CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT07191340Updated Sep 24, 2025

Noninvasive Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation (tcVNS) for Neuromodulating the Conscious State

An interventional study of Vagus nerve stimulator and Placebo comparator sham in Anesthesia, Delirium and Depression, sponsored by Northwestern University. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-24.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Withdrew study equipment issue.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to examine whether noninvasive, transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (tcVNS) (Gammacore Sapphire Device) can help restore consciousness in patients in the Operating Room and Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). To examine whether tcVNS administered in the PACU can help reduce delirium and depression post-surgery, speeding up cognitive recovery from anesthesia, and finally determine if tcVNS can expedite discharge from the PACU.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia
  • Delirium
  • Depression
  • Cognitive Function

Keywords

  • Vagal Nerve Stimulator
  • Post Anesthesia Care
  • Post Surgical
03

In context

Delirium

1,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Delirium; 238 are open to participants now.

Browse Delirium studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 102 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged > 18 years of age
  • Patients undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative disc disease or spinal stenosis involving two or more levels
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 15-accept mild
  • Ability to use a keyboard
  • Able to understand and communicate in English
  • Be able to consent independently
  • Women of child-bearing age must be comfortable confirming a negative pregnancy prior to participating in the study.
  • Must not be involved in any other research intervention study testing neurobehavioral functioning
  • Good internet connectivity and ability to use computer, smart phone or good telephone connectivity (follow up)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18 years of age
  • History of vagotomy (cutting the vagus nerve)
  • History of bradycardia, heart block, prolonged QT syndrome, brugada syndrome, heart failure with ejection fraction less than 35% and/or New York Heart Association symptoms
  • MMSE \< 15
  • History of seizure disorder or intracranial hemorrhage
  • Patients with carotid stenosis
  • Patients with aneurysms
  • Other neurological diagnoses or a diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorder (e.g., psychosis) or a reported childhood learning disability
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding
  • Active addiction history
  • ECG adhesive allergy
  • Severe aphasia, preventing subject from understanding the protocol and giving written consent
  • Patients with an active implantable medical device, such as a pacemaker, hearing aid implant, or any implanted electronic device
  • Patients with metallic device such as a stent, bone plate or bone screw implanted at or near their neck
  • Patients with an active implantable medical device, such as a pacemaker, hearing aid implant, or any implanted electronic device
  • Patients with metallic device such as a stent, bone plate or bone screw implanted at or near their neck
  • Patients who are using another device at the same time (e.g., transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) Unit, muscle stimulator) or any portable electronic device (e.g., mobile phone).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Treatment Group Stimulation of Vagus Nerve

    Stimulation of the vagus nerve with nerve stimulator placed on neck

    Device: Vagus nerve stimulator

  • Placebo comparator
    Sham Placebo Group No Stimulation to Vagus Nerve

    Nerve stimulator placed on neck but not activated.

    Device: Placebo comparator sham

Interventions

  • DeviceVagus nerve stimulator

    Vagus nerve stimulator placed on neck and activated

  • DevicePlacebo comparator sham

    Vagus nerve stimulator placed on neck and not activated

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Aim 1: To determine if administering tcVNS enhances recovery from anesthesia

    Time to a Patient State Index™ (PSi, Sedline Sedation Monitor, Massimo, Inc, Irvine, CA) score of 85.The PSi is a quantitative score derived from 4 channel EEG monitoring of the frontal and prefrontal cortex for assessing level of consciousness during sedation and general anesthesia. The score ranges from 0 (EEG suppression) to 100 (fully awake). A PSi range of 25-50 indicates optimal hypnotic state for general anesthesia.

    Time frame: 60 minutes

  2. To determine if administering tcVNS improves Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores after anesthesia

    RASS Score on arrival to the PACU then 10, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min later.The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) is a standardized instrument to assess arousal, cognition, and sustainability to stepped progression of stimuli. The patient is first observed. If alert a score between 1 to 4 is assigned based on their cognitive state. If the patient is not alert, the patient's name is loudly spoken and they are instructed to open their eyes and look at the speaker. This is repeated once if necessary. If there is eye opening and eye contact for \> 10 seconds, a score of -1 is assigned. If not sustained for 10 secs then a score of -2 is assigned, and so forth.

    Time frame: 60 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. To determine if tcVNS can improve conscious cognitive control in post-surgical patients.

    Targeted tcVNS compared to sham tcVNS will reduce PACU and hospital ward delirium and post-surgical depression. The investigators will test this hypothesis by PACU and in-hospital evaluations for delirium and in-hospital measurement of depression prior to discharge and at a one-month virtual follow-up evaluation.

    Time frame: 1 month after surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07191340
Lead sponsor
Northwestern University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 24, 2025
Start date
Oct 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2025

Study contacts

Alyson Engle, MD
principal investigator · Northwestern Univesity

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion