ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07181928MEDALUpdated Sep 18, 2025

Is Mentalization-based Therapy More Effective Than Treatment-as-usual for Adolescents With Dissocial Disorders?

An interventional study of Mentalization-Based Therapy (MBT) and Treatment-as-usual-plus (TAU-plus) in Conduct Disorders in Adolescence and Oppositional Defiant Disorder, sponsored by University Hospital Heidelberg. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 19 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-18.

Sponsored by University Hospital Heidelberg · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 19 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate if Mentalization-based therapy (MBT) is superior to enhanced usual care (treatment-as-usual-plus (TAU-plus)) for adolescents with disruptive behavior or dissocial disorders.

MBT is an intervention that aims to improve mentalizing. Mentalizing is the ability to reflect on mental states in oneself and others that motivate behavior. TAU-plus consists of psychiatric care for the adolescent, along with additional emotion-focused skills training for the parents.

Participants will be randomized in one of two groups using one study center.

Read the detailed description

The study includes adolescents between the ages 12 to 19 of any gender who have been diagnosed with Oppositional defiant or Conduct-dissocial disorder (serious problems with following rules or criminal behavior).

The diagnosis is the primary outcome, which is assessed based on a diagnostic interview. Secondary outcomes include antisocial behavior, quality of life, symptom burden, and personality functioning (measured through self-report questionnaires), as well as aggressive behavior (measured through interview).

During the study, there will be monthly process assessments. In these assessments, participants will be asked questions about mentalizing, emotion regulation, therapy experience, antisocial behavior, and how much they trust others. These variables are considered mediators of changes in outcome.

Participants will also be interviewed regarding personality functioning to investigate whether dissocial disorders are related to personality disorders.

02

Conditions studied

  • Conduct Disorders in Adolescence
  • Oppositional Defiant Disorder

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • MBT
  • Conduct Disorder
  • Externalizing behaviour disorders
  • Treatment-as-usual
03

In context

Oppositional Defiant Disorder

86 studies on the registry are indexed under Oppositional Defiant Disorder; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is below the median of 102 across 76 interventional studies indexed under Oppositional Defiant Disorder.

Browse Oppositional Defiant Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Heidelberg is the lead sponsor of 177 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 19 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Primary diagnosis of Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) / Conduct-dissocial disorder (CDD) (ICD-11: 6C90-6C91; ICD-10: F91.0-F91.9; : 312.81, 313.81)
  • Aged 12 to 19 years
  • Living with their parents
  • Provide written (plus parental consent for minors)
  • At least one parent provides written informed consent and agrees to active participation in treatment and study, including randomization

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe acute substance dependence requiring inpatient detoxification
  • Acute psychotic symptoms or early-onset schizophrenia
  • Neurological impairments or intellectual disability (IQ \< 80)
  • Insufficient proficiency in German
  • Other clinical for outpatient psychotherapy (e.g., acute suicidality)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mentalization-Based Therapy (MBT)

    45 adolescents diagnosed with conduct disorder/oppositional defiant disorder will receive MBT over 10 months. The patients have 30 individual sessions weekly conducted by one therapist with formal training in MBT. Additionally, the patient receives 5 sessions together with the parents and the parents will have another 5 sessions without the patient.

    Behavioral: Mentalization-Based Therapy (MBT)

  • Active comparator
    Treatment-as-usual-plus (TAU-plus)

    45 adolescents diagnosed with conduct disorder/oppositional defiant disorder will receive standard psychiatric care over 10 months and their parents will participate in the Emotion Focused Skills Training (EFST). The patient receives individual psychiatric sessions at least two per quarter depending on the adolescent's needs. The individual sessions are conducted by a child and adolescent psychiatrist and/or by a therapist working under their supervision. EFST includes an intake session, 5 two-hour group sessions (6-12 parents, led by two therapists), and a final individual session.

    Behavioral: Treatment-as-usual-plus (TAU-plus)

Interventions

  • BehavioralMentalization-Based Therapy (MBT)

    MBT is a manualized psychodynamic therapy based on attachment theory, designed to restore adolescents' mentalizing in general and in emotionally stressful situations and relationships. It targets to rebuilt epistemic trust, to successfully mentalize oneself and others.

  • BehavioralTreatment-as-usual-plus (TAU-plus)

    The adolescents receive supportive child psychiatric consultations. For the parents the EFST sessions combine mindfulness, theoretical input, and experiential practice. Parents learn and apply four core skills: validation, repair, motivation, and setting boundaries.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Remission rate based on diagnostic criteria for Disruptive behavior or Dissocial disorders

    Remission is defined as the proportion of participants no longer meeting full diagnostic criteria for Conduct-dissocial disorder (CDD) or Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). CDD is assessed with the "Diagnostisches Interview bei psychischen Störungen - Version für Jugendlichen" (J-DIPS) and ODD with the "Diagnostisches Interview bei psychischen Störungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter" (K-DIPS).

    Time frame: Day 0, Month 14

Secondary outcomes

  1. Aggressive behavior assessed with the german "Modified Overt Aggression Scale" (MOAS-D)

    Score range: 0 - 300, with higher score representing higher value of aggressive behavior

    Time frame: day 0, month 11 month 14

  2. Social aggression assessed with the subscale from Subtypes of Antisocial Behavior Questionnaire (STAB)

    Score range 11 - 55, with higher score representing higher value of Social aggression

    Time frame: day 0 month 11 and month 14

  3. Quality of life assessed with the Kidscreen 10 Index

    Score range: 10-50, with higher scores representing better quality of life

    Time frame: day 0, month 11, month 14

  4. Symptom burden assessed with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

    Score range: 0 - 40, with higher score representing higher value of difficulties or strengths respectively

    Time frame: day 0, month 11, month 14

  5. Participation assessed with the mini self-rating for psychological activities and participation (Mini-ICF-APP)

    Score range: 0 - 7, with higher score represeting higher value of overall capacity level

    Time frame: day 0, month 14

  6. Gender typicality assessed with the "Instrument zur Erfassung des Geschlechtsrollen-Selbstkonzepts im Jugendalter" (GRI-JUG)

    There are four subscales - femenine positive and negative and Masculine positive and negative. Score range for each subscale: 1-5, with high scores indicate a high expression of the respective facet of the gender role self-concept.

    Time frame: day 0, month 14

  7. Personality functioning assessed with the Level of Personality Functioning Brief Form (LPFS-BF)

    Score range: 12-48, with higher score representing higher value of personality pathology

    Time frame: day 0, month 11, month 14

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institut für Psychosoziale Prävention, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
    Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg 69115, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Korlat S, Holzer J, Schultes MT, Buerger S, Schober B, Spiel C, Kollmayer M. Benefits of Psychological Androgyny in Adolescence: The Role of Gender Role Self-Concept in School-Related Well-Being. Front Psychol. 2022 May 19;13:856758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856758. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35664189 ↗
  • Kay SR, Wolkenfeld F, Murrill LM. Profiles of aggression among psychiatric patients. I. Nature and prevalence. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988 Sep;176(9):539-46. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198809000-00007. PubMed 3418327 ↗
  • Neuschwander M, In-Albon T, Adornetto C, Roth B, Schneider S. [Interrater reliability of the <<Diagnostic Interview bei psychischen Storungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter (Kinder-DIPS)]. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2013 Sep;41(5):319-34. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917//a000247. German. PubMed 23988834 ↗
  • Spitzer C, Muller S, Kerber A, Hutsebaut J, Brahler E, Zimmermann J. [The German Version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF): Latent Structure, Convergent Validity and Norm Values in the General Population]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2021 Jul;71(7):284-293. doi: 10.1055/a-1343-2396. Epub 2021 Mar 10. German. PubMed 33694153 ↗
  • Henning A, Linden M, Muschalla B. Self- and observer ratings of capacity limitations in patients with neurological conditions. Brain Impair. 2023 Dec;24(3):586-600. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2022.26. Epub 2022 Nov 17. PubMed 38167355 ↗
  • Klasen H, Woerner W, Rothenberger A, Goodman R. [German version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-German)--overview and evaluation of initial validation and normative results]. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2003 Sep;52(7):491-502. German. PubMed 14526759 ↗
  • Ravens-Sieberer U, Herdman M, Devine J, Otto C, Bullinger M, Rose M, Klasen F. The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances. Qual Life Res. 2014 Apr;23(3):791-803. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0428-3. Epub 2013 May 18. PubMed 23686556 ↗
  • Burt SA, Donnellan MB. Development and validation of the Subtypes of Antisocial Behavior Questionnaire. Aggress Behav. 2009 Sep-Oct;35(5):376-98. doi: 10.1002/ab.20314. PubMed 19618380 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data is too sensitive

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2025; primary completion for Aug 2028, 34 months later.

Of 35 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Oppositional Defiant Disorder, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 34 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 36 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 1, 2025
First posted
Sep 18, 2025
StartEst.
Oct 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2028
Last update
Sep 18, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07181928
Collaborators
Vereinigung für analytische und tiefenpsychologisch fundierte Kinder- & Jugendlichen- Psychotherapie
Responsible party
Svenja Taubner (Prof. Dr. phil. Svenja Taubner, University Hospital Heidelberg) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 18, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2025

Study contacts

Meike M. Hurrle, Dipl.-Psych.
Contact
Meike.Hurrle@med.uni-heidelberg.de
+496221 56-39528
Svenja Taubner, Prof. Dr.
study director · Institut für Psychosoziale Prävention, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion