ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07182799OCT-AGEMUpdated Sep 19, 2025

Starring Optical Coherence Tomography During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance

An observational study in Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), Chronic Coronary Syndrome and MINOCA, sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-19.

Sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
3,200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The starring optical coherence tomography during percutaneous coronary intervention guidance (OCT-AGEM) registry aims to evaluate the clinical impact of intra-procedural optical coherence tomography (OCT) in coronary revascularization, both in guiding revascularization decisions and optimizing interventional procedural outcomes, as well as assessing mid- and long-term clinical results.

Read the detailed description

The OCT-AGEM registry is an ambispective, single-center observational cohort study comprising a retrospective registry (Phase I) and a prospective registry (Phase II). All patients aged 18 years or older undergoing OCT assessment during a clinically indicated coronary angiography, regardless of clinical presentation (silent ischemia, stable angina, or acute coronary syndrome), are eligible. The retrospective phase targets approximately 2,200 patients, while the prospective phase will enroll 1,000 patients, based on a current annual rate of about 150 OCT-guided procedures. Sample size calculations, informed by prior studies and preliminary experience, are as follows: for the non-interventional arm, assuming a 5% cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint and a 20% prevalence of OCT-defined vulnerable plaque, a total of 1,100 patients is required (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80; 80% power); for the interventional arm, assuming a 25% incidence of OCT-defined suboptimal stent implantation and 12% for the composite endpoint, a total of 2,100 patients will be enrolled (HR 0.85; 80% power). The study will investigate the predictive clinical value of OCT-defined vulnerable plaque in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA/INOCA) and the prognostic impact of OCT-derived plaque and stent parameters in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The primary composite endpoint includes cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
  • Chronic Coronary Syndrome
  • MINOCA
  • INOCA (Ischemia With Non Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease)
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
  • Coronary Stent Implantation
  • Stent Restenosis
  • Stent Thrombosis
  • Clinical Outcome

Keywords

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Optical Coherence Tomography
  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Chronic coronary syndrome
  • Clinical outcome
  • Coronary plaque
  • Coronary stent optimization
03

In context

Acute Coronary Syndrome

1,488 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome; 273 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 3,200 is above the median of 500 across 590 observational studies indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Browse Acute Coronary Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS is the lead sponsor of 952 studies on the registry; 541 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All subjects over 18 years who are undergoing an OCT coronary assessment during clinically indicated coronary angiogram regardless of the clinical syndrome (silent ischemia, effort angina or acute coronary syndrome).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age over 18 years;
  • Patients with clinical indication to coronary angiography undergoing intra-procedural OCT regardless of the clinical syndrome;
  • Patients with at least one end-procedural OCT assessment with a sufficient acquisition length to address the whole length of plaque or stented segments plus the proximal and distal reference segments;
  • Patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions, and has provided written as approved by the Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female with or lactating;
  • Acute or chronic renal dysfunction (defined as creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dl and/or \<30 ml/min);
  • Advanced heart failure ( III-IV);
  • Previous heart transplantation;
  • Co-morbidities that could interfere with completion of study procedures, or less than 1 year;
  • Participating in another drug or device trial that has not completed the primary endpoint or would interfere with the endpoints of this study;
  • Heavily calcified lesion or tortuous vessel which cannot be successfully imaged by OCT;
  • Lesion located at the coronary ostium or in angulated (>70°), sharp take-off vessel;
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
3,200 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Non-interventional

    Patients undergoing an OCT coronary assessment during a clinically indicated coronary angiogram, resulting in a non-obstructive coronary artery disease

    Diagnostic Test: Plaque vulnerability assessment

  • Interventional

    Patients undergoing an OCT coronary assessment during a clinically indicated coronary angiogram, guiding a percutaneous coronary intervention

    Diagnostic Test: Stent implantation optimization

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPlaque vulnerability assessment

    The purpose of the OCT-AGEM registry is to confirm the clinical utility of plaque OCT assessment over the standard coronary angiography evaluation. In particular, this ambispective cohort study aims to validate the predictive value of the OCT-based plaque vulnerability criteria: * Minimum lumen area \<3.5 mm2; * Fibrous cap minimum thickness \<65 µm; * Lipid arc extension \>180°; * Presence of macrophages; * Superficial and deep calcified nodules * Ulceration/Erosion/Dissection * Layered tissue * Optical flow ratio (OFR)

    Also known as: Minimum lumen area, Fibrous cap minimum thickness, Lipid arc extension, Presence of macrophages, Superficial and deep calcified nodules, Ulceration/Erosion/Dissection, Layered tissue, Plaque burden (%), Optical flow ratio (OFR)

  • Diagnostic testStent implantation optimization

    The purpose of the OCT-AGEM registry is to confirm the clinical utility of OCT guidance during PCI over the standard coronary angiography evaluation. In particular, this ambispective cohort study aims to validate the predictive value of the OCT-derived plaque/stent parameters reported in expert consensus OCT documents, utilizing the cut-off points identified in the previous OCT registries

    Also known as: Minimum lumen area, Fibrous cap minimum thickness, Lipid arc extension, Presence of macrophages, Superficial and deep calcified nodules, Ulceration/Erosion/Dissection, Layered tissue, Plaque burden (%), Stent edge dissection, Reference narrowing, Stent malapposition, Minimum stent area, Stent expansion (%), In-stent tissue protrusion, Stent deformation, Stent geometry, Neo-carina shaping, Optical flow ratio (OFR)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with cardiac death or target-vessel myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization (non-interventional group)

    Composite outcome including cardiac death (i.e. any death due to heart disease, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, and sudden unexpected death), target-vessel myocardial infarction (i.e. any spontaneous myocardial infarction attributed to the vessel studied with OCT), and target lesion revascularization (i.e. any target-lesion revascularization by means of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting).

    Time frame: 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years

  2. Number of patients with cardiac death or target-vessel myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization or stent restenosis/thrombosis (interventional group)

    Composite outcome including cardiac death (i.e. any death due to heart disease, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, and sudden unexpected death), target-vessel myocardial infarction (i.e. any spontaneous myocardial infarction attributed to the vessel studied with OCT), target lesion revascularization (i.e. any target-lesion revascularization by means of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting), and stent restenosis (i.e. angiographic in-stent stenosis/thrombosis \>50%).

    Time frame: 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Predictive value of single vulnerable plaque OCT-derived criteria (non-interventional and interventional group) in terms of incidence of the primary and secondary outcomes

    Clinical impact of the single pre-specified OCT features of plaque vulnerability: * Minimum lumen area \<3.5 mm2 (measured along the entire length of the assessed coronary segment ); * Fibrous cap minimum thickness \<65 µm (defined as a signal-rich homogeneous band overlying a lipid core, and measured at the thinnest portion); * Lipid arc extension \>180° (defined as a signal-poor region diffusely bordered by overlying signal-rich bands corresponding to a fibrous cap); * Presence of macrophages (characterized at visual estimation as signal-rich, distinct, or confluent punctate regions that exceed the intensity of background speckle noise); * Superficial and deep calcified nodules (protruding mass with irregular surface characterized by signal-poor heterogeneous regions with sharp borders) * Ulceration/Erosion/Dissection (linear rim of tissue with a width ≥200μm and a clear separation from the vessel wall or underlying plaque) * Layered tissue (plaque with one or more evident layers)

    Time frame: 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years

  2. Predictive clinical value of single pre-specified plaque/stent OCT features in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization (interventional group) in terms of incidence of the primary and secondary outcomes

    Clinical impact of the single pre-specified OCT features of the stented plaques: * Edge dissection with a width ≥200μm (linear rim of tissue with a width ≥200μm and a clear separation from the vessel wall or underlying plaque); * Reference narrowing: lumen area \<4.5mm2 in the presence of significant residual plaque adjacent to stent endings (including 5mm beyond stent borders); * Malapposition \>200μm (stent-adjacent vessel lumen distance \>200μm); * In-stent minimum lumen area (MLA) \<4.5mm2 (measure of smaller in-stent lumen area); * In-stent MLA \<80% (expressed as % of the average reference lumen areas); * Intrastent plaque/thrombus protrusion ≥500μm in thickness (tissue prolapsing between stent struts extending inside a circular arc connecting adjacent struts or intraluminal mass ≥500μm in thickness with no direct continuity with the surface of the vessel wall or highly backscattered luminal protrusion in continuity with the vessel wall and resulting in signal-free shadowing).

    Time frame: 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years

  3. Number of patients with cardiac death

    Cardiac death will be defined as any death due to heart disease, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, and sudden unexpected death.

    Time frame: 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years

  4. Number of patients with non-fatal spontaneous target-vessel myocardial infarction (excluding peri-procedural myocardial infarction)

    Any spontaneous myocardial infarction will be attributed to the target vessel if not clearly attributable to the non-target vessels.

    Time frame: 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years

  5. Number of patients with target lesion revascularization

    Any lesion revascularization will be considered in case of percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting of the studied lesion.

    Time frame: 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years

  6. Number of patients with restenosis or thrombosis of the target lesion

    Any revascularization procedure performed because of angiographic restenosis/thrombosis \>50% at the site of the target lesion associated with clinical or objective evidence of inducible myocardial ischemia

    Time frame: 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Prati F, Romagnoli E, Gatto L, La Manna A, Burzotta F, Limbruno U, Versaci F, Fabbiocchi F, Di Giorgio A, Marco V, Ramazzotti V, Di Vito L, Trani C, Porto I, Boi A, Tavazzi L, Mintz GS. Clinical Impact of Suboptimal Stenting and Residual Intrastent Plaque/Thrombus Protrusion in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The CLI-OPCI ACS Substudy (Centro per la Lotta Contro L'Infarto-Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec;9(12):e003726. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003726. PubMed 27965297 ↗
  • Romagnoli E, Gatto L, La Manna A, Burzotta F, Taglieri N, Saia F, Amico F, Marco V, Ramazzotti V, Di Giorgio A, Di Vito L, Boi A, Contarini M, Castriota F, Mintz GS, Prati F. Role of residual acute stent malapposition in percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 1;90(4):566-575. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26974. Epub 2017 Mar 15. PubMed 28295990 ↗
  • Prati F, Romagnoli E, La Manna A, Burzotta F, Gatto L, Marco V, Fineschi M, Fabbiocchi F, Versaci F, Trani C, Tamburino C, Alfonso F, Mintz GS. Long-term consequences of optical coherence tomography findings during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Centro Per La Lotta Contro L'infarto - Optimization Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) LATE study. EuroIntervention. 2018 Jul 20;14(4):e443-e451. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01111. PubMed 29633940 ↗
  • Gatto L, Alfonso F, Paoletti G, Burzotta F, La Manna A, Budassi S, Biccire FG, Fineschi M, Marco V, Fabbiocchi F, Vergallo R, Boi A, Ruscica G, Versaci F, Taglieri N, Calligaris G, Albertucci M, Romagnoli E, Ramazzotti V, Tamburino C, Crea F, Ozaki Y, Arbustini E, Prati F. Relationship betweeen the amount and location of macrophages and clinical outcome: subanalysis of the CLIMA-study. Int J Cardiol. 2022 Jan 1;346:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.11.042. Epub 2021 Nov 17. PubMed 34798205 ↗
  • Prati F, Romagnoli E, Biccire FG, Burzotta F, La Manna A, Budassi S, Ramazzotti V, Albertucci M, Fabbiocchi F, Sticchi A, Trani C, Calligaris G, Fineschi M, Versaci F, Tamburino C, Ozaki Y, Alfonso F, Mintz GS. Clinical outcomes of suboptimal stent deployment as assessed by optical coherence tomography: long-term results of the CLI-OPCI registry. EuroIntervention. 2022 Jun 3;18(2):e150-e157. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00627. PubMed 34825652 ↗
  • Romagnoli E, Ramazzotti V, Burzotta F, Gatto L, Marco V, Paoletti G, Biondi-Zoccai G, Alfonso F, Crea F, Trani C, Prati F; CLI-OPCI Project Investigators*. Definition of Optimal Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Stent Expansion Criteria: In-Stent Minimum Lumen Area Versus Residual Stent Underexpansion. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Sep;15(9):e011496. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011496. Epub 2022 Sep 20. PubMed 36126136 ↗
  • Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, Vergallo R, Gatto L, Biondi-Zoccai G, Ramazzotti V, Biccire F, Budassi S, Trani C, Ali Z, Stone GW, Prati F. Clinical impact of OCT-derived suboptimal stent implantation parameters and definitions. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Dec 21;25(1):48-57. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead172. PubMed 37463223 ↗
  • Biccire FG, Fabbiocchi F, Gatto L, La Manna A, Ozaki Y, Romagnoli E, Marco V, Boi A, Fineschi M, Piedimonte G, Cerrato E, Musto C, Taglieri N, Di Giorgio A, Vizzari G, Ruscica G, Canova PA, Vergallo R, Burzotta F, Limbruno U, Albertucci M, Raber L, Crea F, Alfonso F, Arbustini E, Stone GW, Prati F. Long-Term Prognostic Impact of OCT-Derived High-Risk Plaque Features: Extended Follow-Up of the CLIMA Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jun 9;18(11):1361-1372. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.04.044. PubMed 40500004 ↗
  • Tanigawa J, Barlis P, Di Mario C. Intravascular optical coherence tomography: optimisation of image acquisition and quantitative assessment of stent strut apposition. EuroIntervention. 2007 May;3(1):128-36. PubMed 19737696 ↗
  • Finn AV, Joner M, Nakazawa G, Kolodgie F, Newell J, John MC, Gold HK, Virmani R. Pathological correlates of late drug-eluting stent thrombosis: strut coverage as a marker of endothelialization. Circulation. 2007 May 8;115(18):2435-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.693739. Epub 2007 Apr 16. PubMed 17438147 ↗
  • Niccoli G, Montone RA, Di Vito L, Gramegna M, Refaat H, Scalone G, Leone AM, Trani C, Burzotta F, Porto I, Aurigemma C, Prati F, Crea F. Plaque rupture and intact fibrous cap assessed by optical coherence tomography portend different outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2015 Jun 7;36(22):1377-84. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv029. Epub 2015 Feb 18. PubMed 25713314 ↗
  • Prati F, Uemura S, Souteyrand G, Virmani R, Motreff P, Di Vito L, Biondi-Zoccai G, Halperin J, Fuster V, Ozaki Y, Narula J. OCT-based diagnosis and management of STEMI associated with intact fibrous cap. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Mar;6(3):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.12.007. PubMed 23473109 ↗
  • Souteyrand G, Arbustini E, Motreff P, Gatto L, Di Vito L, Marco V, Amabile N, Chisari A, Kodama T, Romagnoli E, Tavazzi L, Crea F, Narula J, Prati F. Serial optical coherence tomography imaging of ACS-causing culprit plaques. EuroIntervention. 2015 Jul;11(3):319-24. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I3A59. PubMed 26196754 ↗
  • Tearney GJ, Regar E, Akasaka T, Adriaenssens T, Barlis P, Bezerra HG, Bouma B, Bruining N, Cho JM, Chowdhary S, Costa MA, de Silva R, Dijkstra J, Di Mario C, Dudek D, Falk E, Feldman MD, Fitzgerald P, Garcia-Garcia HM, Gonzalo N, Granada JF, Guagliumi G, Holm NR, Honda Y, Ikeno F, Kawasaki M, Kochman J, Koltowski L, Kubo T, Kume T, Kyono H, Lam CC, Lamouche G, Lee DP, Leon MB, Maehara A, Manfrini O, Mintz GS, Mizuno K, Morel MA, Nadkarni S, Okura H, Otake H, Pietrasik A, Prati F, Raber L, Radu MD, Rieber J, Riga M, Rollins A, Rosenberg M, Sirbu V, Serruys PW, Shimada K, Shinke T, Shite J, Siegel E, Sonoda S, Suter M, Takarada S, Tanaka A, Terashima M, Thim T, Uemura S, Ughi GJ, van Beusekom HM, van der Steen AF, van Es GA, van Soest G, Virmani R, Waxman S, Weissman NJ, Weisz G; International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography (IWG-IVOCT). Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Mar 20;59(12):1058-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.079. PubMed 22421299 ↗
  • Prati F, Guagliumi G, Mintz GS, Costa M, Regar E, Akasaka T, Barlis P, Tearney GJ, Jang IK, Arbustini E, Bezerra HG, Ozaki Y, Bruining N, Dudek D, Radu M, Erglis A, Motreff P, Alfonso F, Toutouzas K, Gonzalo N, Tamburino C, Adriaenssens T, Pinto F, Serruys PW, Di Mario C; Expert's OCT Review Document. Expert review document part 2: methodology, terminology and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography for the assessment of interventional procedures. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2513-20. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs095. Epub 2012 May 31. No abstract available. PubMed 22653335 ↗
  • Burzotta F, Leone AM, Aurigemma C, Zambrano A, Zimbardo G, Arioti M, Vergallo R, De Maria GL, Cerracchio E, Romagnoli E, Trani C, Crea F. Fractional Flow Reserve or Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Management of Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: A Single-Center Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan 13;13(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.034. PubMed 31918942 ↗
  • Prati F, Romagnoli E, Gatto L, La Manna A, Burzotta F, Ozaki Y, Marco V, Boi A, Fineschi M, Fabbiocchi F, Taglieri N, Niccoli G, Trani C, Versaci F, Calligaris G, Ruscica G, Di Giorgio A, Vergallo R, Albertucci M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Tamburino C, Crea F, Alfonso F, Arbustini E. Relationship between coronary plaque morphology of the left anterior descending artery and 12 months clinical outcome: the CLIMA study. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):383-391. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz520. PubMed 31504405 ↗
  • Di Vito L, Cattabiani MA, Paoletti G, Yoon JH, Chisari A, Gramegna M, Versaci F, Castriota F, Prati F. Comparison between intermediate and severe coronary stenoses and clinical outcomes of an OCT-guided PCI strategy. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2016 May;17(5):361-7. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000280. PubMed 26258719 ↗
  • Prati F, Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, Limbruno U, Gatto L, La Manna A, Versaci F, Marco V, Di Vito L, Imola F, Paoletti G, Trani C, Tamburino C, Tavazzi L, Mintz GS. Clinical Impact of OCT Findings During PCI: The CLI-OPCI II Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Nov;8(11):1297-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.08.013. PubMed 26563859 ↗
  • Prati F, Di Vito L, Biondi-Zoccai G, Occhipinti M, La Manna A, Tamburino C, Burzotta F, Trani C, Porto I, Ramazzotti V, Imola F, Manzoli A, Materia L, Cremonesi A, Albertucci M. Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide decision-making during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto-Optimisation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) study. EuroIntervention. 2012 Nov 22;8(7):823-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I7A125. PubMed 23034247 ↗
  • Witzenbichler B, Maehara A, Weisz G, Neumann FJ, Rinaldi MJ, Metzger DC, Henry TD, Cox DA, Duffy PL, Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Mazzaferri EL Jr, Xu K, Parise H, Mehran R, Mintz GS, Stone GW. Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents: the assessment of dual antiplatelet therapy with drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES) study. Circulation. 2014 Jan 28;129(4):463-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003942. Epub 2013 Nov 26. PubMed 24281330 ↗
  • Ahn JM, Kang SJ, Yoon SH, Park HW, Kang SM, Lee JY, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Mintz GS, Park SJ. Meta-analysis of outcomes after intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in 26,503 patients enrolled in three randomized trials and 14 observational studies. Am J Cardiol. 2014 Apr 15;113(8):1338-47. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.043. Epub 2014 Jan 31. PubMed 24685326 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07182799
Responsible party
Romagnoli Enrico (Clinical Physician, Principal investigator, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2036 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 19, 2025

Study contacts

Enrico Romagnoli, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Francesco Burzotta, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion