal block is performed in the supine position, with the legs flexed. After skin disinfection and palpation of the ischial tuberosity, the neurostimulator needle, set at 0.5 mA, is inserted 1 cm medial to the tuberosity. Contraction of the anal sphincter enables the proximity of the pudendal nerve, originating from the S2, S3 and S4 nerve roots, to be identified. Once contraction has been obtained, local anaesthetic is injected using ropivacaine 2 mg/ml at a dose of 0.2 ml/kg per side, in the absence of blood reflux.

    Procedure: Neurostimulation guided pudendal block

Interventions

  • ProcedureUltrasound guided penile block

    The penile block is performed supine. After skin disinfection, the Buck's fascia is sonographically located, and the local anesthetic is injected close to the dorsal nerve of the penis in the plane after a negative aspiration test (16). The recommended dose is 0.1 ml/kg per side of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml (8). Injection is performed bilaterally. A subcutaneous injection of 1ml ropivacaine 2mg/ml (i.e. 2mg) is made at the base of the penis to ensure blockage of the perineal fibers.

  • ProcedureNeurostimulation guided pudendal block

    The pudendal block is performed in the supine position, with the legs flexed. After skin disinfection and palpation of the ischial tuberosity, the neurostimulator needle, set at 0.5 mA, is inserted 1 cm medial to the tuberosity. Contraction of the anal sphincter enables the proximity of the pudendal nerve, originating from the S2, S3 and S4 roots, to be identified. Once contraction has been obtained, local anaesthetic is injected using ropivacaine 2 mg/ml at a dose of 0.2 ml/kg per side, in the absence of blood reflux.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Failure of effective postoperative analgesia

    It is defined by intense postoperative pain: an EVENDOL score ≥ 4 or the use of nalbuphine (0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg discontinuous) in the post anesthesia care unit "EVENDOL" is a French scale, which is an acronym of "EValuation ENfant DOuleur" or "Child pain assessment". This scale goes from 0 to 15, 0 is the absence of pain and 15 is the maximum pain. 4/15 is the threshold from which treatment is indicated.

    Time frame: Perioperative period : From anesthetic induction to discharge from the post- anesthesia care unit (12 hours maximum)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Locoregional anesthesia completion time

    In seconds, defined as the time between the end of skin disinfection and removal of the locoregional anesthesia needle.

    Time frame: Peroperative period : From the end of skin disinfection to the removal of the locoregional anesthesia needle, assessed up to 30 minutes

  2. Volume of local anesthetic injected

    Volume of local anesthetic injected (in mL/kg/side)

    Time frame: Peroperative period : From skin disinfection to removal of the ALR needle, assessed up to 30 minutes

  3. Intraoperative block failure rate

    Block failure is defined by the need to reinject sufentanil intraoperatively when systolic blood pressure or heart rate increases by more than 20% compared with the pre-incision heart rate, necessitating the consumption of intraoperative morphine.

    Time frame: Peroperative period : From the beginning to the end of the surgery, assessed up to 2 hours

  4. Quantitative assessment of postoperative pain

    Quantitative assessment of postoperative pain using the EVENDOL score on arrival in the ICU, H+20 minutes, H+40 minutes and discharge from the post anesthesia care unit. As a reminder, EVENDOL" is a French scale, which is an acronym of "EValuation ENfant DOuleur" or "Child pain assessment". This scale goes from 0 to 15, 0 is the absence of pain and 15 is the maximum pain. 4/15 is the threshold from which treatment is indicated.

    Time frame: Immediate post operative period : From the arrival to the discharge from the post anesthesia care unit, assessed up to 4 hours

  5. Nalbuphine consumption

    Nalbuphine consumption in the post anesthesia care unit (in mg/kg)

    Time frame: Immediate postoperative period : From the arrival to the discharge from the post anesthesia care unit, assessed up to 4 hours

  6. Post operative vomiting

    Post operative vomiting and cosumption of ondansetron

    Time frame: Immediate post operative period : From the arrival to the discharge from the post anesthesia care unit, assessed up to 4 hours

  7. Length of stay in post anesthesia care unit

    In minutes

    Time frame: Immediate postoperative period : From the arrival to the discharge from the post anesthesia care unit, assessed up to 4 hours

  8. Adverse events related to local anesthesia

    Signs of local anesthetic intoxication (neurological signs such as tinnitus, logorrhea or convulsion; tachycardia, hypotension), bleeding and hematoma at puncture site.

    Time frame: Perioperative period : From the completion of local anesthesia to the discharge from post anesthesia care unit, assessed up to 6 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU de Caen
    Caen, Normandy 14000, France
    • Marine A Rolland, MD · Contact · rolland-m@chu-caen.fr · +33699014734
    • Marine A Rolland, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Okoro C, Huang H, Cannon S, Low D, Liston DE, Richards MJ, Lendvay TS. The pudendal nerve block for ambulatory urology: What's old is new again. A quality improvement project. J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Oct;16(5):594.e1-594.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Jul 24. PubMed 32819811 ↗
  • Boisvert-Moreau F, Turcotte B, Albert N, Singbo N, Moore K, Boivin A. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block with ultrasound-guided penile nerve block for analgesia during pediatric circumcision. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Mar;48(3):127-133. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103785. Epub 2022 Nov 17. PubMed 36396298 ↗
  • Gnassingbe K, Akakpo-Numado KG, Anoukoum T, Kanassoua K, Kokoroko E, Tekou H. [The circumcision: why and how is it practiced in the newborn and the infant in the Lome teaching hospital?]. Prog Urol. 2009 Sep;19(8):572-5. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2009.02.011. Epub 2009 Apr 3. French. PubMed 19699456 ↗
  • Aksu C, Akay MA, Sen MC, Gurkan Y. Ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block vs neurostimulator-guided pudendal nerve block in children undergoing hypospadias surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019 Oct;29(10):1046-1052. doi: 10.1111/pan.13727. Epub 2019 Sep 2. PubMed 31433895 ↗
  • Pertek JP, Junke E, Coissard A, Vagner JC, Haberer JP. [Penile block in adults]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1992;11(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/S0750-7658(05)80323-5. French. PubMed 1443819 ↗
  • Faraoni D, Gilbeau A, Lingier P, Barvais L, Engelman E, Hennart D. Does ultrasound guidance improve the efficacy of dorsal penile nerve block in children? Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Oct;20(10):931-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03405.x. PubMed 20849498 ↗
  • Tutuncu AC, Kendigelen P, Ashyyeralyeva G, Altintas F, Emre S, Ozcan R, Kaya G. Pudendal Nerve Block Versus Penile Nerve Block in Children Undergoing Circumcision. Urol J. 2018 May 3;15(3):109-115. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4292. PubMed 29299888 ↗
  • Naja Z, Al-Tannir MA, Faysal W, Daoud N, Ziade F, El-Rajab M. A comparison of pudendal block vs dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision in children: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2011 Sep;66(9):802-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06753.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25. PubMed 21790518 ↗
  • Beydon L, Ecoffey C, Lienhart A, Puybasset L; Comite ICARE de Societe francaise d'anesthesie et de reanimation (Sfar). [Circumcision in children: an organizational or an ethical challenge?]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2012 May;31(5):442-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.01.038. Epub 2012 Mar 30. French. PubMed 22464840 ↗

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · Sep 1, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07191938
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Caen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 25, 2025
Start date
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2025

Study contacts

Marine A Rolland, MD
Contact
rolland-m@chu-caen.fr
+33699014734
Jean Luc Hanouz, MD, PhD
Contact
hanouz-jl@chu-caen.fr
+33231063106
Jean Luc Hanouz, MD, PhD
study chair · University Hospital, Caen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion